← UNBIASED Politics
UNBIASED Politics
May 7, 2026: What to Know About Hantavirus and the Andes Strain, Epstein's Purported Suicide Note, DOJ Investigating Suspicious Oil Trades, FDA's Vape "Approval," and More.
00:41:31
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:00]
A
You're listening to this podcast, so I know you've got a curious mind. Here's a helpful fact you may not know yet. Drivers who switch and save with Progressive save over $900 on average. Pop over to progressive.com, answer some questions and you'll get a quick quote with discounts that are easy to come by. In fact, 99% of their auto customers earn at least one discount. Visit progressive.com and see if you can enjoy a little cash back. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12 month savings of $946 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2024 and May 2025. Potential savings will vary. Welcome back to Unbiased, your favorite source of unbiased news and legal analysis. Welcome back to Unbiased Politics. Today is Thursday, May 7th. Let's talk about some news, starting with this story about Smith College. So the Department of Education has launched an investigation into Smith College. Smith College is an all women's college. And, and the investigation is over the school's policy of, of admitting transgender women. Now, this investigation reportedly started after the conservative group Defending Education filed a complaint with the Department of Education arguing that Smith's policy undermines sex based protections for women by allowing students who are biologically male to attend the school. Now, children, just for some context, Smith College is a private liberal arts school in Massachusetts. For the last 10 years or so, since 2015, it has had this policy of admitting students who identify as women regardless of their biological sex. Smith changed its admissions policy after there was a transgender applicant who was denied admission because some of the federal documents belonging to this individual listed her sex as male. So, so after that controversy, the school moved towards this policy that focused more on gender identity rather than biological sex. However, this new investigation is looking into whether that policy violates federal sex discrimination laws. So at the center of this investigation is a, a pretty specific legal question, if you will. And that is, can a college that was created to educate women still qualify as a women's college under federal law in if it also admits transgender women? And in order to understand why it's even being questioned, we have to understand Title 9, right? Title 9 is the Federal law that prohibits sex based discrimination in education programs that receive federal funding. But Title 9 has this exception for private single sex undergraduate colleges. And that that exception, of course, is what allows women's colleges to, to operate as women's colleges and still receive federal funding. But what's happening now is the Trump administration is basically questioning whether Smith's policy of admitting transgender women fits within Title 9's women's college exception because the Department of Education is arguing that this exception is based on biological sex, not gender identity. And, and Smith's policy focuses more on gender identity, not biological sex. But really there are two overlapping issues here. So the first is the administration's broader argument that Smith shouldn't be able to rely on women's call the women's college exception if it admits transgender women. But then there's the second issue. Even if the admissions question is, is legally a little bit gray, a little bit complicated, because Smith is a private undergraduate college, the school can still be subject to Title 9 in other areas once students are admitted on campus. So the administration might also look at Smith's policies around dorm rooms, bathrooms, locker rooms, sports scholarships, all of those other areas to see whether those policies violate Title IX in addition to the, the admissions policy. So in other words, the investigation might start with admissions, right? That might be the focus right now. But the enforcement question could also come down to how Smith's policies play out once students are actually admitted. But that's a little bit what's about what's going on there. Of course, if there is a violation found, then the administration could attempt to pull funding. It would most likely result in a lawsuit like we've been seeing at other universities. But that's the general gist of that investigation. Now we'll switch gears a little bit to some health related news, to health stories for you. First, we're going to talk about the FDA's vape authorization, what that actually means. And then we'll talk briefly about RFK new medication plan to limit what, what he refers to as overmedicating. So the reason I want to talk about the VAPE authorization is because there's an important distinction to be made here. And this is the fact that this is being described in some headlines as the FDA quote, unquote, approving flavored vapes. Right? But technically what the FDA did was authorize the marketing of these products. So this doesn't mean the FDA is saying these products are safe, okay? Doesn't mean they're, they're promoting these products. They were approved for marketing purposes. In fact, the FDA specifically says that authorized E cigarettes are not necessarily safe and that all tobacco products are harmful and potentially addictive at the same time. The fba, the FDA says that these E cigarettes are a better alternative to traditional cigarettes. But the significance here is that the FDA has historically been very hesitant to authorize flavored vapes specifically