Truth Jihad Radio

Jonathan Revusky on Stephen Hawking Replacement & No Planes Theories

Feb 28, 202500:56:13Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkJonathan Revusky refutes Sterling Harwood on the Stephen Hawking replacement hypothesis and Ryan Dawson on the “Arabs hijacked planes on 9/11” hypothesis.Excerpt:Kevin Barrett: Let's move on to the theories that you wanted to talk about. The first one being: Was Stephen Hawking replaced? We brought on Sterling Harwood and Sterling and I both said there's a kind of a strong prima facie argument that there's something really wrong with this conventional biography of Stephen Hawking, because he lived way too long after an ALS diagnosis. But then after admitting that, Sterling Harwood claimed that there's not really anything else to support (the replacement theory), and ultimately the idea that he was replaced is equally or more unlikely than some other explanation. So go ahead and explain your take on that issue.Jonathan Revusky: Well, of course he was replaced, Kevin. I mean, the whole thing is a pretty self-evident hoax. I never really thought that for anybody who read the article and actually made a point of looking at the photographic record—I sent you a link, which is sort of the main Yandex image search for Hawking, didn't I? You just type Stephen Hawking into the Yandex search engine, yandex.com, and then hit the images tab. You can do that in Google. I trust Yandex more nowadays. Google is, I think, more curated. But you get a series of images. I think the first dozen images are the latter-day Hawking, who was fairly obviously an imposter.But, you know, finally, what is interesting about this Hawking case? I mean, we have all these hoaxes, right? The Boston bombing and some crazy Arab ran over some people at the whatever Christmas market in Germany and some other crazed kid in France cut off his teacher's head and all these kinds of things that are hoaxes. But the funny thing about all of those is they're sort of one-shot deals: They occur on a specific day and then it's over. Even 9/11 left much more of a mess than these other hoaxes, that's for sure. You have all this dust and all the remains of these buildings lying around. But still, but of course, they made a point of clearing off all the junk as fast as possible. So the hoax lasted a certain number of days and was over though the aftermath of the hoax we're still living with.But the Hawking hoax, assuming it is a hoax, I've investigated enough to say it is, is just…this is a multi-decade hoax, a fairly major production, really, sort of multi-layered with a lot of different weird subplots in it. Hawking, the real Stephen Hawking, almost certainly passed away in the year 1985. You can, I think, pretty much pinpoint it.Supposedly he got pneumonia in Switzerland, in Geneva someplace and was hospitalized. And they had him on life support, these tubes coming out of him. This is the official story, by the way. What you get on Wikipedia is the official story, in essence. And what's interesting is you can read the official story and there are enough truthful elements in it that you can largely deduce the truth. Like, the claim is that Hawking is in Switzerland in order to visit CERN, the particle accelerator thing they have there somewhere near Geneva…(Read the full transcript by clicking the “transcript” button above the video image at my Substack.) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Ryan Dawson on 9/11, "Trump vs. Deep State," Slo-mo Collapse of AngloZionist Empire

