Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (2:30)

What if he's abusive? That means he probably did work for the government.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (2:33)

That's right.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (2:34)

That's lends credence to him. And you think they wouldn't, they worked with Epstein, you think they wouldn't work with Mitch Snow. Morons.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (2:40)

So they, they inadvertently confirmed Mitch Snow's account that he was there. They were trying to say he wasn't even there. And one of these podcasters brings on Mitch Snow's son who hasn't talked to him for 20 years to try to debunk Mitch Snow's story that he was at Camp Huachuca. And he inadvertently said, yeah, I got a call from Camp Huachuca asking me about my dad being there and that. I'm like, oh. So they inadvertently actually confirmed Mitch Snow's account that he actually was there. And now we know Candace Owens has uncovered. Did you know this? That here's Erica Kirk. And this is a movie poster for a movie she did called November Renaissance.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (3:25)

No, they didn't do the movie. They were trying to get funding on GoFundMe or not. Fun. You know, it's one of those, like, crowdfunded kind of things. Jimmy.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (3:33)

Yeah, so they were. They did a GoFundMe to get money for it. I guess they didn't get enough money because they never made the movie. But everybody who was involved in this movie, turns out has a direct connection with Camp Huachuca. And so let's. Let's listen to. Candace Owens is going to break this down for you. I watched this last night. This was kind of amazing how she's got. It's amazing the information she gets and how people try to pretend she's not doing great work and she is. But here, let's. This is a couple minutes long, so let's just enjoy it.

Jimmy Dore (4:06)

That she did some acting or reality tv, I don't know how we would phrase it. We know that she was pursuing the stage. Obviously she was involved in pageants and. Yeah, we're checking out this movie poster before I tell you what it's all about, what the movie itself is about. Just by way of association, virtually everyone involved in this movie, the actors, the stunt double men, they are involved with Fort Huachuca, okay? Involved with the military, at the very least. The person they said she was really close to was Clayton Haugen. I hope I'm saying that last name right. H A U G N. Maybe it's just Hogan. And he does marketing for the defense contracting firm Dylan Aerospace. There's Don Fry. Now, you might just think of him as a fighter, but he actually graduated from high school in Sierra Vista and then trained in Judo at Fort Huachuca. There is Peyton McCormick. She. Her grandfather is Colonel Pete McCormick. Her father is Lieutenant Colonel Alan McCormick, once stationed at Fort Huachuca. Peyton was also, by the way, Miss Teen USA in 2006, Priscilla annual. And again, we can pull up that poster, Skyler. So they can just see, going through the names here as well, that her father was a lieutenant stationed at Fort Huachuca.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (5:31)

Whoa.

Jimmy Dore (5:32)

There's also Chantel Theuey. I didn't have too much time to go through that person's background. I bet I could find a clear connection to Fort Huachuca since that's the theme. But we can tell you that her dad worked for in artificial intelligence for IBM. So I'm thinking maybe he had something to do with for Huachuca. And then that Price Mitchum, that just gets dark. I mean that young man or older man got put in a psych 5150 hold. And I mean, I don't know where that direction heads to long family of actors. I've got to prod that narrative a bit more. The point is, is that they told me there's absolutely no way that she's not familiar with Fort Huachuca. I don't, I don't know why that was said by Andrew Colvett. She most definitively was just by nature, like I said, of what her mom did. And also this poster proves it. Okay, that narrative is officially over. This whole. Oh, this is crazy. What are we talking. Okay, that's just done. We can end that.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (6:27)

Okay, so the whole pushback was that this is crazy that she's. Oh my God. Now you're saying Erica Kirk is involved in Camp Huachuca and Scops and somehow she's involved and this is. That is just crazy talk. Well, now it's confirmed that she's not. She's well known on the base to a lot of people. Ok. And she was doing a movie and everybody involved in the movie is connected to Camp Huachuca and that she's regularly at the Camp Huachuca. So let's. A little bit more. Let's listen.

Jimmy Dore (7:02)

Erica in this film was set to play a character named Evelyn Mathis. We know this because we found the remnant of a Kickstarter that was still available to the public. Now I wish I had given to this when it was first espionage up back in 2012, 2013, because I would then be able to open all of these posters and learn more about that particular character. But I can tell you definitively that this was a movie about corporate espionage, assassins and technology nanotech. All used to help the government and corporate financial institutions maintain power. I am not kidding. I'm going to read you the description here before showing you a video. It says, in the world of tomorrow, the mind has become a hard drive linked to the Internet. And once the present divide between technology and humanity has become next to non existent, driving this world forward are the Many emerging multinational corporations that have grown in power far beyond the control of world governments. In this reality, financial institutions vie for dominance through corporate black ops. These clandestine endeavors are carried out by figures known as proxies, Cloak and dagger assets that are hired in secret to remove rivals from power.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (8:25)

What?

Jimmy Dore (8:25)

Or to protect corporate capital from harm. And it tells us about the elites, the proxies. And I'm going to let you just actually listen to the director, Clayton himself describe a bit about what this was intended to be about. I say intended because when you start reading the comments in the Kickstarter campaign, you realize they never delivered. They promised to deliver it in 2013. That didn't happen. Here is the director, Clayton Hogan, speaking about this movie you guys just saw.

Candace Owens (9:02)

There was a visual pitch to really.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (9:03)

Give you a feel for the atmosphere. But as far as concept goes, we really developed it around a number of.

Candace Owens (9:07)

Questions that we were asking ourselves. Now, these questions range from anything from.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (9:11)

How can we manipulate someone's senses enough so that they believe a false reality, when in reality something else is going on entirely.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (9:19)

This is the director of that movie that Erica Kirk was set to star in that they never made. This is him telling you what, what this is about. It's about implanting fake memories in people's brains to make them believe a false reality. This is. This. This is right up your alley, Kurt. This is.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (9:37)

Well, let me be a real Normie Norman and say, well, he's just knocking off the Matrix, but I would still be haunted by that.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (9:45)

Yeah. So there's more to let's listen to this guy go on.

Candace Owens (9:49)

Or even, how can someone like the.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (9:50)

Class geek pirate and steal, say, the varsity quarterback's, you know, knowledge and skill set? Or even more so, how can the knowledge and skill set of a Navy SEAL be copied and transferred to somebody else? And this concept became possible when we really pushed the boundary on what's called nanotechnology. That's tiny little microscopic machines that carry out their function on an atomic level. Now, with nanotechnology, we were able to create this plausible and believable mind bending and reality bending concept that is grounded.