because flavors Flavors like fruits and, you know, candy flavor and mint flavors, etc, are especially appealing to minors. Okay. Now, the FDA is defending their decision by saying that these particular products went through scientific review and that the company that's making them is using age verification technology and there's marketing controls in place to limit access by minors. But that's the significance. Historically, the FDA has been reluctant to approve flavors because they are especially appealing to minors. Now, this authorization comes after reports that President Trump had been pressuring FDA commissioner Marty McCarra Makari to move more quickly on these flavored nicotine products. According to multiple reports citing people familiar with the matter. Trump spoke with Makari over the weekend about what he was kind of seeing as, as delays in approving these flavored vapes and other flavored nicotine products. And those reports also said that Trump had been calling around to some of his advisers for guidance on, on what to do with Makari and on the political importance and like strategy, if you will, behind flavored vaping, particularly that political importance among young voters. Some advisers reportedly told the President that Makari had been blocking Trump's agenda when it comes to these things and, and described the commissioner as a problem for the administration. Keep in mind, back in April, the Wall Street Journal had reported on a February memo from Makari's office that prevented the FDA from authorizing several glass vape flavors, which is what was just authorized. Right. Even though FDA scientific reviewers had reportedly supported them. And that memo reportedly said that the FDA needed more time to evaluate the flavors. So just so we're all on the same page with this, the FDA didn't technically approve these flavors or flavored vapes in the way that people might think of a drug approval or, you know, approval in the medical sense. Instead, what the FDA did here is issue marketing authorization, which means these specific products can legally be marketed in the United States under FDA rules. But again, doesn't mean the FDA is saying they're safe. It doesn't make them legal for minors. Okay, now on to RFK's medication plan. So HHS Secretary RFK Jr. Announced this week this new plan that's aimed at limiting what he calls the over prescribing of psychiatric medications. According to hhs, the goal of this plan is to promote more appropriate psychiatric prescribing, encourage informed consent, and support what's called DEP prescribing when clinically approved, appropriate. Now, deprescribing basically means a doctor or a medical provider reviews whether a medication is still benefiting a patient and if it's appropriate will help that patient taper off the medication or switch to another treatment. So Kennedy's argument here is essentially that too many people are put on psychiatric medications without fully understanding the risks or how long they might be on them or how to safely come off of them. HHS says that this new effort will evaluate prescription patterns. It they're going to look at the benefits and potential harms of psychiatric medications and have providers promote non non medication options when appropriate. Things like therapy, family support, nutrition, physical activity, other evidence based interventions is what HHS is calling them. HHS says that it will carry this out through a multipronged approach. It has already issued this Dear Colleague letter to providers, basically encouraging them to prioritize informed consent and shared decision making when they're prescribing medication. And then also regularly, they're asking providers to regularly review the risks and benefits of psychiatric medications with patients. Later this month, the Substance Abuse and Health Mental Health Services Administration will issue a report on prescribing trends. And then throughout the summer, it'll host educational webinars for prescribers and other health professionals. In July, HHS will also convene a panel that will help develop a form formal HHS clinical guidance on the appropriate use of psychiatric medications and, and tapering and discontinuation. And the NIH and FDA are also expediting research into new treatments for mental health conditions. According to the hhs, the action plan is a, quote, unified and comprehensive approach to, to return to gold standard science and ensure that children and adults struggling with mental health challenges are equipped with the right information to make informed treatment decisions and get the support they need. End quote. Okay, now let's do an update on the White House Correspondents Dinner suspect Cole Thomas Allen. When we talked about this on Monday, he had been charged with three crimes, right? Attempting to assassinate the president. Transport. Trans. Transporting. I don't know why that word is so hard for me to say. Transporting a firearm and ammunition across state lines with the intent to commit a felony and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. And one of the things that I pointed out was that the original affidavit that was filed with the criminal complaint seemed to imply that Allen fired the shot that hit the Secret Service officer. But the affidavit did not explicitly say that. It just said that Secret Service personnel heard a gunshot as Allen ran through that security checkpoint and that one of the officers had been shot in the chest. Well, now on Tuesday, Allen was indicted on four charges. And that indictment now includes a new count which is assaulting a federal officer with a deadly weapon. So this new assault charge and the fact that he was officially indicted on the