C (45:07)
This is pulling up Christian Scientists. Okay, here we go. So one of the reasons why was that Nancy Astor of the Astor family was a member of Christian Science. And so because she was in the elite circles, she was one of the key people pushing this. That's why at the time of the Cliveden set, etcetera, The Astors, they thought this might be the potential future world religion. Somebody. I saw some article claiming Joan Crawford. I don't know if that's true, but we all know probably the most famous member of Christian Science today nowadays is Val Kilmer. Let's see this. This claims Carol Channing. Yeah. Joan Crawford, Doris Day, Robert Duvall. I didn't know that. Interesting. Alleged. Allegedly. Allegedly. Kelsey Grammer, Howard Hawks. That's interesting. Val Kilmer, Ginger Rogers. Interesting. So what you notice about. Oh, interest. Mary Pickford. So a lot of these early old school Hollywood people and one of the reasons that they did this I think is similar to the model of what Scientology did. Right. Where what Scientology did was say, why don't we just recruit a bunch of famous people and then, you know, that'll dupe everybody into joining our cult. Let's see. Musicians. Bruce Hornsby. Well, that's a weird one. That's just the way it is. Some things will never change. Oh, don't you believe? Anyway, but I guess the saddest part of all of that is Mad Martigan. Mad Martigan. What are you doing in Christian Science, bro? You are a hero to all 80s children. How could you Be in Christian Science. Willow, willow my monan foreign. Let's all pray that Val Kilmer leaves this horrible cult. Anyway, for those that don't know, Christian Science is just like a dumb mentalism cult where they're like, they don't believe in the deed of Christ or anything, but it's like, oh, you don't need doctors. You just kind of like think and heal yourself. It's like. Anyway, this didn't end up catching on, but you can see the pattern here is that they're sort of testing the waters, looking for the future world religion. Will it be theosophy? Will it be the New Age movement that birds the New Age movement? Will it be Baha'? I? Will it be Christian Science? What's it going to be? It's got to be something that can have like big reach, right? Or will it be the, the new Vatican, the monotheistic world religion Vatican that we now have with the Abu Dhabi Faith Center? Right. We've got a lot of different possibilities. The Fellowship of Faiths merged with World Zionism and then the League of Nations, and then the Baha' I movement emerged in England and it formed itself into the Oxford Group, which was succeeded by the Moral Rearmament following the close of World War II. All of these groups played a key role in the formation of the United nations. But really these were all just socialists, loosely speaking. And so we have the aclu, the Committee for Economic Development, the whole House, National Council for Women, League of Industrial Democracy, Social Democrats. Social Democrats, that's actually like. That overlaps with David Bentley Hart, aoc. Right. NATO Institute for Policy Studies, Club of Rome, Cambridge Policy Study Institute, Lucius Trust, Aspen Institute, Stanford Research, national organization of women, etc. He argues that all of these were essentially socialist entities that emerged at this time out of this domain of permeating and penetrating the religious sphere. And they could not have done this without large scale Gigantor money support. But how do you get everybody on board with this? Because even if you're rich, you got zillions of dollars. You can't just do whatever you want. You really gotta have mass appeal and mass support. You gotta have the masses on board. That's really crucial. So the way to do that is to figure out in a scientific way all the techniques, tactics, tricks and scientific procedures of social engineering, mind control and manipulation. That's where mass media comes in to play a key role. And the early phases of mass media at the turn of the last century were the printing press, books, right? That was, that was the main forms of mass media. Back then. And they quickly understood that they could easily control those entities without much difficulty. And so before the Tavistock Institute was set up, we have this very important entity called Wellington House. And Wellington House was the base from which the British government. Why can I not spell? The British government set up its World War I propaganda bureau. So most of the early phases of the research and PayPal won't let me donate to Streamlabs. I think you have to. Is there something going on? Is it not working? I mean, I just had Hades Undead sent a super chat, says I don't have a father. So I'll make you my Internet dad for now. Here's $10 for this dad shirt. Dire going dad mode. Thank you so much, Hades. You should be able to send a super chat through either PayPal or a credit card through that right there. If it's credit card, I think you have to use stripe. So. But yeah, you can send a super chat right there through Stream Labs. It should be working because somebody just sent one. Now, Wellington House, as we know, was this early 1914 era propaganda agency where David Lloyd George, Chancellor the Exchequer, was given the task of setting up a British war propaganda bureau together with the Liberal MP Charles Masterman. And by the way, these are Fabians. Who do we have at Wellington House? Well, guess what? It's a lot of people you might expect Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, G.K. chesterton, Rudyard Kipling, H.G. wells, Thomas Hardy. Now wait a minute. A lot of these people are fiction writers. Absolutely. Of course you're gonna have a bunch of fiction writers and British spy fiction writers doing your propaganda. Who else would write propaganda? And they came up with this thing called the Reese Report. Reece, this is not the Reese Committee. This is. That's much later on in America. The Reese report was a made up, totally fictitious report. Excuse me, Bryce Report. I said Reese. Bryce report Bryce. Of German outrages. The Kaiser is horrible. He's just butchering people. And in fact, it is well known nowadays as even this talks about these are famous invented atrocities that make it an often cited example of warfare, wartime psychological warfare and propaganda. So this is just prop. It's not real. It's wartime propaganda made up at the time of World War I at Wellington House to get support first of the British people for World War I. Now this is again the early phase and it ends up eventually being successful because Lord Northcliffe, who was the owner of the Times and the Daily Mail, was put in charge of enemy propaganda. And all of this is what is talked about in Coleman's book. This is all accurate. So there doesn't seem to be much contention about these main line historical accounts of Wellington House. And this becomes, via Lord Northcliffe and others, the entity that will morph into Tavistock. So again, we're just looking at even the mainline stuff that's not even controversial, but pretty much admits everything that we're talking about. About. Now