Dr. Everett Worthington spent thirty years building the most rigorously tested forgiveness program in psychological science — and the day he turned in his first book on the subject was the day his mother was murdered in a home invasion. Three years later, his brother, who had discovered her body, took his own life, after Everett — a psychotherapist, a big brother — had failed to talk him into counseling. So this is not abstract research. The man giving us the REACH model, the distinction between decisional and emotional forgiveness, the six-step protocol for responsible self-forgiveness, and a vision of forgiveness scaling from heart to home to homeland is the man who has had to apply every move he teaches to the people he loved most. We spent the hour on the science, the tools, and at the end, on why the algorithmic version of America is currently training us to become exactly the kind of community in which forgiveness will not happen.

Highlights from the conversation

Decisional vs. emotional forgiveness — and why most people only have one. The distinction that cracks the whole field open. Decisional forgiveness is the choice not to pay someone back. Emotional forgiveness is the replacement of resentment with empathy or compassion. They are weakly correlated. Most religions require the first. None require the second. And most of us have spent years thinking we had failed at forgiveness because the second one would not arrive on the schedule of the first.
Forgiveness happens inside your skin. Reconciliation happens between people. You can forgive someone and still pursue justice, still maintain distance, still walk away from a relationship that is not safe. Conflating the two is what makes most forgiveness conversations land badly. Worthington’s line on the two as “different animals” is the through-line of the hour.
The REACH model, tested in 30+ randomized control trials. R — recall the hurt. E — empathy (or compassion, or non-possessive love). A — the altruistic gift. C — commit to it, sometimes in a literal written contract to yourself. H — hold on when the emotions come back. The largest forgiveness study ever conducted put 4,600 people through this protocol across China, Indonesia, Ukraine, Colombia, and South Africa.
The six-step protocol for self-forgiveness. The harder forgiveness problem. Go to the sacred. Make amends where you can (his brother left a suicide note asking him to help with his widow’s finances; that became Everett’s amends). Address the moral injury. Apply REACH to yourself. Move toward self-acceptance, which Everett calls the cornerstone of psychotherapy. Try not to do it again.
The Gottman cascade and the bridge that does not start in the middle. Criticism ? defensiveness ? contempt ? war or stonewalling. Most relationships do not blow up at the top of the cliff; they slide down a predictable slope. John Paul Lederach: you cannot build a bridge by starting in the middle. Both sides start from their own shore. Stop counting whether your 51% is bigger than their 49%.
What the algorithm is doing to the conditions of forgiveness. Tripp’s extended observation that the most consequential change in American religion over the last sixty years is self-sorting — and that the algorithm now monetizes the anxiety of that sorting. Worthington’s response: the contact hypothesis still works. We need three kinds of reconciliation diplomacy — the Mandela-level leader, the local table where stories get heard, and the leaders going back into their communities to teach forgiveness in the small bodies that actually compose the society.

Dr. Everett L. Worthington Jr. is Commonwealth Professor Emeritus in the Department of Psychology at Virginia Commonwealth University, where he taught for more than forty years before formally retiring in 2017 and remaining affiliated with the department. A licensed clinical psychologist and past president of the American Psychological Association’s Society for the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, he has published more than thirty-eight books and four hundred scholarly articles across forgiveness, humility, positive psychology, and marriage and family. His REACH forgiveness program has been validated by more than thirty randomized control trials worldwide.

Explore the Science of Forgiveness — Greater Good Science Center

The GGSC forgiveness hub brings together research, practices, and essays for anyone thinking seriously about forgiveness — theologically, pastorally, or personally.

A few pieces worth your time:

“Lessons from Cultivating Forgiveness in Faith-Based Communities” by Everett L. Worthington Jr. — the article that extends this conversation. Worthington draws on decades of research running forgiveness campaigns at Christian universities and congregations, including practical guidance on timing them around Lent, Advent, or Yom Kippur, and what actually moves the needle versus what just raises awareness
“Twelve Steps to Self-Forgiveness” by Fred Luskin and Lyndon Harris — a research-grounded framework for the forgiveness most clergy skip for themselves. Harris is a former Episcopal priest whose work on self-forgiveness began after 9/11
“What Happens When Faith Leaders Try to Force Forgiveness?” — for anyone who has watched forgiveness get weaponized in congregational settings; this one names the problem and points toward something better
“How Different Religions Practice Forgiveness — and What We Can Learn From Them” by Christy Vines — a comparative look across faith traditions with real implications for interfaith ministry and pluralist congregations
“What Does It Actually Mean to Forgive?” by Robert Enright — 40 years of research on the definitional questions that matter most, including why skepticism about forgiveness is worth taking seriously
“What If You’re Not Ready to Forgive?” — for ministers whose congregants are being handed forgiveness as obligation before they’re ready for it as practice
Forgiveness Quiz — a quick self-assessment that works well as a formation tool or small group prompt

Full hub: greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/forgiveness

Join our online class – THE FUTURE OF RELIGION