crime of discharging a firearm during a crime of violence seem to suggest that there is evidence tying Allen to that shot that hit the Secret Service officer. Because in order for a grand jury to indict Allen on that charge, prosecutors would have had to have presented evidence that support probable cause that Allen committed those specific crimes. Now, you might be wondering, if the DOJ already filed charges, which we talked about on Monday, why is the grand jury indicting him now? Well, in federal cases, prosecutors will initially charge someone through what's called a criminal complaint. This is typically what happens early on in a case, especially when someone's just been arrested and the government's trying to move quickly with the situation. But after that, prosecutors have to present the evidence or present the case to a grand jury to get an official indictment. That grand jury is ultimately in charge of reviewing the evidence that exists and deciding whether there's probable cause to then formally charge the person by returning an indictment. So the earlier DOJ charges were the. The initial step, and then this indictment is the formal charging document that allows the case to move forward. So the indictment brings Allen's total number of Federal charges to 4. Attempted assassination of the president, of assaulting a federal officer with a deadly weapon, transporting a firearm and ammunition across state lines with the intent to commit a felony, and then discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. As of this afternoon, Allen has not yet entered a plea. That should come within the next few days once he's arraigned on that indictment. All right, let's take our first break here. When we come back, we will talk about Epstein's purported suicide notes, as well as the hantavirus and more. I don't know about you, but I rarely actually put on, you know, like a full on outfit. Even when I'm recording the podcast, I almost always have sweatpants on. Of course, I have to wear a nice top because that's what the camera sees. But on the bottom, almost always sweatpants. I'm just a sweatsuit, loungewear type of girl. And because of that, one of my favorite things to buy are sets that I can wear around the house, but that I can also go out of the house in. And I specifically love Cozy Earth's jogger sets because they make this really easy. They look high quality, so you can lounge in them, but then you can also wear them out. And not only that, but the jogger sets from Cozy Earth are made with the same viscose bamboo that their bed sheets are made with. And you know how much I love my Cozy Earth bed sheets because they're just lightweight and breathable and that kind of soft that gets softer over time and with every wash. So yeah, the jogger sets are amazing for that reason as well. This spring, give yourself the kind of comfort that lives with you all day, not just the moment you get home. Head to cozyearth.com and use my code UNBIASED for an exclusive 20% off. That's cozyearth.com code UNBIASED for an exclusive twenty percent off. And if you see a post purchase survey mention that you heard about Cozy Earth right here on Unbiased Politics. Comfort lives here. Spring is here. We're outside again. We're moving more. We're taking advantage of the nice weather. It's the perfect excuse to upgrade your everyday go tos with Bomb Bombas. Now that I'm in my postpartum era, I am making more of an effort to go on long walks and BOMBA socks have been a game changer. There is nothing worse, okay, than when you're walking and your socks start to fall from your ankles and slowly but surely make their way down to the arch of your foot. I hate that. And Bomba socks do not do this because they are specifically designed not to. And not only that, but they're cushioned where you need it and they are sweat, wet, wicking. Now maybe you're saying, well, Jordan, socks are great, but I'm looking for more than just socks. And that's perfect too. Bombas isn't just a sock company. They also make T shirts, underwear, sandals, slides. Bombas is really out here just trying to make everything we put on our body as comfortable as possible. And if that's not commendable enough for every item you buy, Bombas donates an essential clothing item to someone facing housing insecurity. So head over to bombus.comunbiased and use code UNBIASED for 20% off your first purchase. That's B O M B A S.comUnbiased code UNBIASED at checkout At DSW, we ask the important questions like what shoes are you going to wear? Whether you're prepping for wedding season, festival season, or just planning the ultimate vacay, the right shoes can make or break an rsvp. So own the moment. You've got big plans, and we've got just the shoes at the perfect price, of course. Get ready to get ready with designer Shoe warehouse. Head to your DSW store or dsw.com today and let us surprise you. Welcome back. So yesterday, a federal judge unsealed an apparent suicide note from Jeffrey Epstein. Now, to be very clear, this is an unverified, undated, unsigned note. Okay? It has not been authenticated as being written by Epstein. But to really understand why this note is becoming public now and kind of what its origins are, we have to talk about Epstein's former cellmate, Nicholas Tartaglion. So, Tartaglion was a former police officer in New York who was convicted of quadruple murder. He was awaiting trial on those murder charges when he shared the cell with Epstein in 2019. Remember, Epstein died in August 2019, but just weeks before that, Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell, which was another apparent suicide attempt. Tartaglion says he found this note, which was written on a piece of yellow paper tucked into a book. After