Lewis Herms & Michael Jaco: California Is Under Siege — Time to Take It Back

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: Unleashing Intuition Secrets

Episode: Lewis Herms & Michael Jaco: California Is Under Siege — Time to Take It Back
Date: June 2, 2026
Host: Michael Jaco
Guest: Lewis Herms

---

Overview

This episode dives into the political and social chaos facing California ahead of its June 2, 2026, primary. Michael Jaco, ex-Navy SEAL and CIA specialist, teams up with gubernatorial candidate Lewis Herms to discuss rampant government corruption, election integrity, the collapse of public trust, and surging grassroots energy in the Golden State. Blending political commentary, personal anecdotes, and activism strategies, the pair expose alleged fraud, media manipulation, policy failures, and a growing “awakening” among ordinary Californians. The episode is bracing, irreverent, and at times conspiratorial, with a focus on encouraging listeners to "take California back."

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The California Political Landscape & The June 2nd Primary

• Jaco critiques both establishment Republicans and Democrats, arguing, “Steve Hilton… is still one party system, guys. Even though President Trump has backed him… it looks like Steve Hilton is part of the City of London crew.” (01:36)
• Jaco expresses concern about election integrity: “I know that there’s going to be a lot of cheating… It’s already happening.” (00:50)
• Lewis Herms is praised as a genuinely alternative candidate with ideas like eliminating taxes entirely, contrasted against incremental plans from others. (01:00)

2. Gavin Newsom’s Comments & Deep-State Entrenchment

• Newsom is quoted on “break the glass” scenarios if Republicans win, implying agency resistance to change. Herms and Jaco allege this reflects a deep state dynamic hindering reform (04:18).
• Jaco: “...these communist vampires, like every time I look at Gavin Newsom I think vampire and of course they’re blood sucking Californians.” (03:10)
• Both argue that California’s entrenched bureaucracy is engineered to resist reform, regardless of electoral outcomes, paralleling Trump’s experience with the federal ‘deep state’ (04:40).

3. The Voter Awakening & Crossing Conventional Political Lines

• Discussion shifts to Spencer Pratt, a populist mayoral candidate gaining traction, especially in disenfranchised communities:
  • “Ordinary people in California, they’re starting to trust regular human beings more than career politicians. That, my friends, is the nightmare scenario for the machine.” (10:23 – D)
  • Residents in South Central LA, typically Democrat strongholds, are now considering Pratt due to frustration over crime and homelessness: “We need help.” (10:59)
• Grassroots energy is rising as people recognize longstanding party loyalty has not improved conditions (11:00).

4. Narrative Control, Conspiracies, and Counter-Strategies

• The episode is openly conspiratorial regarding both 9/11 and election security.
  • Jaco describes his demolition expertise and skepticism of official 9/11 explanations, asserting: “I’m a conspiracy theorist because I have the knowledge of how a building will collapse into its footprint at free fall speed...” (13:23)
  • Herms advocates using math and statistical logic to reach indoctrinated citizens: “I’m taking another tact and proving mathematically how their scenario would be impossible.” (17:00)
• Both discuss the public’s reluctance to accept alternative views, attributing it to generations of “programming.”

5. Media Hostility & Handling Loaded Questions

• Spencer Pratt’s viral CNN appearance is analyzed. When asked if he still believes 9/11 was an inside job, he pivots:
  • Pratt: “… with my fresh eyes of surviving the city’s negligence … I think anytime we see something that’s just so shocking and unbelievable, we as humans want to try to find excuses, but sometimes the excuses are just real simple. People failed us as taxpayers.” (21:49)
• Herms offers advice on facing media “trap” questions, suggesting an assertive, open-ended response demanding investigation rather than narrative acceptance (25:12).

6. Government Corruption & Misallocation of Funds

• Herms and Jaco discuss media investigations revealing that disaster relief funds and Lotto revenues are frequently diverted or manipulated:
  • “They put up these big balloons and they use it to steal money and completely move it in other sectors ... it's all a game. It's all manipulation and theft.” (39:25 – Herms)
• They highlight the misallocation of $2.5B in fire relief, with little actually going to victims, echoing broader patterns of budgetary fraud and misuse. (37:45–44:06)

7. Smart Meter Fires & Statistical Coincidences

• Claim: Wildfires disproportionately affected neighborhoods with “smart meters,” raising suspicions of technological targeting.
  • “All the houses with smart meters seemed to burn up mysteriously ... when does it become mathematically impossible?” (31:11–32:46 – Herms)
• Herms encourages using empirical evidence to challenge “official narratives.”

8. Youth Engagement & Changing Demographics

• Herms is particularly optimistic about the involvement of Gen Z:
  • “I'm telling you, we have so many young people that have attached themselves to this message that are ready to take our country back.” (49:29)
• Jaco sees young “mama bear” activism during Covid as a catalyst for generational awakening (49:54).

9. Public Sentiment on the Streets — Mini Vox Pops

• Interviews reveal mixed support for mayoral candidates, but with increasing disaffection toward status-quo Democrats—even among lifelong Democratic voters:
  • “I consider myself a liberal, but it’s just too extreme going on right now…I’m gonna vote for something new.” (53:51)
  • Business owners voice concern about rising minimum wages and regulatory burdens (55:33).

10. Election Suppression, Redistricting, and the Sting Operation Theory

• Herms describes being suppressed in polls and social media: “Grok just admitted yesterday that I'm 92% suppressed on my ex. Just alone admitted it.” (25:12)
• There is speculation that massive redistricting, media blackout, and voting anomalies could be part of a broader ‘sting’ operation to expose system fraud (58:19–60:46).
• Herms: “If the truth was out there, I think most of them would actually vote independent, but that we're under that illusion of choice system, unfortunately.” (58:19)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “Ordinary people in California, they’re starting to trust regular human beings more than career politicians. That, my friends, is the nightmare scenario for the machine. Imagine that.”
  — [10:23, D]

• “People allowed this to happen. So…she was leaving the city, she’s leaving the state…Not a good time. We have a red fire problem.”
  — [23:13, A] (On political neglect and disaster mismanagement)

• “It's not a conspiracy theory when you start to scientifically go with a certain idea and you do the research and you find that yes, there is something here, there is a there…”
  — [29:56, A] (On smart meters and fire damage)

• “We really should be focusing on the fraudulent elections so we can reset this mess.”
  — [40:14, B] (On full government and election overhaul)

• “All the people that were Trump derangement from 2016 on, now they’re the ones that are quietly going to vote for Pratt.”
  — [07:45, A]

• “There’s just so many things that there’s questions. So to say it’s a conspiracy, I think … it should be an investigation is what it is.”
  — [25:12, B]

---

Important Timestamps & Segments

• [00:01–02:24] – Setting the stakes: California’s June 2nd primary, critiques of mainstream candidates, preview of agency resistance.
• [04:17-04:40] – Gavin Newsom’s "break the glass" scenario, discussion of entrenched agency power.
• [06:58–11:37] – South Central voter shift, rise of Spencer Pratt, breaking identity politics.
• [13:23–18:48] – 9/11 conspiracy theories, use of math and logic to counter narratives.
• [21:44–25:12] – Spencer Pratt’s CNN interview, strategies for handling media traps.
• [37:30–44:06] – $2.5B fire relief diversion, systemic budget fraud, misallocation of state funds.
• [49:29–50:18] – Youth engagement and optimism for grassroots change.
• [53:27–56:40] – LA street interviews, reasons for shifting support, persistent problems.
• [58:19–61:07] – Sting operation theory, election fraud, potential for systemic exposure on or after June 2nd.

