Podcast Summary:
Voices of Search — Will traditional SEO tracking tools be replaced by AI visibility tracking tools?
Date: January 22, 2026
Host: Jordan Cooney
Guest: Eli Schwartz (Growth Advisor, SEO Consultant, Author of Product Led SEO)
Overview
In this episode, Jordan Cooney and Eli Schwartz dive into the future of SEO tracking tools, debating whether traditional platforms like Semrush, Ahrefs, and Conductor will be replaced by new AI visibility tools. The discussion explores the technological strengths of established SEO trackers, the limitations of AI-based models for visibility tracking, and what truly drives valuable insights in the current SEO landscape.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
The Core Question: Will AI Replace Traditional Tracking Tools?
- Jordan Cooney ([00:43]):
“Do you believe that traditional SEO tracking tools will vanish in the upcoming year and be replaced by AI visibility tracking tools?”
Eli Schwartz’s Position:
- Dismisses idea of replacement ([01:02]):
“How’s this controversial? No?”
Eli Schwartz immediately rejects the idea that traditional SEO tools are on the verge of obsolescence, calling the discussion “not really controversial.”
Unique Advantages of Traditional SEO Tools
- Comprehensive and Historical Data ([01:07] – [01:59]):
- Traditional tools (Semrush, Ahrefs, Conductor, Similarweb) provide a technical “lift” by:
- Crawling the web and storing snapshots
- Offering historical views of your site and competitors
- Tracking keywords and ads over extended periods
- Quote:
“Telling me that whatever sort of prompt I ranked on two weeks ago is absolutely useless for today because I may never rank on it again. Search is so much more consistent. So telling me my competitors ranked on this thing for the last 10 years and now doesn’t is a much better data point.” (Eli Schwartz, [01:35])
- Traditional tools (Semrush, Ahrefs, Conductor, Similarweb) provide a technical “lift” by:
Limitations of AI Visibility Tools
- Short-term and Volatile ([01:30] – [01:59]):
- AI visibility often works by sending API calls to large language models (LLMs) and caching results situationally.
- These tools lack the depth and historical consistency required for actionable SEO strategy.
- Quote:
“AI visibility is basically an API call to whatever LLM and then it pulls back and it caches it at some point in time... That’s absolutely useless for today because I may never rank on it again.” (Eli Schwartz, [01:23])
The Unmatched Value of Traditional Tech
- Technology and Holistic Approach ([03:29] – [03:57]):
- Established platforms continue to innovate, providing holistic solutions beyond mere “visibility.”
- Failure to adapt or lead in technology is what leaves some companies behind (e.g., Moz).
- Quote:
“Moz is sort of an afterthought in this space because they lost the technology race... Semrush and Ahrefs and Conductor and Similarweb, they figured out how to have the technology questions answered of crawling the web and caching the web and making you be able to do a lookup at any point in time to find out who’s ranking on the keyword, what does the page look like? That’s the challenge. And Moz wasn’t up to that.” (Eli Schwartz, [03:44])
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- Eli Schwartz on AI’s Limitations:
“Telling me that whatever sort of prompt I ranked on two weeks ago is absolutely useless for today because I may never rank on it again.” ([01:35]) - Eli Schwartz on the Value of Consistent Data:
“Telling me my competitors ranked on this thing for the last 10 years and now doesn’t is a much better data point than who had an SEO prompt or an LLM prompt two weeks ago.” ([01:50]) - Eli Schwartz on the Tech Race:
“Moz is sort of an afterthought… they lost the technology race.” ([03:44]) - Jordan Cooney wraps up:
“The answers are always in the data.” ([04:06])
Timestamps for Key Segments
- 00:43: Main question introduced by Jordan: Will AI visibility replace traditional SEO tracking?
- 01:02: Eli Schwartz’s immediate “No” and opening argument.
- 01:07–01:59: Detailed breakdown of traditional tool advantages and AI limitations.
- 03:29: Eli reinforces traditional tools’ holistic edge; tech race example with Moz.
- 04:06: Episode conclusion and closing thoughts.
Tone & Language
The conversation stays direct, opinionated, and slightly irreverent—especially with Eli’s initial “How’s this controversial? No?” His approach combines deep technical understanding with industry anecdotes, presenting his insights with a confident, matter-of-fact tone.
Summary Takeaway
While AI visibility tools are emerging in the SEO landscape, foundational SEO platforms maintain their critical edge due to their technical sophistication, historical data, and consistency in tracking. According to Eli Schwartz, these tools are not only here to stay but are irreplaceable for practitioners seeking actionable, long-term insights over fleeting AI-generated visibility.
Connect with the Guest:
Want more SEO insights?
Subscribe to Voices of Search for daily expert analysis and actionable advice.