Epstein had been taken out of the cell, Tartaglion said, quote, I opened the book to read, and there it was. End quote. Now, after that July 2019 incident, after Epstein had red marks on his neck and jail officials questioned him about them, he initially said that Tartaglion had attacked him and that he was not suicidal. He had no interest in killing himself. But then, just days after that, Epstein told a prison psychologist that Tartaglion had not threatened to hurt him in any way and that he had no recollection of the incident. Tartaglion has repeatedly denied attacking Epstein, and he's told jail officials that he and Epstein never. Never really had any issues with. More recently, he told Jessica Reed Kraus, who's the woman behind House Inhabit, that Epstein tried to kill himself. That first unsuccessful attempt when the two of them were in the cell together. And when he woke up, when Tartaglion woke up, he actually brought Epstein back with cpr. That is. That is what Tartaglion has said. So Tartaglion allegedly finds this note, tucks into a book in the cell and gives it to his lawyers because he says he thought that that note could have been helpful if Epstein continued to claim that he had tried to hurt him. It appears that initially, Tartaglion's lawyers had a picture of this alleged note on a phone. But it wasn't until 2021 that the original copy was turned over to the court, which, of course, would have been two years or so after Epstein died. And once the court got the copy of the note, it put the note and the documents related to that note under court seal. Then, last Thursday, the New York Times went Ahead and petitioned the court to unseal it, because publications can basically petition a court to release documents if the documents serve the interests of the public. So that's what the Times did here. But before unsealing, the judge asked the parties to submit their views on the matter, and neither the prosecution nor Tartaglion's lawyers had any issue with it. So then on Wednesday, the note was unsealed, and we saw this alleged suicide note for the first time. It says, quote, they investigated me for month, found nothing. And then there's a line that's not legible, but seems to say something about his original charges from. From years prior. And then the note continues and says, quote, it is a treat to be able to choose one's time to say goodbye to what you want me to do. Bust out crying. No fun, not worth it, End quote. Sorry to break here, but for those of you listening on YouTube, I can see in the reflection that my light behind me is flickering. I don't know what I'm supposed to do about it right now. So we're just going to have to deal with it, I suppose, for now. Okay. So again, the note has not been authenticated or verified. However, the Times did note that there were two phrases used in this note that were phrases Epstein had used in his emails. Bust out crying being one of that being one of them, and no fun being the other. And so I went ahead and I looked into which emails used this phrase, bust out crying, because I think that phrase is a little less used in everyday life than no fun. Right? So the emails that I found, and I did the search on the DOJ's website. As we know, the DOJ released all of these documents and emails that relate to Epstein's case. So that's what I looked through. There's one set of emails between Epstein and someone named Terry Kafka. Epstein writes, on New Year's Eve 2016, what you want me to do? Bust out crying. Kafka then writes, j. E All the best for a good new year, Safe travels and continued success in Mexico. Rented a nice place. Be well. And then the conversation kind of carries on, and Kafka eventually says, the last time I saw you cry was when Steve Jankowitz Jankowicz bit you on your neck. Man, dat hurt. So not a lot of context there. But that is one of the emails he used that phrase, what you want me to do? Bust out crying. Then in an email thread between Epstein and his brother, his brother writes, haven't seen your name in the media for a While you still alive. And Epstein responds, just give it time. But coming out October 10, trying to decide whether or not to have a book signing party, his brother then writes on another note, cousin Steve became a grandfather last week. His son had a kid. And. And Epstein responds, what you want to do? Bust out crying? And then in another thread between Epstein and his brother, his brother asks if he's still in touch with someone named Eva and mentions that there was this doctor that he'd like to put Eva in touch with. And Epstein responds, I am in touch. What would you like me to say? Do bust out crying. So that's the deal with the note. Again, not authenticated, not signed, not dated, wasn't turned over until years after Epstein died. But at the same time, some of the phrasing does match Epstein's emails. So who knows if it's authentic or not. Has not been authenticated as of today. Now, let's talk about the hantavirus outbreak, because quite a few of you have messaged me asking if this is going to be the next Covid. You just want to understand what's going on. So first and foremost, right off the bat, just want to be clear that health officials have specifically said this is not like Covid and that the risk to the general public is low. But we will talk about that more in a few minutes because this specific strain that we're seeing, which is assumed to be the Andes strain, is a rare train of hantavirus and kind of acts a little bit differently. First though, let's talk about the ship. So MV Hondius is the name of the ship. It's a Dutch flagged expedition cruise and it is currently sailing in the Atlantic. Its itinerary was across the Atlantic. Now when I say this is