---

Tone and Language

The episode is candid, combative, peppered with military analogies, conspiracy language, skepticism toward mainstream narratives, and a sincere undercurrent of grassroots optimism. The hosts use accessible, populist language—mixing humor, frustration, and motivational calls for reform. Herms provides more measured, logical arguments, often returning to stats or procedural details, while Jaco consistently cranks the energy and urgency.

---

Conclusion

Unleashing Intuition Secrets paints a picture of a besieged California on the brink of electoral, social, and institutional upheaval. With deep skepticism toward both establishment parties and state agencies, Jaco and Herms urge listeners to wake up, use logic and math to challenge official stories, and participate in a “red tsunami” of grassroots action. Election integrity, disaster mismanagement, and growing youth activism are repeatedly highlighted as the flashpoints for a reckoning.

“We're going to make a big impact. I do feel like they're going to kind of reset these elections ... So get out. June 2nd, let's make this biggest push for this as possible.” — [50:54, B]

---

Transcript

[A]

Hello, everyone. It's Michael Jacob with Unleashing Intuition Secrets. We're coming up on the January 2nd or June 2nd primary in California. Now, we've seen President Trump, all the people that he's been promoting to basically take down the rhinos have been advancing. We see some horrific Democrat candidates that are being put up. The worst I've ever seen. I think we're going to have, I don't think, I know we're going to have a massive red tsunami coming up in the midterms. Now, part of that we're going to be looking at the January 2nd primary. I keep saying January, June 2nd primary in California. So that's going to be very relevant to our as to what's coming and events in the future. So let's look at some of the things that are out there right now. I've been covering this. I know that there's going to be a lot of cheating that's going to go on. We'll see if that cheating goes to level. It's already happening. Lewis Herms is by far the best candidate that's out there. I see other candidates still. Steve Hilton basically stealing a lot of the points that Lewis came up with because they're so good. But he's still not as good in his points as Lewis is. He's talking about tax reform and so forth. Lewis has talked about completely doing away with taxes and Steve Hilton is only going to do away with taxes up to a certain point. He's still one party system, guys.

[B]

All right.

[A]

Even though President Trump has backed him, he had other choice. It's, he was the best of a bunch of knuckleheads. Right. So I think he's, it looks like Steve Hilton is part of, he's British, part of the City of London crew. So I don't know, will he win? Will Lewis somehow be able to move ahead? Remains to be seen. Now, we've seen Pratt has done really well and we're going to talk about that now. But first of all, let's look at what could happen now. We could have a clean Republican suite in California, but listen to what Gavin Newsom says and we're going to talk about his comments and what that could mean, just like what it meant for Donald Trump in his first term.

[C]

All of agencies, we can shape the future. There's still a lot of, look, I've said this before. It's all repeated. I don't anticipate this need to be the case. But there is a like break the glass scenario and there's many People.

[A]

All right, I want you to listen to what he says. He said just quite, didn't quite get it to that point. I thought I had it. But he's going to mention we have agencies. Right. Key point. So I'll just kind of front load this a little bit and you can listen to what he's going to say. So if we have worst case scenario which he's thinking the Republicans win, God forbid the people of California want this to happen. But if in the worst case scenario for Democrats, of course these communist vampires, like every time I look at Gavin Newsom I think vampire and of course they're blood sucking Californians and Californians, some, a lot of them for a long time have let the vampire in. They just didn't. They just thought they were doing the right thing. Let them, let, let themselves get blood sucked. Right. But people are starting to wake up to it. They're tired of getting their money stolen from them. It's not going into programs they've been lied to. They were going into. It's these political elites in California which are all Democrats are running the whole state now. There's hardly any Republicans left. And will that become even worse going forward? It's a possibility. But if it doesn't, if like I'm saying, we do get unfortunately hopefully some Republicans that move into positions to start to turn things around, will all of the agencies that Newsom is talking about work with them? I think not. And he's telling us what's going to happen.

[B]

We don't treat regretting.

[C]

We, we all have agencies, we can shape the future. There's still a lot. Look, I've said this before so I'll repeat it. I don't anticipate this need to be the case, but there is a like break the glass scenario and there's many people that have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out. And we're going to do everything to make sure that doesn't.

[A]

So again, God forbid that the people of California are tired of the, the incredible incompetence, to put it lightly, of the Democrat Party in California and they vote in somebody that could possibly change the future for them. Democrats that are heavily involved in lots of agencies just happened when Trump came in his first term Russia hoax two times they tried to impeach him. It was like that whole presidency was almost. He could barely get anything done and then you had rhinos that were backstabbing him like Caesar. It's like you're crazy. It's unbelievable the level of incompetence and entitlement that the Democrats have the entitlement to. They are. They should be in charge of our lives, not us. Right? That's communist system, guys. So we have to fight back against this at every level because they have entrenched themselves. We trusted them. We thought that you guys get in, you work your side. The Republicans going again, they work their side. That used to be the way it is. It's not like that anymore. Right. So the deep state has basically completely entangled octopus themselves around Democrat Party and squeezed Democrat party to the point where they're completely manipulated. Like Pinocchio puppet. Pinocchio, right. They lie and their noses are long and it's, like, ridiculous, Right? So let's look at some more of this. It's obvious. It's obvious that people are done. It's obvious. It looks to me like 2016 for President Trump. Now, I lived in California then. And you quietly voted for Trump, right, Because you had radical liberals that would get in your face and probably break the lights of your car. If you had a pro Trump sticker or something like that, you just knew it. You didn't wear pro Trump shirts or hats or anything back then. You would have these radical liberals that would physically assault you. And you're like, are you were scared? No, I wasn't scared. I knew that if I, like, knock these knuckleheads out, that there was a system that would probably come after me.

[B]

Me.

[A]

So you're a big, bad Navy SEAL and somebody was, like, assaulting, threatening you with your life, and you, like, protected yourself. How dare you? That's the way the system is for these Democrats, guys. It's horrific, horrific, horrible. I just make it up as I go along sometime. But it's fun, fun with words. So this is amazing. All right, so this is South Central, very liberal, black, and always vote Democrat. Maybe not this time. So it's almost flipped now. So all the people that were Trump derangement from 2016 on, now they're the ones that are quietly going to vote for Pratt.

