Welcome back to Gnostic Insights and to the Gnostic Reformation on Substack. For the last four weeks we’ve been listening to my interview with Bishop Nathan Wilson concerning the Gnostic Union and his interpretation of the New Testament and also some Gnostic texts.

And I want to make comment on it, although it’s very difficult to compose a comment on this long interview. I don’t want to in any way malign or make light of Brother Nathan’s work on translating the New Testament from the original Koine Greek, as opposed to the way most Bibles are handed down, which are just derivation after derivation after derivation of an original translation into Latin, basically.

Brother Nathan’s translation of the New Testament is called The Gnostic Christian Truth Bible—you can take a look at it. It’s free. He’s made it publicly available online, and I’ll put the link here in the transcript.

Brother Nathan’s translation really does restore the flavor of Gnosticism back into the New Testament, because as we know, the Catholic Church and the Emperor of Rome in the 300s A.D. stripped gnosis and Gnosticism out of the New Testament to the extent that they could, and they changed the translation of many Gnostic words into more vanilla type of language that doesn’t convey the gnosis that is contained within the work.

So his is a very important contribution. But there’s a big however coming up here, and that however is this: Gnosticism is essentially a mystic connection to the Father, and so all of our interpretations of what is written must be processed through that comprehension of our relationship to the Father, and the Father’s originating consciousness—the Father as the Source, the Father as the Father-Mother, if you will.

And when Jesus said, “I and my Father are one; if you’ve seen me, you’ve seen the Father,” he was referring to what we Gnostics call the God Above All Gods. So that’s a very important point. If you study the words of Jesus and don’t meander into the writings of Paul, for example, you will have a much clearer Gnostic understanding of the Father and our relationship to the Father, to Abba God, to the God Above All Gods, as we Gnostics put it. The word for that in Hebrew was El Elyon, and Brother Thomas brings that up in his translation, in his discussion.

I’ve always been very interested in ancient documents, especially ancient spiritual or holy scriptures, not only in the Christian or Jewish tradition, but also in the Chinese tradition, the Tao Te Ching being the primary example in my life, and in the Indian traditions of yogic philosophy. So I wouldn’t say don’t read biblical scriptures, don’t read holy scriptures, because I gained a lot of knowledge, true knowledge, concerning the Father through these scriptures.

But the thing is, you cannot connect with the Father only through reading scripture, or only through hearing preaching about scripture, or only reading people’s books about various books, because then you are filtering your connection with the ethereal realm through human translation, through human interpretation. We need to have a direct mystical connection. I’ve never particularly used that word, mystical, because it kind of implies, you know, woo-woo gypsies, and woo-woo new age and this kind of thing, and you don’t want to go in that direction either.

But what mystical actually means is having a direct spiritual connection to the ethereal realm. And when I say ethereal realm, I’m not talking about channeling—channeling as in the nature of the Urantia book, or channeling as in the work of Edgar Cayce, because in my opinion, channeling while in a trance-like state opens you up to any kind of non-material influence. And you don’t know if those are angels, you don’t know if those are Aeons, you don’t know if that is the Father, you don’t know if that is an archon, or a daemon, or a lesser god. So this applies to the Ouija board just as well. You do not want to open yourself up to those sorts of influences, because we can be easily deceived, and that is a trap.

That deception is part of the imitation. Now those early Catholic church fathers possibly thought they were doing a good thing by throwing the gnosis out, by throwing this idea of mystic out, because they didn’t want people to be deceived and led down the wrong rabbit trails away from God rather than toward God. I’m not sure that was their motivation. We Gnostics generally have a negative view of the church in the 300s and thereafter as being about control, and manipulation, and power. These are not godly attributes. These are human institutional attributes.

So I emphasize a direct connection with the Father exactly, or with the Christ. Now let’s talk about the Christ for a minute.

People get uncomfortable when talking about Christ, or the Christ. People don’t want to believe in Jesus, because, well, it’s too Christian, and you’ve heard too many evangelicals preaching on crazy radio broadcasts, or you were raised in an evangelical church with an unloving leadership, and an unloving congregation, and you would be right to be wary. But what I share with you here at Gnostic Insights and the Gnostic Reformation is what I believe to be a true relationship to actual Christ and to Jesus Christ.

So this is another reason why I am not in favor of delving into history and trying to learn about God, or about your proper relationship to God and heaven, and all these kinds of questions through history, or through transcripts that have been funneled through human imagination and human interpretation. This is why you must go directly to the Father. Well, how? How? Prayer. That’s what prayer is. Prayer is talking to the Father, or talking to Christ, or talking with Jesus, and waiting on their answers, waiting on those directions. Yes, it does work, and no, you don’t have to be purified to a certain extent in order to establish that kind of mystical connection. The Bible does promise that God will come to you. God will come to you even before you turn to him. So in order to turn to the Father, you need to turn.

Metanoia. You need to turn. You need to take your eyes off of the world, take your eyes off of your own desires and ambitions, i.e. your ego, and turn your eyes upward to the Father. Now, this is an interesting thing. I’ve been thinking about upward. Why do we keep saying that the ethereal plane is upward? Well, I actually think that that is perhaps a misunderstanding of something we don’t have the word for.

We don’t know exactly where the ethereal plane is, so we say it’s upward because down is the material, and the dirt, and the under the dirt, which is generally considered negative. That’s why I always say onward and upward. I actually think it’s another dimension in the mathematical sense, so we don’t have a word for that. We don’t have a word for appealing to a different dimension. We might as well say upward, or even more profoundly, you know, physics does not claim that this material world is actually substantial. The closer you dial in the microscopes to the lowest, and lowest, and smallest, and smallest so-called particles of our material existence, they disappear. They evaporate. It’s all space. It’s all empty space with vibrations, with energetic movement, but there’s no there there. It probably all reduces to consciousness itself.

The Father is pure consciousness. We derive from that consciousness, so the fallen state is really in its most sophisticated form probably nothing more than stepping out of the essential resonance of the Father’s consciousness. Our vibratory pattern has become locked onto this so-called material pattern, and again, that sounds kind of new age and whatnot, but it’s not. It’s physics. It’s mathematical, and when we’re talking about math, and we’re talking about physics, and we’re talking about reason, and logic, that is, the Word, Logos.

That is the Word of God, that vibratory pattern. So what we’re trying to do is re-establish coherency with the Father, and that’s generally suggested to do through prayer—that is moving your intention off of the world, off of you, and your concerns, and your ego, and moving that intention toward the Father, and expressing your desire to be one with the Father. Generally, what you do is then at that point after prayer, which is your expression of intention, is give glory, because giving glory is the closest way. It’s the direct path to tune into the Father’s resonance, because the Father is the bedrock of glory.

The Father is glorious. The Father is consciousness. The Father is love. The Father is purity. The Father is true knowledge.

Down here where we are, the things we “learn”—that isn’t necessarily knowledge. That is, we could call information. That is, we could call history. That is, we could call language study or philology. Around us in the world, we have everybody else’s patterns going on, everybody else’s vibrations, so to speak. They produce information. They produce output, output, output, output, but not necessarily knowledge, gnosis. The gnosis only comes from above.

The gnosis cannot be mined out of history. So the reason I reject the study of historical Gnosticism is because those were just people practicing what they thought was Gn...