an expedition cruise, what I mean is that it's the kind that takes passengers to more remote places like Antarctica and remote islands in the Atlantic Ocean. The thing about these kind of cruises is they can last a long time, usually like a month, sometimes longer. And they're actually quite small in size compared to the cruises that we typically think of. So this is not the Carnival cruise ship that's heading from Miami to Cozumel. Okay? This is a very different kind of cruise. It's, it's smaller, it's more luxury, it's much smaller ship compared to the cruise ships that we typically see at the ports here in the United States. This particular cruise set off from Argentina. It started its voyage on April 1 from Argentina. It headed to South Georgia Island. Also. I just want to say about that date. So April 1st is what most reports are saying states. There are some reports saying March 20th is the voyage date, but most reports say April 1st. So that's the one we're sticking with. So anyway, leaves Argentina, heads to South Georgia island, which is in the middle of the Atlantic, north of antarctica, and on April 6th. So just five days after the ship left port, a 70 year old Dutch passenger started feeling sick. On April 11th, he died. Now, when this first passenger died, it wasn't immediately identified as hantavirus. In fact, almost a month passed between the first passenger getting sick and health officials confirming hantavirus. But after that first man died, the ship kept sailing for about two more weeks and his wife was on board too. So his wife is on board the ship, her husband's dead body's on board. It wasn't until April 24 that this man's body was taken off the ship and at St Helena, which is another island in the Atlantic. And by then the man's 69 year old wife had also started feeling symptoms. So she ends up getting off the ship with his body and she flies to South Africa. She actually collapsed while she was at the airport and she, she died the following day. It's also worth mentioning that while the ship was at St Helena, 29 additional passengers got off the ship and went home. Now, these passengers returned to the various countries they came from, like Australia, Taiwan, the United States, England, Switzerland and others. The Swiss man tested positive on Wednesday. He had gone to a hospital in Zurich and initially his test came back negative. But a more recent test this week came back positive and he is currently still in the hospital. There are at least three individuals who got off the ship on, you know, that day that they were in St. Helena that have returned to the United States. One from Arizona, two from Georgia. The Arizona Department of Health Services and Georgia Department of Public Health both said they are monitoring their residents who came home after disembarking the ship. But as of now, none of them have shown any signs of illness. So let's hope and pray that it stays that way. But going back to the ship, once the ship left St. Helena, you know, with 29 less passengers on board, well, I guess 31 if you count the couple that also got off the ship, then headed towards its next stop, which was Ascension Island. And as it's heading to Ascension island, another passenger, a British man, starts feeling sick. The following day on April 27, he was taken off the ship, evacuated from Ascension island and flown to South Africa, where he remains in intensive care. Four days after that, on May 1, as the ship was heading to Cape Verde, a German woman on board dies after getting sick. Meanwhile, South African doctors had begun running tests on. On the British passenger, the one that was. That's in intensive care. And they ran a whole bunch of tests. Everything came back negative. But eventually they tested him for hantavirus. And on May 2, the test came back positive. So that was about 21 days after the first passenger died. And that was the first time that doctors and health officials realized that they were potentially dealing with a hantavirus outbreak. So that positive test result is what then prompted South African health officials to test the Dutch woman's body. The woman who had died the day before her test came back positive on May 4th. At that point, it became pretty clear what this was. And so the ship was just kind of waiting in limbo off the coast of Cape Verde because Cape Verde wasn't about to let the passengers get off the ship and risk spreading the virus to its own residents. Right. So the ship and those on board are stranded off the coast. The next day, though, on May 5, three people get evacuated off the ship because they had started feeling symptoms. So those people were sent by airplane from Cape Verde to the Netherlands. But, I mean, you know, the people in charge still had to figure out where the ship was going to go. It couldn't just sit off the coast of Cape Verde forever. So finally, Spanish officials said, okay, we'll help you out, but you are going to go to an island called Tenerife, which is actually close, closer to Western Sahara and Morocco than it is Spain. It's off the coast of Africa, but it's part of the Canary Islands. So it's the largest island, I think, in. In the Canary Islands. But once you get there, they said non Spanish citizens will be sent back to their home countries immediately. Spanish citizens will be quarantined in a military hospital in Madrid for 45 days. And that's pretty much in line with what the CDC says about the Andes virus incubation period, because the. Well, there was one study. It was a 2006 study. Keep in mind, the Andes virus is pretty rare, so it's not super well studied. But there's a 2006 study on emerging infectious diseases, which actually looked at a 1996 outbreak of Andy. The Andes