Feb 26, 202501:39:48Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkRyan Dawson of the Anti-Neocon Report finally joins Truth Jihad Radio, resulting in almost two hours of incendiary conversation! We discuss quite a few of the hottest and most censored topics, including what really happened on 9/11, whether Trump is really dismantling the deep state, where the next big war will be (Ryan thinks Netanyahu will finally get his long-awaited war on Iran) and how fast the US empire’s collapse will take.Ryan mentions that Epstein’s client list (check out Ryan’s video version) has been public for years—I interviewed Nick Bryant about it in early 2020—but investigative journalism has been missing in action.Transcript begins:Kevin Barrett: Welcome to the podcast version of Truth Jihad Radio. I'm Kevin Barrett doing underground radio for the internet age since 2006, although at that point there was probably as much going on on the airwaves, the actual airwaves and the satellites as there was on the internet. And now here we are. It's been well over a couple of decades, since 9/11, and that problem hasn't been solved. But some people think that Donald Trump is going to solve all our problems. He's going to reveal the UFOs. He's going to reveal the Kennedy assassins. He's going to make peace with Russia. And he somehow got a ceasefire that's barely still holding in Gaza. So, according to one view, Trump is the Messiah. On the other view, maybe he's the Antichrist, or worse, because it's all going to go to hell in a handbasket when war breaks out with Iran. And then of course, his guys are targeting China. So who are we going to talk to to try to figure all this stuff out now, when it's not that clear yet precisely where it's all going? How about Ryan Dawson of the Anti-Neocon Report? First time on my show! He's been following the same paths as me for many, many years, so it's good to finally connect. Hey. Welcome, Ryan. How's it going?Ryan Dawson: Yeah. You know, our paths have crossed a few times. I think not too long ago we were both on the same Press TV interview and I said, oh, Kevin Barrett, I wish we could do a show because I've seen your work before and it's very similar to mine, very similar to my conclusions. And it's surprising it's taken this long for us to finally do a show.Kevin Barrett: That's true. Part of the reason probably is that I don't spend too much time with anybody else's audio-visual. Partly it's a matter of time. My brain works better scanning text. My brainwaves were warped when I was a little kid and I learned to read too early in life. And so I've got this massive left brain dominance thing going: "send me text." Ryan Dawson: I still notebook everything down.Kevin Barrett: Cool. All right, well, we're both relics of another time, and you're kind of the king of anti-neocon 9/11 Truth broadcasting. But you don't write that much...Ryan Dawson: Yeah, well, I did, but it's just easier to plagiarize when you write stuff. But I don't like the word or the term 9/11 truth because I disagree with 99% of people who use that label. You know how bad that's gotten with the airplane deniers and all that stuff. I just don't like it. But yeah, I'm probably the most reasonable, heterodox take on September 11th for sure.Kevin Barrett: Well, let's get your take on that. So we both agree that the no planes planes hypothesis about New York is very, very, very likely wrong.Ryan Dawson: About all of it. There were definitely airplanes. I mean, the Pentagon's just as stupid, because you've got a big airplane sized hole with airplane parts in it, with DNA from all the passengers who were on that plane hitting the building. And they're like, I didn't see it on film, so it didn't exist.Kevin Barrett: Okay, that's going to piss off some of my audience, but too bad. Ryan Dawson: Very important to admit there's an airplane, because if you don't have the plane, you don't have the hijackers in particular. Now we fall down mid-air. And if you don't have that, then you don't have a path back to state sponsorship of September 11th from Saudi Arabia. All that disappears when you deny an airplane.Kevin Barrett: You don't believe that there were actually human hijackers responsible, do you?Ryan Dawson: I do.Kevin Barrett: Really?! Okay, well...You've gone a bridge too far for me. And here's here's my reasoning. And you can explain to me why this is wrong. The biggest,most difficult demolitions in the whole history of the demolition industry were set up and would have taken quite some time and an immense amount of money, expertise and so on, as well as all the expertise required to make it secret. So the demolition of the World Trade Center was an amazing engineering project. Those demolitions, not just the three famous buildings, the Towers and Building Seven. So they had invested a tremendous amount of effort to prepare for these spectacular demolitions that were going to be the key part of the 9/11 psyop. They had to be 100% sure that planes were going to hit those buildings, or at least convince everybody that planes hit the buildings. That's your excuse for what happened to those buildings. If the planes miss or there are no plane strikes, you're stuck holding the bag and you've got a really major problem on your hands. Therefore, since you have to be 100% or at least 99.99 % sure there will be actual plane strikes on those buildings, you're going to have to find a better way to do that than to find human pilots and hijackers who are going to be capable of taking control of a plane and slamming it into those buildings in such a way that there's a big enough apparent fireball soyou can somehow hypnotize everybody into believing that the plane crashes have something to do with your demolitions.So given that, I can say with 100% certainty, they had to have use autopilot to get those planes into those buildings, because there's no way they could ever have the required degree of confidence in any human pilots. And then once we look at the details, the speeds and the trajectories and so on, it becomes even more clear that not even the world's best pilots could probably do that more than 50% of the time, even if they wanted to. And if you're arranging this event, you could never be sure that they would decide that they wanted to at the last minute, could you? So therefore, we are 100% sure those planes were not flown by humans, and if they weren't, what makes us think the other ones were?Ryan Dawson: That's putting the cart before the horse. Assuming there's all this demolition and all this other jazz and who you mean by they. You can have hijackers and have it assisted by some sort of automation, you know, assisting them, but you have to have hijackers on the planes, because if you don't have a person there, at least as a pretext. So you can say, hey, they did it all by themselves. The passengers on the plane are going. Why is the plane just turning around mid-air like flying by itself? They could get on the earphones and say, hey, the plane is out of control or something. That's not what happened. There were hijackers there. We have long records of them going to flight schools. We have. This is stuff they had to bury and redact from their own FBI reports to hide state collusion with September 11th terrorists.Read the full transcript at my Substack. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Celia Farber on the Deadliest Vaccine in History