Candace Owens (10:22)

In, you know, developing physics theories out.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (10:24)

There and developing science. So really the question you should ask yourself is, what happens in a world where the brain is a hard drive, your eyes become video cameras, and knowledge.

Candace Owens (10:33)

Is not learned so much.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (10:35)

It is just programs that are installed onto you.

Jimmy Dore (10:40)

Yeah. So that's not going to help matters any in the world of us conspiracy theorists who kind of think that that's what happens.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (10:50)

So. Whoa, whoa, Whoa.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (10:53)

Yeah, well, this stuff, dude, I wrote a script, a treatment before I got the job on Chappelle's Show. I wrote a treatment for the Six Million Dollar man remake that for Bob Weinstein, for his sister. Okay. And I did all this research and I made the Six Million Dollar man where it was about nano machines about 20. It's like 20 years ago. Okay. And that was already a thing they were talking about back then. But since then, they've the same as the brain chip from Elon that was invented in 1970. It's not a new invention. The fact that they're like, hey, the blind will see and people will walk. That means the military has already gotten every possible use out of it that they could get. And the actually control our military got all the use out of it. And now they're gonna let some blind ec. But mostly it'll be for control. And they all are narcissists that want to make a movie about the they're doing. Going back to E. Howard Hunt, he's got a series of James Bond spy novels. That guy that helped kill Kennedy from Watergate, all of them write a book. James Barr's father from that school where Epstein taught, he wrote a crazy book about oligarchs having sex slaves in space that they keep under a glass case in the school, at that school that, you know, all the greats go to. Like the one working for Biden that signed his name with the autopad. I'm forgetting his name. All these people are such narcissists. I'll bet you could learn a lot from their fiction they write.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (12:16)

You know that? Well, so it turns out she's not a honey trap. She's just a roach motel. And now you're really stuck. So different people grieve in different ways. You know the way when I suffer a bad loss, I take a shower, play music that we both enjoyed. But other people like to strategize a collapse of democracy. Yeah, you, you, you do you.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (12:43)

I'm going to need a lot of pyro for this.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (12:45)

And you know, Charlie Kirk went to a special school. Did you know that? High school.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (12:50)

Yes, I did know that. All of the. I'll bet she did too. I hope Candace is putting it together because listen, these are all great takes. Her defending that scumbag from Scientology, Danny Masterson, who went to prison for serial whatever. And her defending Weinstein are two weird missteps. And I think that's from John Mappin, the Scientologist, who is her billionaire. So maybe she's Putting it together. I hope so. But John Mappin introduced Charlie and Erica. That's who introduced and introduced her to her husband. So I'm curious about that. I really am. I have no quar. I love her telling the truth about things, but keep in mind, wait for the other shoe to drop with all these people because most of the pundits were picked out a long time ago and some of them don't even know it. Charlie didn't, so.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (13:36)

Well, she even talks about how she realized that Charlie had handlers and that she didn't realize that she had handlers and then she did realize it. So it sounds like she's. Wait, she's certainly onto it pretty good. And so she put a lot of.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (13:53)

Info out there that is good to get out there.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (13:55)

Yes, she's definitely. I don't know about that John Mappin guy or his influence or whatever, but I. She's onto it. And that's amazing. The fact that the stuff that she keeps coming up with. And of course they went nuts when she talked about Camp Huachuca because she was 100% over the target.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (14:14)

Fort Hawk 2 is well known to people as being an MK Ultra programming spot. Lockheed's in there, they call it. The saying is give you. They give you a bowl of lsd the soldiers would talk about. So the fact they got all up in arms and I was surprised who got up in arms about it, that tells you somebody kicked the anthill. Taught revealing that. That's what I. How I take it.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (14:35)

So I say more power to Candace Owens. She's going against everybody and everything. And so of course, they immediately call her a left winger, just like they immediately called me a right winger when I was telling the truth about, you know, the Democratic Party, Russiagate, the Ukraine war, Covid. That's. That's their flex. So they're doing the same thing to her. They called me a right wing. They called her. So the fact that she's taking the fire from her own side, from quote, unquote, conservatives, just like Tucker Carlson, you know, they're onto something and they're telling big truths that they're not allowed to say, just like I was telling big truths I wasn't allowed to say. So they had to 100% assassinate my character, which they did over Seth Rich, they did over Russiagate. Again, they did over force the vote, they did over Ukraine, they did over Covid. And, and that's so they don't ever talk about any of the things I'm actually saying. They just go after my Character.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (15:32)

Someone did it with Scott Ritter. When I was in Vancouver, this guy urgently wanted to tell me that Scott Ritter's bad. And I'm like, okay, look, I. I don't know the guy, and I also don't give a shit. Could you tell me his lies? Because if he's bad and he lied, what was he lying about?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (15:45)

Yeah, what did he lie about?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (15:47)

He goes, no, but I mean, can't you go talk about the person like you can? But like I said, if he's really bad, that just proves he worked in the government. That's all that proves. I don't. You don't have to like Candace. You'd be like, I think she's an idiot. What does that have to do with anything? It's not high school, assholes.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (16:06)

So, you know, when it comes to Erica Kirk, do you think someone who wants to come out on stage looking like a cross between a baked potato wrapped in aluminum foil and a disco ball, there might be. Might be. Right after her husband is publicly assassinated, there might be something a little shady happening there. Like she might be programmed that she might be conditioned for this moment.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (16:28)

Brings out a rapper with multiple personality disorder.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (16:31)

Yes, they can sit down. And Nicki Minaj. She brings out Nicki Minaj, who Charlie Kirk said is a bad role model and would never have at AM Fest. There she is putting her on stage and propping her up as somebody with multiple personalities. She admits it. She has these.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (16:46)

It's a matter. Well, it's just stagecraft. Jimmy, you're being silly. Yeah, it's just people that are like, candace is dumb. All that happened is you didn't look at any of the things she said. You did the high school thing, and I'm speaking directly to a friend of mine I just spoke to. You just looked at, geez, bad, like, high school nonsense. And you're not looking at the evidence and you're not looking at actions. Look at these people's actions.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (17:12)

Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member. We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show. You can do it by going to jimmy dork.com clicking on join Premium. It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards. Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member. And if you haven't, you're missing out. We give you lots of bonus content. Thanks for your support. Confronting high credit card debt can feel scary, but the good news is if you owe $10,000 or more in credit card debt, financial relief options are now available. National Debt Relief is currently offering debt relief designed to reduce what you owe and put you on the fast track to becoming debt free. If you qualify for debt relief, you may be able to pay back less than what you owe and save thousands of dollars. Just visit nationaldebtrelief.com Imagine only paying one low monthly program payment you can afford and and saving money as you become debt free. National Debt Relief has already helped bring debt relief to over 550,000 US consumers, earning thousands of five star reviews and an A rating with the Better Business Bureau. You're stronger than your credit card debt. Let today be the day you start turning things around. Take the first step and Visit National Debt Relief.com to see what debt relief you may qualify for. That's nationaldebtrelief.com so do you remember this guy?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (18:39)

Yes.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (18:40)

So this guy is from the Wolves in Finance podcast and Twitter account and he's exposed a lot of fraud that appears to be going on inside TP USA and all their shell companies.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (18:54)

Also Tim Waltz before that fake Shirley kid, this guy had a whole great thing on Tim Waltz's skullduggery.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (19:01)

So he's exposing that they're sending millions of dollars to a UPS mailbox at a strip mall and they're trying to pretend like this is normal and they got all the money moving in and out and so and it seems like Charlie caught on to this and that's why he ordered a Doge style accounting effort inside TP USA and then eight days later he was killed. So this guy's been exposing all this and we've showed it to you before. Well guess what? TPUSA is so stupid and they're so bad at what they're doing, which is covering up stuff. They're so bad at it that they tried to intimidate him. They had a legal letter sent to him and let's listen.

Candace Owens (19:48)

Turning Point states in the letter, Turning Point entities are not looking for litigation. Rather, their interest is in the truth and making sure the public record is accurate. So they are claiming they do not want to sue me. But I view this letter as a threat to sue and I think any reasonable business person would do the same. A cease and desist letter is the first step towards a defamation lawsuit. I interpret this letter as Turning Point telling me to shut my mouth or they're going to sue me. I do not understand what Erica Kirk is doing out of the hundreds of people posting on social media about.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (20:13)

I don't think she understands what she's doing either, because obviously she's a product of MKUltra and had her mind wiped a long time ago.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (20:21)

Yeah. Also, she's not in charge of it. She's the figurehead.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (20:24)

She's the right.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (20:25)

The person in charge doesn't put on a sparkly suit and shoot fireworks off.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (20:30)

That's right. Five minutes after her husband was assassinated.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (20:34)

Yeah, that's. The dancing monkeys got to do that after they kill her husband.

Candace Owens (20:38)

Turning Point.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (20:39)

Why?

Candace Owens (20:41)

Out of the hundreds of people posting on social media about Turning Point, why are they targeting me?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (20:46)

Why? Because he's over the target, that's why. Because he's really uncovered something, that's why. Yeah, those P.O. box. That's right.

Candace Owens (20:55)

Why are they so worried about what I am saying that they're sending me legal letters? I am one of the smallest YouTube channels in my market segment. Who do they think I am? I'm a working accountant with a small YouTube channel. I have no money, I have no power. I have no influence. I don't know how much money they think they're going to get from suing me. All I have is the truth, and I'm not going to stop speaking the truth because Erica Kirk doesn't like it. The one good thing about a lawsuit is that everything will be out in the open and Turning Point will quickly find out that I have nothing to hide. The letter came from a lawyer named Paul Edgard Harold from South Bend, Indiana.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (21:27)

Now, I'm going to guess they're not sending their best.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (21:30)

Yeah. Have you ever seen not a pedophile face, Jimmy? He's not a pedophile.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (21:38)

No.

Candace Owens (21:38)

Named Paul Edgar Harold from South Bend, Indiana. It seems like this is Turning Point's lawyer. I looked him up and I cannot find that he's been admitted to the State Bar of Arizona in order to practice law in Arizona. So I'm not exactly sure how he's going to sue me in Arizona, but maybe he's working with other lawyers. In the letter, they order me to please confirm that you will publicly correct your false statements immediately. This is not what I was going to talk about this week, but turningpoint is demanding that I communicate their statements publicly. So here we go.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (22:02)

Here we go.

Candace Owens (22:03)