virus in Argentina, which is where this outbreak appears to have come from. And the incubation period was anywhere from four to 39 days from exposure. The median was 18 days. So it, you know, from when you're Exposed until you actually feel symptoms. It could be anywhere from, from four to basically 40 days. So the ship is currently on its way to the Spanish island where the remaining passengers will be evacuated. Now the latest update. And this is what, what has people even more worried is that the flight attendant who was working that KLM flight that flew the woman from St. Helena to South Africa has been hospitalized with mild symptoms. And naturally it has people worried because it's starting to spread off the ship as well. If this is a confirmed case. It is not a confirmed case. At this point, the flight attendant's been hospitalized with mild symptoms. Like I said, it's not a confirmed case of hantavirus. But if it is, obviously if it's spreading off the ship, you know, it has a lot of people wondering how close in proximity you really need to be to someone who's sick to catch it. So when we come back from our second and final break, we'll cover what you need to know about hantavirus and the Andes strain specifically. I've told you guys this before, but my go to outfit is something that doesn't require much effort yet still looks put together, right? So maybe it's a comfy loungewear set, maybe it's a basic T shirt with jeans or better yet, a basic tee with linen pants. Because linen pants are super, super comfor. And the key to this effortless yet put together look, and just trust me on this because I'm, I'm a pro at this point is accessorizing. In order to look put together in a basic comfy outfit, you have to accessorize. And Quince makes that really easy because not only does Quince have all of the basic yet elevated pieces you could ever imagine, but Quint also has accessories. It really is the definition of a one stop shop. I love it so much. And as if convenience alone wasn't amazing enough, Quince's prices are incredible. Their linen pants, dresses and tops start at $30. And this goes for guys clothes too, by the way. Incredible prices. I personally love Quince's linen. The fabric is such great quality. The fit is exactly what I want when I wear linen, right? It's not too loose, it's not too structured, it's just right. When I saw the price of their linen, I seriously did a double take because I'm so used to high quality linen being so expensive and that's just not the case with Quince. So refresh your every day with luxury. You'll actually use head to quince.comunbiased for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q-U-I-N c e.comunbiased for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.comunbiased One thing about me is that I don't love to cook. I've always been more of a baker. I will bake some cookies any day of the week. I but cooking a meal, I don't know, it's just, it's never been my thing. At the same time though, I know that I can't order in every night and I do realize the importance of cooking. So I did decide to get some help. Something that would just kind of give me the motivation to whip up some meals in the kitchen. And that's where HelloFresh comes in. HelloFresh is a meal kit delivery service that sends pre portioned fresh ingredients and very important step by step recipes straight to your door. Okay, so let's say you want to make a a delicious roasted garlic and zucchini flatbread for dinner one night next week. The pre portioned ingredients for this flatbread will literally show up at your door along with a recipe card that tells you exactly how to make it. And what I love about HelloFresh is they always offer the most interesting recipes and feature all kinds of different cuisines. So they actually offer more than 80 global recipes every month. Vietnamese, Moroccan, Italian, Chinese, Mexican. The list goes on. I love that. And even though you know not all of us are professionals in the kitchen, it is hard to deny the fact that nothing hits like home cooking. So make home cooking a lot easier and go to hellofresh.comunbiased10fm now to get 10 free meals. Free meals applied as a discount on the first box. New subscribers only varies by plan. That's hellofresh.comunbiased 10fm and as in unbiased 10 free meals if any of you out there are wanting to add some new furniture pieces to your home, let me put you onto article Article Furniture has been a go to of mine for years and it's funny because what initially turned me onto the brand was the style and design of their pieces. But I actually ended up really falling in love with the company once I received my order because not only are their pieces super high quality but their customer service is top notch tier. Now Article carries contemporary, mid century modern and modern furniture but I really love that all of their pieces pair really well with almost any other article piece because for me curation is the hardest part of home design. So this makes curation really easy. My most recent purchase from Article was the Landry 84 and a half inch sofa bed. And it is great. The shape of it, the feel of it, the color, the material, everything about it is just so high quality. And my mom was actually over my house the other day. We were hanging out in the guest room and she, she mentioned the sofa and she was like, this is, this looks really good. Like, it looks really high quality. I'm like, it is, it's great. I also feel the need to tell you that article offers a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. So if you do order something and you're not completely in love with it, you can easily return it. That's just a part of their amazing customer service that I was telling