Feb 25, 202500:54:22Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkCelia Farber , the journalist who did most to expose Fauci & co.’s murderous AIDS hoax, discusses her new book (co-authored with Dr. James Thorp) Sacrifice: How the Deadliest Vaccine in History Targeted the Most Vulnerable. Blurb:Sacrifice documents the true story of Dr. James Thorp, a respected doctor of maternal fetal medicine, who in 2020, finds his entire profession has lost its mind, as well as its soul. Stunned to find his colleagues take the bribe money, drink the Kool-Aid, and push the COVID-19 shots, Thorp is one of the few Ob-Gyns to bear witness and broadcast the multitude of pregnancy complications including miscarriages, stillbirths, and many other tragic outcomes resulting from the shots.One of the few doctors from the maternal-fetal medicine realm who publicly protested the Covid shots as directly deadly to his patients—unborn babies—Thorp witnessed the carnage on a daily basis firsthand, documented it, published papers, and spoke up on countless media platforms, and in Senate hearings in Washington, DC. He was terminated, without any cause, and went on to campaign around the country to get the truth out.From our interview:There are various very creepy and very revealing US government COVID websites. And I discovered those websites in the process of working on this book with Dr. James Thorpe. As we were working on the book, he and his wife, Maggie, who is an attorney, did these freedom of information requests and found the smoking gun about what kind of money and when and how went to the agencies that were put in place to protect pregnant American women to set the standard of what's safe and what isn't for pregnant American women: The American Board of Gynecology, ABOG, the ACOG, and the Society of Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Those are the big three.And it's in the billions. And, like, you see a hockey stick. They got not much funding….And then the hockey stick actually starts just before 2020. Sometimes it starts in 2019. But it's vertical takeoff. And suddenly they're soaking in tens of billions. And the gold standard, as Dr. Thorpe often says, for pregnancy, which... I'm not sure I agree that was the gold standard, but ostensibly the gold standard was no untested substance to be given to any pregnant women ever, ever, ever. No untested substance. And it could be something that people consider harmless: “oh, but that's a cough drop.” It doesn't matter if it's on test.So this was just washed away like those film clips of a tsunami or a typhoon, and it just takes out the whole marina, right? Gone. And these were contracts, let's be clear. Scripts came down. And the contracts demanded that the institutions and that all of the employees browbeat their patients with the script.And this is what's so tragic because the last person a pregnant woman would think might be taking money to gaslight and lie to her would be her OBGYN. That's a trusted relationship. So it really can't get more evil than what they did. It's just breathtaking.And Dr. Thorpe is one of the only doctors who just stood up and essentially screamed bloody murder to what was happening all around him. I don't know the number of how many tens of thousands of OBGYNs there are in the country. Many of them came to him quietly, sub rosa, behind the scenes. He has become the voice for the truth about what happened to pregnant women and their babies.Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Currently I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my dedicated Paypal donation page…: Or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Note that you may need to make a recurring larger recurring annual donation ($100 suggested) not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Free Speech Holocaust?

Feb 23, 202501:10:10Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkStripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Currently I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at Paypal…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate where you may need to do a recurring larger recurring annual donation ($100 suggested) not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20.Mainstream journalists say crazy things. Most of their madness is banal, consisting of shallow platitudes endorsing GoodThink. But sometimes they one-up themselves, exhibiting a genius for craziness that leads one to wonder: What was that about?!Such a moment came when CBS commentator Margaret Brennan blamed the Holocaust on free speech. JD Vance correctly diagnosed Brennan’s remark as mad. But Freud wasn’t the first to note that genius is to madness near allied. That is, certain symptoms of apparent madness imply rich tapestries of meaning, some or most of which the mad person (or poet or dreamer, according to Freud) does not consciously grasp.Brennan’s brilliantly mad remark was symptomatic of the decadence of today’s pseudo-liberal elite. Many decades ago, back when liberals genuinely believed in liberalism,* it was taken for granted that “the Holocaust” and “free speech” were antagonistic polar opposites. Everyone understood, or professed to understand, that Hitler’s regime had destroyed the moral compass of its society by imposing a one-size-fits-all totalitarianism that brooked no dissent. Martin Niemöller’s famous line about how “first they came for the socialists and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist” summarized the accepted wisdom that the drunk-on-censorship Nazis crushed people’s free expression group-by-group. The implication of Niemöller’s truism was that widespread failure to speak out, and consequent loss of free speech, enabled the horrors of Hitler’s regime, including the war it supposedly caused and the extermination of six million Jews (mostly in gas chambers) that it supposedly perpetrated. In short, the destruction of free speech—not free speech—caused the Holocaust.So what led Brennan to madly flaunt her self-styled liberal identity by expressing the precise opposite of the classical liberal understanding of “the Holocaust” and its relation to free speech? The answer, of course, is that she is afraid of something. “The Holocaust” represents something so fearful she cannot allow herself to think about it, or even to think at all. This thought-stopping magic of “the Holocaust,” the secret to its power, is related to its incomparability. Prior to the rise of the Holocaust religion, in which the Jews replace Jesus, the gas chambers replace the cross, and Israel replaces the resurrection, only God was viewed as incomparable. (The Qur’an sums up its last word on theology as Walam yakun lahu kufuwan ahad, “and there is none like unto Him,” and all other monotheisms agree.) But today it is the one-and-only Holy Holocaust that is held to be incomparable, while all other massacres and genocides, including the one happening now in Palestine, are mere trifles. Indeed, those dare to compare the Holocaust to anything else are accused of blasphemy and heresy. For example, in many countries, those who meet the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism by “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” are subject to civil and criminal prosecution and imprisonment. (I hate to even imagine what they’ll do to those of us who think the comparison may be unfair to Nazis!)So the First Commandment of today’s de facto Western state religion is: Don’t even think about the Holocaust! And that explains the subconscious fear that Brennan expressed by absurdly linking the Incomparable Holy Holocaust to free speech. What she is really afraid of is that freedom of speech, a prerequisite for freedom of thought, could lead people to think freely and critically about the Holocaust. Were that to happen, the Holocaust would be reduced from its current status as an official state religion to “just another historical episode to debate and critique.” And once people were allowed to freely debate and critique the Holocaust narrative, instead of being imprisoned for doing so, they might find something so hideously blasphemous, so horrifically sacrilegious, that…that…well, it’s too horrible to even consider! So to prevent people from speaking and thinking freely about the Holocaust, Brennan implies, we need a free speech holocaust. That is, we must burn the Western liberal Enlightenment tradition of free speech to the ground in a kind of sacrificial lynching. (The root meaning of holocaust is “fiery sacrifice.”) Even as Brennan’s Pseudoliberal Party pushes slaughtering free speech on the Holocaust altar and burning it to ashes, JD Vance’s Trumpist Party professes to push back. Indeed, Vance effectively blasphemed against the high priests of German GoodThink by endorsing the anathemized AFD and its right to participate, unhindered by “firewalls,” in the political conversation. That was the infraction that triggered Brennan’s unhinged blame-free-speech-for-the-Holocaust blurt-out.But are the Trumpists really the free speech party? As E. Michael Jones and I observed on False Flag Weekly News, the vast majority of anti-free-speech activity in the West amounts to attempts to protect Jews and Israel. From academics like me, Anthony Hall, Kees van der Pijl, Joy Karega, William Woodward, and others who have exposed 9/11 as a neocon-Zionist fraud and been raked over the coals for it, to Steven Sulaita, Dr. Marc Lamont Hill, and now an ever-growing list of professors fired for opposing Israel’s genocide, to the long list of politicians murdered or ejected from politics** by the Zionists, to the vast majority of censorship of books, mainstream media, and social media, it’s clear that somewhere between 90% and 99.9% of the ever-accelerating crimes against free speech that have annihilated classical liberalism in the West have Jewish-Zionist fingerprints all over them. And the Trumpist party, the party of JD Vance, is even more rabid in its persecution of critics of Israel’s genocide than Margaret Brennan’s openly anti-free-speech party is.So the fear that Margaret Brennan unconsciously expressed—that the truth will harm the Jews—appears to be shared by JD Vance, who not only approves of the purges of anti-genocide students and professors, but also supports persecuting and deporting the Jews’ enemies, namely people from the Global South and especially Muslims, from Europe. Vance’s support for AFD is obviously not about freedom and democracy. If he cared about that, he would demand that Germany stop imprisoning historians who question Holocaust orthodoxy. Instead, Vance and his rightwing Jewish owners want to ethnically cleanse Europe to get rid of people whose cultural environment hasn’t been steeped in pro-Jew/pro-genocide indoctrination…people from countries where almost all intellectuals are Holocaust revisio...

