Transcript
A (0:00)
The following podcast contains explicit language. Hey, Slow burn Listeners, after seven episodes, we're getting close to the end. On January 30th, you'll hear the final chapter of Slow Burn, in which impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon begin and the President resigns under pressure. But before that, we wanted to give you something else. As you've heard me say on this show, Slow Burn is a production of Slate Plus, Slate's membership program. Ever since Slow Burn launched, Slate plus members have been getting a bonus episode each week featuring an interview with someone who has a unique perspective on Watergate. Today I'm going to play some samples for you from a few of those interviews. Our goal with these bonus episodes has been to give listeners a deeper understanding of Watergate, one that goes even further than the stories we've been telling in the main episodes. Here's one example. A few weeks back, we put out an interview about the judge who presided over all of Watergate's most important courtroom proceedings. The judge's name was John J. Sirica. I've mentioned him on the show a few times, but I don't think I've adequately conveyed how significant he was or how complicated his legacy is. On the one hand, Judge Sirica was as instrumental as anyone in getting people to pay attention to the Watergate break in and making sure that White House officials were held accountable for it. On the other hand, some legal experts think that he acted unethically in various ways, that his appetite for publicity and power prevented him from giving the Watergate defendants a fair trial. So I spoke to someone from the Senate Watergate Committee staff, a lawyer named David Dorsen, who feels very strongly about Sirica and the controversy surrounding him. If you want to hear that interview, sign up for Slate Plus. Today you're going to hear excerpts from some of the other interviews I've done. For instance, we've got Dick Cavett, who you may remember from his cameo in episode one, talking about the hate mail he received for spotlighting Watergate on his talk show. We've also got a staffer from Congressman Wright Patman's Banking Committee, talking about how she and her colleagues thought they were being wiretapped by the White House during Patman's Watergate investigation. Then we've got the guy who started a fan club for Senator Sam Ervin, the star of the Watergate hearings. And finally, we've got the FBI agent who helped break open the Watergate case during its opening weeks. He told me why he thinks journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein in particular get way Too much of the credit. Nixon's downfall. Like I said during this episode. I'm just going to play you a little bit of these interviews. If you want more, head over to slate.com slowburn for now, here is Dick Cavett, the legendary talk show host who used his airtime on ABC during the final months of the 72 election to shine a light on Watergate when few others in the media were doing so. Among others, Cavett had on Ted Kennedy, who took the opportunity to speculate openly mere days after the break in about the Nixon campaign's potential involvement. Cavett also had on Nixon's Attorney General Richard Kleindienst, who assured Cavett's viewers in September of 72 that the break in had been subject to one of the most thorough investigations in FBI history. I'm curious how you came to take it seriously. I mean, what about it made you want to not just question Ted Kennedy about it, but to have Klein Dienst on so early? No one else was, you know, it seemed to me that besides maybe some folks at CBS and obviously, yeah, it was kind of a non story. So what drew you to it and what made you think it was worth your time and attention?