you about earlier. So Article is offering my listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. To claim, visit article.comunbiased and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout. That's article.comunbiased for $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. Article.comunbiased welcome back. Before the break, we covered pretty much everything that's happened on the ship. Now what I want to do is talk about hantavirus and what it is and the Andy strain, specifically, hantavirus is the sickness that's usually spread through contact with infected rodents. So their urine, droppings, saliva, things like that. The most common way to get hantavirus from rodents is by breathing in these things. But you can also get it if you eat food that's been contaminated with it or you touch something and then you touch your mouth or your nose or your eyes. Hantavirus, it doesn't usually spread person to person, but there is one exception, and that is the Andes virus. The Andes virus is a type of hantavirus found in South America, specifically Chile and Argentina. So what Argentine health officials are thinking as of now is that most likely the man and his wife, the first two passengers that died, picked it up from rodents while visiting a landfill during a bird watching tour just days before they, they left on their trip. Now, symptom wise, okay, hantavirus can start out looking very non specific. Early symptoms are things like fever, fatigue, muscle aches, head headaches, dizziness, chills, nausea, vomiting. It can look a lot like the flu in its early days. But then some people can start to develop respiratory symptoms if the virus starts to affect the lungs, coughing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, et cetera. In the more severe cases, hantavirus of course progresses and it can kill you. With that said, though hantavirus is rare, between 1993 and 2023, so a 30 year span, there were only 890 cases. And as far as your questions about whether this is the next Covid, a couple of World Health Organization officials have come out and said this is, this is not Covid. This is different. So one of the officials told told Reuters, this is very, very different from COVID or the flu. Andy's virus is more contagious than other hantaviruses, but it's not considered highly contagious in the way that Covid, the flu or other respiratory viruses are an epidemic. Expert at the World Health Organization said said Thursday that that's today, I suppose that hantavirus outbreak is not the next Covid. She said in part, quote, the risk to the general public is low and I think we need to contextualize this for everyone saying, oh my gosh, is this the next one? I really just want to assure people this is something that's quite different. This is not the next Covid, but it is a serious infectious disease. It, it's an infectious disease that if people get infected and infections are uncommon, they can die, end quote. Another WHO expert says to expect to see some more cases of hantavirus reported in the next few weeks, given that the incubation period for the Andes virus is up to six weeks. And he added, quote, while this is a serious incident, who assesses the public risk as low, end quote. So if you, it doesn't seem like you or I have anything to worry about as of now, but that is what's going on. I hope that answers a lot of your questions. Okay, final story. This is a quick one actually, but not, not quite quick enough to be a quick hitter yet. Still a story I think we should touch on nonetheless. This is one that kind of broke towards towards the end of my episode prep today, the DOJ and Commodity Futures Trading Commission are investigating a series of trades in the oil market that made traders a total of more than $2.6 billion billion with a B okay, so. On March 23, 15 minutes before Trump announced that he would delay the threatened attacks on Iran's power grid, traders bet more than $500 million that oil prices would drop on April 7, hours before the temporary ceasefire was announced by Trump, traders bet $960 million that oil prices would drop. On April 17, just 20 minutes before Iran's foreign minister posted on social media saying the Strait of Hormuz was open. Traders bet $760 million that oil prices would drop. And then on April 21, 15 minutes before Trump announced he would extend the ceasefire, traders placed a series of bets worth $430 million that oil prices would drop. These trades happened on the London Stock Exchange, by the way, and the story is reminiscent of the story from January where a poly market user bet more than $33,000 on the United States invading Venezuela and Maduro being forced out of leadership by January 31st. The odds at the time were only 6%. So he puts more than $33,000 on that bet. He ends up making about $400,000. Turns out after an investigation, the user was actually a US Soldier who was part of the raid on Maduro, and he is now facing criminal charges. So we could see a similar outcome here. But so far neither the DOJ nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have commented on that investigation. And now for some quick hitters. The Supreme Court agreed to immediately finalize its decision striking down Louisiana's congressional map, allowing the state to move forward with drawing a new map before the 2026 midterm elections. Justice Jackson dissented from this move to immediately finalize. She argued fast tracking it could appear politically motivated. Justice Alito, though, defended the move as necessary, and he rejected the idea that the court was taking sides. Ted Turner, the founder of CNN, died Wednesday at the age of 87, according to a news release from Turner Enterprises. He passed away peacefully, surrounded