They include a whole list of statements they claim are false that I have made in my videos about turningpoint. Now, I'm not interested in spreading false information, so I'm glad That Turningpoint reached out to me because if I said something wrong, I am happy to correct it. So let us go through the statements where they have a problem. And you're going to want to hear this because some of these are wild. On November 16, I posted a video called Bombshell. Did Turning Point USA commit fraud? They say these are false claims. Charlie Kirk ordered a DOE style audit that was never conducted. Here's my first problem with this letter. They do not include the actual quote that I said in the video. This is a paraphrased statement of what I said. And they are saying that the paraphrased statement is a lie. You have to tell me exactly what I said that was supposedly a lie. And they do this through the whole letter. So my request to this lawyer in future letters, because I'm assuming there's going to be more, please include the actual quote that I said so that I can respond to your accusation. But I'm going to at least try to interpret what they are saying. I spoke in my video about a memo that Charlie Kirk wrote eight days before he was murdered. In the cease and desist letter, they say Indeed, Turning Point USA's COO announcement concerning the DOGE effort never used the word audit. So this is breaking news. Turning Point's attorney has now confirmed that the Charlie Kirk memo is authentic. We now have legal confirmation this did happen. It seems like their problem with my video is that I called it a DOGE audit when in the memo it is written as DOGE effort. So they want everyone to use the word effort and not use the word audit. This letter is seriously hurting my head. Whatever word you use, the memo is clearly talking about an evaluation of Turning Point. But we cannot use the word audit. We have to call it an effort or they are going to sue you. The letter goes on to say the announcement makes clear that Turning Point USA was doing what it has always pledged to donors. Ensuring it was being efficient with its funds and time and making changes to foster greater efficiencies. Moreover, TurningPoint USA hires a third party audit firm to conduct an audit every year. This is all just their opinion. This is how they are interpreting Charlie Kirk's memo. They think that Charlie Kirk wrote this memo and they think it means that they do not have to do anything. How convenient. They think that Charlie Kirk wrote a memo just to tell people to keep doing business as usual. Well, my opinion and the opinion of many other people was that Charlie Kirk's memo meant something different. This is not a statement of fact. It is an opinion this is another problem I have with this letter. Most of the statements they mention are opinions just like this one. If you are going to accuse me of defamatory statements, they need to be facts, not opinions. If I have a fact wrong, let me know and I will happily correct it. But I will not change my opinion of this memo to whatever you want. But since it is so important for Turningpoint, I have no problem with specifying that Charlie Kirk's memo used the words doge effort, not dogeaudit. The next statement is someone at Turningpoint decided not to file 990forms at the time I made that video. Those forms were not publicly posted. Those forms were posted after I made that video. And I've already made a correction about that. The next statement is in 2023, $650,000 may have been funneled from TurningPoint USA through Turning Point Action to TurningPoint PAC to evade campaign finance restrictions. They are referencing this chart from my video. They claim money actually went from Turning Point action to TurningPoint USA as a reimbursement or event expense. There was nothing nefarious about that transfer. I'm not sure they are contradicting what I am saying. According to their own statement, turningpoint USA used their own donor funds to pay for an event on behalf of TurningPoint Action, freeing up TurningPoint Action funds which they then transferred to Turningpoint. They are saying that later Turning Point Action reimbursed Turning Point USA for that event. But that doesn't change what I was saying. Additionally, in my video, I specifically said again, this is not necessarily illegal if they structure their transactions correctly and utilize campaign finance loopholes. But it certainly looks unethical. That is my opinion. This money did move between the organizations. I'm allowed to have my opinion. On November 30, I posted a video called Explosive More Fraud at Turning Point usa. They say these are false claims. There was more fraud at Turning Point usa. I assume they are referring to the title of the video here. They of course are saying that there is no fraud at Turning Point usa. The content of the video is me going over the evidence of fraud and sharing my opinion. Now, technically a true statement would be that no one has been convicted of fraud at Turning Point usa. But whether fraud is going on right now is an opinion. This is what happens in every criminal court case. Both sides look at the facts. One side gives their opinion that they are innocent. The other side gives their opinion that they are guilty. Turning Point is looking at the financials and claiming that they are innocent. I understand that. I'M looking at the same financials and thinking they look suspicious. I did not even say in my video that they committed fraud. I think I'm very fair and balanced when I say now, for legal reasons, I have to say that I do not have any evidence of a crime. We would need an investigation of the books at Turning Point to know for sure. What I am saying is that there are red flags in the financials at Turning Point and a lot of questions that need to be answered. That sounds to me to be pretty fair and balanced and the complete opposite of what they are accusing me of saying. They cannot take my statements out of context and accuse me of defamation. I have the right as a journalist to report on Turningpoint's financials. Their opinion that they have not committed fraud is just an opinion. My opinion is that it looks suspicious. Now, it is nice that we have this letter with their official statements, but the letter does nothing to change my suspicions. It does not address most of my questions. Instead of answering my questions, it is the precursor to a lawsuit. Unless I change my statements. That does nothing to reduce my suspicions. For the sake of avoiding miscommunication, I can change the title of the video if that makes them more happy. I already changed it from More Fraud at Turning Point USA to More Fraud at Turning Point usa. Allegedly. The next statement is that America's Turning Point had ghost employees. The letter explains America's Turning Point had 80 employees in FY23 and 108 in FY24. There was, however, an inadvertent error in America's Turning Point filing which failed to note to these employees. And America's Turning Point is in the process of rectifying that inadvertent error. So I was right. There was something wrong. They did put incorrect information on the 990form. Yes, there were missing employees. They were not reporting. They have confirmed it. And just to be clear, this was not some minor mistake. This was around 80 employees that were somehow missing. Their complaint is that it's not correct to use the term ghost employees. I don't know if I necessarily agree with that opinion, but that is their position. I find this incredible.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (27:37)

Incredible.

Candace Owens (27:38)

How are they going to sue me for this? They admit that I am right, that the employees were not reported correctly. They don't like the wording I used. How is that defamatory? The next statement is that donations to Turning Point action increased from $10.7 million in FY23 to $27.2 million in FY24 and suggested that Tyler Boyer may have been recruiting these donors away from Turning Point USA to undermine MAGA and benefit himself. Again, this is not exactly what I said and I find their paraphrasing of my statements a little silly. They are claiming that Tyler Boyer never tried to undermine Charlie Kirk in any of his decisions. Tyler Boyer never tried to benefit himself in his role at Turning Point. I find those claims a little excessive. What I actually say in my video was sharing my opinion on the financials, which I'm allowed to do. When you see Tyler Boyer's organization growing so much faster than Charlie Kirk's organization, that looks to me like a corporate takeover from the inside. That is my opinion, which I'm allowed to have. Now, of course, I cannot know what is going on inside Tyler Boyer's mind, but that's not what I said in my video. I was not speaking about his state of mind or his motivation. I do not know that. The letter goes on to explain that donors naturally direct more money towards election activities and election years, especially to organizations like TurningPoint Action that can engage in lobbying and political activity during election years. Accordingly, you are wrong to assert that the increased donations to Turning Point Action evinced any sort of wrongdoing on Mr. Boyer's partner. So their explanation is that all the changes in the financials can be explained by the election. That is their official explanation. I do not believe it. And that is my opinion. On December 7th, I posted a video called Top 10 Clowns of the Year. In this video, I called Turning Point my number one clown of the year. I talked about the now infamous interview with Turning Point's chief security person, talking about the day that Charlie Kirk was murdered. I point out the massive contradiction where he says they were not allowed to fly drones. Then I show the interview with Frank Turek where he says he was watching drone footage with Charlie Kirk. This part is breaking news because I'm not aware this has ever been discussed. The lawyer in this letter says the following. There was no discrepancy. UVU prohibited Turning Point USA from flying drones for security purposes during the event, but did allow a Turning Point USA media production drone to briefly fly over the location before the event to collect limited B roll footage.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (29:30)

So you're telling me what? That. That they allowed a drone flight just for BS B roll media coverage, but they wouldn't allow a drone flight for.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (29:45)

Security and you as security accepted that from them and just didn't break that rule? Because that's insane. And I thought your million dollar Secure. You know, Epstein's Million Dollar Security did Everything he wanted.

