
Hosted by Justin Lebbon & Ian Whittaker · EN
This week Ian's away, so Justin Lebbon is joined by Sean Wright, chief insights and analytics officer at Guideline, for a data-led tour of where brand budgets are actually flowing. The conversation moves from Meta's scandal-proof growth to the heating DSP wars and the awkward economics of shifting money out of linear and into streaming. Meta keeps powering through: Scandals tracked back to 2009 show little impact — revenue up ~21% on average in the quarter after, with agency ad spend holding around 17%.A slowdown that isn't about morals: Wright's hypothesis is that Meta's "AI everything" tools are driving up costs and underdelivering ROAS for sophisticated brands, while SMBs love the point-click simplicity.The top-three squeeze: Of every £3 spent, two go to the major platforms, leaving thousands of publishers fighting for scraps.DSP wars: Four players (Google/DV360, Trade Desk, Yahoo, Amazon) now hold ~85% share, up from ~75%. Amazon has jumped from under 10% to just under 20% in ~18 months; long-tail DSPs (MIQ, StackAdapt, etc.) are losing ground.Trade Desk feud: Leaked Holdco memos and public sparring over take rates and transparency — but Guideline's Q1 data shows Trade Desk roughly holding, with ~13% global growth versus low single digits in the US.Streaming vs linear: Consumption hasn't left linear at the rate dollars did. Only ~25c of every US linear dollar lands back on streaming (~15p in the UK, ~20c CAD in Canada), partly due to streaming CPMs pricing 5x above cheap linear.Pricing nuance: The big three are near line-priced globally, while UK streaming looks underpriced versus US/Canada equivalents — an opportunity to grow rates or stay ultra-competitive.OTT in freefall: Video/OTT CPMs have fallen almost 40% in 18 months, driven by an influx of ad inventory, programmatic shift, and Amazon's low-price entry — with FAST/BVOD around 85% transacted programmatically. Key takeaways Meta's scandals — tracked since 2009 — have barely dented growth: ~21% average revenue rise in the quarter after, agency spend holding ~17%.The recent slowdown likely stems from Meta's AI tools raising costs without delivering ROAS for sophisticated brands, even as SMBs embrace the simplicity.Four DSPs now control ~85% of market share; Amazon surged from under 10% to nearly 20% in about 18 months while long-tail DSPs lose ground.Despite leaked Holdco memos and public sparring, Trade Desk is roughly holding — ~13% global growth but only low single digits in the US.Streaming isn't replacing linear dollars: only ~25c of every US linear dollar returns to streaming, partly because streaming CPMs run ~5x cheap linear.Video/OTT CPMs have dropped nearly 40% in 18 months as inventory floods in and buying shifts programmatic — UK streaming remains notably underpriced versus US/Canada.
After a week's break, the hosts return for results season and find the big platforms posting a spectacular year — alongside eye-watering AI investment that the markets, for now, are happy to wave through. Ian walks through the numbers and the Wall Street reaction; Justin presses on what it all means for the advertising and media industry. In this episode: Alphabet's results: Search ad revenues up 19% year on year (vs 17% the prior year), YouTube up 11%, total ad growth 13%, and cloud revenues up a "massive" 63%. Far from cannibalising search, there's a case AI is accelerating it.The cloud CapEx story: AI investment is now showing up in cloud growth across the board — Google Cloud +63%, AWS +28% (its fastest growth in 15 quarters), Azure +40%.Regional splits: US ad growth up 23% (vs 17% prior year), EMEA at 12%, APAC at 22% — an unusually wide US/EMEA gap worth watching.YouTube vs Search: Once the faster-growing engine, YouTube has now trended below search for several quarters.