Tavistock really kicks off when this original Wellington House entity morphs into the World War II era. Tavistock Clinic because they wanted to study shell shock. So we had soldiers coming back from World War I and they were dissociating. They had whatever PTSD ends up being, right? They had. They were having these issues and so they wanted to study what was going on with these people. By the way, if you want to support my stream, you can do so right there if you would it like and share. We only got 280 likes, 700 people watching. If you want to support the stream, be sure and do so through super chats has no is nobody celebrating their BTC gains. I mean, if you want to support me by a bitcoin, you can right here shout out to whoever sent $100 in Bitcoin the other day. Appreciate that. Very generous of you. You can support me there or you can support via super chats. But Wellington House, as we said, was before we get to Tavistock, I wanted to mention that the. The after World War I, what they decided they wanted to do was focus on the 1936 book by Oswald Spengler, Decline of the West. Now, Spengler wasn't writing what he thought was a. He wasn't writing some conspiracy plan. Spengler is a famous historian with a kind of unique theory of history. As you guys may or may not know, that history is characterized by these world empires that have a life cycle. So you have the Babylonian era of the ancient civilization society that was characterized by a Magian worldview. If you come to the modern Western civilization of European man, Spengler characterizes it as Faustian, meaning that man in the west has a Faustian bargain and wants to, you know, control and dominate by technology. He's not calling it even a bad thing. He's just talking about his analysis of these phases of history. He says that Western civilization has a life cycle, a birth, an apex, and then a decline. And he argued that the decline would be marked by certain factors that were already kind of going on in the 1930s. And Spangler, by the way, was not a fascist. I don't, I'm not sure why people call him A fascist. He was very critical of Tiny Mustache Man. And Spangler is a very fascinating character. His books are fascinating. We've talked about decline of the west in the past. But one of the key things that Spengler predicted, and he was not writing this for Tavistock, had nothing to do with Tavistock. But he wrote a famous book where he said that Western man would be his own worst enemy because eventually Western man would allow the importation, shall we say, of large foreign populations who would then take over his institutions and technology and subjugate and destroy Western man, if you follow me. And that's part of the thesis of Decline of the west and other book. I think he has another book too. There's a book about Prussian socialism and then he's got a book about essentially other people taking over our technology and using it, if that makes sense. So that's kind of a ongoing thesis in Spengler. Now, the Tavistock technocrats read this and said, hey, that's a neat analysis and all, but what if we utilize that as a strategy to actually break the west and turn it into socialist world order, which is the only hope and salvation for man. Now this does not mean that capitalism is perfect, but this is a move from an Enlightenment revolutionary philosophy of, you know, Adam Smith's Laissez Fairest stuff to the next phase of revolution, which is way worse in my view. And as even Spangler said there, a famous quote, you may have heard of it. Spangler famously said, you cannot look behind any socialist movement without finding some capitalist supporting it. In other words, if you scratch a socialist, you'll find underneath as you peel away the layer, monopoly, capital support. That's a famous Spengler statement, and Spengler is absolutely correct about that. And in fact, that essentially is the modus operandi of the Fabian socialism that the Tavistock Institute had as its modus operandi, as its strategy and technique. So to all the Matt Walshes and to all the Daily Wire and the normie conservatives who think that there are no such things as long term conspiracies or theories or techniques of subversion and control of a society, the Tavistock Institute is the premier example of this. Admittedly, as we will see, we are not just relying on the claims of Coleman. We are going to the actual texts of the history of it and the actual people who work there with them to craft public opinion, to crystallize public opinion. In other words, I think Lippman has another book called the Crystallization of Public Opinion. Now, how does this work? How do they do this. Well, one of the key things they came up with was not just war propaganda and doing a lot of, you know, pioneering work in that domain and not just studying shell shock and, you know, individual trauma manipulation. We're going to get to more of the specifics, what are called future shocks. But they actually came up with ideas about social justice. So in other words, where does social justice warrior come from? Ultimately, Tavistock. They also came up with ideas like mass manipulation through public polling. Now, nowadays with the Internet, far fewer people care about polls, and the younger that you get, the less people care. But back in the 1920s and 30s, and let's see, when was public opinion wrote so Lippman wrote public opinion in 1920. Now, Lippman, we're talking about OSS, people out of the OSS who here, right. At that time, because people were very interested in groupthink. And by the way, the Tavistock Institute put several publications out about groupthink, how to engineer manufacture, groupthink. They understood that people wanted to be with the winning side and the group and not be an outsider. Right. That was much more normal, I guess, or commonplace in the 1920s, 30s, 40s and 50s. Right. And so they could very easily just make up polls, lie in the polls, and you could, through polling itself, engineer public opinion and consent. In other words, 55% of Americans support going to war. And then the next week, it turns out, after the atrocities, 75% of Americans now support going to war. And the grandpa man voice on the radio telling you that 70% of Americans support the war means that all the good Americans are gonna now support the war. Because the fatherly grandpa voice on the radio told me that. And I don't want to be an outsider. I want to be patriot and support my country. We gotta go to war. Grandpa radio voice told me we're gonna go to war. It literally. Is that like that simple? I mean, yeah, it's a whole book, but like, the basic principle is that just lie through statistics, lie through polls. The polls don't even have to be real. I mean, who in the 1950s was gonna go check to see if the polls were real? Nobody. People weren't. People were probably, I think, much more deferring to authority at the time. And so they could get away with a lot more back in these days as they were making breakthroughs in social engineering and the public had not caught on to any of this. Again, remember the very first page of Bernays propaganda, And