Candace Owens (29:59)

First of all, how could this be defamatory if I had no idea about any of this? Second, I find this explanation absurd. You are telling me that the security team was not allowed drones, but the media team was? That is the official explanation from Turningpoint's lawyer. My honest opinion is I do not believe that. But if that did happen, that is really silly and it may have cost Charlie Kirk his life. On December 14, I posted a video called Tim Pool rants about Turning Point. They say these are false claims asking whether money sent to 110 LLC was to bribe Jake Hoffman. Again, that's not exactly what I said. They are complaining that I'm not allowed to ask questions. I cannot ask questions about 110 LLC. I cannot ask questions about Jay Kaufman. I think those are fair questions to ask given that Turningpoint sends them millions of dollars as one of their largest independent contractors. This is America. I'm allowed to ask questions. But I think it is fair for Turningpoint to also state their official position. They claim TurningPoint contracts with 110 LLC for legitimate services. The money you ask about is spent on marketing and advertising services and any.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (30:59)

So you saw that UPS mailbox there? That's the company that TP USA is sending millions of dollars to. That mailbox Mail. That's the mail. And that's supposed to be this. Oh, this marketing plan. That's what it's all be. It's a marketing company running out of a mailbox at a UPS strip mall.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (31:21)

What's wrong with that? Any claim that's a bribe is false. It's just a normal transfer of funds in a P.O. box in a strip mall.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (31:29)

So it looks very shady and fraudulent and like there's a bribe happening.

Candace Owens (31:33)

Claim that it is a bribe is false. The second statement is asking why America's Turning Point listed COO Tyler Boyer as an independent contractor.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (31:40)

Now watch this one. So they do watch this again.

Candace Owens (31:44)

They are saying I'm not allowed to ask questions. Does Turning Point see the irony in this? Charlie Kirk died under a tent with the slogan Prove me wrong. His whole college campus tour was about asking questions. And now Turningpoint is sending out legal letters to small YouTube channels accusing them of defamation for asking questions. I was asking the question why their COO was an independent contractor. I think that is unusual. That is my opinion. Turningpoint is now stating their official position. America's Turning Point listed COO as an independent contractor because his substantive role for America's Turning Point is more in line with a contractor classification. So this is new Information.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (32:18)

What?

Candace Owens (32:18)

Now, we know Turningpoint is intentionally doing this. This is not a mistake. They are intentionally classifying their COO as an independent contractor, which means they are not withdrawing payroll taxes to send to the ir. Now, if I were their cfo, I would not do this. But for some reason, their cfo, the politician Justin Olson, has determined with all of his accounting expertise that this is the best way to classify their employees. Whatever the reason, this is Turningpoint's opinion about an IRS classification. It is not a statement of fact, and I'm allowed my own opinion. The letter also states, more generally, you have accused the Turningpoint entities of being shell companies. This, too, is false. They are arguing about what can be defined as a shell company. They don't want anyone to call Turningpoint's multiple organizations shell companies. Personally, I do not agree that it is an incorrect use of the definition. Turning Point is moving money between organizations like some kind of shell game. A shell game is a classic street hustle and magic trick. So in my opinion, I think it would be appropriate to call them shell companies. But if Turning Point is so upset about the word shell company, I have no problem calling them something else from now on. On December 28, I posted a video called Shocking Turning Point Fraud Gets Worse. They claim you recklessly repeated many of the previously described falsehoods and again directed viewers to the home address of Mr. Boyer, which has resulted in threats to Mr. Boyer's safety. Let me explicitly state that I condemn any violence, any threat, any harassment being sent to any employee at Turning Point. Do not even harass them on x.com do not retweet at them. Do not send them angry messages. Keep your comments in my comment section. Just for the record, I will repeat what I have previously said and I have to tell people, please do not go to Tyler Boyer's house. That is not appropriate. I was in no way calling for violence against Tyler Boyer. And you are absolutely false in claiming that I was. In the video, I blacked out Tyler Boyer's address, which I did not have to do. He put the address himself on a public document. That's not my fault. That's his fault. Don't blame me when I have tried to protect his privacy. So that is the letter. There are more paragraphs of legal language that I skipped, but that is pretty much the letter. I have to say that in general, most of the things they brought up were nitpicky little things like they don't want me to use the word audit or the word shell company. Those are not even Facts. But I am going out of my way to adjust for some of their requests. And I want to mention something else. Take a moment and think of all the statements they listed in this letter as problematic. I think it's around 11 statements they are claiming are false. Now think about all the things I've talked about in my videos on Turning Point. There are a lot of other things that I have said in my videos that were never mentioned in this letter. They did not say I got those statements wrong. I think that is very telling. Again, I have no desire to spread false information. Some of their statements in this letter were actually very helpful in answering some of our questions. So I hope that this video cleared up any confusion. I will be honest with you guys. Getting a legal letter like this is scary. I don't know why Turning Point is attacking me like this. I don't have a lot of money. Lawyers are expensive and I'm going to need a good one. So I'm going to ask for help. If you like my videos, consider signing up for a membership. That is money that I would use if this turns into a lawsuit. If you want to provide additional support, you can also donate directly from the homepage of my website on wolvesinfinance.com I really appreciate all my members and I'm so thankful for your support, especially in times like these. I'm Zach from Wolves in Finance. Thank you for watching.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (35:13)

So everybody, if you can and you care, go donate. Help him fight back against the $150 million corporation that is Turning Point USA. They probably have more money now than that. But anyways, just subscribe.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (35:28)

Yeah, you know, I mean the show doesn't have a lot of engagement and you would never get a letter. He when he hit that P.O. box that really got to that. That's a big.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (35:38)

Yeah.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (35:39)

PO Box. That's all. That's what we could discern from this.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (35:42)

Yep, that was a big deal. Tucker Carlson in an interview with this adviser to Putin and he told him that they're they're willing to do nuclear war. Let's listen to listen a little bit of this. But none of those concerns. So all the concerns that we've been talking about, none of them according to Tucker, is even close, even close to what's happening in Eastern Europe. What's happening between Russia and Ukraine. Russia. And prepare yourselves because this is the global headline. Russia is actively considering the use of nuclear weapons against Europe. Not against Kiev, against Europe. Specifically the UK And Germany. Just taking out the UK and Germany with nuclear weapons. That's a Fact. Now we're going to explain why we know that that's true in a moment. And at the end of this open, we're going to play an interview we did a few hours ago with a man called Sergei Karanagov, who is a longtime political advisor to Vladimir Putin and one of the most famous public intellectuals in Russia, been around for about 35 years. So here's what he actually said. So Tucker asks him.

Candace Owens (37:04)

Talking about that, what is defeat of Russia?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (37:07)

What is the defeat of Russia? So they're talking about this. So Europe wants to defeat Russia. So does NATO. So what is the defeat? What does it look like? And here's what he says.

