← Literature and History
Literature and History
Episode 105: Gregory of Tours, Part 1
02:27:06
Gregory of Tours (c. 539-594) completed The History of the Franks in 591. The long book's account of Clovis and the Merovingian Dynasty has been one of our most important sources on early Medieval History, ever since. Episode 105 Quiz: Episode 105...
Loading summary
Transcript9 lines
- [00:02]
Host
Literature and history.com.
- [00:12]
Guest
Hello and welcome to Literature & History. Episode 105 Gregory of Tours. In this program we will read the first half of the History of the Franks, or Historia Francorum. Written by Bishop Gregory of Tours and completed in about 591 CE, the history of the Franks is about the founding and first five generations of the Merovingian dynasty, a dynasty which ruled much of modern day France from 481 until 751. Our author for today, again Gregory of Tours, died in the year 594 and. And so his history covers only the first hundred and ten years of Merovingian leadership, the years between 481 and 591. But oh, what a 110 year period this was. From 481 to 591, Roman Gaul definitively became Merovingian Francia. The collapse of Roman power gave way first to to a failed state in which shifting consortiums of barbarians destroyed the last bastions of Roman power, while also vying for supremacy with one another. Out of this chaos in the late four hundreds, there arose King Childeric I and his son Clovis, the founders of the Merovingian dynasty and ultimately some of the most influential figures in European history. When we read their story in the pages of Gregory of Tours History of the Franks, and as we press on to read the stories of their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren, something extraordinary happens. We see unmistakably the world of the Middle Ages. Born on the page, it is a smaller and more local world than the old Roman one. News travels more slowly. There, checkerboards of modestly sized kingdoms have replaced emperors ruling over swaths of continents. There are still wars, but they're smaller and less decisive. An indigenous European aristocracy, complete with dozens and dozens of named dukes, counts, chamberlains and others, has replaced the old Roman nobility. Languages are evolving as barbarian vernaculars meld with Rome's ancient tongue. And Latin itself slowly becomes a liturgical language, separate from the everyday dialects of bishops and priests. The Catholic Church has undergone stunning expansion and standardization, transforming the defunct old Roman administrative districts of Civitates into dioceses and bishoprics. Orthodoxy and canon law have solidified decisively since the time of the Church fathers Jerome and Augustine two centuries prior. As we read Gregory of Tours, the history of the Franks, then, we witness all of this happening, the sudden genesis of the Middle Ages from the wreckage of Roman Gaul. A new world in which no one seemingly is in charge for very long. There are very disquieting elements within the history that Gregory records the violence of the Historia Francorum is extreme. Tortures, mutilations and maimings appear frequently, along with dissipated behavior from both churchmen and laity alike. To quote the great 20th century scholar Erich Auerbach, in Gregory's most famous book, there is a progressive and terrible brutalization. Intrigue and policy have lost all formality. They have become primitive and coarse. Just as bleak as the violence and disorder were in post Roman Gaul, though, was Europe's first brush with the bubonic plague. Appearing first in Byzantine port cities in the year 541, the the pandemic tore through the old Roman world until 549, although this was by no means the end of its time there, Gregory of Tours himself reports persistent outbreaks over the course of the second half of the five hundreds. And in addition to the plague, climatological instability seems to have pummeled an already vulnerable civilization. In Merovingian Frankia, the worst volcanic winter in the past two millennia happened in the year 536, when an erupt launched so much debris into the atmosphere that summer never came, and famines and crop failures occurred as a result, possibly for years afterward. As Gregory's older contemporary Procopius wrote in and shortly after the year 536, the sun gave forth its light without brightness, like the moon. During this whole year, and from the time when this happened, men were free neither from war nor pestilence, nor any other thing leading to death, close quote Living through a period that was quite literally dark then, the first generations of Merovingian Franks endured an especially dreadful sequence of catastrophes, catastrophes rarely mitigated by organized and compassionate leadership on the parts of the Merovingian kings themselves. While Gregory's history of the Franks then offers us a glimpse of the Middle Ages coming into being, and while this glimpse is often a dismal one, the book also offers strange glimmers of hope and beauty. Wars in Gregory's book, while frequent, never last long. The Byzantine Empire is far enough away that citizens are free of its taxes, its conscriptions, and its marauding provincial rulers. In scene after scene in the Historia Frankorum, a citizenry deprived of a stable state system largely makes do in local worlds knit around parish churches and cathedrals. And while Gregory has no illusions about the moral spotlessness of his fellow clergymen, nonetheless the hundreds of Catholic officials we meet in Gregory's book are largely literate, qualified professionals, a modest but diligent safeguard against famine, poverty, and social breakdown. Though they might lash out at an Arian for heresy or condemn a self styled miracle worker for blasphemy. And though many of them are creeps and weirdos of various sorts, Gregory's fellow clergymen are also more generally on the front lines in feeding the hungry, caring for the sick, and administrating the sturdy little bureaucracies of their dioceses and parishes. In the book's most inspiring moments, councils of bishops convene to sort out genuinely complex political and ecclesiastical controversies, and in doing so they bring some measure of order and compassion to a turbulent time and place. And Gregory's style too, is remarkably unique for the period in which he writes. His sometimes low brow and colloquial Latin prose and his digressive narration in the Historia, though not without their faults, nonetheless show a curious and sympathetic mind more interested in vivid scene painting than setting events within a grand and international framework of cause and effect. Gregory cares about Frankia for its own sake, its quirks, its daily life and its political microclimates, and he considers much of this worth setting down for posterity. The History of the Franks, then, is required reading for anyone interested in the inception of the European Middle Ages, but it's also a challenging book to go through from end to end. Gregory's history sticks in one's mind not because of the brio of its prose or the effectiveness of its organization, but instead because of its sheer breadth and quantity of details. It is a book that one reads with a dynastic diagram on one side and a map on the other. The book's rapid changes in subject between sacred and secular, and its frequent assumption that the reader is familiar with hundreds of named clergymen at work in 6th century Frankia, not to mention 17 Merovingian monarchs, their children and their aristocratic subordinates, makes for slow and challenging reading. Gregory, according to scholar Alexander Murray, has for a long time been regarded as a naive and superstitious compiler of raw data, which he conveyed to his readers in disjointed narrative fragments that belied any deliberative, reflective and selective perspective. As flawed a chronicler as Gregory was, though, as we lean down alongside Gregory over in particular the 570s, the 580s and the early 590s, the incredible abundance of information that he set down about the history he had lived through offers one of late antiquity's broadest windows into how people lived, worked and thought in the century after the Western Roman Empire collapsed. King Childeric the First and his son Clovis, coming to power just as the last Roman emperor was deposed in the west, were the linchpins between the classical and medieval worlds and the dynasty that they established portended what was to come for a long time afterward. Because of the size of the History of the franks, more than 700 pages with notes in the edition we'll be using, we will devote two full programs to this book. While we'll learn plenty about early Merovingian history, we'll also learn about late antique Catholic historiography, history writing as it would take place on the desks of bishops, priests and monks over the next thousand years, the norms of this history writing, and what they thought was worth setting down the most. We'll also observe that while the immediate collapse of Roman power in Gaul was catastrophic in the instability that it unleashed, the societies that emerged in the wake of Rome continued often to look quite Roman. So let's begin the story of the Franks by meeting our author for today. Gregory, Bishop of Tours Gregory of Tours was born in about 539 CE in a town called Avernus. Today Clermont Ferrand is in the central part of southern France, about 200 miles south, southeast of Paris. Gregory was born with both pedigree and wealth, the scion of senators, saints and bishops. His father and grandfather were both of the old Roman senatorial rank, which still had plenty of cachet in Francia in the 500s. His mother's grandfather and great grandfather had both been bishops and saints and uncles and cousins. On his mother's side of the family were also important churchmen and aristocrats. The apple that was Gregory's life was naturally not likely to fall very far from this privileged churchman tree. As a young man, likely due to the death of his father, Gregory went to live with his uncle Gallus, a bishop and a saint. In Avernus. This uncle passed away, and so young Gregory remained in the household of an archdeacon named Avitus. During the formative years between the ages of 10 and 20, young Gregory lived in a thoroughly ecclesiastical world, the frequent guest of his great uncle, the bishop of the city of Lyon, and his cousin, once removed, the bishop of the city of Tours, both of them canonized as saints. When Gregory was 25 years old in 563, he took the cloth, being ordained as a deacon. Ten years later, church officials elected Gregory to replace his relative Euphronius as bishop of Tours. With the approval of the Merovingian king Sigibert, whom we'll meet later on, Gregory assumed the mantle of Bishop in 573, which he held for the next 21 years until his death in 594, the city of Tours, then as now near the confluence of the Loire and Cher rivers, was home to an important bishopric located on the border of the Frankish territories of Neustria and Aquitaine in the west central part of modern day France. Tours had once been the seat of St. Martin, whom we met a number of episodes ago, and it had been a pilgrimage site since the 4th century. The city of Tours, a hub in the fertile Loire Valley, with numerous Roman roads going through it, and one that connected different factions of Francia during Gregory's lifetime, is the scene of many important events in the Historia Frankorum that's on our desk for today. Gregory's position there was a high profile one. The Bishop of Tours, by the time Gregory was elected to the office, was responsible for eight dioceses. In addition to having the devastating prerogative of excommunication, Gregory was also seated in a tenured position, somewhat insulated from the usurpations and civil wars of late antique Frankia. And while the office of bishop came with special privileges, it also came with a lot of work. Gregory's daily grind included overseeing tithe collection, managing reliquaries and tombs, superintending church land holdings, ecclesiastical building maintenance and construction, and paying visits to the monasteries and nunneries in his dioceses. While, of course, he and other late antique bishops had subordinates to help with these considerable responsibilities, Gregory was ultimately the executive in charge of a miniature state, a state with a complex system of incomes and expenses, accountability to both subjects and a central authority. And he also managed the tricky operations of diplomacy with secular monarchs and aristocrats, which sometimes included delicate errands as an envoy, a royal advocate and an arbitrator. While Gregory never did leave Gaul, to our knowledge, he certainly wore out a lot of shoes trekking all over modern day France, Belgium, and once or twice the far west of Germany. The bishopric of Tours during Gregory's episcopate included even more responsibilities than these. The city's main cathedral had burnt down during the tenure of Gregory's precursor, and Gregory spent much of his time as a bishop rebuilding it. Additionally, Gregory put a lot of effort into refurbishing St. Martin's Church, which had also burnt down during his predecessor's time as bishop. St Martin, who again had died back in 397, is never far from the story told in the Historia Frankorum. The Catholic Holy Trinity in the book seems to often be a Quaternity, with St Martin's miracles, relics and holy presence, often working for the force of good in a disorderly world. Honoring this saint, then, through caring for St. Martin's Church, was a major responsibility for Gregory. The church was not only a pilgrimage site, it also served as a sanctuary destination for fugitives fleeing justice. And Gregory had to occasionally serve as a bumper between prosecuting authorities and church laws, offering criminals sanctuary. Gregory then was born into extreme privilege, and he was given an office that conferred even more power and prestige at the same time, though his episcopate was no nobleman's sinecure, but instead a demanding and sometimes outright perilous occupation. Beyond the considerable duties mentioned above, Gregory also threw himself into work as a historian and hagiographer, ambitious even beyond the scope of his day job as one of Francia's more important clergymen. Much of what we've heard about Gregory so far would be true of any late antique bishop. The highest officeholders of the Catholic clergy had stringent demands placed on them, and far from sticking to a script, many of them had to alternately improvise and negotiate for the sake of their dioceses and sometimes their personal safety. A Few more Details More personal details about Gregory of Tours, insofar as they are available to us 1500 years later, will help bring him to life a bit more before we open the Historia Francorum. Allegedly, Gregory was quite a small person. There's a 10th century story about Gregory of Tours meeting Pope Gregory the Great. The pope and the bishop were about the same age, and the pope saying something compassionate about the bishop's diminutive stature. Gregory of Tours also allegedly had a strange