[D]

Consultants across Los Angeles choking on their oat milk lattes because this was not supposed to happen. The political machine, they thought that Spencer Pratt was just some reality TV punchline, a meme candidate, somebody they could just laugh off while Karen Bass kept talking about experience for the 9,017th time, like she was applying, applying for assistant manager at Chili's. But then something happened that just completely terrified the establishment. People actually started listening to him. Not because he sounded polished and probably because he didn't Sound polished is why they listen, right? Not because he talks like a consultant built robot assembled in Sacramento basement, but because he sounds normal. And when Spencer Pratt walked through neighborhoods politicians usually avoid, like a gym membership in January, people started crowding around him. Phones came out, social media exploded. Suddenly the clips were everywhere. And then of course, the panic started immediately because Democrat elites, they understand something very dangerous is happening right now.

[E]

I love the black party. I've been speaking to Spencer. I said, get the South Central, get the South Central. And he sent me a flyer right as I was saying it. I was like, oh, oh, he's coming, this is it. And I loved it. I grew up in St. Louis, Missouri, the inner city. And so I couldn't even imagine having something like this. So this is just beautiful. Just to get the community together, just to show people that he's for all of la, not just some of it, not just parts, but all of la, that he's going to represent the entire city. We can look back, we can go decades, candidates avoid cities like this, areas like this. Where I'm from, in St. Louis, it was called the state streets. Politicians avoided the state streets at all costs. And so him coming out, he's showing that I care. He knows exactly what neighborhood this is. That's exactly why he's here. And so that's just. I'm honored to even be here. My main thing is just for Spencer to just keep going, keep spreading your message, keep bringing hope and positivity to the people out here for the other candidates. You were in office this entire time. Why did you not stop the issues that were happening? Something like in LA, we have black people are 8% of the population, but 35% of the homeless. We have a black man in office. Do you not see your people out there suffering? Spencer Press wants the suffering to stop. We want the suffering to stop. So that's what today is about and is showing that we're going to come to the place where people avoid. This is a new Los Angeles.

[D]

Ordinary people in California, they're starting to trust regular human beings more than the career politicians. And that, my friends, is the nightmare scenario for the machine. Imagine that.

[A]

Right?

[D]

So now here's where the story gets really nuclear. Because this viral moment wasn't just Spencer Pratt walking in the South Central. It was what people started saying once the camera started rolling. Residents, they blasted the condition of Los Angeles right in front of them. Crime and homelessness and drug addiction, unsafe streets, businesses collapsing, kids growing up around tents and needles. And then came the line that hit Like a freight train. We need help.

[B]

That's it.

[D]

Raw, simple, real. And suddenly the entire identity politics game started falling apart. On camera because voters weren't talking about race, they weren't talking about party slogans. They were talking about survival, safety, their neighborhoods, their children. And this is what really made this moment so dangerous for Democrat leadership. For years. Tell me if I'm wrong guys. For years voters were told that they had to stay loyal no matter what, stay loyal to the party, vote Democrat no matter what. But now people are looking around, they're saying, wait a second, we've been voting this way forever. Why does everything keep getting worse? Folks are waking up here guys, and

[A]

let's be honest here, supposed to waking up and it's, it's a wonderful thing to see and, but not everybody, but it's sometimes we're not going to get everybody awake. It's just the way it is. I look at people that just recently, this man, 40 year old man, but back in the day, back in 911 day, he was probably about, I don't know, 15, 17 or something like that. I'm, I'm in my 30s back then, so now 35, 37 I think it was and now I'm 65. So I've lived through this, I've seen this. I watched 911 and I watched the towers collapse, the two towers. And then a lot of people forget, because that wasn't part of the narrative, that there was a third tower that collapsed as well. It was a third tower that collapsed, it was not hit by any jets. Right. And it was just some stuff that fell off of one of the other buildings and landed on it, fire started and it collapsed in its footprint at free fall speed just like the other two towers. So I'm a demolition expert in the SEAL teams and when I saw that, when I first saw the first tower coming down, it's like somebody got in there. Planet demolitions. There's no way a tower falls a free fall speed perfectly in this footprint. You can take the word of someone like myself and call it a conspiracy theory, which a lot of people still do. So some, a lot of people are still stuck in 9 11. The narrative, it, it baffles me, but I can see why that is. This one gentleman that I'm speaking of had all these friends that were New York police and cops and so forth, firefighters that he knew that had died that day. So to honor them, he doesn't go down the conspiracy theory line because he wants to honor them. And he thinks that if he goes down the conspiracy theory line. That dishonors them because it brings up another narrative. We want to focus on the narrative where they died doing something of service to others. Yes, they did die of service to others. But I'm someone that, I want to hunt down the people that did this and bring the truth. So when you, when you latch onto a narrative like that is not based in truth and you want to discount, which a lot of people still do, unfortunately, the real narrative and saying that anyone that doesn't accept the narrative is a conspiracy theorist. I'm a conspiracy theorist because I have the knowledge of how a building will collapse into its footprint at free fall speed. I know this. So with all my background as an ad seal, 35 years serving our country, I'm a conspiracy theorist. We have a lot of people to wake up and we have a lot of people still to wake up in California. Right. So we have an expert like myself that's here to help us unwind some of this for California.

[B]

Governor, you're talking right in my wheelhouse. Actually, I, I was doing some math today. Today on this exact subject.

[A]

Wow.

[B]

Let's talk about symbiotic and you know, I'm all about the math.

[A]

Yeah, you good. You've done a good job with it. Thank you.

[B]

There were. Here's what's interesting, and this is about the most compelling thing I even got AI to. To. To admit that based on this following content I'm going to give you right now, that it was, it is a conspiracy. That's how powerful what I'm going to tell you is right now. So the total passengers that passed away, quote unquote, hitting the towers. Right. That's a whole nother story. According to the narrative, would have been 157, or I think including the flight attendants and everybody, 157 total. Think about that. The total. Out of all the hijackers, there were supposedly nine, Right. Yet now here's the math. There were four passports from hijackers found during these terrorist attacks. Four of them. So four out of nine. There were zero identifications or passports found from the two planes that hit the Twin Towers.

[A]

Oh, my God. How about that? Oh, good. Good job. I see where you're going with this. It's amazing.

[B]

So I love math and I just did this with the elections right now

[A]

and there was like, it was, it was obviously stolen. So fantastic, 55 trillion to one.

[B]

So I said, you know what, let me do the math on something else.

[E]

Yeah.

[B]

So how is it possible that four passports ports out of the nine supposedly terrorist attackers were found, by the way, undamaged. And AIs couldn't say one of them had fuel on it. Whatever. Okay, so four out of nine were undamaged, yet zero of the passengers, passports or identifications were.

[A]

Were found.