Candace Owens (37:15)

Russia comes ever close to a defeat. That would mean that Russia now would use nuclear weapons and the Europe will be finished physically. So I mean, it's simply impossible even to think about it. But they have been talking because they need a war to rationalize their stay in power, to rationalize their existence. And it is not about even defeat of rationale. It is simply keeping on with the failing European Union, with a failing economy, with fading European positions in the world. Everybody in the world now laughs at Europe, which used to be, by the.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (37:53)

Way, one of the core centuries of world power.

Candace Owens (37:57)

Now it's a joke. And of course, I'm not speaking of all Europe. We know that there are decent Europeans.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (38:02)

That are smart Europeans, though in my.

Candace Owens (38:04)

Class of European thinkers, and you're on foreign policy and defense, etc. Etc. There's only one or two men or persons left. I will name them because that would jeopardize them in the night of the audience, but nobody else. I do not have any interlocutor, almost any influence to Europe anymore.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (38:24)

So he's saying that they'll use nuclear weapons. He asked them point blank what countries, if there were nuclear strikes from Russia into Europe in the next year or two, as you said, there may be. What countries would that include?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (38:39)

But my choice would be Britain and Germany.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (38:44)

He says it Britain and Germany. So that's how come that's not the headline in every newspaper? Because of course, that's why you have nuclear weapons. If Russia feels like their defeat is imminent, they're going to use them. And that's what he's saying. But it's so just could you respond to that? It seems crazy. And why isn't Trump ending this war?

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (39:05)

The question also is how did we get here? It's because our foreign policy has been dictated by people like John McCain and the Bushes and frankly, people who have no party, who are at the State Department who have insisted on expanding NATO over and over again to basically the humiliation of Russia. So I say Putin is a Cold War relic who was elected due to another Cold War relic, NATO. And you know, the thing, the reason he's still in power is he represents pride. Like people, you know, there's national pride, we're all proud of America, and there are Russians who are proud of Russia. And by continually sticking our finger in their eye, we have, they had, they felt, or Putin did, and he stayed in power. He's not been overthrown like the predictions. You know, in the early stages of Ukraine, remember, they said, oh, his country's going to turn on him. Oh, look, he's dying of cancer or something. There were all these predictions, this will be over quickly. And it's not, because that's what's at stake for them now is their pride. And that's where we are. It's a wounded bear and there are nuclear power. And we've always been playing with matches near gasoline to be involved in Ukraine. And it's a place we never should have been and we never should have. We wouldn't have had to provoke Russia into their action of going into Ukraine. If you looked at Ukraine, you know how in the United States, there's the blue counties that I was going to say Biden, I forgot, they put Kamala Harris on the ballot instead. But there's the blue counties that Kamala Harris won and then there's the red counties that Trump won. And you can see where the coasts are and you can see where Chicago is and the biggest city in every state. Well, if you did a blue versus red map in Ukraine long ago, it was a continuous, like it went from red to blue and it was purple in the middle, and it's always been that way. And there's just varying degrees of Russian culture on one side and, you know, non Russian European culture on the other side. It never made sense to make it all one or the other, frankly. And when this is over, assuming we don't get into a nuclear war, the end game is going to be largely what it started out with, which is three or four of those territories that were predominantly dominated by Russia are going to be dominated by Russia. If we can get to an end game. This is not nuclear war or something totally crazy.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (42:03)

I've lived long enough to be through a bunch of wars now, and it's always the same story. And I can't believe that the Americans, after Iraq, twice, after Afghanistan, for 20 years after Libya, that they fell for it so easily again in Ukraine. It's just amazing that they fell for this propaganda and that people, oh, we gotta go. But of course, that was the big purpose of Russiagate also was to prime the pump for this war because they've been planning this war for 10, 15 years. That's what this was about. And, you know, you can't talk sense to people. Why do you think Donald Trump, he promised to end this war in 24 hours. And here we are a year into his presidency and he's still funding it and he's still sanctioning Russia, which is just the most self destructive thing we could do. Why do you think he's doing that?

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (42:54)

Was he's not completely in control? That's part of it. I don't believe that he was disingenuous when he campaigned and said he was going to end the war and he was going to get us out of Ukraine. I just think you wake up in the morning and you're the president and you got a lot of stuff on your plate. You got to tweet something mad about Thomas Massie and then you got to tell Canada you're going to invade them and then you gotta go about the other business of the day. And I just think he's left too many things up to other people. But I'm not giving him a pass anymore. Used to, you know, in the first administration we said, oh, he made some hiring mistakes. He hired John Bolton.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (43:37)

Right.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (43:38)

He hired Bill Barr. Those were mistakes. And that's that. You know, he won't especially like you. You know, when he was shot in the ear, I thought, okay, now here's a man who's been shot. There's no way he's going to get in there and fall for the same slop again and hire bad people who are at odds with the things he campaigned on. But that's, I mean, that's where we are. And with the $300 million going to.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (44:06)

Ned.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (44:08)

Even if you're the president, you've only got so many hours in the day and you just spent $300 million for other people to figure out how to get you to do the things you said you weren't going to do.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (44:19)

Here.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (44:23)

But here we are. And so this is.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (44:27)

So when you say he's not in total control, like what, so who, who is in control of this Ukraine situation?

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (44:37)

It's, it's the people who've always been in control. The people in 2014 who led the revolution there in Ukraine that instigated that.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (44:50)

The CIA.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (44:51)

The CIA what's the woman's name? If you said it, I would remember it. She's like a bad penny. She shows up everywhere.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (45:00)

Yes.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (45:01)

Yeah. Victoria Nuland.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (45:02)

That's it.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (45:03)

Yeah. It's those people. It's those people who get into government, and they're there regardless of who the President is. And they're moving around hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars regardless of who the president is. They're making phone calls and doing business. And in Congress, the bodies that are supposed to have oversight over this, like the Intel Committee, they pick those folks either for not being. I'm going to get in trouble for saying this. I'll just say they're uncurious. The people they put on the Intel Committee are, for the most part, uncurious. They don't ask questions and they. Whatever you tell them, they're. They're conditioned not to question authority. And then they do have some bright people on there who are basically.