Transcribe →

Genocide-Complicit Media Amplify Israel's Lies

Feb 22, 202500:06:25Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkIsrael has killed almost 100 innocent civilians, committing over 300 ceasefire violations, since the truce went into effect. They lie incessantly about their false-flag bus bombings, "beheaded babies," "babies killed with bare hands"…giving pathological liars a bad name.Transcript of Press TV interview:The Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has named the six Israeli captives due to be released on Saturday. Israel is also expected to release more than 600 Palestinian abductees in return. The exchange is the final one under the first phase of a ceasefire agreement signed just over a month ago. On Thursday, Hamas handed over the remaining two Israeli captives who were killed in Israel's bombings of the Gaza Strip. Israel claimed that the body of one of the captives wasn't actually hers, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatening to make Hamas pay. The resistance group rejected the threats as a PR stunt. Hamas said it's investigating the Israeli claim, adding that there's the possibility of the bodies due to Israeli airstrikes on the location where the captives were being held. The head of the government media office in Gaza says Israel has violated the ceasefire agreement with Hamas over 350 times. In a statement, Ismail al-Tawwapt has said the Israeli violations included direct shootings at Palestinian civilians and airstrikes by fighter jets and drones. Since the start of the ceasefire agreement, Israel has killed nearly 100 Palestinians and injured hundreds of others. The confirmed death toll from the Israeli genocide in Gaza has surpassed 48,300 people, mostly women and children. Israel has been hampering the entry of humanitarian aid, including shelters and medical necessities, even after the ceasefire agreement. Well, joining us now from Morocco, we have editor of Veterans Today, Mr. Kevin Barrett. Mr. Barrett, first of all, share with us your views on the constant violation of the ceasefire by the Israeli regime, which has come to be known as a common practice by the Israelis.Yeah, Israel's notorious for this kind of lawless behavior. And the reason they get away with it is the skewed media coverage in the West. The media are dominated by the sympathizers, co-religionists and co-ethnicists of the state of Israel, who are loyal to the state of Israel, in many cases more loyal than they are to their own countries. They dominate the media of Western nations and give cover to the Zionists as they violate the ceasefire hundreds of times with impunity, while the Western media reports headlines on “Hamas may have returned the wrong body,” or “buses are blowing up in Tel Aviv,” empty buses blowing up in parking lots in Tel Aviv. Obviously, there being no Palestinian faction that would have any motivation to do anything like that, the only people that would have any motivation for blowing up empty buses and parking lots in Tel Aviv would be Netanyahu and the extremists in his cabinet who want excuses to continue the massacre, the genocide, and to continue violating the ceasefire. And then the Western media just dutifully reports this stuff as if that somehow Israel is experiencing terrorism, when Israel is blowing up its own empty buses in the parking lot as a blatant, transparent, false flag publicity stunt.You know, I'm really tired of the Western media being complicit for genocide. And if we ever have real war crimes trials, the owners and operators of the Western media need to be put on trial for their lives, for broadcasting non-stop genocide propaganda.And Mr. Barrett, if I'm correct, tomorrow marks the final stage of the first phase of the ceasefire agreement. After that, it's scheduled to have medical necessities, humanitarian aid, shelters, to be allowed in to Gaza. What is being allowed in right now has been described as just a drop in the ocean of what the Gazans need. Do you think that the Israelis will also not be holding up there under the bargain when the time comes for the allowing of humanitarian aid to come into Gaza?Well, even in the first phase, they were supposed to allow humanitarian aid in, and they did not meet their commitments. And their failure to allow the trucks in that they were supposed to allow in was the reason why Hamas briefly talked about delaying the release of some of the captives. And then, of course, once again, the Western media covered for the Zionist genocide perpetrators by not reporting honestly what was going on.And so we can't trust the Zionists to keep their end of the bargain. There are those in the Zionist entity who want to flee forward into a wider and bigger war and a bigger genocide. And indeed, they've moved their genocide from Gaza, where to some extent they're still perpetrating it, but they've moved the focus to the West Bank now. And the extremist faction there, which unfortunately is not marginalized—it's central to the power structure in occupied Palestine—they want more. They don't want to abide by the ceasefire. And unfortunately, they can get away with violating it because the Western institutions, starting with the media. won't hold them accountable by informing the people of the Western countries what's really going on. And those who are paying attention know, but the majority of people are still being grossly misinformed. So no, I don't expect the Zionists to abide by this ceasefire. Whether they completely blow it up and go back to wholesale genocide and utter annihilation of the civilian population of Gaza—I certainly hope and pray that they don't.Thanks a lot, Kevin Barrett, Editor of Veterans Today, joining us from Saadia. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Salim Mansur: Trump as Peacemaker?