[B]

There's your answer right there. It is. It is a trillion to 1, quadrillion to 1. Whatever the number is. That wouldn't even be possible. So when I asked AI this today, I said, based on Occam's razor, what's more likely a conspiracy, A or B, your narrative on how the towers fell? Because it was. I was talking about how the towers fell. That was my conversation and it flipped it, it said, you are right, it would be a conspiracy is more likely based on using Occam's razor. So I'm telling you this is the way I'm taking all of this and I know I'm giving it away and somebody's probably gonna steal this idea too is in the next coming weeks I'm gonna just use math with all of this stuff because here's where I think we all made a mistake. Because we have discernment, because we can see the truth, because we want to get out to the truth. We go right to it's election fraud. We go right to it's a conspiracy, it's free for all demolition. It's obvious, right? The challenge is what we're missing is people have been indoctrinated for well over a hundred years through generations. Us saying that is just blank to them. They cannot assimilate the information. So I'm taking another tact and proving mathematically how their scenario would be impossible. Now that should open them up to say, okay, then what really did happen? And I think the mistake of all of us truthers is we went right to the truth. And sometimes you have to figure a way to speak their truth, which is in their mind, science and math. And therefore it gives us an opportunity to bring in the real truth. So this is the tact I'm taking moving forward.

[A]

Yeah, very good. And of course the most secure and safe and great person election in history. So these narratives come at us. It's conspiracy theory if you believe that the 911 attack was anything other than the planes crashing into them. So it's okay. So they still have that. They build that narrative over and over and they show the aircraft blasting into the blowing up and with all that fuel blowing up and crashing into the building magically. Those four passports flew out only from terrorists, but not from any of the other Passengers. It was great way you came up with that. Now I want you to listen to this because I prepared it for you and I didn't even know that you had done that. So this is amazing the way this is going to work out. So I want you to listen. The way they basically come at Spencer Pratt, of course this is CNN try and set them up and they talk about 9 11. So brilliant that you are tapped in like this. Let's listen to this little clip and I want to get your comments on this, how you would have responded. I, I just talked about how I would respond. I'm my background's Navy seal, demolitions, blah blah blah. Three towers fell, not two. And I would ask that question first. How many towers fell? And usually you're going to get two. And they fell in 110 minutes. That's pretty quick. Hey, but what about that third building and the one that the BBC said what, 20, 40 minutes before it fell? They said it was, it had already fallen. A lot of them in the background right behind them. So they're giving narratives. We could break all this stuff down for people. But like I said, people are stuck on a certain narrative and it's hard for them to get out of it because it's been programmed into them so many times they don't know how to get outside of it.

[F]

So let's listen to this and something incredible happened. Emerson College yesterday releasing their latest poll from the 27th to the 28th. So the last two days showing Spencer Pratt leading in dark solid blue Los angeles, Pratt with 35%, Karen Bassett 33% and 16% undecided. Now the media, they want you to laugh at Spencer Pratt the same way they did during 2015 with President Trump. He's just the TV guy, a reality TV personality, just like Donald Trump. In fact, CNN this morning they tried doing the bidding of the Kieran Bass campaign. They invited Spencer on for an interview to talk about your campaign, Spencer to talk about the race. Tell us how you think people in LA are feeling right now. And he went on CNN and guess what happened? Jake Tapper tries trapping him, asking him about comments he made 20 years ago about 9 11. Do you think September 11th Spencer was an inside job? Something LA voters would obviously be turned off by? Watch what happens.

[A]

Do you still think that 911 was an inside job?

[G]

What I've learned almost 20 years later is it's actually the negligence of the people in power. I would have loved to have gone along with when my house burned down and my parents house burned out everyone saying it was lasers, it was a land grab, it was just like Maui. But it's not. The reality is people in charge fail us as taxpayers. And when you're listening that audio, that's a 21, 22 year old person. I'm now 42 and have experienced city negligence, state negligence, and I've learned a lot about. It's actually worse than a conspiracy. It's that we have people in charge that make mistakes that get people killed. So unfortunately, I was young and naive to understanding how there is people that will fail citizens across the board. And I would have to go back and look at all that. I haven't watched any of those things in 20 years or whatever. But I bet now with my fresh eyes of surviving the city's negligence that burned 12 people in my neighborhood alive, 7,000 structures, seeing how fast the Internet was said, that was a conspiracy, and how I had to be like, no, this is how it happened. This and this. Now with new fresh eyes, I'm sure I would look at that a lot different. I think anytime we see something that's just so shocking and unbelievable, we as humans want to try to find excuses, but sometimes the excuses are just real simple. People failed us as taxpayers.

[A]

Perfect. All right, so, Kendall, where we're just going. Your commentary, I think was pretty apropos. As far as he took attack, that's very political, but still breaching the problem areas. People allowed this to happen. So Kara Bass, she told her bar chief that she was leaving town, she was leaving the city, she's leaving the state. She didn't say she was going to. God, if she was leaving a country. She didn't even tell him that. Or he, she, whatever the fire chief was. So the fire chief is, this is not a good time. We have a red fire problem, possibly. And so of course, Karen left anyway and then the fire happened. It's interesting how that same scenario where the people in charge that would make decisions in Maui had also left. So we see pattern in all this. But we can't claim conspiracy theory because that would be wrong because it would be sensitive over sensitive for sensitive people. So we keep it in a category in a frame that people can understand and not get all hurt about, but hurt. But that's my language. That's the way I talk. I'm an AV seal. I'm an upper dragger. I go after the enemy and kill the enemy. I engage with the enemy. So the enemy, unfortunately, I'm fighting the enemy overseas. And the enemy is even worse here in the United States now. So it's hard for me to stay calm and cool. Right, but you have done a really good job of it. How would you have responded to. Let's say you are. You went on cnn. Now, if you went on cnn, you would be at the, at that point, you would be number one for governor right now. There would be no one to cut you. We know that you've been suppressed. It's. Is that a conspiracy theory? All right, so all these conspiracy theories, they hurt people, so we can't go there.

[B]

What would you say first, not a theory anymore. Grok just admitted yesterday that I'm 92% suppressed on my ex. Just alone admitted it. So put that one out the window. Facebook admitted that their employee took me off of a poll. So it's never a conspiracy anymore. Right, but the way I would have approached it with that question, and I would say it's fascinating that you would answer the question because it literally has nothing to do with California. I said so it's very clear what your objective to do is try to smear me of some sort. But I'm going to answer this anyways. And so I would ask you, is, should we be shamed in asking questions about something that seems so nefarious? Is that what you're suggesting? I would suggest that we should ask it many questions. And I would suggest that our government would always be more open to suggestions. In fact, I just think, is it not weird though that nobody Knew about Tower 7 Felling, falling? Is that not a great question? Did you know that the BBC announced Tower 7 falling 26 minutes before it actually fell? Did you know that the plane did not hit Tower 7, but it fell anyways? Did you know it was on. On fire and abandoned? Did you know that somebody actually said pull it as if it was demolition? I'd say there's just so many things that there's questions. So to say it's a conspiracy, I think. I think it's an investigation is what it is. You can call it conspiracy if you want, or say I call it conspiracy. I know it should be an investigation. I'll give you another one. We know something weird happened in Paradise. We know something weird happened in Maui. We know there's weird connections there. But how about this one for the Palisades? It's just basic math. On Edison International in 2012, they posted that they are going to put smart meters in houses in 12 to 14 cities out of 97 cities in LA and Ventura County. Ironically, mathematically, it may seem impossible, but those are the same 12 cities that burn down, the other ones are untouched. I don't know if there's something there, but wouldn't you agree we shouldn't just buy the narrative anymore and we should really start asking questions.