~$200bn in AI spend — and markets didn't blink: Investors don't punish spending per se; they punish spending without a visible return. Diversified revenue streams (Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft) buy more tolerance.Meta's single pillar: Growth around 23%, but advertising is ~90–98% of revenue, leaving it more exposed. Q2 guidance — possibly deliberately conservative — weighed on the share price and reflected a deeper concern about reliance on one engine.How Meta is growing: Pricing up ~12% and impressions up ~19%, fuelled by more (AI-driven) content. WhatsApp scaling from ~1m to ~10m conversations a week.Where the growth really comes from: SMBs (≈85% of the market) and likely Chinese advertisers. Large advertisers are decelerating — guideline data cited shows US Meta growth falling from 27% ('23–'24) to 14% ('24–'25), UK 15% to 10%, Canada ~10% to 4.5%.Is the money leaving? Probably at the margins — but not obviously to traditional media. More likely diversified to other online platforms like TikTok (a Bloomberg report cited ~60% revenue growth expected for 2025).The measurement angle: Advertisers running geo-testing and switching off spend to test incrementality — echoing Google's Latin America episode. A friendly disagreement on whether moral/regulatory pressure (EU breach claims) is pushing brands to dig deeper.Amazon: Advertising up 22% ex-currency, AWS accelerating to nearly 30%. The hosts argue advertising and AWS — not retail — drive the profit. Roughly ~$200bn annualised AI spend; shares up ~4% post-close.Coming up: Guests in the next few weeks, including Guideline, plus a proper measurement discussion. As always: this is most definitely not investment advice. Key takeaways AI hasn't hurt Google search — it may be helping: search ad revenue accelerated to +19% YoY, with cloud up 63%.Markets tolerate huge AI CapEx (~$200bn at both Alphabet and Amazon annualised) when growth visibly follows the spend.Meta's vulnerability isn't its growth (~23%) but its reliance on one engine — advertising at ~90–98% of revenue.Meta's growth is increasingly powered by SMBs and likely Chinese advertisers; large-advertiser growth is decelerating across the US, UK and Canada.Spend leaving Meta isn't obviously returning to traditional media — TikTok and other online platforms are the more likely beneficiaries.Advertisers are increasingly using geo-testing and switch-offs to prove incrementality, with moral/regulatory pressure prompting deeper scrutiny.
This week on Unfiltered, Justin Lebbon and Ian Whittaker dig into three of the spiciest stories in B2B media. They start with NBCU's unusually pointed attack on Nielsen — not on methodology, but on the claim that its measurement is devaluing media companies and impacting shareholder value. They then reframe retail media's surge toward $190bn as a capital-markets story driven by high-margin promises to investors, before closing on Havas and Publicis Q1 results and why North America remains the growth engine. Highlights NBCU vs Nielsen: Why the line of attack has shifted from measurement methodology to shareholder loss, SEC sensitivity, and the litigious nature of US class actions.The power of "the gauge": How a simple, trusted chart shapes how CEOs, CFOs and CMOs allocate spend — and the YouTube "is it TV?" parallel.Retail media as a capital-markets story: Walmart's high-margin (70–80%) ad revenues, the rerating logic, and the promises retail CEOs and CFOs now have to keep.Incrementality warning: The risk of siloed, closed-loop ROI that simply discounts to existing buyers — and the "vicious circle" of diverting brand budgets into retail media.Two universes for agencies: Publicis (~4.7%) and Havas growth led by North America; AsiaPac and China strength; share prices lagging amid AI concerns.The case for agencies: Healthy ~14% margins, the danger of self-commoditization on price, and how AI plus a renewed focus on knowledge and creative could lift margins. Key takeaways NBCU's attack on Nielsen targets shareholder value, not just methodology — a potentially powerful weapon given US litigation and SEC sensitivity around perceived share-price impact.'The gauge' matters because CEOs and CFOs trust a simple chart, and their view of the media landscape filters down into how CMOs allocate spend.Retail media (heading to ~$190bn by 2026) is best understood as a capital-markets story: ultra-high-margin (70–80%) revenue that drove rerating promises retailers must now keep.Diverting brand budgets into retail media risks a vicious circle — weakening the brand makes advertisers more reliant on retail media to get noticed.Brands should demand proof of incrementality rather than accept closed-loop ROI that discounts to buyers who would have purchased anyway.Publicis (~4.7%) and Havas show solid organic growth led by North America, but share prices lag on AI-driven worries about the agency business model.