Loading summary
A
Right in the middle of that valley where there was this abundance of water and pasture land was a fully modernized city. He didn't ask questions like where will my family live? Where will they go to church? Where will my children be educated? The shortest critique on record of pragmatism was uttered by Jesus of Nazareth when he made the statement, what shall it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his own soul? At that point we see Christ walking on a collision course with contemporary value systems. Pragmatism has a tendency to move in the direction of. Of dealing with issues in terms of immediacies, short term goals. Here's where we see the conflict. The Christian philosophy, the Christian life and worldview is saying that quite often the short term solution is ultimately destructive. One of my favorite illustrations, that's the Old Testament situation that emerged between Abraham and and his nephew Lot. Remember when Abraham came out of Ur of the Chaldeans and answered the call of God to go to a strange and foreign land. Comes out with his family, brings Lot, and Lot and he are very much busily engaged in the business of cattle ranching. And they come and they settle down together and they both are very wealthy men. Their cows are prospering. But pretty soon the cowboys that are working for Abraham start fighting with the cowboys that work with Lot. And they're fighting over water rights and over fences and over pasture land and they're getting their brands mixed up, you know, And Abraham's holding his foreman in charge of so many cows and lots holding his foreman in charge. And the guys are stealing them back and forth and you have all these problems emerging. So finally these men decide to sit down and talk it over. And Abraham comes to his nephew and he said, look, we have a serious problem here that's threatening the harmony of our relationship and our business. Now there ought to be some amicable agreement that we can reach some practical solution to solve this problem. He says, I'll tell you what, he says, this land is big enough for both of us. All we have to do is to divide the land. And Abraham says to Lot, he says, I'll tell you what I'll do. He said, we'll divide the land and I'll let you have first choice. So Lot looks around, he looks over the Transjordan area and what does he see? An arid, barren wasteland fit for only TS Eliot's thousand lost golf balls. Certainly not fit for cattle. He knows that if he grazes his cattle in that particular area that most of them will probably die of starvation. And the rest who survive will be so thin that they'll be worth next to nothing if he takes them into market. Secondly, it's a long trek from Transjordan into the city to the place of marketplace. And not only will the cattle lose whatever value they've gained in their meager past, but in the same time, it's very expensive and dangerous to drive them in the market. They can be wrestled on the way. It's expensive venture. They get there to the slaughterhouses, then they're going to have to have them killed and shipped. The whole logistics of ranching is very poor if they settle across the Jordan at the same time. Lot then turned his gaze to the Jordan Valley. He sees the Jordan river flowing right down through this valley. And even though this outskirts and the surrounding areas are nothing but parched and arid desert land, right there in that valley is some of the most lush, fertile, beautiful grazing land that you ever laid eyes on. And not only that, but right in the middle of that valley where there was this abundance of water and pasture land, was a fully modernized city with the butcher shops and the slaughtering yards right there, right on the outskirts of town. He looks down, he says, oh, my go there. He says, my cattle will get fat. They won't lose what they've gained from their feed by being driven to market. It's economically simple and advantageous. Of course, this is the solution to my problem. And he says, abraham, thank you very much for letting me have first pick. I'll take the city. And the problem of raising cattle was solved. A couple of things Lot didn't consider. He didn't ask questions like, where will my family live? Where will they go to church? Where will my children be educated? What kind of value system will be inculcated into the minds of. Of my daughters? Those questions weren't even considered. But the immediate problem of fattening his cattle was solved. Do you remember the name of the city? Sodom. And Lot had one of the finest herds of cattle in the ancient world. And he had a wife who turned to a pillar of salt and two daughters who were totally degenerate because of the corruption of the pagans where they lived. Abraham didn't do too badly. He's not famous, however, for his cattle. But his children became the heirs of redemption for the world.
B
Thank you for listening to ultimately with RC Sproul, Dr. Sproul founded Ligonier Ministries to proclaim the holiness of God in all its fullness to as many people as possible. To learn more about our holy God, request a free booklet by Dr. Sproul when you visit ultimatelypodcast.com Holy.