Candace Owens (45:58)

Former.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (46:00)

I'll say former Deep State are going to be Deep State later in their lives. They're in one door of the revolving door, and they just happen to be on the Intel Committee or the Foreign Affairs Committee in Congress right now, waiting for their job at the CIA. Or maybe they were at the CIA and we didn't know it when they got elected to Congress. There are people, you know, there are people who run for Congress and say, hey, I was in the CIA and I protected this country. And then there are people in Congress who are in the CIA and you never know it.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (46:31)

Yeah.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (46:32)

And they go back to the CIA when they're done.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (46:37)

This is Randy Fine. He's the Zionist maniac from Florida. He's a congressman. And this is from April 27th of 2023. They made a secret trip to Jerusalem with.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (46:50)

Why secret?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (46:52)

With Governor DeSantis so they could sign a bill. They literally went there to sign a bill taking away people's free speech in Florida for Zionism. Yes.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (47:03)

And why would you go to. On a secret trip? Can't he sign it in Florida? Like, why do it there? I don't get it.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (47:10)

Why go to Israel?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (47:11)

Yeah.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (47:12)

To show that you're a bigger cuck than you have to be. So Florida passed an unconstitutional hate speech law in 2023 that was signed into the law law by DeSantis. Now, less than three years later, Miami beach police are going door to door asking American citizens about their social media posts that are clearly protected speech under the First Amendment. So this woman here, her name is Raquel Pacheco. She's A Miami beach resident, veteran, and a repeat candidate who has been openly critical of Mayor Steven Minor and of Israel. And guess what happened to her. Well, the cops.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (47:48)

The bits, right?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (47:50)

Yeah, I think so. So a cops came to her house and this is what happened.

Candace Owens (47:58)

Picture to make sure it's you.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (47:59)

We're not sure.

Jimmy Dore (48:00)

Okay.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (48:02)

Is that your account?

Jimmy Dore (48:06)

I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present, so I really don't know.

Candace Owens (48:10)

How to answer that question.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (48:12)

Like I said, not freedom of speech.

Jimmy Dore (48:14)

This is America, right?

Candace Owens (48:16)

Veteran.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (48:16)

And I agree with you 100%. I'm just trying to see if it's.

Candace Owens (48:19)

You, because if we're not talking to the right person, we want to go see who the right person.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (48:22)

Okay.

Jimmy Dore (48:22)

How can I help you?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (48:23)

So, pretty much it's just a statement.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (48:24)

That was made as far as, you know, verbatim.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (48:28)

It says the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians tried to shut down a theater for showing.

Candace Owens (48:34)

A movie that hurt his feelings and.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (48:36)

Refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ.

Candace Owens (48:38)

Community in any way. Way even leave the room when they vote.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (48:41)

And unrelated matters, wanting to know that.

J.D. Vance (48:44)

You are all welcome.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (48:46)

Clown face, clown face, clown face. So they're literally reading her her Facebook post. Cops are at her house to talk to her about an insulting Facebook post. Hang on. There's more to this.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (49:02)

Or no, if.

Jimmy Dore (49:03)

It was you, I'm not going to answer whether that's me or not.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (49:06)

Okay, the concerning part and not concerning.

Candace Owens (49:10)

For the person who's posting it when.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (49:13)

We'Re just trying to prevent somebody else getting agitated or.

J.D. Vance (49:17)

Or.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (49:18)

Or agreeing with the statement. We're not saying it's true or not. I understand that guy who consistently calls.

J.D. Vance (49:24)

For the death of all Palestinians, that.

Foreign Policy Expert or Analyst (49:26)

Can properly incite somebody to do something radical.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (49:29)

That's all. We're here. Oh, my God.

J.D. Vance (49:31)

We wanted to get your side.

Candace Owens (49:32)

If it was you that posted that to. I would think to refrain from posting things like that because that could get something insane.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (49:39)

Yeah. We're here to intimidate you from posting things that are critical of Israel and the mayor. That's what we're here to do. We're here to intimidate you. With my gun, with my police badge, and a special trip to your door to read to your social media post back in your face and tell you you better refrain from that.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (49:59)

Jimmy, shouldn't he have a mask on or something?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (50:01)

You should have something on.

Jimmy Dore (50:03)

I appreciate you coming out here.

Candace Owens (50:05)

Okay, that's it.

Jimmy Dore (50:06)

That is it. I'm going to maintain my. My amendment rights to not answer the question about what?

Candace Owens (50:13)

That's. I hope that's understand. We appreciate it.

Jimmy Dore (50:15)

Thank you. You as well. Thank you. Take care.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (50:18)

Two cops. Shouldn't they be out fighting crime, trying to make their city safer?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (50:23)

Shouldn't they be trying Florida, you got nothing better to do?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (50:27)

So here. Can I just say F you and F Israel. How about that? Can I say that? And I can actually say that whenever I want. It's literally. It is my right to say that because unlike the modern Ashkenazi state of Israel, we actually have a constitution in the United States. And you have the right to feel hurt by what I said. Just like you have a right to go fuck yourself. How about that?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (50:52)

No one can take away your right to go fuck yourself. Pigs.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (50:57)

So no, of course there weren't. Not there to intimidate. They're part of Florida's new grammar police. They're citing you for spelling the word. You're wrong. It's got an apostrophe re. So. And we all, as we all know, facts are anti Semitic, especially if the truth upsets ones. The. The truth is about.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (51:19)

I missed this in the earlier slide, but. So she's been a candidate before. So that sounds to me like the mayor is persecuting a political opponent. Using the sheriffs is pretty common for. Well, every state really. You know, that's why they focused on her.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (51:35)

You are correct. Because here's that cop. Oh, and by the way, I think, is he wearing the exact same thing? Looks like it's his same casual uniform. He's wearing the exact same thing. So this is the mayor.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (51:47)

I see his shoes. The same shoes too.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (51:49)

So same shoes. So there's the Miami beach mayor. Steven Miner addresses attendees at a campaign event in October. On the right is the same officer who questioned Raquel Pacheco at her door this week and can be seen at Retim leaning against the wall wearing what appears to be the same clothes he wore at Pacheco's doorstep. So that's a crime that you would think. You'd think that the Miami beach mayor too cheap to buy his henchmen a second outfit.

