Tucker Carlson CRUSHES Israeli TV Host Live!

Summary

The Jimmy Dore Show
Episode: Tucker Carlson CRUSHES Israeli TV Host Live!
Date: May 27, 2026
Host: Jimmy Dore

---

Episode Overview

This episode centers on Tucker Carlson's explosive interview on Israeli television, during which he sharply challenges Israeli policies, military actions, and U.S.-Israel relations. Jimmy Dore and his co-hosts analyze key moments of the debate, offering their own provocative commentary on Zionism, U.S. foreign policy, media narratives, political power, anti-Semitism discourse, and broader issues of ethics and control. The latter part of the episode pivots to Meta/Facebook's AI-driven layoffs, employee surveillance, and the dehumanizing trajectory of the tech industry. Comedic interludes and impersonations punctuate the intense critiques.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Tucker Carlson's Confrontation with Israeli Media

Main Theme:
Tucker Carlson appeared on Israeli Channel 13, confronting the host with blunt criticisms of Israel's conduct in Gaza, calling out its claim to democracy, and the U.S.'s implicit complicity.

Highlights & Analysis:

• Assassinations and Morality

  • Carlson points out Israel's public celebrations of assassinating opponents.
  • He stresses that killing innocents is never acceptable, no matter the justification or country.
  • Quote:

    "Killing innocents is never acceptable, period. Under any circumstances, by any person or any nation. It's immoral." – Tucker Carlson (03:37)

  • The Israeli interviewer counters with "self-defense" as a foundational justification.
  • Carlson clarifies he does not question Israel's right to self-defense but insists the standard must be universal.

• U.S. Support and Accountability

  • Carlson questions why the U.S. is obligated to fund and defend Israel, pointing out the damage to American interests and global standing.
  • Quote:

    "There's no reason the United States should be sending any money at all to Israel and particularly not to its military..." – Tucker Carlson (07:54)

  • The interviewer speculates about the 'annihilation of Israel' as a hypothetical price.
  • Carlson reiterates, "I don’t want Israel to be destroyed… I just don’t understand why the United States has an obligation..." (08:31)

• Control and Influence

  • Carlson accuses former President Trump of folding under Israeli pressure, leading to U.S. military interventions against America’s best interests.
  • Quote:

    "The Israeli Prime Minister decided when this started. Well, that’s the definition of control." – Tucker Carlson (11:04)

• Zionist Talking Points and Media Critique

  • Jimmy and Kurt mock the Israeli anchor's repeated use of standard Hasbara (pro-Israel propaganda) lines—anti-Semitism, existential threats, self-defense.
  • Dore says, "A Zionist cannot debate without lies... They are immoral. They're genocide. They're the terrorists." (04:52)

• Moral Arrogance and Hypocrisy

  • When called a "terror regime" by the host, Carlson counters that Israel should "pause before using the phrase terror regime since you live in a country that just murdered thousands of children in Gaza." (12:55, 13:41)
  • Dore and panelists praise Carlson for delivering painful truths on Israeli TV, noting Israeli media rarely tolerates such candor.

Timestamps:

• [01:48] – Introduction to the Carlson interview
• [02:24] – Debate on assassinations and morality
• [07:09] – U.S. response post-9/11 versus Israeli conduct
• [08:31] – Carlson on funding Israel
• [11:04] – U.S. foreign policy "control" by Israel
• [12:55] – Carlson on Israel's actions in Gaza

---

2. The Power Discourse: Media, Lobbying, and "Jewish Money"

Main Theme:
Dore shifts to discuss the role of Jewish donors in U.S. politics, responding to a viral video of John Podhoretz explicitly discussing the use of "Jewish power and money" to punish politicians deemed anti-Semitic.

Highlights & Analysis:

• Antisemitism and Power

  • Podhoretz claims it's good if politicians believe "Jews are going to use the power that we have openly to go for you," defining that power as "Jewish money" (23:08-24:19).
  • He cites disproportionate Jewish political donations, bragging about their impact on elections.
  • Quote:

    “There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics... Jews make up 2% of the population. According to some studies, Jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually." – John Podhoretz (24:44)

  • Dore comments, "If I said that, it would be anti-Semitic. I would be canceled." (26:16) and that only "Nazis and Zionists conflate Judaism with this horseshit." (26:23)

• AIPAC, Influence, and Censorship

  • Dore and Glenn Greenwald highlight AIPAC’s open boasting of unseating Israel critics in Congress.
  • They critique how any public mention of Jewish or Israeli lobbying influence is quickly labeled as antisemitism.

• Critique of Equating Criticism of Israel with Antisemitism

  • Dore slams the expanding definition of antisemitism to include those questioning military aid or seeking scrutiny of figures like Epstein.

Timestamps:

• [23:08] – Podhoretz on "Jewish money" in politics
• [26:03] – Dore calls out the shifting "antisemitism" label
• [34:34] – Coverage of AIPAC's influence and public perception

---

3. Historical Reflection: Dostoevsky and "Rule by Minority"

Main Theme:
Dore reads a controversial Dostoevsky passage reflecting on Jewish power and hypotheticals of the majority-minority flip. The moment is used to underscore historical anxieties and the dangers of generalizing.

• Quote:

  “What if there were not 3 million Jews but 3 million Russians in Russia and there were 80 million Jews? Well, how would they treat Russians?” (35:02)

• Dore clarifies that most Jews he knows are as disgusted with Israeli policy as he is, insisting the critique be aimed at Zionists, not all Jews.

Timestamps:

• [35:02] – Dostoevsky reading and discussion

---

4. Big Tech and the Dehumanizing March of AI

Main Theme:
Dore transitions to revelations about Meta (Facebook): Employees are being watched by AI to improve the company's AI systems—ultimately to be replaced by those very systems.