habit of mixing himself health tinctures made partly out of dust and bits of relics from saintly tombs, which may have been part of the reason for his reportedly delicate health in the Historia Francorum. While Gregory has plenty to say about recent history and is quite proud of his ecclesiastical relations for their own sake, his presence as a historical participant is often an unassuming one. Nonetheless, over the course of hundreds of pages, Gregory's perspective on things becomes increasingly clear. Gregory was, above all else, an industrious, curious chronicler, setting the sacred and secular the aristocrat and the bumpkin and the saint and the scoundrel all together. In 10 books subdivided into dozens of sections each, Gregory lays out Merovingian history, offering only occasional grimaces at the evil deeds of kings and queens. Alongside this royal history in the Historia Frankorum, Gregory also takes endless excursions to offer local and ecclesiastical history as well, telling us that this bishop was good and upright and that other bishop was a scoundrel. And did we hear about the miracle healing that happened in this reliquary up in this small Frankish town? Or did we hear about the exorcism that happened in this other Frankish settlement? Gregory's familiarity with the ecclesiastical world of Gaul is dizzyingly broad, and he assumes in his reader a shared Catholicism, a belief in saints, portents and miracles, and fluency. In nearly a century of recent church history, he was then a quintessential late antique bishop, a man of the cloth, born into power and privilege, unselfconsciously partisan for his faith, at a remove from the discord of secular politics, but nonetheless overall campaigning on behalf of peace, stability and the well being of his congregation. Like Boethius, born two generations before him, Gregory of Tours wrote far more than the one book for which he is the most famous. In addition to the Historia Frank Horam, Gregory wrote nine other texts in the standard genres of late antique Christianity. These included biographies of saints Martin Julian and Andrew the Apostle, a compendium of biographies of church fathers, two books of martyr tales, a commentary on the Psalms, and an additional book on astronomy. It's worth noting for a moment here that as we come into the 6th century, we enter a phase of late antiquity at which we begin to have a deeper and deeper substrate of Latin texts written by Catholic clergymen, very often bishops, and successfully preserved ever since. While we might not find, for instance, Gregory of Tours biography of Saint Martin of Tours, or his surviving narrative about third century Ephesian martyrs, particularly essential reading specialists on subjects like hagiography and Christian hermeneutics, find a wealth of information in the obscurer pages of these late antique Christian texts. So that's a quick introduction to Gregory of Tours himself. Again, he lived from about 538 to 594. And for many of the key events of early Merovingian history that he chronicles, Gregory was in his 30s and 40s and he personally knew the grandsons of old King Clovis, who were on the throne during Gregory's career as a bishop. Now that we've met Gregory and learned a bit about his world, let's spend a moment talking about the book that we're about to read. Its architecture, its style and its quirks. The History of the franks is a 10 book long chronicle of, for the most part, Frankia's Merovingian rulers from 481 to 591. However, a famous idiosyncrasy of this book is that it actually begins at the beginning of time, when the Old Testament deity created the world. Book one thus covers the first 5,800 years of the world's history. Gregory of Tours reckoned the world to be about 6,000 years old. Then book two of the history of the Franks covers the period from 397. This was the year St. Martin died to the year 511, the year Clovis died, Clovis being again the most important founder of the Merovingian dynasty under whom Gregory worked. And then books 3 through 10 cover increasingly minute stretches of history, often just a year or two. The chronological organization of the History of the Franks, then is odd, but after Gregory gets to book five, we settle down into the decades of the 570s and 580s and get to enjoy some extremely detailed accounts of old Clovis, grandchildren and great grandchildren. If shifting chronology is one of the book's famous idiosyncrasies, another is its perpetually changing focus. The 10 books of the Historia Francorum are themselves broken into numbered paragraphs. These paragraphs are often non contiguous. In other words, paragraph one gives you an update on this Merovingian king. Then paragraph two tells you about this wonderful bishop who lives down on the lower Rhone. Then paragraph three informs you that heavy rains and strange lights in the sky happened up near Paris. And then paragraph four chronicles a depraved duke who lived up in the northeast and eventually got what was coming to him. The book that we're about to read, then is an assorted history offering a vision of Merovingian Gaul through the span of its accumulated details, rather than a focused narrative that tries to tease out cause and effect. Gregory's stylistic models for writing history, or Jerome and Eusebius rather than Polybius and Thucydides. To repeat what I said a moment ago, Gregory is more interested in penning anecdotal and illustrative local history than writing a book analyzing international relations and exploring the greater flux of the late five hundreds ce. With all that said, then, I think we're ready to crack open one of the most famous history books of the Middle Ages. While the text we're about to look at is a sprawling one with a bewildering array of characters and scenes, and while we're going to consider its reliability and contents in a lot of detail, the ultimate takeaway of this book is very simple. When we Open to page 1 of the Historia Frankorum, we're still in the twilight of the Roman Empire. When we close the back cover, we're in the Middle Ages. Gregory's most famous work, while this may not have been his intention, demonstrates how this transition took place Gregory of Tours, History of the Franks begins with a one page preface. In this preface, Gregory writes that during the turbulent decades of the 570s and 580s, with Kings feuding with one another and Catholic churches still vulnerable to heresy and non believers, no writer has come to the fore who has been sufficiently skilled in setting things down in an orderly fashion to be able to describe these events in prose or verse. In fact, in the towns of Gaul the writing of literature has declined to the point where it has virtually disappeared altogether. Accordingly, writes Gregory, largely for the purpose of preserving the facts for future generations, he undertook creating the History of the Franks. Gregory professes in the preface that his style as a writer of prose isn't very impressive, but all the same, that straightforward, simple prose is comprehensible to a larger audience than prose with a lot of filigree and polish. Gregory then announces that he'll begin his story at the very beginning with the creation of the world, and quotes in this episode, by the way, will come from the Lewis Thorpe translation published by Penguin Classics in 1974. The History of the Franks, Book 1 Gregory of Tours opens his history by first declaring his ardent faith as a Catholic and emphasizing that Arianism wrong. Gregory makes clear that he believes that those who do not share his exact doctrine of a coeternal and consubstantial Jesus are heretics. It's fascinating to see how hardwired Gregory's generation of Catholics were to strike preemptively at Arian doctrines. As the first sentence proper of the History of the Franks is a sectarian retelling of the opening of Genesis, Gregory writes, in the beginning, God made the heaven and the earth in his own Christ, that is, in his own Son, who is the origin of all things. This was certainly Catholic orthodoxy by Gregory's lifetime, but its placement front and center at the outset of the History of the Franks demonstrates how 6th century bishops continued to be as engaged with Arianism as their predecessors had been two centuries prior. Following this opening, Gregory moves through the main events of Genesis pretty quickly, with a few curious sidetracks. Gregory pauses, for instance, to insist that Noah's grandson, a person named Cush, was actually Zoroaster, the inventor of idolatry and magic. Gregory creates a longer retelling of the Tower of Babel story, inventing details about how it was constructed. Gregory also offers a much longer retelling of the biblical story of Moses parting the waters of the Red Sea, insisting that the tracks of the Pharaoh's chariots can still be seen beneath the ocean where the Egyptians were drowned. In addition to these moments of creative editorializing, Gregory goes back in time to what we would call the Iron Age to list which kings were ruling, for instance, Assyria, Latium, Sparta and other regions during the tenure of the biblical King Solomon. Skipping over 500 years of history between the Babylonian captivity and the coming of Julius Caesar and Augustus, Gregory speedily reaches the birth of Jesus. Gregory summarizes Jesus, many palpable miracles, and then, taking the yohannine perspective that St. Augustine did, Gregory grouses that making it most clear to the people that he was indeed God in person, the Jews became incensed and were roused to hatred against him. Embroidering the Gospel stories of Jesus with later apocryphal ones that had been folded into Catholic theology, including various fables that had sprung up about Pontius Pilate, Gregory offers a three page summary of Christ's life and its aftermath. And then he goes on to discuss the founding of the papacy in Rome under the apostle Peter. This part of the history too makes liberal use of late antique Christian narrative traditions that likely had no basis in fact. Gregory informs us that the nefarious sorcerer Simon Magus, who shows up briefly in Acts, partnered with the emperor Nero to persecute Christians in Rome, resulting in the deaths of the apostles Peter and Paul. Gregory then moves on to give a tour of each of the Flavian and Nerva Antonine Roman emperors. Vespasian, skipping Titus, then Domitian, then Trajan, then Hadrian, paying attention exclusively to persecutions of Christians and then skipping three quarters of a century to the reign of the emperor Decius. Recording a summary of all the various 3rd century martyrs, Gregory pays especially close attention to 3rd century Gaul, including his own hometown of Clermont Ferrand, which was attacked by an Alemanni invasion in the year 260. Moving more speedily through the Diocletianic persecution, Gregory reaches the reign of the first Christian emperor Constantine, covering it quite quickly, and then Constantine's heirs and The Bishopric of St. Martin of Tours. Seeming to lose interest in the greater history of the world, Gregory of Tours settles comfortably down into Gaul in the 4th century. Taking his reader in some curious zigzags, Gregory expands nearly a whole page, telling a lurid tale about a bishop from his hometown giving in to having sex with his lusty wife. Then Gregory expends three pages telling the racy story of a bride in a marriage bed who tearily admitted to her groom that she wished to remain a virgin for Christ's sake. The first book of the History of the Franks culminates with the end of the important reign of Saint Martin of Tours, Gregory's own distinguished predecessor and the subject of an influential and early hagiography, closing with St. Martin's death in the year 397. And while book one of the history of the Franks certainly moves us from the miracle of creation all the way down to the turf of Gaul in the year 397, the route that Gregory takes us to get there offers an inauspicious preview of his methodology as a historian, skipping greater geopolitical context for a pot boiler about a lusty bishop's wife ignoring major emperors for the sake of a sexy but chaste yarn about some newlyweds. Gregory's consuming passion for martyr tales and prurient stories derails the historical agenda of his book's opening chapter, heralding the bumpy ride that is to come in the remainder of his most famous work, the History of the Franks. Book two, Gregory opens the second book of his famous history by talking for a moment about his own methodology. Perhaps self conscious that his first book was a bit meandering, Gregory writes in the Penguin Thorpe translation that it will not, I am sure, be held unreasonably of me if I describe the blessed lives of the saints together with the disasters of the unfortunate. For it is the course of events which demands this and not my fantasy as a writer, just as I have done myself. So Eusebius, Severus, and Jerome mingled together in their chronicles the wars waged by kings and the holy deeds of martyrs. In other words, it is a standard practice in Christian works of history to allow oneself to be liberally sidetracked for the purposes of telling blood and thunder stories about saints and martyrs. So be advised that I will often leave aside my history of the Frankish people and their leaders in order to indulge myself as my predecessors did. The narrative appropriately then opens with a brief miracle story about St. Martin and then a lurid tale about how St. Martin's successor Bricius was accused of having sexual intercourse with a washerwoman and then miraculously acquitted himself by having the woman's month old baby exonerate him. This and other miracles did not convince Bricias subjects of his devoutness, though, and the population of Tours eventually threw him out. After two intermediary bishops, though, and following a stay in the see of Rome, Bishop Bricius returned to Tours and completed his term in office. Our author, Gregory of Tours writes that the decades after St Martin died in 397 were not serene ones for the Gallic provinces. The Vandal king Gunderic invaded Gaul in 406, only a few years later, turning his forces southward into the Iberian peninsula. Gregory's interest in the Vandal invasion of Gaul, Hispania and North Africa arises predominantly because the Vandals were Arians, and the Arian Vandals, when in power, tended to persecute Nicene Catholics like Gregory himself and his predecessors. Retelling a story about a confrontation between a pious Catholic bishop and a wicked Arian bishop backed by the Vandals, Gregory applauds the faith of his Catholic precursor, who, in spite of his legitimate miracles, was eventually exiled by the Vandal king Gunderic. During the Vandal reign in North Africa, Gregory writes, many Catholics went astray, but eventually the Vandal kingdom fell to the Byzantine Empire, having held sway in North Africa for roughly the century between 430 and 530. As a side note, Gregory's history of the Vandals is light on facts. He doesn't have his chronology of Vandal kings correct, but it is important to remember that the early years of Vandal Africa did see some very nasty persecutions of Nicene Christians. And