Feb 21, 202500:56:46Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkSalim Mansur discusses his new article: “What Is the Essential Requirement for a Peacemaker? Remove the beam out of one’s eye, as Jesus commands.” In it he notes: “The Ukraine war will end sooner than later, if not it will greatly impede Trump’s ‘Make America Great Again’ domestic agenda. But this is not the case with the Gaza genocide of Palestinians by Israelis and, consequently, there is no end on the horizon for the conflict in West Asia.”Salim Mansur is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Toronto. He has published many books and academic articles, as well as numerous op-eds in several of Canada’s leading mainstream newspapers.Excerpt from the interview:Your latest piece on what is the essential requirement for a peacemaker—remove the beam out of one's eye as Jesus commands—went to the heart of the issue a lot of people are talking about with Trump. Is he going to make peace, which is possibly what it looks like in Ukraine, or is he going to preside over World War III in West Asia as he hands everything on a silver platter to Netanyahu and his messianic, millenarian, lunatic cabinet? That's the big question, isn't it?It's a very big question, Kevin. But it not only depends on Netanyahu and the Zionists in Israel, the Israeli extremists, fascists, whatever we want to call them, which is appropriate. But it also greatly depends upon that 80 million Christian Zionists in America. I think they have got the American Republic, whatever remains of it, by the throat. And that is what is entrapping Trump.…Ever since Truman—the only exception being John Kennedy,who was as a result assassinated,murdered—all the presidents and the Congress have been bought by the Israeli lobby. And this is the burden that the American people are saddled with. But will they awake? Are they ready to awake? That's the question.(Read the whole transcript at https://KevinBarrett.substack.com )Stripe debanked me so I can no longer get paid through Substack. The workarounds are SPdonate and Paypal . A recurring $10 or more monthly donation via Paypal, or $100 or more recurring annual donation via SPdonate, will help keep this Substack operating. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Peter Myers on "Holocaust Reparations and the Gaza Genocide"