Bernays is one of these people working with these people. Remember, we, we've lectured through the entirety of Bernays book many years ago. Propaganda. And on the very first page Bernays says you think you live in a democratic society where you make choices but all of your choices are given to you and your choices are manufactured for you and your desires are given to you and are controlled by an elite of whom you've never heard and you don't know anything about. Now I don't think that Bernays was directly talking about the Illuminati. He's talking about the Tavistock Institute, the social scientists and social engineers working at Tavistock, people from the Frankfurt School to pioneer psychological manipulation through advertising, public campaigns, polling, etc. That's what he's talking about. He's talking about people like Don Draper in Mad Men as just one example. I'm not saying Don Draper runs the Illuminati, you know what I'm saying? Hopefully this we had a high IQ audience over here, right? Remember Bill Gates was seen that famous picture a few years ago with the book how to lie through Statistics. So this is a very well known precise science. This is not wack, a doodle quack, a doodle made up tinfoil stuff. This is all very easily verifiable. Walter Lippmann and Tavistock for example came up with, with Bernays a term that would help the Woodrow Wilson administration convince the American population to be involved in the European foreign conflicts. Remember the founding fathers had an established attitude in America that we would not be involved in European foreign conflicts. This was weaponized when Wellington House and Tavistock came up with the idea of isolationism. Isolationism became a derogatory term when prior to that wasn't anything derogatory. It's just that's the American attitude. It's America first. That was the attitude that was the model. But these people came up with a very cunning strategy to attack and to demonize people who would be America first. I'm talking about back at the, in the 1930s, 40s etc by saying that they were callous, didn't care about the human rights in other countries, they were insensitive to atrocities, etc. Etc. All the stuff that they had tested out in World War I with attacking the, the Kaiser, the posters about the Hun, HG Wells's propaganda posters that he came up with that we've covered in the past. And so social justice demands that America take action and be involved in these campaigns. In fact the United States will champion and lead the charge according to the Fabians in this just world order that they want to establish. I'M not joking. That's from them. Tavistock came up with the idea that in order for this to be successful, we would need a long term plan of what are called future shocks. These would be shocks and tests to the system. This is not dead, by the way. If you remember, I think even Klaus was speaking this way not too long ago. There'd be certain shocks to the system. And if you listen to enough of these people and their lectures and their talks, you'll hear them use this terminology quite often, right? Shocks to the system, future shocks. In fact, one of the global elite themselves, Alvin Toffler, wrote a whole book called Future Shock. That's Tavistock ideology. The idea was that certain crisis, big scale crisis events, shock events are the things that can propel this ideology in this game plan forward. Large scale crises. That's why every, almost every global elite text that we've, we lectured through many of them, as you guys know. How do they always begin? We are in a crisis, crisis, crisis. They always begin the same way, whether it's Brzezinski, whether it's Freethoff, Capra, whether it's H.G. wells, whether it's Charles Galton, Darwin. The books begin with, we are in a crisis, human population, nukes, blah, blah, blah. One of the things that they tested out at Wellington House that was very effective in terms of propaganda was get this, to call the Kaiser the Butcher of Berlin, the Beast of the east, etc. Etc. They come up with these wild sort of almost like, like Trump tweets, right? Like Sleepy Joe, right? Like the. And what's funny is that Coleman argues, and I don't doubt this, that when the United States wanted to go after Saddam, they literally just copied and pasted everything that Wellington House had done with the Kaiser. And guess what? What do we see nowadays with all the same types of propaganda? Assad is Hitler. Putin is Hitler. Hitler, Hitler. Every look, Bob Woodward, Putin is the Hitler of our century. Assad is Hitler. Like, are you noticing a pattern? Like, So all you do is just slap the person that you want to go after up with a heat lurk, right? This is a just endless left tactic. They never get old. They never, they never get tired doing this. And I mean, I don't care who you are, if you're not a leftist by default, your tiny mustache man, Assad regime Assad is using is worse than Hitler. Assad is using chemical weapons. Guess what? That was all fake. You remember when they admitted that Assad was not using chemical weapons on his own people? That was all Made up. Oh, are you noticing a pattern here? The atrocities, the atrocities against their own people. The Butcher of Baghdad, Saddam Hussein. And this works on the dumbed down normie. AUDIENCE. Let's see if we can find any old propaganda about Saddam. Saddam Hussein is worse than Hitler. Saddam is Hitler. So as you can see, this is a, like, literally the lowest tier of propaganda. And they still use this. It's kind of, it's kind of wild. Like they've never, they've never stopped using this. It never stops. And eventually it becomes this. It doesn't even have to make any sense. Anyone who is not Mao is Hitler. You see, that's the logic of the left here. And you could only get to this kind of a situation with the long term in depth brainwashing and social engineering that the Tavistock Institute pioneered. Now, other key members of the Tavistock Institute, they utilize the Halford Mackinder Heartland Rimland theory to be the kind of guide for the Royal Institute for International affairs and the London University and London School of Economics. In fact, we must have a world state to bring in this world order is itself a phrase from Toynbee. So Toynbee, the famous Fabian socialist, British intel, I think it was British intelligence, wasn't he? Historian and philosopher Arnold Toynbee is one of the key figures working at Wellington and I think at Tavistock. So if you're looking for key operators and thinkers and movers, Toynbee is definitely up there with H.G. wells and all these other characters that we mentioned. H.G. wells's book, the Open Conspiracy, is a key text that outlines the Tavistock Institute's plans. This is not for those that don't know. And we've lectured through this book for many, many years over and over and over. This is not a conspiracy book, you understand, this is a book from the very people we're talking about. And it is an admitted plan and strategy from a Fabian socialist working with all of the people that we're talking about. Right. H.G. wells. And the reason he calls it an open