these persecutions were what stuck in the mind of Gregory of Tours the most. The Vandals weren't the only barbarians to invade Gaul in the 400s. In 451 the Huns migrated into the territory as well, and Gregory summarizes some of the events of the Hunnic invasion relevant to his own interests. An ancient oratory that survived the Hunnic destruction in the city of Metz. Then a miraculous instance when the city of Orleans, under siege by the Huns, was rescued by the timely arrival of ostrogothic forces in 451. A rescue, in Gregory's opinion, which happened due to the ardent prayers of the besieged city's. Then the rampaging Huns, as Gregory knew, were defeated by the combined forces of the Ostrogothic king Theodoric I and the great Roman general Flavius Aedius at the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains in 451. Gregory Heaps praises on Aedius, who in spite of all the services he rendered to the Western empire, was murdered by the Emperor Valentinian III in 454, which did little to stabilize the faltering Roman West. Lets pause for a moment and zoom out. So far what we've heard in Gregory of Tours history of the Franks has been quite miscellaneous. A breakneck and scattershot dash through all of Christian history that after the second century pauses every page or two for a miracle story. It's a bewildering beginning, and if you're disoriented at this point in the episode, so am I, and so is everyone else. However, about a third of the way through book two, Gregory's history of the Franks finally gets to the titular Franks. The Franks are the anchor of the whole book, where they came from, their first kings, and their ups and downs over the course of especially the 500s. The way that Gregory introduces the Franks, however, is confusing. Let me therefore give you a very short, generic scholarly introduction to the Franks. The Franks were a barbarian tribe from east of the Rhine and north of the Danube. Gregory himself acknowledges that many of his generation held the roots of the Franks to lie in the province of Pannonia, or roughly modern day Austria and Slovenia. As a named group, the Franks begin to show up on the historical record in Roman chronicles of the mid to late 200s CE. As students of Roman history know the years between 238 and 284 bookend what we call the crisis of the third century. And the Franks were one of a number of Germanic tribes that took advantage of this period of Roman weakness in order to invade and pillage provinces in present day France and Spain. Following this period of instability, the Roman emperors Maximinian and Constantius in 288 and 292 respectively, had run ins with Frankish armies two generations later. The Roman Emperor Julian, between 356 and 358 fought Frankish armies alongside those of other barbarians near present day Cologne, Lyon and Strasbourg. Like other barbarian groups in late imperial history, sometimes Franks served as Roman confederates and at other times they were enemies. And also, as with other barbarian groups in late imperial history, some Franks ascended to positions of considerable political and military authority, like the Frankish magister militum Arbogast, who rose to power in the 380s and 390s. Prior to the Merovingian period, the Franks were often divided into two groups. The Salian Franks were from the Upper Rhine and territories within what's today the Netherlands, and the Ripuarian Franks and likely other Frankish clans were from the area around the Middle Rhine. Gregory dives into this Frankish history in about the year 388. Gregory was at work on the history of the Franks 200 years after this. And it's possible that because he wanted to concentrate on the colorful sagas of Merovingian rulers, he didn't think it was necessary to delve back into the murk of their earliest predecessors. Quoting extensively from a lost work of Latin history, Gregory retells the story of a group of three Frankish warlords leading armies over the Rhine river in 388 and how the usurper emperor Eugenius allied with the Roman Frankish general Arbogast. The Franks, Gregory records, following some lumps and bumps as the three hundreds led into the four hundreds managed to sack the important northern capital of Trier more than once in the first decades of the four hundreds. But, Gregory writes, unfortunately, no one recorded the names of their earliest kings. If we're looking for early Frankish kings, though, and moreover, early European kings, the person who usually shows up for roll call is Childeric I. In French monarchical history, before the house of Bonaparte, before the house of Bourbon, prior to the Capetian and Carolingian dynasties, at the very beginning of the Merovingians, there was Childeric I. Gregory doesn't have much to say about Childeric I. Gregory offers us a narrative about how Childeric ran afoul of his subjects by having sex with too many of their daughters, how Childeric was temporarily exiled, and how he came back and sired a son named Clovis with the queen named Basina. Just as Gregory finally reaches the subject of Childeric, however, he sidetracks into a series of stories centered on a decorated 5th century churchman named Sidonius Apollinarius, a bishop of the city that is today Clermont Ferron. Let's bracket Sidonius and Gregory of Tours desultory history for a moment and once again lay down some basic historical facts insofar as they're available to us. Childeric I lived from about 437 to 481. Childeric I himself had a legendary ancestry through a father named Merovech, hence the word Merovingian. But Gregory does not describe this ancestry. Modern historians are uncertain of how Childeric came to power before, during, and after the defeat of the Huns in 451. Gaul was awash with Roman mercenary forces with barbarian backgrounds. The 500-year-old Roman territory had by this point been largely under the control of a patchwork of different barbarian tribes for a generation. Historian Guy Halsall theorizes that Childeric may have arisen to prominence via a military career under the Roman general Flavius Aedius. This would have likely been some time before the General's death in 454, however exactly Childeric I emerged as a military leader within the Gallic conflicts of the mid-400s. There were plenty of opportunities for a warlord to distinguish himself, and Childeric I evidently did so. Several other barbarian kings also emerged from the Roman military in the last decades of the Western Empire, like Odoacer, who had been a Federati military commander, and Gundabad, a one time Roman master of the soldiers, who emerged as leader of the burgundians in the 470s. To return to the subject of Childeric I, we know that he was a wealthy and powerful leader, in part due to an archaeological discovery that happened in 1653 in the city of Tournai in western Belgium. This was the capital of the Salian Franks under Childeric I. Again, the Salian Franks were the northern bands of Frankish tribes. And in Tournai in 1653, a stonemason doing repairs in a church discovered Childeric I's tomb. Childeric, who had again died way back in 481, had been buried with a cache of gold and jewels. The discovery of this hoard of treasure, though it was extracted and a couple of centuries later melted down, was an important milestone in French history. Childeric I's grave goods, which were fortunately documented with meticulous illustrations before their destruction, conclusively proved that the Merovingian dynasty's founder was a leader with substantial financial resources. Hundreds of golden bees or cicadas, were found in Childeric I's tomb as decorations on the monarch's cloak. And over 1300 years after childeric I died, when Napoleon decided he wanted to do away with the Fleur de lys of the Capetian monarchy, Napoleon decided he'd use golden bees in the style of Childeric I's golden bees as symbolic of the ancient glory of the French monarchy. So Childeric I died in 481, having had, according to Gregory of Tours, some dealings with two other important leaders during this catastrophic phase of the late Western Empire. The first of these leaders was the overlord of a short lived rump state called the Kingdom of Soissons, with its center in the town of Parisius, or modern day Paris. The second leader, Gregory records Childeric I as having had dealings with was the barbarian king of Italy, Odoacer. Gregory tells us that Odoacer and Childeric I worked together to subdue another barbarian tribe that had invaded Odoacer's new territory of Italy, which Odoacer had secured control of in 476 after deposing the final Roman emperor, Romulus Augustulus. When Childeric I died in 481, he left behind an heir. This heir was Clovis. Clovis, in the time of Gregory of Tours, as well as ours today, was considered to be the founder of the Merovingian dynasty. And while Clovis was the progenitor of the long line of monarchs who still held sway when Gregory of Tours was writing his history a century later, Clovis first appears in the Historia Francorum as quite a flawed hero. Clovis, Gregory tells us, marched over to the kingdom of Soissons, defeated its decaying Roman regime on the battlefield, and then secured its monarch and executed him, expanding the kingdom of the Salian Franks westward. However, Clovis was at this time not a Catholic, and he saw Nicene churches as ripe for pillaging. According to Gregory, Clovis early reign was marked by brutality, expansionism, and careful control over his troops. Clovis capped off his 10th year on the throne with a successful expedition into the territory of the Thuringians, a people who lived along the west bank of the Elbe in what is today Germany. The southern neighbors of the Franks at this juncture, say 491 CE, were Burgundians. And out of a welter of Burgundian heirs, Clovis decided to marry a princess named Clotilde. And Princess Clotilde of the Burgundians proved quite an influential figure in European history. In the evolving world of Clovis, Gaul, there were Nicene Christians or Catholics. Then there were Arians, these often being from barbarian backgrounds like the Visigoths or Burgundians. And then there were others, people who practiced traditional Roman religions or indigenous religions from northern Europe, and so on. Clotilde was a Catholic, and when she and King Clovis had their first child in about 494, the baby was baptized as a Catholic. The boy, unfortunately died in infancy. Gregory of Tours narrates the early part of the royal marriage as a conversion narrative. Pious Clotilde offers disquisitions on the correctness of Catholicism to her skeptical husband. And in spite of the death of their first baptized child and the illness of their second, Clovis eventually converts. In the Historia Francorum, the conversion is a battlefield conversion, like that of Constantine. Clovis was engaged in a military campaign against the Alemanni, a major barbarian tribe from the central part of modern day Germany. And Gregory tells us, up to this point, nothing Clotilde could do could persuade Clovis to accept Christianity. Finally, war broke out against the Alemannae, and in this conflict, Clovis was forced by necessity to accept what he had refused of his own free will. It so turned out that when the two armies met on the battlefield, there was great slaughter, and the troops of Clovis were rapidly being annihilated. He raised his eyes to heaven when he saw this felt compunction in his heart and was moved to tears. Clovis then prayed again, according to Gregory, that if the Catholic deity would help him win the battle, he would accept his wife's religion. And straight away the Alemanni fled and their king was slaughtered. Clovis dashed home and he told his wife of how praying to her God had allowed him to smite his foes. And after this, according to Gregory, Clovis was baptized as a Catholic, along with 3,000 military men in his army. However, it actually happened. Clovis's conversion was quite an important moment in European history. Gregory of Tours offers a dramatic baptism scene in which a decorated bishop performs the ceremony. In the early 490s, the territories of modern day France and Germany might have swung Arian or Catholic or something else. And so, considering the ultimate staying power of the Merovingian dynasty, their founders, conversion to Catholicism is quite an important event to remember. It took place, according to tradition, on Christmas day of 508, though Gregory dates it substantially earlier in the year 496. And we'll discuss why a bit later in this show. As with other imperial and monarchical conversions in history, it's possible that political machinations figured into Clovis decision to convert. There was likely much to be gained from allying with the powerful institution still headquartered in the old city of Rome. Whatever his motivations for converting were, right around the year 500, Clovis, King of the Salian Franks, became a Catholic in the twilight of his reign. This reign's final years would not be peaceful ones. One of the first things Clovis did after his conversion to Catholicism was to help one of his uncles in law plot against the other. These two Burgundian rulers were Clovis's neighbors to the south, and after a few hiccups, brother in Law 1, with whom Clovis had originally allied, ended up dying, and brother in law two ended up converting to Catholicism, after which relations between the Salian Franks and the Burgundians became stable once more. It is at this point in the story that I need to introduce one of the key power players of late antiquity. From about 500 to 700 CE, these power players are the Visigoths. The Visigoths were originally a barbarian tribe. As many of us know, the Visigoths came down out of what is today Hungary and Romania and into the Roman Empire in the late three hundreds. In the early four hundreds, under their famous leader Alaric, they managed to sack the city of Rome in 410. By 410, like so many other barbarians, including the Franks, the Visigoths had widely adopted Roman cultural practices and Latin speech, and they had converted to Christianity. So they were more Roman than they were stinky dudes with battle axes. Their name, Visigoths, means Western Goths, which is a little bit puzzling at first, as they came down out of Eastern Europe. The reason that they are called Visigoths is that after they sacked Rome, following their leader Alaric the first Death, they ended up migrating back up the Italian peninsula and then into southern France, setting up headquarters in Toulouse and then spilling over the Pyrenees and into the Iberian Peninsula. The Visigoths are thus so named because they were over in the far west of Europe, ruling most of what is today Spain during the 500s and 600s, up until the Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula, which took place between 711 and 722. So, simply put, the Visigoths were the folks in the west, in Spain during the early Middle Ages, sometime around the year 500, King Clovis also met with King Alaric II of the Visigoths. The visigoths, in, say, 506, about a century after the earlier Alaric I's famous sack of Rome had come to control southwestern Gaul and the eastern 