Feb 18, 202501:21:08Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkAustralian author and conspiracy researcher Peter Myers discusses his new book "Holocaust Reparations and the Gaza Genocide: Does One Holocaust Justify Another?" He argues that Netanyahu enabled the October 7th 2023 Al-Aqsa Storm operation in order to trigger a pre-planned genocide, and that Holocaust reparations to Jews should end and instead be given to Palestinians. Myers writes: “Germany is still paying Holocaust Reparations. Israel has committed its own genocide of Palestinians, but they receive no Reparations.The issue is not money, but the claim of Holocaust Uniqueness. If the Nazi Holocaust is unique, no other genocide is comparable, and Israel cannot be held accountable. Does one Holocaust justify another? To stop the 2-state solution, which the Palestinian Authority favoured, Netanyahu built up the Hamas terrorists and allowed them to receive millions of dollars in cash payments. He was aware of Hamas' attack plan for October 7, he let it happen, and he stood down the IDF, to create consensus for destroying Gaza and ethnic-cleansing the territories. His settler allies want to expel Palestinians, annex their lands, and build the Third Temple on the site of Al Aqsa mosque. After that, their Messiah would rule the world. The West should list them as 'terrorist', as it lists Hamas. Extremists on all sides should be marginalised. The Balfour Declaration, a contract between Britain and Jewry, provided for 'a Jewish home' but not a 'Jewish State.' This book proposes a Hybrid Millet system as a solution to the MidEast Crisis.”Excerpt from the Interview:Peter Myers: Well, even with the IDF, the New York Times published an article that Israel had the Hamas attack plan a year ahead of the event. That attack plan didn't give the date of the attack. But there were intelligence warnings only a few months before the attack that it was coming. And the night before the attack, the IDF and Shin Bet had two meetings. One meeting was about midnight and one was about 3 a.m.So they knew it was coming, but they didn't warn the Nova Festival. And they could have very easily told them to cancel a festival, but they didn't. Now, this was on a holiday weekend in the Jewish religion. And a lot of IDF troops were on holiday leave. Others had been transferred to the West Bank. There were several articles in the Israeli media that said about 100 were transferred to the West Bank. But Seymour Hersh said about 1,600 were transferred. And it left only a very small number, 800 troops for the whole West Bank, for the whole Gaza wall, defending the Gaza wall.And the head of Egypt intelligence rang Netanyahu. This was reported in Israeli media. Ten days before October 7th, the intelligence minister rang Netanyahu personally and warned him. And Netanyahu showed no interest and later denied getting the call.And there were some IDF people called spotters who were women, who about 15, I think of them, or maybe there were 20. But anyway, they used to get images from balloons, which could see throughout the Hamas territory right over to the oceans. And they were reporting Hamas training exercises, very obvious exercises, in the weeks before the attack. And they were told, you send these warnings and then helicopters will come. But they didn't come.And there were a number of reports that the IDF units in the South were stood down for seven hours that day. And there were a number of reports that the IDF units in the South were stood down for seven hours that day. And so there were a number of articles which say, where was the IDF? So a number of IDF people had been transferred. Others were on holiday leave. I mean, they already knew that this attack was coming. So you wouldn't give your soldiers holiday leave at that time, nor would you transfer units to the West Bank, which were much less risky. They had the Hamas attack plan. They didn't have anything similar for the West Bank.What they were doing was weakening the idea deliberately to allow a chaotic situation to occur And the whole purpose of that was to panic Israelis into committing a genocide, destroying Gaza. That was the plan. I mean, it's not as if it was micromanaged. There were a lot of things that happened that day that hadn't been planned. But given that you had, on the one hand, an idea of stand down—most of their helicopters were not available at that point, that morning. Only two were ready and they were in Haifa in the north. And there were none locally. And a few others got ready after a while and then others during the day. And by the end of the day, it's reported there were 28, the full 28 were operating. But there was a stand down.So tanks came from the Egyptian border. Helicopters came from Haifa. So they came from some distance away. They took time. But the local IDF was sort of in a chaotic situation. Instead of defending other Israelis, they were just trying to survive themselves when they were attacked. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

NEVER AGAIN…Will a HOLOHOAX Trigger a REAL GENOCIDE!

Feb 16, 202500:58:04Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkA few days ago, US Vice President JD Vance made a pilgrimage to Dachau, apostatized from Christianity and embraced Holocaustianity—the new official religion of the West in which the Jews have replaced Jesus, the gas chambers have replaced the cross, and Israel has replaced the Resurrection. To climax his conversion, Vance prostrated himself before the holy imaginary gas chambers and uttered the sacred litany: “Never again!”According to the exoteric doctrine of Holocaustianity, never again means never again a genocide. But even as Vance was intoning “never again,” the government Vance represents was perpetrating genocide—a real and indubitable one this time. And Vance’s boss Trump was blessing that genocide with boastful threats to nuke what remains of Gaza, expel the survivors, and build casinos on the bones of Palestinian women and children.So what does “never again” really mean, then? The true, esoteric meaning seems to be: Never again will anyone significant in the West arise to challenge Jewish power, or even have the temerity to notice it. If JD Vance had cojones, he would have put it this way:“NEVER AGAIN will I allow the Jews to drag me to their infernal holohoax theme park and force me to bow down and kiss kosher tush!”Now that the livestreamed genocide of Gaza has changed everything, it won’t be long before people start saying things like:“Never again will we believe in Jewish victimhood.”“Never again will we allow ourselves to be duped by Jewish Power.”“Never again will we vote for anyone who tolerates the continued existence of the Genocidal Zionist Entity (GZE, pronounced jeeeeez!)”“Never again will we allow week-old babies to be circumcised and traumatized into a lifetime of tribal psychopathy.”“Never again will we believe the victors’ history they taught us in school.”“Never again will we take the Holocaust story on faith.”“Never again will we tolerate the persecution of people who don’t take it on faith.”“Never again will we fall for a Jewish propaganda operation like 9/11.”And above all:“NEVER AGAIN…Will a HOLOHOAX Trigger a REAL GENOCIDE!”Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. So I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at Paypal or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. (Note that you need to do a recurring larger recurring ANNUAL donation not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20. For smaller recurring donations use Paypal.) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Christianity, Spirituality, and Guyénot’s Marcionism