conspiracy is that he says that we don't have to hide this. There's no, there's no need to make this some kind of a secret thing. It's just simply reality and it doesn't have to be hidden. Of course, My, my talk on this never comes up, even though. Wait, no, does it? Here, here we go. Greeting. Oh, it comes up on some other person's channel and not my channel, of course. So this is really frustrating because, You know, so many of my talks are buried you can't find half of these anymore. There we go. Amazingly, this one comes up. So I think. Yeah, so here is the original talk. This was almost eight years ago. So we've been talking about this book for eight years. This is a half and half talk or partial talk. Now he has another book that's equally as important and, well, actually there's more than one. There's God, the Invisible King that Jamie and I covered is another H.G. wells book about the coming world religion. And he has. Where's the other one? It's called New World Order. That one might be buried. No, it's not, amazingly. So here's me back when I had carbo bloat with mustache. This is Seven Years Ago, H.G. wells book. Now again, I don't know why anybody at this stage could or would think that what we're talking about doesn't exist and is made up and is crazy talk. When the actual most famous authors and writers of the last century were part of the Fabian Society working with Tavistock, admittedly saying they want a nwo, admittedly talking about all the stuff in their books, and then you insist it doesn't exist, it's made up and you're crazy. I'm not talking about aliens, I'm not talking about Tartaria. I'm talking about verifiable public information and books that really should settle. Like, there should be no debate, given the fact that these are real texts and these people really are who they say they are. But I would venture that I would say, what do you think? 90 to 95% of the people who are awake have never heard of these books, never read these books, don't know what any of these things are about, even though we've been talking about this for almost 10 years. The books are not conspiracy books. HG Wells was a high level freemason by admission, atheist, socialist technocrat who wants to depopulate in the family, have a completely controlled, technocratic one world order, and what's in Brave new world in 1984 is what they want explicitly, end of debate. There is no debate about this. If you're debating this at this point, this is your problem. This is a you problem. So so far in the Tavistock book, it looks like we're on the right track. So far we've got good information. And one little ditty that I was surprised to see at the beginning of the book was that because the UK was so envious and hateful towards Germany, they were really looking for at this Wellington House phase, any Ways and means to destroy and bring down Germany as a competitor to the Anglo American establishment. And so they saw the need first and foremost, as we said, to control the newspapers. Not just control the newspapers, but to control education and to essentially engineer the public through public polling and consent to flip them to be pro war, not just in the UK but also eventually in the west and the United States. Now if you heard my lectures that we did in, in my live talks, you know, we went into detail about Colonel Edwin Mandel House and President Woodrow Wilson. Did you know that the 14 points was actually adopted from a Fabian socialist book? The 14 points was the part of the Fabian socialist model for a socialist world. Now they didn't get all of this at World War I and with the League of Nations. The League of Nations ended up being a failure. Even though Colonel Edwin Mandel House and other Fabian socialist operatives working for Ralph Child were really pushing to alter America and bring it back under, quote, British Empire. Now when people hear this, it's not, it doesn't mean like the classical British Empire of, you know, 1700s. No, no, we're talking about a world Federalist Socialist empire. That is the model that John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes had, okay? So they realized with the waning of the British Empire and with the rise of America and the American revolution, all that etc. That they were not going to be able to rebuild the British Empire as it had been in its so called glory days. And so when you have that early phase of Rhodes and Ruskin and people, they were talking about the white Anglo Saxon man through evolution being destined to dominate the planet. Okay, that, that, that's true. That is accurate. They did say that. And they had a Darwinian Malthusian worldview even then. And it was connected to the idea of the specific Anglo Saxon breed and stock of people. However, this changes as we begin to have the ascent of the Fabian socialist model which agrees with a lot of what the prior model had. But they do not share anything to do with anything pro white man. The Fabian socialist model says no, no, it's not going to be a race or breed of people. That is the future. We're going to select specific elite members of any group. It doesn't matter. They will be the leaders of the future. They have to be atheistic, technocratic, etc. Etc. That's why George Bernard Shaw, one of the key future people in the movement I'm talking about, has a famous quote where he says, when we get the technocratic order in place, you'll have to Come to us, the priest class technocrats, and you'll have to convince us why we should let you live. Because we have a mandate for the good of the survival of the human race to mass depop. Literally. And he says so remember this flips in terms of attitude from Ruskin, Rhodes time away from quote Anglo Saxon man dominance to anti human attitude only socialist technocrat dominance. They get rid of all of the race elements. This is partly why Tiny Mustache man is part of the dialectical system that they want to destroy. I'm not saying Tiny Mustache man was good. I'm saying that that was an older model that these people had discarded. And in fact, if you read the Raw to you book, the the Fabian socialist, whether it's eventually Bertrand Russell, the webs, I forget he mentions. I know Bernard, Bernard Shaw says it, but some of the other keys, they actually say that no, this model is wrong. In order to get advancement for the socialist order, we will actually have to destroy honky man. You catch my drift? So this attitude changes and that attitude continues into the model of Tavistock and the technocrats. That is what dominates still to this day. For example, General Wesley Clark famously said Europe will have to be destroyed. I'm not saying that. I mean General Wesley Clark had some criticisms of the neocons. Okay, wow, great. That's great. There's a seven nations plan. Okay, yeah, wow, that's true. That's great. Yeah. But he also is a proponent ultimately of this technocratic Fabian socialist agenda. Thank you guys for those super chats. Appreciate that. Thank you so much, AC for that big fat super chat. Of course, looks like AC is going to win. But hey, maybe you guys can top him or you can equal it out. I know a lot of people had some BTC celebrations today. We did hit a ATH a minute ago. Did we pull back a little bit for. We're all waiting for. We're hovering around 92. 