2/3 of the Iberian peninsula. Quite a large swath of territory, this meeting between the Visigothic king Alaric II and the Frankish king Clovis, a little after 500, was peaceful, and Clovis and Alaric II swore allegiance to one another. But King Clovis knew that his Visigothic neighbors were Arians, and this rankled the new convert. Thus, shortly after the diplomatic meeting, deciding that religious warfare was preferable to peaceful coexistence, Clovis marshaled his forces against the Visigoths. Gregory of Tours narrates the Frankish march westward across Gaul into Visigothic territory as a holy war with a divinely assisted river crossing and a magical pillar of fire witnessed in the distance, eventually near the city of Poitiers. In the year 507, the Franks under Clovis met the Visigoths under Alaric II. The ensuing battle, which we expect to be rather climactic from all the portentous miracles that lead up to it in Gregory's book, was over quickly. The Visigoths fled. King Alaric II was killed, his son went to regroup in Spain, and the Franks under Clovis consequently expanded their land holdings in France all the way to Toulouse, Bordeaux and the feet of the Pyrenees. This battle was an important one, as it mostly erased the Visigothic presence in Gaul and established Frankish control over the southwest of what we now call France. This Frankish victory over The Visigoths in 507 had reverberations. The Byzantine emperor Anastasius was pleased that nearly the entirety of Gaul was now stable under the control of a single Catholic king and Emperor Anastasius conferred a consulship onto King Clovis. Whatever in the hell that counted for in the year 508, perhaps Clovis got a special headband. Clovis, also, considering the recent expansion of the Frankish kingdom, moved the seat of his government to Paris. In Paris, Clovis continued efforts to bolster his power. As we've heard from time to time, Clovis was the king of the Salian Franks. And there were other Frankish tribes. One of these again gets called the Ripuarian Franks. Their territory was traditionally the Middle Rhine. Clovis convinced the son of the Ribuarian king to kill his father. Then Clovis envoys killed the parricidal son with an axe to the head, just as the son showed off the father's treasures. As Gregory writes, this unworthy son thus shared the fate of his father. Never mind, I suppose, the fact that the son was egged on by a powerful and ascendant rival king who presently murdered him. Later, Clovis himself, confronting an assembly of Ripuarian Franks in one of their capitals, lied about what had happened, saying that the son had murdered the father according to his own whim, and then someone else had killed the son. Ah, Clovis had no idea. But the Ripuarian Franks might as well accept him, Clovis, as their king. However it happened, Gregory's narration of the history sounds a little odd. Clovis secured control over the Ripuarian Franks, afterward, killing the leaders of the Salian Franks so as to rule over them as well. Even after all of this general butchery of rivals and potential rivals, Clovis singled out another foe within Frankish territory. This was a minor king called Ragnachar. According to Gregory, a debauched warlord seated in the northwestern Gallic city of Cambrai. Clovis bribed some of Ragnachar's allies with counterfeit gold, killed Ragnachar and his brother Ricar, and then refused to give their betrayers real money, chastising them for accepting money for betraying their king. Later, Clovis murdered another brother of Ragnacar, and by way of concluding the bloody, tempestuous story told in Book two, Gregory of Tours writes that in the same way Clovis encompassed the death of many other kings and blood relations of his whom he suspected of conspiring against his kingdom. Clovis last recorded statement in the Historia Frankorum is the aging king's lamentation that he has no more relatives left to kill. The memorably ruthless monarch died, Gregory writes, after 30 years on the throne at the age of 45. His wife Clotilde outlived him, spending her later years at the Abbey of St Martin in Tours, working to advance various Catholic construction projects and trying to lead a pious life as wars between her children quickly broke out. These children and these wars will be the subject of the next part of Gregory's book the History of the Franks Book three Book three of the History of the Franks takes us into the Merovingian dynasty proper, telling us the story of Clovis male heirs, how they squabbled and sometimes successfully worked together, and how kingship passed from Clovis sons to a third generation of heirs. Book three encompasses the time frame between 5:11 and 5:48. Let me say something up front here as we look at the first page of Book three. When we study monarchical dynasties, we are confronted with challenges. First, there are the names. There's Billy I and then Billy II and then Billy II Jr. And Billy Jr. And Billy Jr. II and Billy the third the second, and Billy Jr. II is often nicknamed Mr. Pumpkin and Billy the second Jr. Is often nicknamed Mr. Parsnip, and we get lost in far too many billies and their nicknames, so to speak. Some of the billies are great. Some of them are really bad people. Some of them have lives that span multiple generations and some bite the dust pretty quickly. And if you're out there listening to history on headphones, walking the dog or driving or hitting the gym, all of the billies are going to blend together. Some of that may happen in this episode. So let me give you some advice up front as someone who also listens to history podcasts while jogging and making unprotected left turns. First, there is a diagram of all of the quote unquote billies at the top of the present episode. Transcription available there in the podcast notes if you want it. Second, the early Merovingians aren't too complicated as far as medieval monarchical dynasties go. I hope you will be able to follow the power players, because I am going to do my pedagogical best. Third, even if you don't remember every succession dispute and fratricidal backstabbing that's about to happen, you will remember the gist of the Merovingians and moreover, how this dynasty was a flagship for so many others that followed in Europe after the 500s. So let's get started. Book three begins with a prefatory castigation on Gregory's part of all non Catholics. Then Gregory begins the heart of his book. King Clovis had four surviving male heirs at the time of Clovis death in the year 511. These heirs would have been mostly in their teenage years, and one of them already had a child. These were Theuderic, that's the one with the child. And then Chlodomer, Childebert I, and Chlothar I, who sometimes gets called Lothar. The four brothers had a sister named Clotilde. Clotilde shared her mother's name. Sister Clotilde ended up marrying the Visigothic king Amalaric. Remember that at this point, 510, or 520 or thereabouts, the Visigoths controlled most of modern day Spain and the Franks most of modern day France. And so this was a useful diplomatic marriage for the two kingdoms. As for the four boys, Theuderic, Chlodomer, Childebert I and Chlothar I, let's learn about this first generation of Merovingian kings and what happened to them. The first major crisis that the brothers weathered came from the north, when Danish invaders attacked by sea. Theuderic and his son Theudebert rebuffed their attack, however, and the Danish king was killed. Other problems soon flared up in the east. In Thuringia, or the east central part of modern day Germany, strife broke out between the region's two kings as a result of one of their wicked and scheming wives. And in Burgundy, a wicked and scheming stepmother prompted a king to murder his son. Burgundy was the homeland of Queen Mother Clotilde, still alive at this point, and she gave her sons directives as to what to do about the situation down in Burgundy. Two of Queen Mother Clotilde's cousins were ruling in Burgundy at that point, one of whom had killed his son. And while Queen Clotilde's motivations are very unclear, in Gregory's text, Clotilde dispatched one of her sons into Burgundy on a military mission. The son in question, Chlodomer, murdered his mother's cousin, the one who'd killed his own son, along with this cousin's family, going all in. In an effort to subdue Burgundy as well, Queen Mother Clotilde's armies dispatched military forces into what is today eastern and southeastern France. In pursuit of her cousin Clovis son, Chlodomer managed to scatter his cousin's army, but in the process, Chlodomer was killed. This was Clovis oldest surviving son, and he died in 524. His death, while it was a steep price to pay, brought Burgundy temporarily to its knees. Although its king, his name was Godomar, and he was again the cousin of the first generation of Merovingians, the Burgundian king survived and after 524 was able to reassert himself in the kingdom of Burgundy. Soon thereafter, following a minor war with the kingdom of Thuringia in the east central part of modern day Germany, one of the surviving Merovingian heirs decided to kill his brother. In a very strange story, King Theuderic laid a trap for his brother, King Chlothar. King Theuderic hid assassins between a tarp in King Chlothar's courtyard. Chlothar, seeing the assassin's feet sticking out from behind the tarp, went into his courtyard with the protection of his bodyguards. Theuderic, knowing that his plot to murder his brother was foiled, gave his brother Chlothar a nice silver dish. Then, regretting his offer of the gift, Theuderic sent his son Theudebert to get the dish back. And the young man retrieved the dish from his uncle. Sorry for trying to kill you. Here's a plate. Hang on. Give me the plate back. Someone had definitely raised these Merovingian kings to be good people. Fortunately, not all of Clovis kids were so mean to one another. Another of his sons, Childebert, heard that his sister Clotilde, not to be confused with the Queen Mother Clotilde, was being mistreated. Over in Visigothic Spain, Sister Clotilde was a Catholic, the Visigoths were Aryans, and so she was having a hard time over there. In present day Spain, brother Childebert went to rescue sister Clotilde. Her husband, Amalaric, King of the Visigoths, was killed in the process. And poor sister Clotilde, although liberated from Visigothic Spain, died of illness on the way back to Frankish territory. Frankish territory around this time had continued expanding. The Merovingians had been using Burgundy as a punching bag for a generation and a half. And in the early 530s, the two Merovingian brothers Chlothar and Childebert, invaded it once more and occupied it. Meanwhile, the third Merovingian brother, Theuderich, whose territory was supposed to be in the northeast, stomped into the south central part of modern day France and started battering towns there, including our author Gregory's hometown of Clermont Ferrand. The territory of what was becoming Frankia at this point was divided into an uneasy quartet of regions, with Theuderic holding ground up in the northeast, headquartered in Metz, Clothar down in Aquitaine to the southwest, Childebert up in the northwest, ruling from Paris, and then the ailing Burgundian kingdom to the southeast. Chlodomer, who had once held control over the central west, was gone, though his offspring were technically in command of their father's former region. Recent military campaigning, along with the intrinsic delicacy of the situation, led Theuderic the northeast son, to sign a treaty with Childebert the northwest son, and hostages and guarantees were exchanged to seal the peace between them. Unfortunately, greed and insecurity led to more infighting between the second generation of Merovingians. Childebert of the Northwest, while his mom was visiting Paris, noticed that she was lavishing a lot of attention on the sons of the departed Chlodomer. Jealous, Childebert and his brother Chlothar gave their mother an ultimatum. The departed Chlodomer's two surviving sons could either survive and not ascend to their father's throne, or they could be murdered. The queen mother, Clotilde, said she'd rather her grandsons be dead than to live the lives of commoners. And so Chlothar murdered his nephews, their attendants, and their tutors. The boys had been ages 10 and 7. The children had a third brother, but he devoted himself to the church. Following the killings, Childebert and Clothar divided the central eastern lands of their dead brother and his murdered sons between them. Old Queen Clotilde, understandably stricken by her children butchering her grandchildren, retired increasingly to the quiet and charitable work of a pious dowager. And as for the child murdering clothar, his heirs, the four grandsons of King Clovis, would go on to be the most important Merovingian kings of the next generation, sticking with old King Clovis sons rather than grandsons. For now, Clovis oldest son, Theuderic, perhaps wincing at the murder of his nephews, worked to bolster the fortunes of one of his own kids, securing his son Theudebert a marriage with the princess of the Longobards, or Lombards, whose kingdom was seated in northern Italy. With marriage came other responsibilities for young Theudebert, grandson of Clovis. All of the plotting and infighting up in Francia had led the Merovingian kings to neglect some of the Visigothic territories that their father, Clovis, had conquered. Theudebert, the son of Theuderic and grandson of Clovis, was dispatched to reclaim some territories to the southwest. And while down there, he became infatuated with a local woman and speedily impregnated her. Around this time, about 534, Theudebert received news that his father was dying. The young heir hurried up through Francia with his forces. He was intercepted by his uncle, Childebert. Childebert, rather than doing any violence to the young man, told Theudebert that he himself was childless and he'd like to adopt his nephew as a son. Considerable gifts convinced young Theudebert that his uncle's offer was genuine. And the adoption meant that Theudebert secured control over the whole northern block of Francia, his father's capital in Metz, and his uncle and adopted father's capital in Paris. Together, the two of them, for reasons that Gregory of Tours does not see fit to disclose, decided to make war on Uncle Clothar down in Aquitaine. They marched their armies down into Clothar's territory and surrounded him in a forest, planning to kill him in the morning. Up in Tour, though, old Queen mother Clotilde wasn't happy about the latest round of familial killings. She prayed for her son Chlothar to be spared, and sure enough, a major storm hobbled the efforts of the assailing armies and peace was brokered. And so, instead of trying to kill one another, the two surviving Merovingians of the first generation headed down into Spain in order to bully some Aryan Visigoth, as they did from time to time. Gregory of Tours, at this point in the narrative, breaks off to treat us to a completely fictitious account of a certain barbarian Roman hybrid woman named Amalasuntha, one