[A]

Wow, that's. It should be governor. It should be president. God, that's brilliant. Good job. I never would have came up with that. So that's why I'm not running. But I look at some other. I look at a lot of things and see people in our chat, they're like, of course. Course, Lewis should be the governor. He's far and above everybody else. You look at Karen Bass, you look at all the people that were AOC or Gavin Newsome or some of these other people that may be running for president, and you're like, they just pick dumb people. It's very obvious these people are not intelligent. They don't speak intelligently. They don't. They don't respond to questions like you just did intelligently. That was out of the blue that I came out of that for you. And that was like, absolutely brilliantly. Everybody should share that. That was brilliant. Good job. I'm gonna put that in a clip and share that everywhere. It's gonna get a lot of views.

[D]

Why.

[A]

Why do they do that?

[B]

Why do they. Let me ask you a question.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

If you're dumb, which you're not, and if I'm dumb, which I hope to not be one day, but. So if we're not dumb. But if we are dumb, right, and somebody comes and they said, we're going to make you a millionaire, just do what we. We say, guaranteed. What are these dummies going to do? They're going to go along with it.

[A]

Absolutely.

[B]

And then they say, and if you do anything, we're going to take out your family, we're going to expose you, it's going to be the absolute worst. You're going to just absolutely wish that you'd never lived. Okay, I'll take a million dollars. Because they are dumb. And they don't think about the ramifications because people. People that do not think about out of the box or the ramifications of anything. I would say Marxists are like that. They think, what's in it for me today? But they don't think about playing it out and seeing what's down the road. It's the same mentality. So they don't think how bad their life can be when they're under a control mechanism. Right. All they think about is, I can have this car and this house and travel and I can get the exposure that I always wanted because I know I'm a knucklehead. Yeah, they're going to take it. So those people are really easy to find. But here's the funniest part. What people don't understand and they need to realize is these people are tracked from when they're very young. Yeah, very young. And they capture them when they're primed to be captured. Probably right after Knee Pat Harris took care of Willie Brown. Yeah, that would be, that would be an example.

[A]

Now I've spoken to a woman that comes to your events and she had a very high end house, I think in Palisades. I'm not sure exactly where it was, but she showed me her house and she had watched my program years before. Right. Me and Patty Greer talked about smart meters in Colorado in January where they had this fire and it seemed like all the houses with smart meters seemed to burn up mysteriously. And those that didn't, if they didn't have a smart meter. Now she made sure she didn't have a smart meter in her house and she told everyone in her neighborhood, there's only one other person and I'm not going to name names, but he's. You would know his name if I said it. And he took off his smart meter, all the other houses burned. So it's not a conspiracy theory when you start to scientifically go with a certain idea and you do the research and you find that yes, there is something here, there is a there and we further research. You go around the country, you go into Canada, you go wherever you want and you can find that smart meters seem to have their houses burned more often than those without. What are your thoughts?

[B]

Yeah, my first film ever is called 2020 Vision, which I did six years ago. And the theme inside of that is when does it become mathematically impossible? And that's what we're, that's what we're dealing with in, in regards to this mathematically. What are the possibilities that by the way, you can still go on international on Edison International today. I recommend everybody go on there, hit the search bar on there and put in smart meters. If I continue to talk like this, they're going to delete it. They've deleted a lot of stuff I've talked about in the past. They'll do this screen capture, do everything. I already screen captured a little bit of it myself. So what are the odds that they say by 2012 our goal is to have smart meters in these certain amount of cities and that's about 12, 14% of how many cities there are in the area that they're talking about. Yet those are the same cities that burn down. I'm just. Is logically, mathematically, logically, any investigator, even Inspector Clouseau, would figure out that, hey, maybe we should take a look at that. But it goes across the board on all the stuff we're talking about. It just doesn't add up. And the best thing to do is use logical equations. Here's why. Because the, the segment of the population that we are talking about already thinks they're smarter than us. So let's play to that. Okay, you're smart, so let's do the math. You like science, let's do the science. Right? Because it always comes down to science with them.

[E]

Great.

[B]

Let's. Scientifically, let's, logically, let's just take a look at this. And then after that, it's like what you say. So they can even, they can either choose to stay indoctrinated after that or they can make a conscious decision. Now, we have to understand that their ego's not going to let them tell you, you, you're right there, but you spark that thought within, inside their head. And if they can somehow turn around, like it's their idea to expose this, then they're going to do it. Fine. Whatever it takes.

[A]

Yeah. So let's watch another video. So let's, let's break down. So LA is one of the most prosperous cities in America. And, and will that continue? Because Detroit at one time was one of the most prosperous cities in America.

[B]

Great point.

[A]

And it is no longer. It's had 100 or 1.5 million people. I think it has. Last I saw was like well under 700,000. And you can look at pictures of, for and after Detroit, and it's staggering. So we're starting to move in that, that direction with la. And people will say that. I've. I've seen people, and I might have one here, I might have to dig for a little bit, but I'm gonna show with this one guy's basically going around and asking people in LA how they're gonna vote. And it's staggering. What. And I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna frontload who, who most people say they're gonna vote for, because it's gonna be interesting. So let's look at this particular article right here and get your response on this. Because as governor, LA would be, of course, one of the cities that you would manage. You would work with the mayor. And so you would want the best. So would Spencer Pratt possibly be the best Remains to be seen. Soft on crime. LA allows ghouls to steal from Pacific Palisades. Now Spencer Pratt of course had a home there. It burned his parents had a home there, it burned his family. So his family and his friends, he's lived there for decades. They had their homes burned. So now they're trying to rebuild. Now I'm going to come to your location starting tomorrow and I'm going to go the Pacific Palisades and I'm going to video what's happened there over the last year and a half. There's not a lot, there's not a lot of homes being built, but the ones that are being built, where they come in and they drop off lumber and copper coil, do the piping and so forth is being stolen because there's no, there's no police there, the lighting is gone and it's incredible. So Nina Maddock, 65 year old resident, has seen this coming. She tracks incidents in a community spreadsheet, attributing the crime wave to law enforcement. Feeling not empowered to determine. Now when I worked in casinos in, just on the Nevada, California side, sometimes we would get the California police involved because some of the people that had done the ripping off or whatever went over to California and they'd stolen a certain amount of stuff. And so we would contact the California side police that hey, we got a, we got somebody that stole from our casino there. We saw them going down this street, they're heading there right now. And they, they'd always ask how much? What is the value of what they stole? And if it wasn't over about a thousand bucks, they would not respond.