5. Okay, okay, okay, okay. We're all waiting for things to pop off to hit 100k anyway. And as you may understand, you probably are aware, yes, it is precisely this era of Woodrow Wilson, Colonel Edwin Mandel House, where we get the Federal Reserve. Absolutely. And we begin to get Marxist ideas such as the income tax. And if you doubt that. Are you not familiar with the planks of the Communist Manifesto? One of them is the fiat central bank abolition of the family inheritance tax. Here it is, the planks of the Communist Manifesto at its very beginning. Thank you for that. Appreciate that. Now remember, do not misunderstand what I'm Saying here what guy is wildly wrong? I'm wrong. You want to come on and debate where I'm wrong? I'm literally@marxist.org abolition of private property, a heavy and progressive income tax. Abolition of inheritance. These are planks of the Communist Manifesto. Free education in public schools. Communist Manifesto. So you can see some examples. Centralization of bank and credit in the hands of the state. Guess what? Ultimately that's the private Federal Reserve. You see who, who's I'm wrong or who's wrong? I want that guy to come to bait me. I mean literally looking at the mark, this is the Marxist Communist Manifesto. Now we're not fighting classical Marxists because the Fabians are reformed Marxists who wanted to align a softer socialism with monopoly capital. So in other words, a liberal economic elite was much more effective than these hardcore extreme policies that Marx wanted right away through the proletariat rising up in bloody revolution and seizing the means of of production. That didn't happen. It's not going to happen. And so the Fabian said we want a gradual slow kill model using Money and even H.D. wells, if you guys remember. I don't remember if it's. It's either New World, his New World Order book or open conspiracy where H.G. wells says to the Marxists of his day, he says, you Marxists are stupid. Stupid. He says, do you not realize that the only way the NWO will be built is through capital? He says that don't worry, let the capitalist elite build the infrastructure of a global order. We will then take it over. Not in a one day bloody revolution where the factory workers stop printing the Funko pops and they rise up and kill the CEO. No, we're going to wait until they build it and we will gradually through permeation and penetration. The long march through the institutions, as Gramsci said, will take it over and our allies will be and here's the big secret have always been big capital. Remember Spangler was correct when he said you can never search or scratch below the surface of a socialist movement without finding mega capital behind it. This is the thing that we can never get across to the normie conservatives. Normie conservatives cannot understand this. They will not understand this. This is one of the roadblocks to anything actually ever changing. In order for things to actually ever change, we have to get the right to understand these points that it is not just the boobs in Washington, the idiots in Washington, dum dums and Joe Biden's an idiot. It's not idiocy that's importing Millions of people. It's a strategy. And by the way, Coleman said in the 1990s that's exactly what they would do. Large scale importation, change the demographics boom with a gigantic underclass easily turned this nation into a socialist country. It's not rocket science. It's pretty obvious. A gigantic dependent underclass that's imported on the teat of the nanny state makes the whole country eventually socialist by design. It is not just boobs in Washington. And how can. Why can we not get the right to understand this? Why is this so difficult? It's like it's so obvious if you actually read the actual people. Arnold Toynbee wrote already took down the Toynbee. So now I got to get this book because this book sounds crazy. Toynbee says, quote, if we are to avoid mass unaliving, he means self that humanity will destroy itself. We must have a world state. Now it must not have a democratic form to begin with. We must build the world state. Now that is one of the most important ideologues of the last century. Arnold Toynbee himself. I have his. Was it history? There's AC well says outlines of history. And then Toynbee has another one. Forget Toynbee's book. But one of the key figures that we're talking about here in the British socialist empire saying we must have this. Thus with the advent of Wellington House, that was funded originally by the British monarchy and later by Rockefeller and Rothschild, we would begin to have the Institute, the think tank that would be the seed for which the world would be converted into a world socialist order. And to get back to the character of Bruce Lockhart, We are speaking of this famous British operative because I'll mention just this brief section that he talks about. And again, this is actually correct because I have his memoirs. This is corroborated. We often hear of what Sutton talked about, right in Wall street in the Bull street revolution about the support. Now apparently I haven't checked this because I've never read Churchill and I'm not a Churchill. I think Churchill was a stooge essentially of the same people. But apparently Churchill at one point said, I got to figure out where this is. Maybe this is in his. He does mention a Churchill book at the end. I've never read Churchill, so I don't know which one it is. But he mentions Winston Churchill's book. I don't remember which one. I don't see it. But anyway, Churchill apparently says the transportation of linen Vladimir Lenin in a sealed truck like a plague base Basilisk from Switzerland into Russia established Lenin and Trotsky enabled them to seize Russia by the hair of its head. So Churchill was actually admitting and alluding to the importation of Lenin and Trotsky secretly into Russia via this train and that they had a bunch of gold given to them. Millions of dollars in the seal train or truck transported Linen and his Bolshevik revolutionaries into the midst of war torn from war torn Europe into Russia to deposit them to import their revolution, which was not the Russian Revolution, but was actually exported to Russia. When I was privileged to actually study at Wellington House, this is Coleman's claim. I was reading through Arnold Toynbee's papers. I found then Bruce Lockhart's private papers which led me to the conclusion that without Toynbee, Bruce Lockhart and British intelligence and without the complicity of at least five European nations, the Romanovs would not have fallen to the Bolsheviks. And by the way, Sutton says the exact same thing in his chapter on David Lloyd George. Lord Milner. Lord Milner using Bruce Lockhart as the go between to the Bolsheviks. This account must of necessity be limited to Tavistock's participation in this affair. It will not be a complete account of the skullduggery because according to Milner's private papers, Lord