Austin (5:06)
Yeah. So it's, it's, you know, it's a great film as far as, like, from a direct. Just the standpoint of. Of a director or the, you know, directorial, you know, just expertise of Paul Thomas Anderson is very obvious. He's one of my favorite directors, honestly. He did. I think my favorite film of all time is probably Inherent Vice, which it stars Joaquin Phoenix and Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro, and it's got a pretty great cast, but for the most part, the main reason I appreciate it is because the value of what it introduces pop just in terms of pop culture wise, like it introduces this this very valuable concept of of honestly a perfect window into the playbook that you can apply into the clandestine operational kind of just again, we're talking the mind war, right? And and this is not at all limited to just the the psychological operational right value of of what they're implementing as far as the playbook is concerned. But it it, I think is holding I think it's hand in hand with that of, of the Gladio operation in modern form. And really this is just a diabolical strategy of tension to essentially domestically disrupt and destabilize right the general public in the US and and I think at really what ultimately takes place is they manufacture consent to you know, I think facilitate the the overall totalitarian tiptoe toward the technocratic state. And that in itself is is what I'm most concerned with because you can see it forming around us in, in the current moments. And I feel like everyone's just caught up in the ideological divisiveness of the window dressing in terms of the political puppets and how they leverage them against us. And, and my God, I I caught a, a brief glimpse into, you know, what, what the end game might potentially be as far as some of the. Just looking at like the Monarch program or Project Monarch, right? And seeing these, these stables of, of young boys that have been victimized prepubescent and to where they've. They've been essentially, you know, overexposed to these levels of programming that in in includes dissociative Identity disorder, right, which most of these victims suffer from. And what I saw was was Paul Benassi essentially who's a victim of the Franklin scandal and, and went public after Lawrence E. King. He sued him and won a million dollars I believe in the lawsuit. And he was claiming that Lawrence E. King brought him into the network at 12 years old and you know, sexually abused him and then basically tasked him with running rough shot after he was was programmed. Apparently what they had done is they had essentially provided him with altars which one of which would be suicidal. Right. So they handlers could essentially trigger this suicidal altar if he he, let's say, went off the reservation, so to speak, right. And and began to to blow the whistle or name names or or again provide a window into the the strategy at play here as far as the mind war is concerned in Project Monarch. Because the, the reason that I refer to it as that is is because the the book from Psyop to mind war, the psychology of victory, which feels like the modern PSYOP doctrine. And as far as the social engineering and psychological warfare aspect of, of what they have very well in terms of, evolved into this extremely sophisticated level that I think is basically impossible for most people to conceptualize at this point. Right. So, but the only point I'm making is, is it seems as if the end result was not only to utilize Paul Banasi to help procure other child victims and, and, you know, condition them to be submissive in terms of their abuse and, and things of that nature, but he, he was also supposed to allegedly join the military and then they would send him to Germany, which he had already been apparently distributing porno pornography, child pornography internationally on behalf of the network and specifically on behalf of the leadership hierarchy within nambla, the North American Man Boy Love Association. And, and, but the, the, what they apparently wanted him to ultimately become was this useful puppet in terms of. He would spend six years in the military, then he would be. And he would apparently be in some sort of prominent position during that time, then he would be brought back to the States, he would effectively retire after six years of military service, and then they would have him run for public office and he would basically become a politician. And what he claimed was that he would then therefore become ultimately a puppet on behalf of the network and they would utilize him as a prominent valuable asset to obviously push this dystopian agenda forward. So if that's legitimate, which I, I do believe this. And, and I think that Paul Benassi is directly connected in. With John Wayne Gacy and, and the, the, you know, John David Norman Odyssey foundation because he's the one who claimed that he witnessed the pink index cards, right, which, which were in John David Norman's warehouse and various properties where he, he kept his sexual blackmail archives, essentially. And, and it's just fascinating that, that he claimed that John Wayne Gacy was behind the kidnapping of Johnny Gosh, right. And the paper boy fetish that was ordered through Michael Aquino. And he names Michael Aquino as essentially the founder of the. And being involved as with the origin of Project Monarch and, and bringing it domestically into the States after studying essentially the Nazi scientists in these various. Right. Military operatives within the SS who had fundamentally helped evolve these techniques. So I don't know. It's just the only reason I bring that up is because I think the level of deception at this moment is, is again, I, I don't think the vast majority are even capable of properly interpreting, right. This, this manipulation as it's playing out. And, and I had just seen you, I had, I, I think I watched you. It was a tweet that you had made a couple of days ago about the, the Minneapolis ICE agent shooting this mother. Right. Fatally, which sparked nationwide protests obviously. And, and the reason I brought up one battle after another is because I remember first talking about it on whatever this is. And Sam was like, so what do you think the end result of this? Truly, you know, what was the intention behind the film, like, as far as the plot line and, and what was it attempting to evoke from the audience? And I really just came down with, with my, my takeaway being to further escalate the culture war through the immigration crisis and, or right. Also provide this left wing because it really was left wing progressive pornography propaganda in a way. Right. As far as like, it's all about this leftist revolutionary organization called the French 75. And, and what are they doing? They're, they're conducting and engaging in domestic terror operations as if they're a gladio paramilitary organization. It's just fascinating because I, I, I've seen that play out so many times. I mean, my God, in, in, in Belgium. Right? That's the same thing they were doing with the pelvic paramilitary groups there to destabilize the nation and, and essentially, you know, usher in the new leadership which would be fully compromised. Right. And, but anyway, it's, it's, well, you.