[D]

Yep,

[B]

yeah, we're in a deep sickness is what we are. And it's interesting. So I talk about a wharf waste, abuse, redundancy and fraud in our, in our state. And I say to everybody, I, you know, it's what I hear constantly. What I heard from Spencer is it's, is, it's mismanagement, it's bureaucracy, it's red tape, it's this excuse, I believe that the baddies love that language because they can hide behind that as it's this mammoth unmanageable bureaucracy that we can't do anything about when they're stealing. That's what it is, it's theft when they're stealing we the people funds. So I say when does WARF become intent and not mismanagement? I believe it's completely intent and it can, I have procedures that can be used in every single city in the whole nation that if they were to interact a few procedures that I've already developed, their cities would thrive immediately and we would take our nation back. And that's why I say the micro will fix the macro.

[A]

Good, Good. So here's another video that talks about the $2.5 billion that was allotted for relief for the Eaton Palisades fire victims. Let's see exactly what transpired with that

[G]

2.5 billion than Altadena destroying homes and neighborhoods. Thanks for joining us, everyone. I'm Carolyn Johnson.

[A]

And I'm Robert Kovacic.

[B]

Donations poured in to help those who lost everything. Governor Newsom promised billions of dollars to help survivors. But NBC for investigate has traced some of the spending and it wound up in places you may not expect.

[G]

Investigative reporter Eric Lender joins us now from the newsroom with more on what

[B]

happened to all that money.

[E]

Eric?

[H]

Hi Carolyn. And Robert, you may remember seeing Governor Newsom and a bunch of local leaders out in Pasadena in the days after the Eaton and Palisades fires pledging a $2.5 billion relief package for fire victims. Now, we know a lot more that about all of that money, that a lot of it hasn't been used. And the portion that was distributed actually sent very little directly to fire victims. Instead, much of the spending circulated through state agencies for their fire related work. And we learned some of the money was even diverted to pay for crowd control in last summer's protests against immigration enforcement. This is where nearly $14 million of the state's relief money for the victims of the Palisades and Eaton fires was spent. Overtime for CHP officers sent to demonstrations in downtown LA where protesters marched against immigration enforcement operations, according to this.

[A]

All right, so there's more to this, but let's get your thoughts on this at this point. So they diverted 14 million to law enforcement for another other incident that have nothing to do with the Palisades or Eaton fire victims. What are your thoughts?

[B]

That's the game, Mike. This is what they do. They put up these big balloons and they use it to steal money and completely move it in other sectors. I'll give you the biggest one in California, for example, the California Lotto. The California was the Lotto was developed to add more money into funds to enhance the schools, keep music programs going, give them all the supplies they need and make sure the facilities are air conditioned and they have new books and so on. And so of course, so what happens is you have a billion dollars or whatever the number is coming in from The California Lotto. You would think, wow, this is fantastic. No, that's not what worked. How it happens. These sickos go, there's a billion dollars coming into the education system. So let's do this. Let's take a billion dollars out and allocate it someplace else.

[A]

Oh God.

[B]

And that's exactly how it runs with the California Lotto and virtually every other system that's there. It's all a game. It's all manipulation and theft. And I believe this is not a popular statement. I believe we need to clean house through virtually everything from townships to our federal government and completely reset and get the elections fixed, repaired I should say they're already fixed and get the elections repaired and then we should have special elections all across the country. And I don't care if it takes a year to put the right people that are really going to do great things for us in there. And that's it. That it's a. It's a mammoth that has to be taken care of. The. The good news fraud vitiates everything. So we really should be focusing on the fraudulent elections so we can reset this mess.

[A]

Yeah, it's a Good point. And J.D. vance who's the frauds are for the government has said that if they were able to reverse all the fraud that they're finding so far they would completely negate the federal debt. There would be no federal debt just if they got a hold of the fraud and got recompensated for the fraud that was stolen. Which I don't think they're ever going to get. But it's very interesting memo.

[H]

The Department of Finance in June 2025 used some of the fire money for law enforcement unrelated to the fires. But diverting the relief money for crowd control was pre authorized by state lawmakers.

[A]

I definitely would not want funds directed

[B]

to anywhere but in the hands of

[A]

the survivors who've lost everything.

[H]

Zaire Calvin has been working to help the victims of the Eaton fire that claimed the life of his sister and destroyed his family's homes.

[A]

You're looking at my lot, plural, which we had five homes on. I lost so much. I've been an advocate since the fires

[B]

fighting for my community.

[A]

Rebuild everything Altadena. I had no idea $2.5 billion was designated for fire victims.

[H]

Governor Newsom announced the relief fund near the Eaton fire burn zone in the after the fires and fire victims told us back then they needed the help.

[G]

People who live in Altadena are hoping this is the beginning of more aid and more resources. I would say thank you obviously right, because we need it, but we need more.

[H]

The bill the governor flashed at that news conference was ABX14, co authored by Encino Assemblyman Jesse Gabriel. It directed the emergency money to protect health, protect the safety of persons or property, and expedite recovery. NBC 4 Investigates has found that much of the $605 million spent from the fund went right back to state agencies. The latest figure from the state Finance department shows about 75% of the relief money promised was never released by the state.

[G]

$2.5 billion is a whole hell of a lot of money. And off the top of my head, I was like, no, I don't remember that at all.

[H]

Nicole Vasquez is a community advocate in Altadena helping fire survivors while also being one herself. We asked her if she remembered any fire messaging from state health officials.

[G]

You feel like you got information from

[B]

the state health Department?

[G]

From the state Health Department. I don't remember getting anything from them.

[H]

That's because the spending records show it received $13 million from the relief fund. The department says it used some for air monitoring or testing and spent some making YouTube videos like this one.

[G]

Cleaning soot, ash and smoke damage from

[H]

your home after a wildfire. It was posted nine months after the fires. It's been viewed 181 times.

[A]

13 million for a video to help them clean up the ash. Nine months after the fire and only 181 views. So that's the. It goes on and on. It's pathetic how they steal this money. The fraud is incredible. So the people that have been defrauding the. You. The people in me, when I was living in California, defrauding us, our money, or have been there for a long time. Karen Bass said when she came in four years ago, however long it was, that by 2026, that the homeless situation will be corrected. It's gotten worse. It's almost twice as worse as bad. That's when she came in. So the. These people keep getting elected or selected or whatever's going on there in California now you're trying to rectify that. You're up against some. Some tough, very tough things. But it does look like we're looking around the country right now that things are starting to really turn against the Democrats in a lot of ways. In a lot of ways.

[G]

Yeah.