of the most remarkable people from late antiquity. Let me tell you the real story of Amalasuntha, or sometimes Amalas Huintha first, because it's worth knowing. In the early 490s, around the time old Clovis and Clotilde had been married, Clovis sister Auda Fleda had married Theodoric, the great, king of the Ostrogoths, whom we met in a previous episode on Boethius. Autofleda and Theodoric had a daughter, Amalasuntha. Amalasuntha was a bridge between the Latin and Gothic world of the Italian peninsula to the west and the Greek world of Constantinople to the east. A trilingual intellectual who, like so many other Ostrogoths, was an Arian Christian. Christian and Gothic though she was, Amalasuntha was a Roman to the core and more importantly, a capable stateswoman. And when her father Theodoric died in 526, Amalasuntha's son, the Ostrogothic king, Theodoric's grandson, was enthroned at the age of 10. Amalasuntha, acting as a regent for the youngster, wielded a lot of power in the court, and the Ostrogothic aristocracy of Italy was unhappy about it. Amalasuntha was at this point corresponding with the Roman emperor Justinian and considering extricating herself from Italy altogether and joining the more refined and Roman world of Constantinople. Her son Athalaric died making her queen, and although she tried to install her cousin as Ostrogothic king and work alongside him, Amalasuntha never managed to make it to Constantinople. Instead, while taking a bath, she was murdered. Her death in the year 535 was one of the things that prompted the Byzantine Emperor Justinian to make war on the Goths in Italy for the next two decades. And that is the actual story of Amalasuntha. Here's the one that Gregory tells Gregory did not know that when the great Theodoric died, his wife and Clovis sister, Auda Fleda, had already passed away a long time before. Gregory writes that upon Theodoric's death, Amalasuntha, ignoring the advice of her mother, married a slave in secret. This slave husband was murdered, though at Amalasuntha's behest. And in revenge, Amalasuntha poisoned her mother. As a result, the Ostrogoths in Gregory's fable enthroned a new king who closed Amalasuntha in a bathhouse and steamed her to death. That's Gregory's account. A cosmopolitan stateswoman turns into a licentious and matricidal heretic. Gregory, bred by two centuries of Catholic theologians to roar with fury at anything Arian, pins Amalasuntha's moral degeneration on the basis of her wayward faith. Now, let's leave Amlasuntha behind, but stay focused on the Italian peninsula for a moment, where she spent most of her life in the background of the Historia Francorum is something historians call the Byzantine Gothic War of 535. 554. If you know anything about the early history of the Byzantine Empire, you probably Know that during the 530s, 540s and 550s, the Byzantines under Justinian sought to do nothing less than reconquering the entire Mediterranean. The Byzantines swept up vandal Africa between 533 and 534. Then the Byzantines turned their attention north, where they fought barbarian armies, mostly in Italy, and most often led by ostrogoths. For nearly 20 years. The victory that they eventually won was an anti climax. After 20 years of war, Italy wasn't much of a prize to win back. And after two centuries of population migrations, even after the reconquest, Italy was surrounded by barbarian foes. And that's a very short introduction to the Byzantine Gothic War of 535, 554. Gregory doesn't provide it, but it's good to know for the readers of the Historia Frankorum. With the Byzantine Gothic war stretching from 535 to 554, Frankish troops were bound to get involved at some point. This was once again a major war between the full military might of the Byzantine Empire and the Ostrogothic populations at that point, headquartered in Ital and around the Adriatic rim, not existentially threatening to the Frankish kingdom, but offering occasional opportunities for gainful alliances. The first Frankish involvement was during the summer of 539, when Clovis grandson Theudebert marched armies into northern Italy. Theudebert attacked Goths, but his forces suffered from a dysentery outbreak. Other than the fact that Theudebert had a fruitful reconciliation with the bishop, this is about the last we hear of Theudebert, who fell ill and died in the year548. Gregory writes that Theudebert, grandson of Clovis, had ruled for 14 years and left his kingdom to his son Theudebald. And with this dispatch we move from book three to book four of the History of the Frank the History of the Franks. Book four, book three of Gregory's history, the one we just finished, told of events between the death of Clovis in 511 and the death of his grandson Theudebert in 548. Book four, our present one, is about to focus on events between 548 and 575, most importantly, the deaths of old Clovis, two surviving sons, Childebert and Chlothar, and then the rise of Chlothar's four heirs as we descend more deeply into the story of this tangled and tumultuous dynasty, complete with more feuds between kingly brothers who share often similar or Identical names with previous generations. With a full 400 pages of the Historia Francorum still ahead of us, you will be glad to hear that you've already met many of the story's key figures. King Clovis again on the throne from 481 to 511, is its most important character and the one to keep in mind even if you remember no more than him. We've been through the story of Clovis sons already. Book four introduces us to Clovis grandsons, and the grandsons are really at the heart of the Historia Francorum. These were kings whom Gregory of Tours knew. The most successful of Clovis grandsons, King Guntram, who would rule for a surprising 31 years, is introduced in book four for the first time. And it is King Guntram and his brothers, the grandsons of Clovis, who are the central subjects of this book more than the sons or Clovis himself. With that said, then, let's see off the first full generation of Merovingians, Clovis's kids, and then move forward to meet Clovis grandkids. Old Queen Clotilde passed away in 544, being one of the few powerful women in the Historia Francorum whom Gregory describes in exclusively positive terms. Upon her death, her son Chlothar announced that the churches in Frankia would now have to pay a third of their revenues to the crown. A prominent bishop, shocked at both the novelty of this policy and the volume of taxation, urged Chlothar to back down, and the king did. Chlothar by this time had sired a lot of sons, seven of them by three different women as well as a daughter. In an unusual arrangement, Chlothar married a pair of sisters named Ingund and Aragund, siring children with both of them. Now, if you know early Byzantine history, you know that in the 540s, when Queen Clotilde died and as the Frankish kingdom tumbled from Clovis sons to his grandsons, something else was happening. This something else was the Justinian Plague, the first outbreak of the Black Plague in Europe. That awful disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis and spread by fleas and rats. I mentioned it before, but it's worth mentioning again. The Justinian Plague was the defining experience of a generation of Byzantines. Byzantine metropolises and port cities were especially ravaged by it, and the plague was one of the main reasons the Byzantine reconquest of Italy was such a drawn out affair. The plague, as pandemics tend to, was concentrated more in urban areas, and so it's possible that in the more decentered civilization of Francia, the disease didn't have as devastating an effect as it did in Constantinople. Even so, it's still surprising just how little the subject comes up in the Historia Francorum. During Gregory's narration of the 540s, Gregory mentions an outbreak near Arles, but only in order to tell a formulaic miracle story about a bishop praying and thereby saving his congregation from the pandemic. As for the Merovingians, their checkered history continued Forward into the 550s. Clovis's grandson Theudebald, the son of Theuderic, was evidently a cruel and dissipated person, and he died of complications from a stroke in 555. This meant that the sons of Clovis son Chlothar were the only scions of the Merovingian founder left alive to rule. Chlothar thus had great power and great responsibility. Having inherited his brother Theudebald's territories along with the Upper and Middle Rhine, he had also inherited a border with the Saxons. The Saxons were in the year 555 already immigrating to Britannia, but they were also ceded in their ancestral land of what often gets called Old Saxony, a region in what is today north central Germany. According to Gregory, in a series of one sided negotiations, the Saxons just wanted to have peace, and the Frankish king Chlothar wanted peace, but Clothar's Frankish troops wanted war. And so the unruly Frankish troops invaded Old Saxony with great losses on both sides. And nothing came of the conflict other than a restoration of the status quo. With Clothar busy reluctantly fighting a war with the Saxons, Chlothar's seven sons began machinations against him and one another. An attempt of one son to ally with Chlothar's brother Childebert was ultimately unsuccessful. As old Childebert, the second to last of Clovis living sons, died in 558. This left only Clothar alive as Clovis sole surviving son. Chlothar's first act was to fight a war in Brittany, then as now, that rugged peninsula at the far northwest of France. This was a small territory that remained a client kingdom throughout the Merovingian period, and Clothar's armies beat those of the Bretons Clothar afterward killing the first of his seven sons for conspiring against him. A year later Chlothar died, having repented his considerable transgressions at St. Martin's Church in Tours. This was the end of the first full generation of Merovingian kings to zoom out for a quick moment and consider what we've read so far. Theuderic, Chlodomer, Childebert I and Chlothar I. When you read their stories in books 3 to 4 of the Historia Francorum, are generic figures, their stories told at breakneck speed, with Gregory only once or twice pausing to tell us about the monarchs themselves. There is a memorably chilling scene in which King Clothar butchers his Two nephews, aged seven and 10, along with their retinues. And there is a contrastingly gentle scene when young Theudebert, hurrying to his father's deathbed, meets his uncle, King Childebert, who seeks to name Theudebert his heir. However, Theudebert dies pretty quickly afterward, and King Chlothar, who killed his brother's children, ends up having seven sons, being the only one of Clovis sons to pass royal heirs onto posterity. Clovis4son Then, impress Gregory's reader as little more than despots and warlords, ones perhaps kept slightly at bay by the vigilance of a Catholic clergy and the directives of an aging mother. But despots and warlords nevertheless. So let's move on. The second generation of Merovingian kings who rose to power in the 560s were once again all the sons of King Chlothar. Their names were Charibert, Guntram, Chilperic and Sigibert. As their fathers had been, they were immediately tested by pressure from foreign invaders, and as their fathers had, they schemed and plotted against one another straight away. Case end point When Sigibert went to ward off a Hunnish invasion successfully by the way, his brother Chilperic dashed into his territories and began capturing cities there. A civil war broke out between the two. Its center northeast of Paris. Sigibert won, securing a treaty with his brother Chilperic. As these two brothers fought a civil war, their brother Charibert was busy having sex, first with a wife named Ingeberg, then two servants named Markavitha and Merofled, and later with a shepherd's daughter called Theudechild. These infidelities produced marital strife, divorce, polygamy and excommunication, but no male heirs that survived. The polygamist. Charibert's fourth wife, theudhichild, for some reason left him, bringing treasures to Charibert's brother Guntram. In an effort to marry him, Guntram lost interest in her, took her money and left her in a nunnery, where, after one escape attempt, Gregory tells us, she lived miserably for the rest of her life. As all of this happened, King Sigibert gradually rose to prominence over his brothers. He had beaten the Huns, he had beaten his brother Chilperic in a civil war, and he was disgusted that his brothers were marrying servants and peasants. Sigibert himself sought a proper princess as a wife, and he found one in Spain. Her name was Brunhild, and she was the daughter of the Visigothic king. Brunhild would prove to be the mother and grandmother of future Merovingian kings, a survivor and fixture in the Merovingian world who would outlive Gregory of Tours himself by almost 20 years. During much of her long life, Brunhild would also feud with her sister in law. Lets meet this sister in law. Her name was Fredegund and she was the wife of King Chilperic. King Chilperic, following the example of his sturdier brother, Sigibert, also married a Visigothic princess. No matter that Chilperic was already married, or at least in a sexual relationship with the aforementioned Frigunde, Chilperic set Frigand aside and he married a Visigothic princess. This Visigothic princess was Queen Brunhild's sister. The marriage was miserable. Brunhild's sister ended up dying, Gregory suggests, due to murder. Afterward, Chilperic went right back to having sex with his previous wife, Fredegund. And so the two queens, Brunhild and Fredegunde, who would be the mothers of the next generation of Merovingian kings, had ample reason to hate one another from the beginning. Their husbands had fought a civil war against one another, and Friedegand may have been involved in a murderous plot against Brunhilde's sister. Friedegand, for hundreds of pages to come, is going to be a villain. Her dastardliness as astounding as her longevity. Picking up the story again, Gregory tells us that in the year 566, the Huns once more tried to fight their way into Gaul using an army of necromancers. Yes, you heard that correctly. Necromancers. The Huns were able to defeat the sturdy King Sigibert's forces, and he only escaped with his life through bribery, after which Sigibert managed to secure peace with the Huns that lasted until his death a decade later. Then Sigibert began a war against his brother Guntram. He was unsuccessful, but following the assault, Guntram sued for peace and the status quo was restored. The third generation of Merovingian kings soon developed more marriages with the Visigothic royal family in Spain. Over in Constantinople, the Emperor Justinian died in 565. In 567, the Merovingian king Charibert died, meaning that only three of old Clovis grandsons survived as kings. Squabbling broke out between the three of them. In spite of the advance of a council of bishops in Paris, it came to a head with two brothers, Chilperic and Guntram, siding against Sigibert. Guntram backed out, though, and Chilperic, realizing that a full scale