Bob Wright is back, and The God Test is the AI book I had been waiting for someone to write — the only one I have read that takes the spiritual stakes of the technology with the seriousness Teilhard would have. It opens with the interview Bob conducted with a young Geoffrey Hinton in 1983 — now anointed by The New York Times as the godfather of AI, now also one of its loudest doomers — and pivots into what Bob did not understand in that hotel room forty years ago: that we would build something as powerful as the human brain without ever first having to understand the brain. The bottom-up approach won. We are now inside the consequences. We spent the hour on Teilhard’s noosphere acquiring silicon neurons, on why Bob argues accelerationism is lethal, on the difference between cognitive sovereignty and cognitive empathy and why both are now in jeopardy, on whether the algorithm has already occupied the very inner room from which sovereignty would be exercised, and on the closing line of the book — which I will not spoil here, except to say it is the kind of line you stop reading after.

Highlights from the conversation

What Bob did not understand in 1983. Wright’s interview with a young Geoffrey Hinton in a hotel room, when Hinton was championing the bottom-up neural-network approach nobody else thought would work. What Wright did not see at the time, and now does: that you can build something as powerful as the human brain without ever first understanding the brain — you just feed it data and let it reverse-engineer the mind. The whole AI race runs on that one insight. Zuckerberg’s keystroke monitoring is the punchline.
The awe spectrum. Wright’s frame: if you are not somewhere on the awe spectrum about AI — between the doomers, who experience awe as terror, and the accelerationists, who experience it as celebration — you do not understand the power of the technology. The God Test is closer to a defense of doomerism than accelerationism, which is rarer than it should be in a book by a writer this temperate. The Silicon Valley dismissal of “kumbaya” gets the response it deserves.
Teilhard, but with silicon neurons. Wright on the Teilhardian trajectory as “objectively right” — three billion years of complexification, moving through thresholds, generating ever-higher levels of organization. The noosphere is the next one. What Teilhard did not see: that the neurons in the global brain might be silicon, not biological. The book carries his vision into the AI age and asks who is actually building the planetary mind, and on whose terms.
Cognitive sovereignty and cognitive empathy. Wright’s central interventions. Cognitive sovereignty is the resilience of your mind against algorithmic manipulation. Cognitive empathy is understanding how the person on the other side of the wall actually views the world — not sympathy, not agreement, just getting it. Wright calls cognitive empathy “the most underexploited human superpower.” The fundamental attribution error is the chief impediment, and Wright unpacks a deeper version of it than the textbook one.
The inner room may already be occupied. My pushback in the conversation: Jesus says go pray in the inner room, and the contemplative traditions read that as the sanctuary of the self where the panopticon does not reach. The neuroscience on inhibitory-control damage in heavy users of algorithmic platforms now suggests the door of that room is harder to close than it used to be. We have not just been manipulated — we have been occupied, in a way that may have compromised the neural hardware required to evict the occupier. Bob agrees on the diagnosis and pushes back on the despair. Hartmut Rosa’s dynamic stabilization gets a turn here too — modernity is structurally addicted to acceleration, and the China-race framing is a perfect fit for a system that requires uninhibited growth.
“If a silicon god arrives, it will be in some sense the god we deserve.” The closing line of The God Test — and on Bob’s reading in the conversation, neither warning nor resignation but inverted hope. AI is evolving, and we are the environment shaping its evolution. The moral tenor of whatever silicon god arrives will correlate with our own. To get the god we want, we have to become the species that could deserve it. Which is, in older language, the actual content of the gospel.

Robert Wright is the New York Times bestselling author of Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, The Moral Animal, The Evolution of God (Pulitzer Prize finalist), and Why Buddhism Is True. His newest book, The God Test, is out from Simon & Schuster in June 2026. He is Visiting Professor of Science and Religion at Union Theological Seminary in New York and president of the Nonzero Foundation. His Nonzero Newsletter and Nonzero Podcast (currently in rotation with Paul Bloom) live at nonzero.substack.com — and yes, I am a paid member. Books surfaced in this conversation: The God Test (the book at hand), The Evolution of God (the silicon-god closing line of The God Test picks up the long arc of Evolution directly), Why Buddhism Is True (the contemplative-traditions stretch of the conversation), and Nonzero (the non-zero-sum framing that runs under everything Bob does).

Previous Episodes with Robert Wright

Join our online class – THE FUTURE OF RELIGION

Tripp and Ilia Delio are teaming up for a brand-new four-week online class, The Future of Religion — for everyone who’s read the books, asked the questions, and realized the faith they inherited doesn’t quite fit anymore. Together they’ll trace religion’s evolutionary arc and map what’s emerging on the other side. Includes 4 video lectures, 4 live Q&As (replays available), and a community of fellow travelers. Donation-based, pay what you’re able (including $0). Live sessions start this month — register at ? www.thefutureofreligion.com