[B]

And I honestly hope it just turns against the establishment. Yeah. Because. Because the reality is Republicans are just as complicit as the Democrats. They just hide under a different letter at the beginning of their title. Just want to preface back on something I was just made sure of In 2012, Altadena was fully implemented with smart meters. In 2013, 52,000 houses in Palace, 6 at smart meters. So I'm just saying. But not conspiratorial. That's just math.

[A]

Yes.

[B]

So interesting enough in regards to the election and the suppression and so on and so forth, I really don't even know where I stand at this point because the major outlets refuse to poll. They won't pull me. They will not put me on a poll, which is amazing considering the non Democrat, non Republican electorate is 30%. In California, the Republicans are only 24%. So at this point, Mike, I can't tell you if I have a thousand voters or a million voters.

[G]

I would.

[B]

I would have no idea. I know we did a damn good job. I know we went all up and down the state. I know we're battling against a Goliath. And this is literally David versus Goliath in regards to this battle. Now, regardless of what happens on June 2, that's primary day, by the way, go out and vote if you haven't voted.

[A]

There's already been people in the chat said they voted for you already. So that's a good sign.

[B]

Awesome. So now I have three. So here's the good news. I've already figured this part out. Did you notice that Louisiana had something that went through the Supreme Court in regards to redistricting that was overturned because it's racist? Two other states are trying to tag on to that. Several other states are talking about it. We had something called Proposition 50 go through through California, which is the most massive redistricting in the history of the country. Right. And the reasoning behind it was is about as shady. It's literally the same because. Because of President Trump and what they're doing in Texas. That's why we're going to do this here, which is nonsensical if you're really trying to run the state properly. So guess what, June 2nd, we're on completely redistricted maps. Completely. That's still going to go up to SCOTUS to see if that can get overturned. It went up once and they turned it back, but now they're rewriting it based on some information and based on the Louisiana ruling. So imagine that goes up to SCOTUS and gets overturned. What does that do with the primary? They're going to have to reset the whole primary. So I don't even know what the future holds. But I do believe, because I've been tracking it, the elections are going to become paramount in the zeitgeist of us knowing that they're stolen. And I think that's huge. Here's what I see. I see in the last week, just on X alone, there's been more election fraud information that has stuck and when it stuck, not been taken down than in the five years previous. Yeah, that's huge. It's astronomical. So we can see the direction. Everything, everything is moving. Something good is happening. And I'm going to go total tinfoil hat on everybody right now. My wife and I have been looking at chemtrails for years. We haven't seen one in the last 30 days. Something is up. And that was shortly after Lee Zeldin from the EPA said they're going to do a full investigation on this. So I don't know. I feel like there's a turn. I feel like Congress is now finally in investigating the vaccine entries and the vaccine deaths. I see all this information coming about out about the elections. I see amazing young people that are attracted to our campaign. That would just blow you away. I can tell you, since you just mentioned JD Vance and his fraud exposure organization and what he said. His chief guy that's in charge of doing that, his son saw my bus. And his son is very young, I think maybe 20ish. And he came to ask me a whole bunch of questions. We ended up interviewing him for about eight minutes.

[G]

Wow.

[B]

He is extraordinarily bright and awake. And I'm telling you, we have so many young people that have attached themselves to this message that are ready to take our country back. And I didn't feel like that with our 30 somethings, to be honest with you. The 20 somethings, they were raised by the mama bears that saved our country

[A]

during COVID Good point.

[B]

And they're the ones that are coming forward and saying, we are not going to put up with this stuff. I have 14 year olds coming up to my bus, literally, in Alpine, California and says, what do you think about transgender? I'm like, I think it's a psychosis.

[I]

He's.

[B]

And he's exactly. I'm like, wow. So it's huge.

[A]

Oh, my God.

[B]

Telling you we're going in the right direction regardless of the outcome of the election. It doesn't even matter at this point because we're going in the right direction. We're going to make a big impact. I do feel like they're going to kind of reset these elections and they're all. We're going to have to redo a lot of them just based on what the Supreme Court is starting to decide on some things. So get out. June 2nd, let's make this biggest push for this as possible. And if we're through the primary, fantastic. If we're not, it's not even a big deal because there's so much more that's happening that I'm just. I'm jacked about the future for the first time in a long time.

[A]

Very good, very good. And of course, let's put your site up here so people can get involved here. Let me see if I get the right. There he is.

[B]

I can help you with the next two days. So we're going to be in on. Actually on campus at UC Santa Barbara, 8am in the morning tomorrow. I'm not asking anybody to go there if they're in the area. Fantastic. I'll get to speak for four minutes, but it'll be very powerful. Four minutes, I hope. But then what's really cool is on June 1st, we're going to be at our buddy's med spa in Westlake Village and we'll be speaking there. And you get to see what he has at this med spot will blow people away. The best frequency technology that's on the planet. He's got Tesla technology there that we can use. It's just amazing. And you and Tracy Jo will be there on June 1st?

[A]

Yes.

[B]

Good. So meet Michael Jaco. It'll be at Westlake Village, 6pm at SportSite Q in Westlake Village. The address is right there on the screen. That is going to be a lot of fun. Everybody should show up for that. That's the last event on the agenda until after the election. So that should be the one people want to show up with. The owner of that is just absolutely amazing. He's helped cure a lot of our friends of some crazy stuff. He's got brain technology, he's got hemp technology, you name it. It's just incredible. So you're gonna have a lot of fun there.

[A]

No, that sounds fantastic. Yeah. Looking forward to it. There's one other one I want you to. Are you. Do you have time?

[B]

Sure.

[A]

Okay.

[B]

For Mr. Jaco? Of course I do.

[A]

Oh, wow. I know you just been. I appreciate that you are older than

[B]

me, so I can still call you mister.

[A]

There you go. All right, so here's an interview that this gentleman did to a lot of people on the streets of la. And let's listen to a few of them.

[I]

Karen Ballet, Karen Bass, and why Karen Bass?

[G]

Why Cry?

[I]

Anything else?

[H]

No.

[I]

I just flew across the country to ask people in LA who they're voting for Mayor. LA county is the largest economy in the nation and that makes this the most consequential mayoral election since Mamdani won in New York. Will LA take a similar direction or go the opposite way with Pratt? This video will aim to shed light on who will win on June 2 between Nithya Rahman and Karen Bass and Spencer Pratt. I started this channel by asking people who they're voting for and it's good to be back. Welcome to the Nate Friedman Show. We're asking people in LA who they want to win as mayor.

[G]

Oh, Karen Bass.

[E]

And why.

[I]

Karen Bass.

[G]

I'm going to tell you something really specifically every. This has been the last two years. Where in Leimert Park. She has supported the Ramadan Festival and it's been amazing. And I. Yeah.

[I]

So you voted Democrat all your life. What is the specific thing that made you say I'm gonna vote for Pratt?