Milner, his aides through Tavistock were contacted through a fellow named Fritz Platen. First Platinum was a famous socialist, Milner was a leading Fabian. And although he eventually ended up scorning Sidney and Beatrice Webb, they were all still working on the same team. It was Fritz Platin who planned the logistics of the trip that oversaw the arrival of the revolutionaries to Petrograd. This was confirmed and borne out by the Welling by the Wilhelmstrasse files of which I was able to gain access. These files were open to certain people allowed to read them. They tallied very closely with Bruce Lockhart's account in his private papers, as well as what I was able to read from Lord Alfred Milner and the betrayal of Russia. Now remember, Sutton says the exact same thing in his book on this, on naming all the same people in the exact same account. It appears that Milner had many contacts amongst the Bolsheviks in addition to Lenin. In fact, it was to Lord Milner that Lenin went when he needed money for the revolution. Armed with a letter of introduction from Fritz Platin, Lenin met with Lord Milner and laid down his plan for the overthrow of the Romanovs in Christian Russia. Eventually, to seal the deal, Milner agreed on condition that he could send his agent Bruce Lockhart of MI6 to oversee and supervise day to day affairs and how Lynnham was handling the job. Lord Ralph Child and the Rockefellers demanded that they be allowed to send Sydney Riley. Sidney Riley. Did you hear what I said? All of this seems to line up with all the other research and stuff that I've talked about. And I am looking forward actually to reading Dr. Richard Spence's book on Sidney Riley. Now I have a mainstream normie book on Sidney Riley, but I guarantee you that Dr. Spence's book is going to have the actual details. In other words, if you really want to understand the last century and what all was going down, you got to read Quigley's text in toto, you have to read the RA2 book and you have to go into these famous spies, you got to go into the Bruce Lockhart memoirs. And although I've not read some of those, I've read the whole thing yet. You have to go through these rare texts like Trust no One, the Secret World of Sidney Reilly by Dr. Richard Spence, whom we've interviewed, same Richard Spence that wrote the book Secret Agent 666 about Crowley. Now did you catch that Coleman accurately here mentions Ralph Child and the Rockefellers demanded that they be allowed to send Sidney Reilly to also supervise the transfer of Russia's natural resources and the gold that were held in the Central bank of Moscow. Lenin agreed to this, allegedly and then Trotsky as well. To seal the bargain, Lord Milner, on the behalf of ralph, gave Lenin £60 million of gold. The Rockefellers then contributed £40 million of gold. Countries in complicity with this and the seal train of fair were Great Britain, Germany, Finland, Switzerland and Sweden. The US however was not directly involved at this time. However, at the orders of President Wilson it was. This is where you get Wilson granting a a passport through Fritz Platen through German espionage operatives to Trotsky. The Wilhelmstrasse files confirmed that the carriage was remain locked. No one was able to board the carriage without Fritz Plotin's permission. The train would have extra territorial status. Passports were not to be checked, tickets would be bought at regular prices. There would be no security issues. And if you remember, Sutton has a whole chapter where he talks about the Wilson administration getting Trotsky or Lenin or Trotsky. I forget who the their, their files and passports so that they could do all this. So $100 million in gold was the price of the revolution. Now why would they want that? Well, if you remember, the revolution in Russia was actually run out of one of the basically a block of New York that the Rockefellers owned and we've Detailed this. The whole. The Sutton book covers the entire history, what each department and building of that Rockefeller complex was doing. They're literally running the Russian Revolution out of this building, you see, out of New York. So it's run out of New York. A lot of different individuals, entities, corporations, people, family, banks contribute. And why do they do this? Because Russia has some of the most valuable resources on the planet. And this was the creation of a whole new capital market. If the revolution is successful, if there's a destruction of Russia, and if the Western capitalist elites are supporting the revolution, then Western companies and corporations who are bought into this pay to play can come in and loot the place. It's not that sophisticated. It's fancy, with all these fronts and shells and this and that. It's just causing a disturbance and looting a country. That's all it is. And that's really what modern warfare is, destroying and looting and then rebuilding and making the people that you conquer pay for it. It's not that sophisticated. It's literally just warfare and subterfuge to take. That's it at its most basic level. Now, to get back to Tavistock. Tavistock had not only pioneered studies, now remember, they got their start through a gigantic grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. The Rockefeller Foundation's giant grant is the significant money that facilitated the creation of what we know of as Tavistock. Now, remember, at this time, it's just Tavistock Clinic, which becomes Tavistock Institute. This expands to be a multi tiered facility, places all over the uk and it eventually becomes the spearhead of, you got it, T R A N Z movement. In fact, the last 10 years. If you're wondering where all this came from, do you think it just popped out of nowhere? Suddenly Bruce Gender is on the COVID of Sports Illustrator. Does anybody read Sports Illustrator? Don't even know that exists. But Woman of the Year, Bruce Gender. What? Where does this come from? Do you think that it just all sprang out of nowhere? No, it's not. One damn thing after another. A lot of things are strategized and planned far more than what the normie conservatives think. We don't even consider the normie liberals are not even. They're out to lunch. They don't even. They can't think. The normie conservatives can at least think, but they're so arrogant and delusional and prideful that they cannot admit that evil strategizes and plans. I don't understand how they. I mean, every normie conservative will have these fetishes about. I love to study you Know, I love to study the techniques and tactics of D Day and Normandy and the invasion. And 23,000 tanks at this day, 43,000 troops are over here. Then all this stupid shit about things of specifics of World War II. But they can't figure out that strategizing happens at a bigger level than a war. Did the strategy and the espionage just quit after the war? And yet the mainstream media has said for seven years that Russia has conspired for many, many years to subvert our elections and to control our country. And all I saw today on Twitter, in the normies, I looked, I looked briefly at the normie sphere. Do you know what they're all