Feb 15, 202500:51:42Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkChristians reacted to last week’s interview with Laurent Guyénot by disagreeing with Guyénot’s assertion that the Old Testament is very bad scripture, that Yahweh is basically Satan, and that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah. Patrick Chenal, a Catholic listener, and Ed Kendrick, a spiritual seeker and pioneer of the “Israel did it” school of the 9/11 truth movement, continue the discussion.ExcerptEd Kendrick: I'm kind of a Heinz 57 as far as religious experience, starting with Southern Baptists, moving into Mary Baker Eddy's Christian Science as my mother had cancer. We were trying to seek a cure through spirituality. Then moving on to Unity, that's in Lee's Summit, the Unity School of Christianity. And then moving into meditation, Buddhism, Baha'i, Scientology eventually for a year and a half, and I went legal against Scientology to get out. That's an interesting story but we don't need to go there right now. Where I'm at right now is I'm at a bit of variance to contemporary Christians in the context of the I am references. “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” Moses at the burning bush, the burning bush suggested he tell his people that I am sent him. And Jesus met on this road by a stranger, replied to the stranger, I am that I am.The concept being something I encountered about 50 years ago, a pastor named Rocco Errico, who grew up in Mesopotamia, and he's a biblical scholar. And he comes from the Essene standpoint of the definition of I am as a central viewer, the watcher, the witness that we all have in Hindu traditions. It would be what we acknowledge when you say namaste to someone and that you acknowledge that core self that you see in the other in front of you that we all share.I'm quite uncomfortable with taking things on belief, which by definition requires no evidence. And I'm quite an advocate for things that we can mutually verify, not because of a majority rule or the loudest voice, but things that we can verify when we start talking about epistemology and the relationship of science and spirituality.Kevin Barrett: Those are two very different perspectives. And they're different from mine, and they're different from Lauren Guyenot’s. We've got a diversity of viewpoints here. Patrick, in a way, your viewpoint, the traditional Catholic viewpoint, is in some ways closer to sort of the long-term Western consensus. There's a doctrine. There are some things that are taken on faith, but there are mechanisms for empirically verifying things. In the first hour, I was just talking about miracles with Eric Wahlberg, And the Catholic Church is well known for doing very extensive investigations of reports of paranormal phenomena that might be accepted as miracles and as evidence for somebody's sainthood. So there is a tradition of empirical research in certain respects in Catholicism, as well as a whole doctrinal approach to what's really going on. And some of that does require faith.So Patrick, what's your take on sort of the relationship between faith and investigation, skepticism, looking for evidence?Patrick Chenal: Well, I would point out that the word faith in Hebrew means understanding. And if you understand something, then you know that it's true. And if you know it's true, then you have hope in something, which is trust. And then love comes after that, and that would be mercy. You were talking about miracles. I'd say one of the greatest miracles in history in regard to Catholicism would be the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. And recently I read the Gospel of Mark, of Jesus meeting the two followers that were on the road to Emmaus, where he appeared and broke bread with them…When we regard Catholicism, we have the Eucharist, which is the body and blood of Christ in the form of bread and wine, which is the heart of Catholic worship. We go on Sunday to church and we participate in that.Now, when Jesus met these two on the road to Emmaus, he mentioned to them that he was the one prophesied from the time of Moses and throughout the Old Testament. So, that right there gives evidence against the Marcionite claim that Jesus had nothing to do with the God of the Old Testament, which is quite a stretch. And I think a lot of that comes from people who are trying to justify their behavior. And a lot of times they do it to justify their bad behavior so that they can revert to the old way and say, well, God is just this revengeful, almost like demon-like figure that takes revenge and kills entire peoples, like the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, when God saw that they were so evil that he wiped them out.It's quite a shock to people today, that sort of thing. Why would God do that? It really begs the question that most people who aren't of the faith have, that if God is so good, if God is totally good, then why does he allow evil to occur? And I think this kind of involves sort of magical thinking in a way because it's like saying that God is God and that he doesn't have the power of life and death and the ability to take something that is evil, like, for instance, the death of Jesus, his only begotten son, and make it into something glorious, which is his resurrection. I This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Are Miracles Real?