[G]

It's a lot of things. It's been a process, but that's just seeing what's going on in the city. Right. It's just, I guess the whole woke extreme ideology, I just don't like it. I consider myself a liberal, but it's just too extreme going on right now. I just don't like it. So I'm gonna vote for something.

[I]

Was there a specific cause you mentioned homelessness. But did you see something that made you snap?

[G]

No, not one particular thing. It's just everything. I just see. For example, we had a trillion dollars in surplus budget when Gavin Newsom took in, and now we have a deficit of $500 million. $500 billion. So I think that's a great reason to question what's going systematic issue at Playhouse. Personally, I met some people who have been unhoused. And I think that there's a diaspora of different reasons and places that they come from. So I think maybe assuming that they're all just bused in and are on drugs, maybe oversimplifying the problem.

[I]

I think he was saying some of them.

[H]

But anyway, what would you like?

[I]

My last question is what would you like to see, Nifia, do you with homelessness? How would you like to see her tackle it? You mentioned she had some good ideas. Karen Bass.

[J]

From what I see, I would prefer Spencer Pratt.

[I]

Okay. And why Spencer Brat?

[J]

I think we need something new in la. We need to clean the city, we need to clean the street. Too many homelands to median security. We've tried Karen Bass. Maybe we need to try someone else.

[I]

So I noticed in this next part of the conversation that he was subtly referencing small business quite a bit. So the conversation got to be very interesting. Once I just asked him that this. Are you a business owner?

[C]

Yes.

[I]

Okay. What kind of things for business owners would you like to see? Like, how can the mayor help business owners?

[J]

I think they can help with maybe choosing more things to happen. Minimum wage. I've been in business for 10 years. Your minimum wage has increased like double since we open our business. So the problem that the politics don't understand is that minimum wage increasing, it's okay for the people, 3% increase is fine. But for the business owners, it's related and connected to the workers compensation, was connected to the gross revenue of the people.

[I]

Despite the craziness, like, you see a better future for la? Like, are you optimistic about it? I am, absolutely. I think LA is a unique, resilient city. I think you have the best year round climate. Where else can you enjoy what we enjoy in May? So, yeah, yeah, I'm absolutely bullish on la. And why do you think it's blue? And like every governor's blue, mayor's blue, everything's blue. Why do you think they're continuously voting blue? Honestly, I do not know, but it seems like we just continue to do the same thing over and over, hoping for an alternative result and that just doesn't seem to materialize.

[A]

So I don't know.

[I]

But you have to vote red in order to see any new change. Investigate it all and I'll see you there. People were willing to do an interview. I can only share what I for Bass, Maybe it's like 2024 where people that were voting for Kamala largely didn't want to talk. But it's also tough to say because Pratt people also didn't want to talk. In la, I had the highest rejection rate by far that I've ever had. Only about 5% of the people were willing to do an interview. I can only share what I saw and to me, I am seeing very close similarities between this election and Trump in 2016. There were a lot of people who were enthusiastic, but much like the last interview that we did, they were a bit more reserved because of the potential backlash. If you want to see why there are massive protests in Spain.

[A]

All right, so there is a spot in there where he says that of all the people that would win the limit because he says that most people did not want to say that they were going to vote for Spencer Pratt. Most of the people wanted Spencer Pratt to be elected. So it sounds just like in 2016, I don't know how it was for you, but I remember you didn't wear anything supporting Trump because you get attacked. You didn't put anything on your car that supported Trump or your car would get bashed. And so we just quietly went out and voted for Trump, and of course, Trump won. It seems to be the same situation now in throughout California where people are probably liberal Democrat normally voting and they're going to vote Republican. What are your thoughts?

[B]

Yeah, I think so. I believe if the truth was out there, I think most of them would actually vote independent, but that we're under that illusion of choice system, unfortunately. So I think that it's going to be overwhelmingly, at least, people not voting that are Democrat. So I think what you're going to see is you may not see this complete influx of coming over to vote for the other side, but I think you're going to see a massive attrition of Democrats. The problem is, will we know it? Because if there's election fraud, they'll just fill in those ballots for them. So this may be a bigger sting operation than 2020 in. In my opinion. I think it's something to look for. They've already got the goods on 2022 in Arizona. So what better to put a cap on everything by Getting the Goods 2026. So is that what I want? No, I don't. But I don't think we're completely there yet on the exposure phase, so I wouldn't doubt it. And I can tell you there are some mechanisms in place already that are going to test my theory right after June 2nd. So which. Which will be huge, in my opinion. I felt it interesting, listening to these interviews, that you would have some person how racist is Will vote for Karen Bass based on the melanin of her skin. I think that's sad and really sad. You'd be okay with people dying as long as she's black. If that was in reverse, would that not be racism? I'm thinking it would be somebody said that. And then you have somebody that wants to vote for Bass because she's supportive over of this massive Islamic attempt to take over the United States and the support of Ramadan. So that tells you the mindset in general. Right.

[E]

And then.

[B]

So you have Bass, you have Spencer Pratt, and then you have Ms. Netanyahu. I know that's not her name, but it's fun to say.

[A]

Absolutely. Wow.

[J]

Good.

[A]

Good points, Lewis. And I like your point about this could be a big sting operation that's going to happen on June 2nd. We'll see how that turns out. If. I think it's pretty clear that Spencer Pratt is probably going to win. But will he win is the point. And if he does not win, what will the blowback potentially be?

[D]

Yeah.

[B]

And exactly right. I'm thinking. I think it's clearly ahead and I would. I would agree with you and what the person was indicating that I don't think all the Spencer Pratt voters are public yet. I believe a lot of them are going to cast their votes privately. So we're going to find out what happens. Yeah.

[A]

It's going to be interesting. Thanks for coming on and sharing with us. It's. I'm so proud of you for doing this. It's. I know you did it because God said you're going to do it. And you're like me. Okay. God. I learned not to go against God. So things don't work out so good when you do that. And it's not that God's going to punish you. It's just like he's trying to help you and he's trying to help the world and definitely California. So whatever has transpired through your. You're going out there politicking throughout California. You've been all over California, I think all 58 counties, right?

[B]

Yeah, all 50 counties. Unprecedented. Nobody's ever went in and tried to attempt to interview. All 57 election supervisors were the first ever to do that.

[A]

No kidding. Wow. They just don't get the credit that you deserve. It's sad. Maybe at some point you will.

[B]

And you know what I tell my wife or my wife feels the same thing. I said in the eyes of God, I know I'm doing the right thing. So that's good enough for me.

[A]

Absolutely. And that's the way, like the for agreement type thing, you always do your best. And whatever happens, you know you've done your best and that's things to work out pretty good in the long term. All right, Mr. Lewis, terms. It's been a. Been an honor, pleasure as always to have you on and great wisdom. Appreciate your time and look forward to seeing you on the first and second.

[B]

All right, my brother. See you Monday. Take care.

[A]

Yours.

[E]

Bye.

[B]

Bye.