Podcast Summary: Next Comes What – Episode: A Tiny Revolution

Host: Andrea Pitzer
Guest: Fred Grande
Release Date: December 6, 2024

In the thought-provoking episode titled "A Tiny Revolution" of Next Comes What, host Andrea Pitzer delves into the potent role of humor as a tool of resistance against authoritarian figures, with a particular focus on Donald Trump and his allies. Through a blend of historical anecdotes, contemporary examples, and insightful analysis, Pitzer explores how satire and comedy have historically undermined oppressive regimes and examines their efficacy in today's polarized political landscape.

Humor as Historical Resistance

Andrea Pitzer (A) opens the discussion by highlighting the longstanding tradition of using humor to challenge dictatorships. Referencing Charlie Chaplin’s iconic portrayal of Adenoid Hinkle in The Great Dictator (00:28), Pitzer emphasizes how comedians have historically skewered tyrannical leaders to diminish their fearsome image.

Notable Quote:
"Dictator of the world, your destiny will kill off the Jews, wipe out the brunettes, then will come forth our dream, a pure Aryan race... You make me afraid of myself." (00:28 B)

Pitzer further explores Mel Brooks' strategic use of humor against oppressive leaders. In a 2012 Q&A with Salon, Brooks stated, "If I can make this guy ludicrous, if I can make you laugh at him, then it's a victory of sorts." (05:50 A). This sentiment underscores the power of comedy to humanize and diminish the stature of authoritarian figures.

Modern Applications of Satire and Comedy

Transitioning to contemporary times, Pitzer discusses how modern entertainers have transitioned into political roles, embodying the fusion of humor and governance. Fred Grande (B) provides insights into figures like Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who leveraged their comedic personas to gain political traction.

Notable Quote:
"There is not an empty chair on that stage that didn't tweet out. Never forget the heroes of 9/11... leaders like Zelenskyy, who transitioned from a comic to a wartime president." (08:05 B)

Zelenskyy's rise from a satirical actor to the president of Ukraine serves as a case study in Pitzer's analysis. Her ability to use humor not only galvanized public support but also provided a relatable image in times of crisis.

The Onion and InfoWars: Satirical Takeover

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to examining The Onion’s acquisition of Alex Jones’ InfoWars (25:12 A). This strategic move symbolizes how satire can dismantle platforms that propagate conspiracy theories. Pitzer explains, "If the company manages to defeat a court challenge to their purchase, they can use satire to further mock and deconstruct the conspiracy narrative that hoodwinked so many." (25:29 A).

Online Resistance and 'Laughtivism'

The discussion shifts to the rise of online resistance movements, where hashtags and digital satire play pivotal roles. Pitzer introduces the concept of "laughtivism," where humor is employed as a nonviolent strategy to challenge and delegitimize authoritarian power.

Notable Quote:
"The response to these humorous stunts has been telling... there’s our downer moment. While threats have been made against journalists, immigrants and protesters, the US has not yet crossed into violent reprisals against those who mock the president." (20:56 A)

However, Pitzer warns of the potential dangers of humor becoming defeatist or reinforcing existing prejudices, emphasizing the need for humor to evolve and adapt to effectively foster unity and resistance.

Impact and Limitations of Humor in Political Resistance

Pitzer critically examines the dual-edged nature of humor in activism. While it can unify and reduce fear among marginalized groups, there is a risk of it promoting division or becoming stale through repetitive jokes that fail to inspire broader societal change.

Notable Quote:
"Constantly resorting to gallows humor to joke about a worst possible future... can disempower people who might make a difference." (31:22 A)

She advocates for fresh and challenging humor that transcends stereotypes, ensuring that satire remains a vibrant and effective tool for resistance rather than a means of alienation.

Conclusion: The Future of Humor in Resistance

In concluding the episode, Pitzer underscores the necessity of leveraging humor to bridge divides and foster collective action against authoritarianism. She posits that while humor alone cannot enact change, it serves as a crucial catalyst that complements broader social movements.

Notable Quote:
"If we can't imagine uniting more people than the number who currently agree with us using humor and the recognition of shared experiences, then deep down, we have to wonder how much we really believe in democracy." (35:01 A)

Pitzer calls for a reinvigorated approach to political humor—one that is inclusive, dynamic, and strategically aligned with the goals of social justice and democratic resilience.

Key Takeaways

• Historical Significance: Comedy has long been a powerful tool against tyranny, effectively humanizing and diminishing the stature of authoritarian leaders.

• Modern Adaptations: Contemporary figures like Zelenskyy demonstrate how entertainers can harness humor for political leadership and resistance.

• Satirical Strategies: The Onion's acquisition of InfoWars exemplifies how satire can dismantle harmful conspiracy narratives.

• Potential Pitfalls: While humor can unify, there is a risk of it becoming defeatist or reinforcing existing prejudices, necessitating continual innovation in satirical approaches.

• Future Directions: Effective political humor should aim to unite broader audiences, fostering shared experiences and collective action to support democratic values.

This episode of Next Comes What offers a comprehensive exploration of humor's role in political resistance, blending historical context with contemporary examples to provide listeners with a nuanced understanding of satire as a tool for social change.