civil war would come at a great cost, backed off too. But then, the next year, Chilperic allied with Guntram once more, although an actual battle was fought this time and Chilperic's son was killed. Again Guntram backed out of the alliance, and again the feisty king Chilperic was compelled to flee. At this point, it was becoming clear that Sigibert was the most competent of Clovis kingly grandsons. And some of the envoys and nobles in his brother Chilperic's territories said they would abandon the feisty and warmongering Chilperic and swear loyalty to the sturdier Sigibert. Sigibert was ready now to overthrow his perfidious brother. Ignoring the advice of a bishop, Sigibert led his army to where Chilperic was entrenched. But before Sigibert could attack, sturdy Sigibert was set on by assassins and he was killed. These assassins, we are told, came at the behest of the wicked Fredegunde, the wife of chilperic. Sigibert was 40 years old and had been a king for 14 of them. His son, Childebert II was to inherit his kingship at this volatile moment. The History of the Franks Book v in book 5 of the Historia Francorum, the pace of events changes. Books 1 through 4 have taken us through a century of Merovingian kings, 475 up to 575. And books 5 through 10 only cover 16 more years, or 575 to 591. During these 16 years of Merovingian history, Gregory of Tours was a bishop in the heart of Merovingian territory at the crossroads city of Tours. He'd been elevated to the position of Bishop of Tours in 573. And as he served as a bishop from 575 to 591, roughly between the ages of 37 and 53, Gregory was in a very good position to tell the story of Merovingian history as he witnessed it. The remaining books of the Historia Francorum, much more granular and specific than the earlier ones, contain more eyewitness details than the earlier ones. Because it was during these years that Gregory was often a part of the history that he chose to set down, the remaining books zoom in on a somewhat smaller and more manageable cast of regal characters. And due to the narrowed focus and Gregory's own participation in key events, the second half of the History of the Franks is the portion of the book that gets taken a bit more seriously by historians. So let's jump right in. Book five of Gregory's history begins with a melancholy tone. He tells us in the Penguin Thorpe translation, it gives me no pleasure to write of all the different civil wars which afflicted the Frankish people and their rulers. The Franks ought indeed to have been warned by the sad fate of their earlier kings, who, through their inability ever to agree with each other, were killed by their enemies. In Gregory's estimation, old Clovis had conquered much of Gaul with the dearth wealth and resources, while his grandsons and great grandsons lived in luxury and engaged in fruitless wars with each other, in the process squandering some of their great inheritance. The story of Book V picks up in earnest with the death of good King Sigibert. Sigibert had married the Visigothic Princess Brunhild, and with Queen Brunhild he had sired a boy. This boy's name was Childebert ii, and at the time of his father Sigibert's death, he was only five years old. In spite of his youth, he was crowned king on Christmas of 575. But Queen Mother Brunhild and young Childebert II did not get to enjoy any peace. Little Childebert II's uncle Chilperic and Chilperic's wife Fredegund were likely behind the assassination of little Childebert II's father, King Sigibert. Uncle Chilperic, when little Childebert II began his reign, hurried into Paris, banished Queen Brunhild and imprisoned her daughters. Afterward, Uncle Chilperic proceeded further with his assault on his dead brother's territory and family. He sent his son Merovech to attack the cities of Poitiers and then Tours. Prince Merovech pressed his attacks on the dead Sigibert's territories, eventually coming to the city of Rouen, where Queen Brunhild had been exiled. And then, rather unexpectedly, Prince Merovech married his aunt, Queen Brunhild. Merovech's dad, the rampaging King Chilperic, was not happy about this, but he seemed willing to tolerate it for the present King Chilperic swatted down a rebellion of some noblemen in his own land, and one of the new noblemen who came to power, his name was Ronching, was a particularly awful person. Ronching, Gregory tells us in a little inset narrative, liked to torture his slaves over dinner by forcing them to burn their legs with candles. When two of Ronching's servants married one another, he was incensed, but he pretended to be perfectly fine with it. The young couple had sought sanctuary in a church, and Ron Sheng went to talk to the priest there. The priest said Ron Sheng could have a servant's back, but only if he promised not to separate them. Ronshing promised that he wouldn't do so, and true to his word, when he got back to the estate with them, he buried them alive. The young husband survived, but the young wife died. And that is the inset narrative of the sadistic nobleman Ronching, who lived near Soissons. Unscrupulous noblemen weren't the only destabilizing force in Francia in the late 570s. Some churchmen, as it turned out, were also behaving wickedly. The Bishop of Nantes, whose name was Felix, Gregory tells us, wanted some church land that was in Gregory's see. He accused Gregory's brother of murdering this brother's bishop, and in order to set the record straight, Gregory offers us the actual story of how his brother had died. A convoluted three page narrative that eventually reveals Gregory's brother Peter was murdered by a bereaved bishop's son who thought that Peter had killed his father. After setting the record straight about his brother, Gregory indulges himself in a few pages of miracle stories and some anti Semitic anecdotes. In one, a blind archdeacon had his sight miraculously restored through the magic of St. Martin's Church. Afterward, though, the archdeacon went to a Jewish physician for follow up treatment, and following this treatment he became blind again, which leads Gregory to conclude, what communion hath light with darkness, and what concord hath Christ with Belial? Another narrative in book five, related to Jewish people, chronicles a mass conversion that happened in Clermont Ferrand. Again, Gregory's hometown. A Jewish man there converted to Christianity, but angry at his defection, one of his Jewish acquaintances dumped foul oil all over him. Later, the Catholics of Clermont Ferrand smashed the city's synagogue down to its foundations. Much of the Jewish population of the city, 500 of them, according to Gregory afterward knelt before the city's bishop. Gregory tells us that the whole company of Jews lay prostrate before him, begging for baptism. After this, the Jews converted to Christianity, with a few outliers remaining unconverted and opting instead to head down to Marseilles. Returning to his main subject, Merovingian kings, of course, Gregory tells us of the deeds of the volatile Chilperic's sons. These are Clovis great grandsons, and none of them ever became kings. One of these sons was the aforementioned Merovech, the youngster who'd married his aunt. This marriage, as it turned out, had been a bad move for Merovech. Merovech's father, Chilperic, was probably mad at Merovech because Merovech had married Brunhild, the royal Visigothic wife of the well liked King Childebert. And Chilperic didn't like the idea of his son marrying his former sister in law. Around this juncture of the book, Chilperic, the grandson of Clovis and the father of Merovech, emerges more and more as a central villain in the Historia Frankorum. In the next book, Chilperic will be described as the Nero and Herod of our time, and Chilperic's wife Fredegunde emerges as equally violent and vindictive. This conflict between father and son, between Chilperic and Merovech, directly affected our author, Gregory of Tours. In the year 577, young Merovech stormed into Gregory's church and demanded communion and sanctuary there. Gregory was hesitant, but to keep the peace, he allowed Merovech communion and sanctuary. But King Chilperic was angry at Gregory for having offered sanctuary to Chilperic's son Merovech. In 577, volatile King Chilperic marshalled troops to attack Gregory's diocese. It was an extremely touchy situation for Gregory of Tours. On one hand, Gregory had ecclesiastical obligations to offer sanctuary to the vulnerable. On the other hand, Gregory had a vengeful king rampaging the communities under his care. Gregory decided that his sacred obligations to canon law trumped everything, and so he kept the vulnerable young Merovech sheltered. King Chilperic, enraged that he couldn't punish his son, made a punitive attack on Tours afterward, taking the unthinkable step of burning and ravaging St. Martin's Church and relics. While this chaos was unfolding over in the middle of modern day Germany, a war broke out between the Saxons and their neighboring swab, and more strife arose as a result of Francia's barbarian next door neighbors over in Brittany, which was in the late 570s, a client kingdom controlled by chieftains whom Gregory sometimes calls counts. A small war broke out as well. Some more positive events, though, occurred in the mid-570s. The promising King Sigibert had been murdered back in 575, leaving behind his wife Brunhild and a five year old heir. This child's name was Childebert II, and in the year 577, his uncle Guntram said he would like to adopt Childebert II and share territories with his young nephew. The two agreed to do so, which was at least decent news for the troubled world of Francia. Under the grandsons and great grandsons of Clovis. King Guntram, whom, as I mentioned, would eventually rule for 31 years, is the most important Merovingian monarch in Gregory's book. Other than Clovis, though, we haven't heard much about King Guntram yet. Unfortunately. In spite of the union fostered between King Guntram and his adopted heir, King Childebert ii, Guntram's brother, the volatile Chilperic, continued to cause tumult. Chilperic believed that the Bishop of Rouen, whose name was Praetextatus, was dead set against him and angry. Chilperic had assembled a sort of ecclesiastical kangaroo court to confront Praetextatus. Praetextatus was the guy who had performed the wedding when Chilperic's estranged son Merovech had wed his own aunt Brunhild. The specific accusation that the volatile King Chilperic had against the bishop Praetextatus was that Praetekstatis had accepted a huge payment from Brunhilde in order to perform the wedding. In reality, Praetextatus did have a bunch of Brunhild's money, but he had it because she'd left it with him for safekeeping rather than in payment for services rendered. Gregory himself figured into the negotiations of the trial. Through a combination of wheedling, threats and attempted bribery, King Chilperic and his wife Fredegunde tried to get Gregory of Tours to turn on his colleague, the bishop Praetextatus. Gregory's resolution was to stick to canon law and let God sort out the rest. As for Praetextatus, he ended up acting on some sketchy legal advice. This sketchy legal advice came from two bishops who were loyal, secretly or otherwise, to King Chilperic. These two, Gregory calls them sycophants, advised Praetextatus to admit his guilt to Chilperic. And then to throw himself at the mercy of the king, who the sycophants alleged was a merciful person. Praetextatus did so, but unsurprisingly King Chilperic did not pardon him and give him a clean slate. Praetextatus was humiliated and imprisoned and then later exiled. This whole affair of Praetaxtatus trial had taken place because Chilperic was still furious at his son Merovech, since Merovech had married his aunt Brunhild. And as of 578merovech was still out there evading his father's forces. Eventually though, young Merovech ran out of luck. Near Reims, young Merovech had a servant kill him so that he wouldn't fall into his father and stepmother's hands. When Chilperic and Fredegonde's forces found Merovech dead, they exacted grisly retribution on those who had been with Merovech, torturing these servants to death. As the Merovingians continued their ancestral traditions of savagely killing one another in Frankia, over in far off Constantinople, there was a regime change. In the autumn of 578, Justinian the Great had died back in 565 and his nephew Justin II had succeeded him for a perfectly decent 13 year reign, dying of natural causes after a decline due most likely from dementia. Next on Constantinople's throne was the emperor Tiberius ii, a man who only ruled for four years, but about whom Gregory has very kind words. Tiberius, who ruled in Constantinople from 578 to 582, was a Catholic ruler and very generous with the poor. Gregory offers a couple of genuinely charming stories about Tiberius. Once due to a miracle and on another occasion due to a generous donation, the emperor Tiberius happened upon hundreds of thousands of pounds of gold, which Tiberius afterward gave to the needy. Less generous in the 570s were a pair of bishops named Solanus and Sagittarius. This pair had dioceses in the far southwest of modern day France, in the rugged country southwest of Grenoble, and Gregory tells us that they were no sooner raised to the episcopate than their new power went to their heads. With a sort of insane fury. They began to disgrace themselves in peculation, physical assaults, murders, adultery and every crime in the calendar. While the two wicked bishops were put on trial for their crimes and reprimanded by Pope John iii. Afterward they hurried right back to their wicked ways, only stopped when the Frankish king of their region demanded their permanent imprisonment and isolation. However, the two corrupt bishops, Solanus and Sagittarius were eventually released, and and predictably, they returned to their malfeasances. Their moral behavior was so abhorrent that at last the two were stripped of their bishoprics, and in 579 they disappeared from the Frankish ecclesiastical world. Gregory briefly offers the story of two feuding dukes, Dragolan and Guntram Boso, in which Guntram killed Dragolin with a pike to the throat. I should note that the noblemen of the Historia Francorum are a nearly constant presence, some of them, like Dragolin, figuring into brief stories, and others, like Guntram Boso, showing up again and again and again. The quarrel between these two noblemen was a small thing in comparison to a sequence of events that unfolded in King chilperic's territories in 578 or 579. At this juncture, volatile Chilperic instituted a massive tax hike, one so severe that a tax collector was nearly killed in a protest. The protest failed, however, and Chilperic made the rebels pay punitive fines on top of their higher taxes. And while the last years of the 570s scraped through Frankia with continued chaos at the monarchical level in the year 580, the average citizen living under Merovingian rule had more still to contend with. Natural disasters ravaged Merovingian territories, first rain and flooding, especially of the Loire and Rhone, and then later