saying, literally all saying, tulsi Gabbard is a Russian agent. She was cultivated by Russia just like no evidence. They just say because she doesn't want to continue the policies. She's a Russian operative and agent. It's just ridiculous. No, normie conservatives, not everything is planned. We don't go full schizo. But far more is planned than what you think. And it's precisely the reality of large scale espionage. Let's call it. You want to call it espionage? Is that better for you? Is that more acceptable to you? Because publicly, according to mainstream media, the Spearhead of the TR&Z movement for the last decade or more has been Tavistock. They had the largest clinic in the world about this. Do you think it's accidental that it's all the same goblins I'm talking about that are behind this clinic? I mean, it's like, in your face, dummies. What is wrong with you? What is the major malfunction to where you can't see this when it's right in your face, admitted in mainstream news. In fact, it was so egregious, egregious, as Jack Sparrow says, that two years ago they had to shut all this stuff down because they were just openly trying to brainwash youths into snipping off pee pees. I mean, it would take you two seconds to look up on the Internet, the hub of TR&Z stuff from the establishment. It happens to be Tavasock. Hello. You can't figure this out? Well, I'm a Konomi conservative. It doesn't just. It doesn't exist. I don't want to be a tinfoil hat. It literally takes you two seconds to look up Tavistock gender. The foremost clinic in the world had to shut down over this. Now I wonder where and how they came up. Why would the Tavistock Institute be involved in this? What does this Go along with. Are there any other ideologies that this links up with, like depopulation, like that kind of stuff? So so far we've seen Coleman even when he's making speculations or claims that we can't exactly verify, he's pretty much so far doing good. Like he's, I'd say he's 80% pretty much right. So far we haven't seen anything that's totally hard to believe or whatever. And he points out that one of the things that they studied early on TAVISTOCK in the 1920s, when I guess it was still well and house or whatever. Let's see, what year is Tavistock? 47. Tavistock Clinic becomes Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in 1947. So the clinic becomes this more of a think tank at this point. And how does it become so powerful? Well, not just Rockefeller, but you'll notice according to the public record, giant corporations begin to be interested in their research. We have Amida Bad Manufacturing, Shell, Bayer, Glacier Metals, Unilever, the National Coal Board start contracting and utilizing research from the Tavasog Institute. So you understand this is growing into a corporate level entity that is used or consulted or contracted out to do research. So maybe Shell, Shell Oil says, hey, Tavistock, we want to create a much broader consensus and community amongst our customers. What are the techniques of groupthink and cult behavior literally that we might utilize to create that for our market share? And Tavistock says, let us go to work on that for you. You see, the CIA says Tavistock, we want to study PTSD in soldiers coming back. I don't, I'm just speculating and throwing out things that are probably the case. We want to study PTSD and soldiers that came back from Iraq. Ah, yes, we'll do that. We have decades of research on ptsd. Let us, let us do that for you. So this is what we're talking about. Corporations, entities say we want to create a new market. For example of, here's one for you and I'm just throwing this out, but I guarantee something like this happened. Let's say you're. What's the big makeup companies? Sephora or. Maybelline, I don't know, whatever makeup companies are. Makeup company says, how do we create a new market? Well, right now half of the population uses makeup. The women. What if we can sell the idea that the other half of the population, it's cool and trendy and gender affirming and safe. It's a safe space for dudes to wear makeup. And Jeffrey trolls is promoted to the Top of everything for years. Why is he? Why? Because there's a vested interest that certain companies have. We're just talking about the money level. We're not talking about the big social engineering, just the money level. Okay. Wouldn't Sephora do well if the other half of the population potentially now, is going to start wearing makeup on a large scale? Of course. And that's exactly what they did. The large makeup companies literally start putting men in their ads wearing makeup, TRA n z stuff. So just at the money level, normies ought to be able to figure that out, even though they can't. But beyond the money level, there's a deeper agenda at work. Exactly, exactly. Dudes at Sephora full on, dressed like ladies. Exactly. What was study? Here's the thing. What was studied is something I told you about a few streams ago. In the 1920s was the mini sex revolution in the 1920s. Did you know in the 1920s there was a mini sex revolution? And you might think this, this is not for this time. This was a huge deal. So in the roaring twenties, there was this mini sex revolution, which, by the way, Tavistock promoted and. And was studying and wanted. There was a mini free love thing going on. In the 1920s. The women started moving their dresses up. And so to have and show your leg an inch or two above the knee was like, scandalous. Right? So this image right here, this kind of stuff, and this was in a lot of the movies at the time. And not only that, to drink alcohol. This is. I didn't actually realize this until I was reading this book. In the 1920s, women drinking alcohol in public was seen as scandalous. I mean, just imagine, like the stuff that we think is scandalous is like nothing compared to what the 1920s thought was scandals. Now, I'm not saying, by the way, that we have to go back to the 1920s or we get. I mean, I think some of this is a little bit ridiculous, but wherever on the scale or the spectrum you think it is, like, in terms of ridiculousness, I don't think it's that big of a deal. If a woman has a drink in public, that's kind of ridiculous to me. And a skirt being an inch above the knee, I mean, come on. But for the time, that was seen as revolutionary, you see. So regardless of what the actual Right. Standard is, if you think about it in terms of social engineering, these people are studying how this works and how this affects people at that time for where they want to take the revolution in the future. You see. So the little Revolutions are being studied to push the envelope in the next 10, 20, 30, 40 years. That's the way by design. Explicitly, the Fabian socialists were thinking. This is also. And I haven't proven this, but I'm pretty sure. This is where the it girl comes from. So I think the first it girl was Clara Bow, right? And they realized back at this time, let's see. Yeah, we could control society not just through this goofy, you know, news stuff where the newsman comes on and says 75% of Americans support the wall. It's time to go to war, boys. And then