Episode Date: March 13, 2026
In this episode of Ultimately with R.C. Sproul, the focus is on the distinction between Christian values and the philosophy of pragmatism. Drawing on biblical illustrations and the teachings of Jesus, R.C. Sproul challenges listeners to evaluate decisions not by immediate benefits, but by what is ultimately right and aligned with eternal truths. Through the story of Abraham and Lot, Sproul demonstrates the perils of making choices based only on short-term advantages while neglecting spiritual and moral considerations.
Pragmatism Defined:
Pragmatism is described as the tendency to address issues based on immediate, short-term goals, often at the expense of deeper, long-term consequences.
"Pragmatism has a tendency to move in the direction of... dealing with issues in terms of immediacies, short-term goals."
— R.C. Sproul [01:00]
The Christian Worldview:
In contrast, the Christian perspective prioritizes ultimate outcomes, even if it means forgoing obvious or immediate gains.
"The Christian philosophy, the Christian life and worldview is saying that quite often the short-term solution is ultimately destructive."
— R.C. Sproul [01:15]
Sproul invokes Jesus' succinct condemnation of purely pragmatic reasoning:
"What shall it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his own soul?"
— Jesus (quoted by R.C. Sproul) [00:34]
This, Sproul argues, is "the shortest critique on record of pragmatism" and places Jesus "on a collision course with contemporary value systems."
— R.C. Sproul [00:40]
The Conflict:
Abraham and Lot, both successful cattle ranchers, find their workers quarrelling over resources. Seeking peace, Abraham offers Lot the first choice of land.
"We have a serious problem here that's threatening the harmony of our relationship and our business. Now, there ought to be some amicable agreement that we can reach, some practical solution to solve this problem."
— R.C. Sproul, channeling Abraham [02:10]
Lot evaluates two options:
R.C. Sproul narrates Lot’s reasoning:
"Lot then turned his gaze to the Jordan Valley... right there in that valley is some of the most lush, fertile, beautiful grazing land that you ever laid eyes on. And not only that, but right in the middle of that valley... was a fully modernized city with the butcher shops and the slaughtering yards right there, right on the outskirts of town."
— R.C. Sproul [03:30]
Lot's Oversight:
Lot’s decision focuses solely on economic gain—he does not consider the spiritual or moral environment.
"A couple of things Lot didn't consider. He didn't ask questions like, where will my family live? Where will they go to church? Where will my children be educated? What kind of value system will be inculcated into the minds of my daughters? Those questions weren't even considered. But the immediate problem of fattening his cattle was solved."
— R.C. Sproul [04:45]
The city Lot chooses is Sodom. The result:
"Lot had one of the finest herds of cattle in the ancient world. And he had a wife who turned to a pillar of salt and two daughters who were totally degenerate because of the corruption of the pagans where they lived."
— R.C. Sproul [05:25]
Contrast with Abraham:
"Abraham didn't do too badly. He's not famous, however, for his cattle. But his children became the heirs of redemption for the world."
— R.C. Sproul [05:45]
“The shortest critique on record of pragmatism was uttered by Jesus of Nazareth when he made the statement, ‘What shall it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his own soul?’”
— R.C. Sproul [00:34]
On Lot’s business decision:
“He looks down, he says, oh, my… my cattle will get fat… It’s economically simple and advantageous. Of course, this is the solution to my problem. And he says, Abraham, thank you very much for letting me have first pick. I'll take the city. And the problem of raising cattle was solved. A couple of things Lot didn't consider…”
— R.C. Sproul [04:15]
The consequence of pragmatism unchecked:
“He had a wife who turned to a pillar of salt and two daughters who were totally degenerate because of the corruption of the pagans where they lived.”
— R.C. Sproul [05:25]
R.C. Sproul urges listeners to resist making decisions purely based on short-term, pragmatic benefits, reminding Christians that such choices can lead to spiritual devastation. Through scriptural example and sharp insight, he calls for a focus on what is ultimately right—valuing the soul, faith, and legacy of belief over fleeting success or ease.
(End of content summary. Promotional material and outro excluded.)