Feb 14, 202500:50:34Tap to summarize

Rumble link Bitchute linkLast week's interview with Laurent Guyénot stimulated much discussion and controversy. Some listeners wanted to hear more on miracles and what Islam says about them, while others insisted that Guyénot's critique of Christianity is misguided.Canadian Muslim author Eric Walberg and I discuss miracles. Walberg discussed anomalous events in general, and miracles in particular, in his review of Jeffrey Kripal's How to think impossibly about souls, UFOs, time, belief, and everything else. Since my doctoral dissertation compares medieval Moroccan miracle stories to contemporary personal experience narratives of anomalous events, I've thought about this topic quite a bit, which is why I didn't want to go off on such a huge tangent during last week's conversation with Laurent Guyénot. So today's the day for the tangent.Guyénot suggested that Islam is less concerned with miracles, and more compatible with secular rationalism, than Christianity and Judaism. Though he isn't entirely wrong, it's actually a lot more complicated than that. Tune in for the details.Excerpt addressing Guyénot’s question about Islam and miraclesKevin Barrett: Laurent Guyénot raised the issue of how religious schools of thought (specifically Islam) think about miracles. In Christianity we know that they are considered religiously significant. When an alleged miracle or a story of a miracle comes to the attention of the church authorities, and they think it might be religiously significant, they investigate it. And it can end up becoming a proof of somebody's sainthood. They believe that miracles are related to whether or not somebody deserves to be canonized as a saint.And in Islam, there's a parallel process with saints' miracles, which are called karamat al-awliya. But there's no institutional bureaucracy that decides whether or not this particular story is legitimate and whether it's a real karama or miracle. So the two types of religiously significant miracles in Islam are the saints' miracles, the karamat al-awliya, and then secondly, the mujiza.The mujiza is a miracle of the prophets that God sends as proof of the prophet's mission. In Islam it's widely accepted that the prophet Muhammad peace upon him, the last and seal of the prophets, brought as his main miracle the message itself: the Qur’an. There are stories of other miraculous events around him, but they're all secondary to the main miracle of the message.So those are the two religiously significant kinds of miracles: the mujiza, the miracle or proof of a prophethood—and that would include all of Jesus' miracles that we discussed, as well as Moses parting the Red Sea, etc.—and then there are the karamat, the saints’ miracles. But then what do you do with all of these other things you're talking about Eric like levitation? Some guy posts a video of himself levitating. How would muslims or christians think about that?In Islam, it’s generally accepted that there are these kinds of events that may not have the religious significance of a prophet's miracle, a mujizah, or a saint's miracle, a karama. And probably the term that gets used the most often is the khariq al-ada خارق العادة which it means the shredding of habit or habituality. So the idea is that nature has what some scientists think of as laws, but they're not laws. That's just a metaphor. A law is when the government says you have to do this or else. But the the regularities in nature, which are often mathematical, are simply habits. That is, generally, when you let go of something, it falls to the ground. It doesn't just float up into the air. And usually when you lie down on your bed, you stay pressed into the mattress. You don't slowly rise up off the mattress. That's very rare. So if that happens, is it violating a law? No, there's no law. No government told you had to get stuck to the mattress. It's simply something that's inhabitual.Now, this goes right in line with Hume's critique of causality, where Hume—and then Bishop Berkeley pushed it even further—said that there's no such thing as a cause. There's simply stuff that happens after other stuff happens. So if every time you lie on the bed, you press yourself into the mattress, it's not caused by gravity. There's no cause. It's just that you've observed that every time you ever lay down on the bed, you've gone into the mattress. So it's happened 100 times. The 101st time, you happen to float up into the air. That's an exception to the rule. And in the Islamic view that's a shredding of habituality. So the normal habitual action, or what we expect—that habit is suddenly broken. And something very inhabitable happens, to the extent it's so extreme that habituality is shredded like a veil that's shredded, revealing some deeper reality underneath.So that's the term that gets applied in general to all such paranormal type events. And it's widely accepted in most parts of the Islamic world traditionally that these types of things do happen. And then there's a discussion about whether the fact that this particular holy man, wherever he goes, people are miraculously healed, and wild, fierce animals come up and roll at his feet and love him. And he knows what's happening at a distance. Maybe he even teleports. There are people here in Morocco who are said to occasionally teleport to Mecca. They don't need to take the plane to do the Hajj pilgrimage. There's one one person in Oujda, Morocco, here on the Algerian border, who went to sleep one night and supposedly woke up in Algeria the next day. He was a shrif or holy man. So for all of these kinds of stories—whether they're all true or not, well, probably not—and if you want a collection of all these Moroccan stories about wild and crazy events and superstitions and such, read Westermark’s Ritual and Belief in Morocco. It's quite a collection of these kinds of things.But getting back to Laurent Guyenot’s point: Is Islam less given to being focused on miracles? And the answer is, maybe a little less, in that the Quran is the main miracle of the prophet. That message is the miracle. But I think the actual ontology in the Islamic world is in some ways almost more open to accepting the reality of these inhabitual events, these shreddings of habituality, that occasionally happen. And I think one reason is that the ontology in the Islamic world is based on wujud. And wujud is the word that's translated as being in English. But what wujud actually means is finding. So in that sense there's no such thing as being, outside of finding. That is, everything that exists is found by somebody. You find it: that's how you know it exists. Somebody has to find it. There's no such thing as just pure existence without somebody finding it. And the act of finding is an active process. It’s like what quantum mechanics says. There's nothing there until somebody looks at it. The tree doesn't fall in the forest until somebody hears it. And so that's the implication of the notion of being as finding or wujud.Stripe debanked me. Currently I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at Paypal. Or better yet, use the free speech platform SPdonate: Note that you need to do a recurring larger recurring ANNUAL donation ($100 suggested) not a small monthly one, because SPdonate can’t process anything under $20. If you want to give small recurring donations, use Paypal. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

All episodes

Jonathan Revusky on Stephen Hawking Replacement & No Planes Theories

Ryan Dawson on 9/11, "Trump vs. Deep State," Slo-mo Collapse of AngloZionist Empire