Candace Owens (52:19)

Yeah.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (52:20)

Or even some masks.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (52:22)

So they aren't doxxed Right. Any. By the way, anytime you see a police office politician with a suit and sneakers, just know they're getting ready to run if they need to. That's what that.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (52:33)

Oh, I thought they're like Gavin Newson. They're getting ready to put their legs behind their head and suck their own dick.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (52:38)

Well, either yoga. Either that or this guy. Let me show this Guy show the thing. Either that or the mayor has Jerry Seinfeld dressing him every morning.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (52:50)

I find that very suspicious that he's dressed exactly like Seinfeld. Passing Zionist, literally.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (52:56)

Candace Owens tweeted it out and said, nothing will catalyze anti Semitism in America faster than this. Right there. No doubt about it. No doubt about it. Showing up, asking someone about a social media post critical of pals of Israel and guys who support Israel.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (53:16)

What is this? England.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (53:19)

Right? No, kid, right?

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (53:21)

This is bitch ass England.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (53:25)

I feel, yeah, it is like England. Hey, this is Jimmy. Who's this?

J.D. Vance (53:39)

Hey, man, it's J.D. vance.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (53:40)

Hey, Mr. Vice President, what a pleasure. How are you?

J.D. Vance (53:44)

Fuck you. And I'm giving you the middle finger into the phone, just FYI.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (53:50)

Why? What did I do?

J.D. Vance (53:52)

That's a perfectly justifiable response.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (53:55)

To what?

J.D. Vance (53:57)

Just whatever. Look, the President responded that way to Heckler the other day. And the White House spokesman said it was appropriate behavior from a sitting president. So now we are all doing here at the White House to normalize it, like it's no big deal. We're flicking each other. Each other off and saying fuck you.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (54:17)

Okay. All right, I see.

J.D. Vance (54:19)

And especially me, because I have an important new role here at the White House. The normalizer in chief.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (54:26)

Is that a formal title now?

J.D. Vance (54:29)

No, it's still pretty cash. But it's an important job. The more Trump does things that are, say, unconventional, the more we are going to need to, say, mitigate the unconventionalness of them. Like saying, fuck you. What? You've never said that. Fuck you.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (54:51)

Okay.

J.D. Vance (54:53)

Take Greenland, for example. As in Donald Trump wants to take Greenland. A president just unilaterally announcing he's going to be ceded an entire nation, quote or else. Totally normal. Dude.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (55:09)

Is it though?

J.D. Vance (55:11)

Yes, you. Because, Jimmy, this is all about the security of the United States. And the United States government and military has always taken hegemonic steps to pro. To protect the security of its citizens. Even at times, violating the sovereignty of other nations when necessary. Like that. Or not. This is not new.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (55:34)

Wow. Nicely done. And what security threats would be neutralized by us invading Greenland?

J.D. Vance (55:42)

Jimmy? Any number of securities. Take your pick.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (55:46)

I'd like you to actually name one, Mr. Normalizer.

J.D. Vance (55:50)

Okay, let's play devil's advocate. The left is always talking about climate change and rising sea levels, right?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (55:57)

Yeah.

J.D. Vance (55:57)

And where would all that new water be coming from? Melting ice in the Arctic. And what's between us and the Arctic? Greenland. Boom.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (56:08)

How would we. What? How would we stop the water?

J.D. Vance (56:12)

The Navy would do something.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (56:14)

Idiot.

J.D. Vance (56:14)

They're the water dude.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (56:22)

How. How would the Navy stop rising sea levels?

J.D. Vance (56:28)

I don't know. I don't know. Maybe put out a bunch of those ropes that have white and blue floaty things on them that separate the shallow end from the deep ended public pools. My point is we got this.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (56:42)

I don't think that's how water levels work.

J.D. Vance (56:46)

Oh, what are you a hydrologist now?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (56:48)

You okay?

J.D. Vance (56:52)

And then there's Venezuela. When asked who is currently running Venezuela, President Trump said, I am. And everyone clutched their monocles or whatever that thing is that fancy people do. But guess what? Big deal. Breaking news. F you.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (57:09)

How is that okay?

J.D. Vance (57:12)

Oh, like presidents have never run other countries before, have never kidnapped world leaders before.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (57:18)

Yes, they have. But they have used flowery language about spreading democracy because a US President running another country, it's not supposed to happen.

J.D. Vance (57:27)

Well, he's just saying the quiet part out loud. Now, isn't that somehow better admitting that there are no norms or guardrails on US Foreign policy?

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (57:37)

Not when he campaigned on doing the exact opposite.

J.D. Vance (57:42)

Well, that was then and this is now. We didn't know about Greenland then.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (57:46)

You didn't know what about Greenland?

J.D. Vance (57:49)

That it was there. Whatever. I don't know. Point is, there is now a Trump doctrine, and that doctrine is simply you do you personally do the world to other nations do collectively agreed upon norms. You. Wow.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (58:08)

Okay.

J.D. Vance (58:09)

But that's totally normal. Just like what ICE is doing. We've always enforced the laws, Jimmy. There's nothing new about any of this. Shooting women in the face for driving has always been a part of enforcing the laws.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (58:23)

You know, Mr. Vice President, I think you're smart enough to realize that this tactic is simply not going to work on a lot of people.

J.D. Vance (58:31)

I, of course, do know that. And we have a message for those people.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (58:35)

Oh, I'm pretty sure I could guess what it is.

J.D. Vance (58:38)

Blow me.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (58:39)

Ooh, curveball. You juked me.

J.D. Vance (58:43)

I know. Pretty slick. I like the opposition on their toes. Sort of my job.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (58:48)

Well, you're doing really great at it. We. We gotta go now. Talk to you later, Mr. Vice President.

J.D. Vance (58:55)

Okay, cool. But also fuck you. Fuck you. Also, in addition to blow me, fuck you. Bye.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (59:08)

Hey. Become a premium member. Go to jimmy door comedy.com sign up. It's the most affordable premium program in the business. All the voices performed today are by the one and only, the inimitable Mike McRae. He can be found at mikemcrae.com that's it for this week. You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.

Jimmy Dore (59:36)

Do not freak out.

J.D. Vance (59:39)

Don't freak out.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (59:45)

Don't freak out.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (59:48)

Don't freak out.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (59:49)

Don't freak out. Don't freak out. Do not freak out.

Jimmy Dore (59:54)

I'm not kidding.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (59:55)

Do not.

Guest Commentator (Possibly a Political Analyst or Comedian) (59:56)

Do not.

Candace Owens (59:57)

I'm not.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (59:58)

I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not.

Jimmy Dore (60:02)

Don't freak out.

Zach (Wolves in Finance) (60:04)

Do not freak out. Freak out. Freak out. Freak out. Freak out.