everybody wants to go to war. Well, much more effective than grandpa Radio Voice would be the babes of the time like Clara Bow. If Clara Bow bobs her hair and smokes cigarettes and bops around and whatever she does in her little flapper stuff, that's way more effective for social engineering because now all the girls want to be like Clara Bo. The. The social engineering of the star. You see the celebrity, the star, and then all the girls are suddenly acting and dressing like Clara Bow. And this is so powerful, especially for women. It's kind of crazy, right? And they're not going to pick ugly. You had Clara Bow and then Joan Crawford, who becomes basically one of the most iconic, hugest Hollywood women of all time, right? She follows suit. She becomes the it girl. She's icon of Hollywood and all kinds of crazy stuff for the next several decades. And I mean, I have to admit, she is very talented actress. I'm not hating on Joan Crawford. I think she's. She's pretty just from a talent standpoint. Like she's pretty, pretty wild just as an actress. But the social engineering is pretty much next level. You also get this with what's her face. I can't stand Bette Davis. I can't stand Betty Davis. Her movies suck too. Seem like one good Betty Davis movie. Same situation. She's also it girl at the time, flapper, all this kind of stuff back in the early, like 20s, 30s. And I think, by the way, she became a witch. Her daughter, I think, says she became a witch, which is crazy. Not surprising. But my point is that, okay, so even in the 1910s 20s with these early it girls, they are being studied for the manufacturing and engineering of social revolution. And he argues that, oh, by the way, this is also prior hate to the Hayes Code. You guys remember this? So if you watch, for example, a movie like Rain with Joan Crawford, which is one of the. It's one of the most famous early. I think it's her most Famous early film. This is really scandalous because in the movie in 1932, she plays a prostitute on an island who has these long arguments with this puritan minister. And it's. It's really like the film is like degraded quality, but it's a very famous, you know, old school Hollywood 30s film. This was really edgy for the time. But the weird part was that this is right prior to the Hays Code, so they could actually almost do pretty much rate, I would say, rated R stuff and maybe even a little bit of nudity at this time in movies especially. This is right after silent pictures. So this is like the beginning of the talkies, but then the Hays code comes in. And the Hays Code was intended to counteract this kind of stuff in the movies. And I think the haysco was largely promoted by Catholics. It was in effect from 1934 to 1968. So note notice that date. 1968, right in the middle of the 60s. Countercultural sexual revolution. You get the removal of the Hays Code. And I mean, look, it was definitely better under the Hays Code, but I mean, there's some really ridiculous stuff. Like the Hays code would, like, you couldn't have a kiss on screen. Like what? And like, if you had a bedroom, you had to portray. This is where we get the two beds, right? Two beds. That's kind of weird. So, I mean, it was. It was a little too far on the Puritan side, but way definitely in the right direction of today. Yeah, rare Catholic win. Exactly. I mean, definitely we better rather have the Haze code than like Rocky Horror or any of this kind of garbage. Yes, rare Catholic win there. But point being is that they were studying, according to Coleman, I think he's probably correct, the sex elements of the silent era film stars. And this was before the Hays Code. And this is when they could get away with a lot of more. If you, by the way, if you've seen the movie Babylon with Mario Robbie and Brad Pitt was actually a really good movie about the history of Hollywood. The beginning of the movie when they're doing the silent pictures is pre haze code. And that's why you see them doing all this kind of crazy stuff, because you're like, how could they do this crazy stuff in the 1910s and 20s? Well, that's because they didn't have laws about this yet. Now moving on to the key characters of the phase of Tavistock proper. When we get these research units and they start setting up units that deal with all kinds of stuff all the way up until today. The units are for Example, it says human resources. So I would venture that human resources itself probably comes out of Tavistock. Just the whole idea of human resources is probably a Tavistock invention. Human Resource center, center for Applied Social Research, Institute for Operational Research, British Operational Research Society. Now, a lot of this sounds really boring, but what they're doing is literally giving corporations the structure that corporations have. So, for example, when you go to a company and they have an HR manager and it's, you know, big old fat bitch who's talking to you about you being a racist, that's from Tavstock. When you go to the grocery store and there's a employee of the month, that's from Tavistock. The military, they contract to Tavistock. How can we get our special forces units to have more group think and less independent action? Tavistock, all of this. It's all Tabasox. Now, keep in mind, this also kind of bursts the bubble of the libertarian versus government dialectic, because Tavistock is 100 united with the corporations, and they're 100 united with the British government, the US government, CIA. So there's no either or here. This is a public, private type of entity, what Coleman calls, I think correctly, the world's foremost brainwashing entity. So who are some of the key figures? Some of these. You've probably heard of some of the most important, outstanding figures of the earlier phase. This, or I guess you say middle phase of Tavistock. When we're getting in, getting into the 1940s, 50s, 60s, many of them are mentioned here. Let's see. He mentions Dr. Kurt Lewin, who is also Frankfurt School. Frankfurt School overlap. Major General John Rawlings Reese. Whenever we did this previous talk, which I can't find on or it is, we covered John Rawlings Reese extensively. HV Dix. And who is HV Dix? Well, he just happens to be the author of the official academic history of Tavistock, W.R. bayonne, who has countless Tavistock publications. Margaret Meadow, Margaret Mead, the famous fraudster woman, wife of Dr. Gregory Bateson of MK Ultra fame. So notice now we're having overlap with MK Ultra through Dr. Gregory Bateson, Margaret Mead, the famous noble, savage person. Remember? Did you know? Do you. Are you aware that it turns out that Margaret Mead was a fraud? She was faking stuff. Her research on indigenous peoples and all that, it was all just gibberish. It's all fake. Noble, savage. All the stuff that Margaret Mead was pushing, that was all blunt. Well, she's out of Tavistock, and her husband, Gregory Bateson is out of Tavistock. But these are the same people who go on, as we said, to create Michigan University's Institute for Social Research. And what do we get from the isr? Critical Studies, Critical Theory, Critical Race Theory.