centered in Bordeaux. An earthquake. One can believe Gregory when he reports boulders tumbling down from the Pyrenees as a result of the quake. But when he alleges that spontaneous fires erupted in Orleans or in the suburbs around Bordeaux, and that blood gushed out of a broken loaf in Chartres, one suspects that Gregory of Tours might have read a bit too much apocalyptic literature. Anecdotal accounts of natural disasters mixed together with stories about supernatural phenomena fill the later books of the Historia Frankorum. In them, Frankia is seemingly always plagued by floods or earthquakes, in addition to rains of blood, spooky lights in the sky, and that kind of thing. In August of 580, in an already hard year, Gregory reports that a dysentery epidemic ravaged Gaul, though the symptoms he describes, postulant tumors in particular, sound more like those of the bubonic plague that had torn through the urban Byzantine world four decades earlier, the family of volatile King Chilperic was directly impacted, and the normally impenitent Queen Fredegund, according to Gregory, felt extremely compunctious for all of the family's greed and evil doings, as she saw her young sons on death's door. Gregory even invents a long and penitent monologue for her, the fruits of which were the royal couple's decision to annul the harsh taxes they had recently instituted. The penitence of the queen and king, however, could not save their youngest children, who both passed away from the epidemic. Another Merovingian casualty of this 580 epidemic was King Guntram's wife, who, just as wicked as several other powerful women in the Historia Frankorum, took the bizarre and cruel step of ordering all of her doctors to be murdered after she died. Following the reports of these high profile casualties, Gregory mentions several others, including a wicked count from the southwest of France. Different troubles than these plagued visigothic Spain. In 580, the Arian regime there, helmed by a wicked widowed queen named Athonagild, had begun preying on Catholics, including a Merovingian princess who had married into the Visigothic royal line. This princess had convinced her husband to convert to Catholicism from Arianism, but the conversion ended up alienating him from his father and resulting in his exile. Parents warring with and or murdering children seemed to be quite the thing to do in the Christian world of 6th century France and Spain, because soon the volatile King Chilperic, grandson of Clovis, decided to kill his own son, whose name also happened to be Clovis. Remember that Chilperic had already managed to wipe out his other son, Merovech. This was the second son Chilperic was going after. Little Clovis II was excited that his brothers had died in the recent epidemic because it meant that their kingdoms would fall to him. An animosity broke out between Clovis II and his stepmother, Queen Fritigern, who became convinced that Clovis II had been instrumental in to her children's deaths. Queen Fredegunde believed that one of her servants was in love with Clovis II and that this servant's mother had been casting spells. And so she tortured them until they confessed. And although the confessions were doubtless just desperate measures taken to curtail physical agony, Queen Fredegunde believed she had her evidence. She had Clovis II apprehended and soon Clovis II had been murdered in prison. Gregory of Tours says it may have been Clovis II's stepmother Friedegand, who ordered the deed done, but it also might have been king chilperic. Clovis II's family was then murdered, excepting a sister who was put in a nunnery and the poor servant girl who had confessed to plotting against Queen Fridigerd was burned alive. While all of this was going on, Gregory of Tours himself had a visitor. The visitor in question was a man named Aguilarn, an Arian by faith and an envoy of the Visigothic king. And right in the middle of the events of Book V, Gregory offers us a long, pedantic Arian versus Catholic debate scene in which he Gregory, is naturally correct and his argumentative adversary, Agilon the Arian is not. In this debate, Agilon pointed out a moment in the Gospels at which Jesus described himself as the Son of God and a lesser being than Yahweh, that's John, chapter 14, verse 28, thus supporting Agalon's Arianism. Then Gregory engaged in some interpretive acrobatics in order to countermand a literal reading of the passage. The two theologians butted heads for four pages in a point counterpoint that might be fairly interesting for historians of the Arian schism, but for the rest of us is rather unappealing, with its vicious and inflexible hair splitting up until Gregory simply insulted his Aryan rival, and then informs us that the man grew sick when he returned to Spain, eventually converting to Catholicism there. Now, in addition to the Merovingian kings who are the main subject of Gregory's book, the Historia Frank Oram has quite a few noblemen, mainly counts and dukes, peopling its pages. One of these is Count Leudist of Tours, a nobleman with whom, as a bishop, Gregory had a troubled relationship. Gregory reports that once Count Ludost tried to slander him to King Chilperic, but Chilperic didn't believe any of it, and Gregory then closes book five with a long catalog of the misdeeds of Count Ludist of Tours. Gregory describes Count Ludast of Tours as low born, impious and greedy, a man who rose to power by ingratiating a Merovingian queen whom he thereafter stole from. Ludist was as unscrupulous as they came, and on several occasions he escaped punishment by the skin of his teeth. According to Gregory, when Count Ludist of Tours plotted against Bishop Gregory of Tours, he created a legally complicated situation, one in which nobles and churchmen and the monarch Chilperic himself had to figure out how to proceed so as to not set any awful precedents. The accusations were serious. Count Ludist of Tours had alleged that Gregory was plotting against Queen Fritigant, but in the end, due to Gregory's solid reputation and many testifying that it was silly to think that Gregory would do such a thing. Gregory was allowed to make a sworn statement and perform mass afterward. Gregory, perhaps more of a pragmatist than he often lets on, writes that these conditions were contrary to the canon, but I fulfilled them out of consideration for the king's feelings. Eventually, though, a larger conspiracy came to light. Gregory was stricken to discover that churchmen had joined Count Leudist in plotting against him. The story of the conspiracy, which ends book five, concludes with an anticlimax. Count Ludist escaped punishment again and again, and while Gregory held onto his position in Tours, Merovingian history grinded onward as usual. It's worth noting that Clovis had become king in 481, exactly a century before the year 581, the year with which Gregory of Tours closes book five and opens book six, an excellent stopping point in the narrative for our purposes in today's show. So that takes us precisely halfway through Gregory's History of the Franks. You've heard enough thus far to understand a lot of the heft of Gregory's most famous book. It's the tale of a feuding dynasty, told with the occasional demonstrable inaccuracy and widespread poetic license of Merovingian brothers, uncles and nephews scheming against one another, with each generation also plagued with a helping of wicked wives and stepmothers. While on the sidelines, a mostly beneficent Catholic clergy distracts Gregory into many hagiographies, miracle stories, theological debates and tall tales about supernatural portents. We'll talk a lot about Gregory's style, especially in the episode to come, once we finished the book. For now, I think that the most practical thing for us to do is to address what we might call the elephant in the room of Gregory of Tours. And this elephant is the question of how much of what we read in the Historia Frank Horam is accurate. To even ask this question, we need to first consider the importance of Gregory's book. For its size, its scope, and the wealth of its details, the History of the Franks is an anomaly within late antiquity. It is a large historical tome concerning events absolutely central to French, Belgian and German history over a stretch of decades, about which we have very little other specific written information. The History of Frank Oram is so long and detailed that for centuries it's been a resource for historians not only of France and Germany, but also of neighboring regions. Gregory deals with, in passing, Visigothic Spain, Italy under the Lombards, and even, for a brief sequence to come in Book X, in which some Merovingian envoys get waylaid in Byzantine Carthage for North Africa. We do not have, in other words, a comparably hefty history of any other region of post Roman Europe, with the exception of the works of Procopius and his successor Agathias in the Byzantine East. The only other exception is the scholar and statesman Cassiodorus. Roughly a contemporary of Gregory who lived in Ostrogothic Italy. Cassiodorus around 530 completed a multi volume history of the Goths, but the text only survives in small fragments. Several other works of history existed by Gregory's time and he uses and quotes them fairly extensively in book two. But these other works of history have been lost. Thus, Gregory of Tours, History of the Franks, because it is an oasis in a desert of historical information, is a book central to studies of the early Middle Ages. And the text's accuracy accordingly is an important subject to consider, even to us non specialists who are just passing through. There are two main biases that usually get considered in the Historia Frankorum. The first is that the author is a monied Catholic bishop and understandably a partisan on all religious subjects. The second is is more complicated. As we read Gregory's book, meeting so many kings, queens, bishops, counts and dukes, it is with the undeniable sense that we're not hearing the entire story. Some characters in the book act with pure unmotivated malice. Others appear consistently beneficent for reasons unknown. Some events, which we would expect to be of tremendous importance to Merovingian history, are speedily passed through, while at other moments internecine scandals between nobles and fairly minor churchmen get copious treatment. And so the second main bias that readers often consider in Gregory's famous book, either in sections or as a whole, is whether or not the History of the Franks had political motivations in the violent world of Merovingian Gaul, and we'll see it get worse next time. But anyway, in the brutal decades of the 570s and 580s, Gregory of Tours knew he had to watch himself. Though his pedigree and position insulated him from open assassination, some tactical considerations must have gone into what he wrote and what he did not write. In his history. Historian Alexander Murray describes Gregory aptly as an apprehensive expedient politician, looking over his shoulder, fearful that the wrong people might get a look at his thoughts and tailoring his narrative to the momentary political situation. So those then are the two main biases which often get considered when scholars look closely at the History of the Franks. The book's thorough and undisguised Catholic partisanship on one hand and and then its subtler and more inscrutable political bent on the other. Let's talk for a moment about Gregory's thoroughgoing pro Catholic tilt in the History of the Franks. It comes as no surprise, of course, that a dedicated Catholic bishop would take up staunchly pro Catholic positions throughout his long book. You don't open a box of Wheaties and expect to find Frosted Flakes. I want to quote a passage from Gregory for you from book two of the History of the Franks, a passage that's one of the first things Gregory offers us in regard to the Franks at all. After briefly introducing the Goths and the Burgundians, Gregory writes of the Franks that this particular race of people seems always to have followed idolatrous practices, for they did not recognize the true God. They fashioned idols for themselves out of the creatures of the woodlands and the waters, out of birds and beasts. These they worshipped in the place of God, and to these they made their sacrifices. If only the inner recesses of their hearts could have been moved by that awe inspiring voice which spoke to the people through Moses. Gregory's perspective here is what we'd expect. Romans had long written of the backwardness of barbarian cultures. When Rome bit the dust, its Christian scions, often with barbarian blood, themselves replaced the superciliousness of the old Roman intelligentsia with the sanctimoniousness of the devoutly religious in regard to unconverted foreigners. We hardly open Gregory's book then expecting some anthropologically even handed respect for pre Christian Frankish culture. But as we move through the remainder of book two, we do expect some basic accuracy about Childeric I and his son Clovis. Accuracy which on one key point at least may not be there. This point has to do with which religion the earliest Merovingians practiced prior to Clovis conversion and when this conversion actually took place. In the story that Gregory tells King Clovis, a blood splattered pagan warlord from the Salian north, butchers, foes and family members alike in a brisk and cryptic avalanche of conquests that eventually leads to a consolidated Francia under Catholic rule. Francia expands a bit later in Gregory's text, but it's Clovis who emerges from the death knell of the Roman west from a generation of barbarian legionary crossbreeds to establish the kingdom. Clovis then marries goodly Catholic Queen Clotilde, and mesmerized by her devoutness and her trinitarian Christology, he dutifully converts in the year 496. After 496 in Gregory's book, Clovis is a Catholic, his campaigns particular against the Visigoths, having religious justification behind them. And as to the accuracy of these foundational events in the history of the Franks, historian Roger Collins writes, it is clear that Gregory's information relating to that period is both slight in quantity and was handled by him in a selective and ideologically motivated way. To be clear, Clovis conversion to Catholicism was one of the most consequential events of the 6th century. So it's worth considering the nitty gritty of just this one event for a moment. Modern historians have most often dated Clovis conversion to Christmas Day of 508. And modern historians have reason to suppose that Clovis converted from Arianism to Catholicism rather than from paganism to Catholicism. A correspondence Exists dated to 486 between two bishops from Vienne and Reims, and in one of its surviving letters addressed from Bishop Remigius of Rheims to Clovis himself. The latter appears to have already been a Christian before he ever met Clotilde. None of this is to say that Clovis did not convert to Catholicism at some point, but Gregory may have antedated this conversion in order to lend an air of religious manifest destiny to the monarch's early confrontations