In a world where silence is profitable and outrage is performative, character still matters. Today I’m asking you a simple question with complicated consequences: Shall you take a stand, or stay seated?

Take a Stand or Take a Seat

I was watching The New York Times interview with Scott Pelley when the reporter asked him to respond to a statement celebrating his firing from 60 Minutes.

The president called him “stiff” and part of a “gang of stupid, crooked people that don’t care about the country.”

Pelley’s response is both tactful and visceral. He didn’t seem to care about being fired for his beliefs. He didn’t seem concerned about answering to power. He stood up right and got fired, when so many others might have said nothing, kept their seats, and protected their paychecks.

I get it.

It’s tough out here.

According to Stanford’s 2026 AI Index Report, 90% of companies using AI-assisted applicant evaluations retain candidate scores for up to 330 days. That means one bad assessment, one poorly matched resume, or one automated rejection can effectively lock you out of opportunities for nearly a year. AI adoption is growing faster than ever. Yet brave researchers buck the trends and report inconsistencies and limitations in these systems. But that doesn’t help if you’re caught in that 330-day lockout.

So yes, I understand why people say nothing and cling to their jobs.

But if an environment demands that you surrender your values to keep your position, it might be worth considering an exit strategy.

Quiet quit.

Update your résumé.

Find another lane.

Because an environment with no morals will eventually consume yours.

Back to Scott.

Accused of being crooked and seditious, he swallows and carefully chooses his words. There’s still more to lose because leadership is being weaponized.

I remember a time when, regardless of party, there was at least an expectation that the occupants of the highest offices in the land would demonstrate empathy and respect for all Americans. Those days feel very far away.

So hearing a journalist described as a “stiff” who “doesn’t care about the country” because he asked difficult questions- well, let’s just call it disappointing.

Watching a news veteran like Scott Pelley visibly choke up when responding to the accusation was moving.

In his interview, Pelley reminded viewers that while he never served in uniform, he spent years reporting from war zones.

“I’ve been in combat for this country in Afghanistan and Iraq. I’ve spent nights in foxholes. You become a journalist because you love the First Amendment. There is no democracy without journalism.”

Scott is someone who stood up and risked his life in pursuit of truth.

It reminds me of people throughout history who believed in something enough to sacrifice for it.

People who risked financial ruin. People who lost family members. People who gave up comfort, status, and sometimes their lives for truth or some big principle.

In an age where everything feels transactional, people like Pelley or Ida B Wells show us that there are things worth fighting for.

The current political and cultural climate sharply reveals the difference between true allyship and performative allyship.

Sitting back, waiting for things to change, costs women—particularly Black women and women of color.

But Vanessa, I’m scared.

I get it. Some things are triggering. I understand that. Everyone must have their own standards and beliefs. But don’t expect others to help you when you are the one in the line of fire.

For me, I believe in the dignity of the human experience. You see my pen write this experience in a Fire Sword and Sea. In the beginning, Jacquotte is a passionate screw-up, but she finds her calling, rises to her feet, and becomes a captain leading an integrated crew of men and women.

I believe laughter is still the best medicine. You see that in A Deal at Dawn when enemies-to-lovers laugh about old times while dealing with the enemy, chronic illness.

I believe hard work matters.

I believe prayer matters.

And I still believe that when you focus, work, and persist, you can move closer to the desires of your heart.

But what troubles me is how often public virtue has become performance.

In 2020 people in publishing sat at home posting black squares. These posts on Instagram cost them nothing. And when many of their Black and brown colleagues were fired in 22-24, they didn’t post anything.

A black square requires no sacrifice. No difficult conversations. No risk. No courage at all.

There’s nothing wrong with capitalism. Nothing wrong with protecting your peace and your pockets. Just don’t confuse me by making me think you care. I’d respect you more if you were openly scheming aka JR Ewing of Dallas not that backstabbing Iago from Othello. Please don’t be the deceiving Uriah Heep from David Copperfield—humble while plotting my doom.

I don’t need that kind of disappointment and heartache in my life.

But this is America.

Companies can hire and fire people for many reasons. In most places, employment remains largely at-will.

If there was a legal way to know the workplace is amoral, doesn’t like to hire women, is loath to put a Black woman in charge—I’d like to know. Is that a Reddit or Threads feed?

If you have preferences or prejudices, own it. Trust me. We expect you to stay in your seat, way over there.

In a matter, I truly want to call, “ You don’t want us, so leave us alone,”

There’s a lawsuit filed by Colorado dermatologist Dr. Travis Morrell and the advocacy group, Do No Harm, against Find A Black Doctor, a directory created to help patients locate Black physicians. The lawsuit argues that restricting listings to Black doctors constitutes discrimination.

The irony is hard to ignore.

Black Americans make up only a small percentage of physicians nationwide. Patients often seek doctors who understand their cultural experiences:

John Hopkins has found:

Black patients are much more likely than white patients to discover language in those records that indicates they are not believed by their physicians. - What in the DEI?

So let me get this straight. Instead of building new resources or even working to dismantle disparities, you’d rather dismantle a system trying to fix it. Dr. Morrell be honest.

Black people constitute 4% of Colorado. Perhaps this doctor and his conservative group should spend more on advertising to reach that 4% or I don’t know…post some research to show how your treatments benefit Black skin. But you can’t because all skin matters, even if some hydrate and respond differently.

The question isn’t really lotion. It’s access.

Deep down, it’s ownership.

Who gets to create community spaces? Who plans where the number of tables and where the seats go?

And who gets to benefit from the dollars at those tables?

Meanwhile, small farmers continue to discover what happens when their voting preferences have real-world consequences.

The current administration has issued federal cuts reducing funding for local food purchasing programs that used small farms to service schools and food banks. Farmers like Iowan Anna Pesek have warned that losing this funding hurts already razor-thin margins and weakens local food economies.

At the same time, Congress has advanced proposals to reduce WIC funding by $200 million. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, those cuts could reduce fruit and vegetable benefits by more than $141 million for approximately 5.4 million women and children.

Actions have consequences.

Votes have consequences.

Policies have consequences.

Character has consequences.

Demonizing programs that helped the elderly, moms,

and children now hurts small farms. Generational legacies are being lost. These are consequences.

I care about lost legacies. It hurts a lot of tables. Farms collapsing is a recipe for humanitarian and economic disasters.

So what are you saying, Vanessa. Well, have a seat.

I need you to think about what you stand for. I want you to think long and hard about it.

Make up your mind with facts, not social media or even online essays like this.

I spend a fair amount of time on social media. Social media can be fun, informative, a start point.

But it is first and foremost a commerce lane. For authors, we use it to scream, stand up for causes and especially, marketing.

Most writers would gladly choose a quiet afternoon...