by family. A federal judge ruled that the DOJ can keep more than 600 boxes of 2020 election ballots seized from Fulton County, Georgia. The judge rejected the county's request to have the materials returned. The judge acknowledged flaws in the DOJ's basis for the search warrants, but ultimately determined Fulton county had not met the legal standard to prove that its rights were violated or that it would be irreparably harmed. Justice Thomas became the second longest serving justice on the Supreme Court bench in history. Today, he has served 34 years and 197 days. The only justice with a longer tenure is William O. Douglas, who served 36 years and 209 days. Thomas would overtake Douglas in 2028 if Thomas stays on the court. And for some news just now making headlines despite taking place a couple of weeks ago Now, CBP arrested 28 individuals aboard five different cruise ships at the San Diego port for being involved in either the receipt, possession, transportation, distribution or viewing of child sexual exploitation material or child pornography. A CBP spokesperson said all 28 individuals have had their visas canceled and are being removed from the country Rumor has it. So rumor has it, it's been a minute since we've done this because I've been out on leave. But rumor has it, just as a refresher is my stuff segment where you all submit rumors and I do my best to either confirm them, deny them, or add context. And I always take submissions from all of you. Some, some weeks there's one, you know, rumor that you all want to know about. Other times there's five. So really just depends on the episode. Today we have one. Rumor has it that more than $300,000 in taxpayer money was used to settle sexual harassment claims involving lawmakers. This is true. So let's break this down. Republican Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, she's been pushing for more transparency around what has often been criticized as Congress's sexual harassment slush fund is the one who got these records released. And according to the records, between 2007 and 2017, more than $338,000 in taxpayer funds was used to settle sexual harassment related claims tied to congressional offices. These settlements involve claims connected to several former lawmakers, including Blake Farinhold, Eric Masa, John John Coyne, and Patrick Meehan, all of whom had previously faced public allegations of misconduct. The records also reportedly revealed payouts connected to the offices of former Representative Rodney Alexander and and former representative Carolyn McCarthy, which had not been previously disclosed to the public. Now, a couple of important pieces of context here. Number one, this doesn't mean every settlement was was personally paid because a member of Congress was found guilty of sexual harassment. Right. These settlements came through a broader workplace complaint system that covered Capitol Hill employees and included all kinds of harassment like discrimination, retaliation and pay disputes. This specifically, we are talking about sexual harassment, but it's this workplace complaint system that covered lawmakers. But the concern, and then the reason this keeps coming up is that for years these cases were handled pretty quietly, often with taxpayer dollars, and the public wasn't always made aware of which offices or lawmakers were involved. Now, the second thing here, Congress changed the rules in 2018 during the height of the MeToo movement. So since 2018, taxpayer dollars are no longer supposed to be used to pay sexual harassment settlements involving lawmakers. Lawmakers can now be required to personally reimburse the treasury for certain misconduct related settlements, which of course would mean the taxpayers aren't left covering the costs, assuming, you know, the lawmaker reimburses. But yes, this is true. Newly released documents Show More than $300,000 in taxpayer money was used to settle sexual harassment related claims involving congressional offices. Before the 2018 reforms. And now for some critical thinking. Critical thinking segment is a segment I do at the end of every episode, or at least try to do at the end of every episode to get you thinking a little deeper about certain issues. It's not meant to be too complex. It's just meant to challenge you a little bit, get you thinking twice about your opinions, ask yourself why you feel the way you do about certain things. It's really just a fun exercise. So. So for today's segment, I want to revisit the story about Smith College and the investigation launched by the Education Department. My first question for you is this. What is the purpose, in your eyes, of a women's college? Is it to serve people who identify as women or people who are biologically female, or both? When you think of a women's college, what who is it meant to serve? The next question is who should get to define the word women in the context of a women's college? Should that definition come from the college itself? The federal government? The courts? Federal law? Something else? And why? Why does the defining entity, whatever you choose, why does it get that power? And then finally, as we talked about earlier, Title IX treats admissions differently than other parts of campus life, right? Private, single sex undergraduate colleges are exempt from Title IX admissions requirements, but that doesn't mean they're exempt from Title IX altogether. So my question is, is there a meaningful legal or practical difference between who a women's college admits and how that college structures campus life after students are enrolled? Why or why not? That is what I have for you. Thank you so much for being here. Have a fantastic weekend and I will talk to you on Monday.