with the Visigoths in what is now the southwest of France. And Gregory also ignores Clovis and his father Childeric's likely backgrounds as Arian Christians. For Gregory, writing in pre Islamic Europe, Arianism was the most formidable of all of Catholicism's theological boogeymen. And so it makes sense that he would elide the Merovingian founders Arian backgrounds, if he knew about those backgrounds at all. So to repeat, there is an obvious and natural partisanship in Gregory's theological bias. And this bias impacts the way that he sets down the conversion of Clovis. Gregory also had a political bias, and one which we can see halfway through the book if we look just a little bit deeper. In describing the lives and times of Childeric and Clovis, Gregory does his best to narrate highly complex events that took place a century prior, serving up the story with a Catholic bias, but also a healthy helping of other historians who've come before him. As I mentioned, there are extensive quotations in book two, from now lost works by prior historians of Gaul. But when Gregory gets closer to his own times, telling the stories of Clovis children and then grandchildren, he seems vastly more interested in some Merovingian kings than others, overlooking the achievements of some and magnifying the faults of others. And more than anything, focusing his attention on events that impacted his bishopric in Tours, his hometown of Clermont Ferrand, and moreover, the west central part of modern day France. Now, we're already a couple of hours into this program, and your brain may already be filled to capacity with the tangled world of the Merovingian dynasty, but to give you your money's worth here, I want to talk for just a moment about two important, important narrative decisions that Gregory of Tours makes in his book. The first has to do with King Theudebert. King Theudebert, in the words of historian Roger Collins, was undoubtedly the greatest of the Frankish kings of the 6th century. I am guessing, though, that after listening to this show, you don't remember Theudebert. He is treated quite quickly. In the Historia Frankorum, we learn that Theudebert helped his father ward off a Saxon invasion, that Theudebert married a Lombard princess. Theudebert enjoyed an unexpected alliance with his uncle Childebert. And then, in 539, Theudebert led an unsuccessful invasion into northern Italy, before eventually dying in 548. He appears at first glance as just another face in the Merovingian crowd in Gregory's book. The question is that if modern historians see Theudebert as such an important king, then what is Gregory not telling us about him? And why isn't he telling it? Theudebert was the oldest son of Clovis oldest son. Had Clovis not divided his kingdom into four, and had his oldest son Theuderic, and Theuderic's heir Theudebert, had full control over the kingdom. Francia's 6th century history might have been far smoother and more prosperous. Theudebert seems to have been a far sighted leader. Like Clovis himself, Theudebert, before and after his father Theuderic's death, secured control of the Rhineland frontier. His territories were in the eastern Marchlands, where Saxons and Thuringians were making incursions into Frankish territory. And by the time of theudebert's death in 548, these Marchlands were stable. Theudebert had also, rather than warring with his brothers, extended Frankish territory down to the southeast into northern Italy, creating a stable borderland that stretched from the mouth of the Rhone, just west of Marseilles, through a corridor of northeastern Italy and all the way up to the center of what is today the Netherlands. Theudebert, again the oldest son of Clovis Oldest son, who only gets brief coverage in Gregory's book, was the first monarch in the west to begin minting gold coins. He created a Frankish solidus modeled on Byzantine coins stamping his name where the emperors normally went. He appeared in many ways to model his career on that of his older contemporary, Theodoric the Great, expecting to be taken seriously as protector of his own realm, a potential ally and a formidable foe for the Byzantines. When Theudebert marched armies into the Byzantine Gothic war zone in 539, he attacked Ostrogoths and Byzantines alike, though, as we learned at the close of book three, a dysentery outbreak curtailed military efforts there. When theudebert died, his 13 year old son, theudebald, ascended to the throne. Theudebald's forces could not maintain the southeastern frontier his father had carved out in Italy, and He died at 20, his lands passing to his father's uncle, Chlothar afterward. Frankia's eastern borderlands would not see such steady rule for a long time, and the departed Theudebert's cousins, who would be the next Merovingian kings, spent more time fighting one another than they did expanding Frankish territory abroad. Theudebert's cousins, though, were the people ruling when Gregory of Tours was writing the Historia Frankorum. And these cousins, especially King Guntram, King Chilperic, and their nephew Childebert ii, may not have been pleased at a work of history that glorified the bygone victories of Theudebert and his father, Theuderic. One reason for this may have had to do with lineage. Theuderic was Clovis oldest son, but this oldest son was also the son of a concubine, and not the son of Clovis and Clotilde, and every other Merovingian king came from that original union of Clovis and Clotilde. Additionally, Theudebert's father, Theuderic, had made at least one assassination attempt on the life of Chlothar, through whom all subsequent Merovingian kings descended. And Theuderic had also at one point invaded Gregory's hometown of Clermont Ferrand around the time Gregory himself was born. Gregory of Tours then, had many reasons to sideline, some political and some personal. And Gregory also may simply not have known about the importance of Theudebert's campaigns along the eastern border. Discussing international affairs and, moreover, exploring the larger geopolitical implications of contemporary history were definitely not Gregory's strong points as a writer. One of the things that Gregory can do as a writer, though, is to create memorable villains. And this takes us to the second and final point I want to make about the selectiveness of his Merovingian history. If there is an arch villain in the history of the Franks, other than perhaps Arianism or Judaism, it is Friedegand, the third wife of the volatile Chilperic, who in the five books to come will emerge as indefatigably malevolent. There are other villains in Gregory's story. King Chilperic himself is no picnic, but Chilperic's wife Fredegund, book after book is bent on assassination, provocation and vengeance. There are plenty of reasons why we can guess this to be the case, not the least of which is that Gregory's allegiances appear to lie closer to steady old King Guntram than to Guntram's vicious sister in law. But rather than trying to sort out all the specific reasons Gregory had to dislike Fritigern, I think we can see a very simple rule throughout the history of the Franks that Gregory uses to evaluate the goodness or wickedness of the many figures that people it Gregory cares most of all about whether or not people disturb the peace. Perhaps his most pervasive bias is against agitators and firebrands and against those who don't weigh the long term public costs against their short term personal gains. As a bishop, Gregory was responsible for the care and well being of people in his diocese. He was not like the Roman proconsuls of old, sucking tax revenue out of an administrative unit with icy indifference to the human cost. There he was a Gallic Christian, responsible for and talking to and providing alms for other Gallic Christians and concerned with the history and happiness of his local world. When we consider the sheer complexity of this world, it's easy to cut Gregory some slack for his omission and imprecisions as a historian. The Roman ship of state had wrecked and flotsam and jetsam were swirling around with bewildering speed, and the old historiographical template of Rome versus the world was an anachronism. Gaul by the year 500, when the Merovingians had wrested military control of the northeast, was not a single administrative unit the way that Italy still was by this late period. By 500, Gaul had come apart over the course of a full century and thus there was no simple means for a bureaucracy, political or religious, to flip a toggle switch and begin a new period of tax funded leadership. Gregory was dealing with a baffling world and he had little in the way of an exemplar to follow. As a chronicler of such a place and time, he wrote the most about what he cared about the most the Loire Valley, his hometown to its southeast, and the busy churchmen who worked there. And while the history of Frank Oram ultimately does provide a lot of history in the classical sense of geopolitics and international affairs, the idiosyncrasies, hypocrisies of Gregory's book and the narrator we meet therein with all of their peculiarities are just as valuable. Well, I want to frank you or thank you couldn't resist for your interest in this part of late antique history. Gregory's history of the Franks and the historical accuracy of the History of the Franks are not ideal topics for an audio show. And if I've left you rather bewildered, there's once again a Merovingian dynastic diagram and a map of Frankish territories front and center on this episode's transcription, available as usual in your podcast app. The early Merovingians are a tangled thicket to wander into if you've never met them before. And if you're wrapping up this show still unable to recall your childeberts from your childerics from your chilperics, don't worry, I, and literally any other human being alive, would be as well. Both times I've read Gregory's book, the experience has been the same. It is a slow immersion into a world of many, many details. Rather than a magisterial record of cause and effect, it has an accumulative effect like the realist novels of Balzac and Flaubert would long after Gregory passed away. The dozens of kings and dukes and counts and bishops in the Historia Frankorum build as you read, into a dense aggregate of information. And even if you don't remember who said what and when, you still walk away with a surprisingly rich portrait of early Merovingian life, not only due to the characters in the painting, but also due to the painter himself. In our next episode, we will wrap up this long book and really sink down into the 580s, in the process becoming acquainted with Clovis grandchildren and their children. The nice thing about books 6 through 10 of the Historia Frankorum is that they cover a smaller cast of characters, a more contained set of events, and by the time we get to them, we know Gregory's style and predilections pretty well, and aren't as surprised when he gallivants off for a few pages to tell a tale about an enchanted relic or an especially kick ass priest Reading Gregory's works has sometimes been considered, in one historian's description, a tedious occupation at best. But as we'll consider a bit more extensively next time, his desultory style also has a certain charm, a charm that started being taken more seriously over the course of critical reevaluations during the mid 20th century. There's a quiz on this show in your podcast app. Feel free to cheat on it and use that dynastic diagram in the episode transcription to review what you've learned for you Patreon supporters. I've recorded Guy de Maupassant's short story The Necklace, published in 1884. It's one of the most famous short stories in 19th century literature, and since we've been hanging out in France all day and your host loves French literature, I thought I'd send it your way for everyone. There's a song coming up if you want to hear it, stick around, and if not, I'll see you next time. Still listening I got to thinking about the medieval world and the classical world and how they have traditionally been periodized. And I thought that in this program, in a lot of ways really the first program on the Middle Ages in our show, that it was time to ask a question. The question is which was better, Greco Roman antiquity or the Middle Ages? Needless to say, this is a silly question, but still one that inspired me to write and record the following song in which two groups of singers debate the merits of the classical period and the merits of the medieval period. The following tune is called Midasical Times. I hope you like it and Gregory and I will be back soon to wrap up the Historia Frank Oram.
- [142:56]
Host
The classical past was pure and bright All Europe was filled with light people they lived lives of joy no churches nor altar boys Life was perfect through and through Sparkling seasons, Skies of blue Greece and Rome perfect sunlit Then afterward things went to sh yeah classical wtf Recent Rome Give it a rest. The Middle Ages were the best Priests and nuns and church picnics and happy thriving bishoprics no evil empire in control Laughing laughs round the maple, small scale wars and no slave class Antiquity can kiss our ass. I'm Julius Caesar, I'm Uranus, yet to brute the dark age is so dumb, so dull Peasants, knights were all numbskulls Maidens trapped in stupid towers, Witches stuck in stupid bowers Smelly troops in rusty armor, Ugly monks and stupid farmers living in mud and eating trash having no pants let alone cash King Arthur was a loser man OMG God worked to death with no Rewards all for distant overlords wars with tens of thousands killed. And you and your friends pay the bills carving statues. Yes, that's true for the pricks who conquered you. If this sounds like a place you want to call home then get ye all to Greece and Rome. I'm Janus. I'm Coriolanus. Are we even having this debate? Greece and Rome were truly great. Are we? Our urban poor were tired and scarred and provincial subjects had it hard and governance from far away left huge regions to the prey. A fearsome army is always slaying our people. Hang on, what were we saying?
- [145:10]
Guest
Yeah, Rome was pretty up, bro.
- [145:13]
Host
Index Chelsea, shut up. Look, neither time was really pleasant. It always sucks to be a peasant. The Middle Ages sucked. What we want from you is to admit Greece and Rome sucked too. Very well. Yes, our times weren't pretty. We admit Greece and Rome were also. We're so glad to hear that after so long. Let's celebrate with a new part of the song. What should it be called? It's up to us all. Medieval or classical? How about Metastical?
- [145:50]
Guest
Yeah, let's just go with it.
- [145:55]
Host
Menasical times not so different after all. We had it hard before and after Rome's fall. Metastical times were far from great but we were doing our best to survive and collaborate. Metastical times all equally worthwhile Though the excesses of both can make us wince and smile. Why do we have to keep hitting.
- [146:43]
Guest
Ourselves on the head? Oh no, Ryan. You're the one who wanted to be a monk, bro.
- [146:48]
Host
Literature and history dot com.