Highlights & Analysis:

• AI Watching Employees

  • Leaked audio of Zuckerberg explaining that AI learns from “really smart people” before those same people are laid off.
  • Quote:

    "We're in a phase where basically the AI models learn from watching really smart people do things." – Mark Zuckerberg (38:45)

  • Dore lampoons the idea, noting Facebook staff are training their own replacements.

• 10% Workforce Layoffs: Mass Casualties in the Tech Industry

  • Meta is laying off 8,000 employees, shifting others into "AI-powered" teams, part of ongoing tech industry downsizing—framed as boosting "efficiency."
  • Dore satirizes the "soulless machine" that is Facebook, comparing workers to disposable utensils.

• Surveillance and Dehumanization

  • Layoff notices are sent at 4am, and employees are reduced to “disposable instruction booklets.”
  • Co-hosts predict this mass displacement is a global trend, the real threat—not some foreign rival.

Timestamps:

• [38:45] – Zuckerberg's explanation of AI surveillance and learning
• [44:09] – Tech layoffs as routine, Dore compares employees to fodder
• [46:05] – Internal memos and dismal morale at Meta

---

5. Satirical Skits: The Deep State & Epstein

Main Theme:
Comedic sketches feature J.D. Vance (as "Vice President") and Jeffrey Epstein (ostensibly calling from the afterlife), lampooning the idea of secret elites controlling politics.

Highlights:

• Vance alludes to "them"—the elite above government and deep state (55:01).
• "Epstein" calls in, coyly referencing his own fate and the untouchable nature of the elite.
• Dore calls it "a glimpse into the horrifying reality of how power actually works."

Timestamps:

• [53:07] – JD Vance call-in skit
• [57:11] – "Jeffrey Epstein" cameo

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• "Killing innocents is never acceptable, period. Under any circumstances, by any person or any nation. It's immoral." – Tucker Carlson (03:37)
• "No one will answer that question. Instead they say, 'well, you’re an anti-Semite.' Well, I’m not an anti-Semite. And that's not an answer." – Tucker Carlson (09:01)
• "There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics...a tenfold [proportion]...And if that money isn’t used...what, why do people give money? Because they want to influence elections." – John Podhoretz (24:44)
• "If I said that it would be anti-Semitic." – Jimmy Dore (26:16)
• "Meta’s human resource chief has confirmed the company will cut 10% of its workforce tomorrow. 8,000 workers will lose their jobs via email that was sent out at 4am." – (44:55)
• “A plastic fork has a longer lifespan than you do now working for that soulless machine called Facebook.” – Jimmy Dore (45:39)
• "Gotta go, Mr. Vice President. I have got a show to do where we expose all this BS so people can know what's really going on. Hopefully someday you'll all be sent to the Hague." – Jimmy Dore (59:21)

---

Tone and Style

The episode is combative, irreverent, and profane, oscillating between serious moral critique and dark humor. Dore and panelists deconstruct establishment narratives, challenge taboos, and ridicule official justifications for violence, while also lampooning Big Tech's disregard for its workforce.

---

For Listeners Who Haven’t Tuned In

• The episode delivers a biting breakdown of political power—linking U.S. foreign policy, lobbying, Zionism, and the demolition of tech labor.
• It exposes, mocks, and satirizes establishment hypocrisies with characteristic Jimmy Dore Show flair, featuring direct quotes, paraphrased skits, and recurring themes of truth-telling against institutional denial and deception.
• Listeners get both substantial excerpts of the featured Tucker Carlson interview and raucous, sometimes shocking, commentary from Dore and crew.

---

For those wanting the episode's core message:
(1) U.S. complicity with Israeli violence must be questioned on ethical, not just strategic, grounds;
(2) Honest debate about lobby influence and anti-Semitism is stifled by those who benefit from it;
(3) The tech industry, under the guise of advancement, is grinding workers into disposable data points.

---

Transcript

[A]

Pros save more on the materials you need to get the job done inside and out at Lowe's right now. Get 10% off in stock Trex Naturals decking now available in more styles. Plus get 15% off select custom entry, interior and storm doors. Then we'll deliver it all straight to your job site to help keep your jobs moving. Get the brand's pros trust priced right and ready when you need them. Our best lineup is here at Lowe's, valid through 527 while supplies last selection varies by location. Pros save more on the materials you need to get the job done inside and out at Lowe's right now, get 10% off in stock Trex Naturals decking now available in more styles. Plus get 15% off select custom entry, interior and storm doors. Then we'll deliver it all straight to your job site to help keep your jobs moving. Get the brand's pros trust priced right and ready when you need them. Our best lineup is here at Lowe's, valid through 527, while supplies last selection varies by location.

[B]

Come see me at Raleigh, Spokane, Tacoma, Levittown, Rosemont, Chicago. Also, we're having our panel show with celebrity guests June 19th at the Starlight Cabaret. You know, they're already buying tickets. It's on Ventura Boulevard. It's right by Sushi Row in Studio City. I'll see you there. Only 100 tickets going fast. Go to Jimmy Dore.com for a link for tickets. There's already a link.

[C]

Establishment media sucks.

[D]

August fighting.

[B]

So good luck.

[C]

We can't afford why he's fomenting this.

[B]

Watch and see as his jack off

[C]

the medium speeds and jumps the medium

[B]

and hits them head on.

[C]

It's the Chimney Tour show.

[B]

Tucker Carlson had an interview, Kurt, I don't know if you know this, with an Israeli reporter journalist on TV in Israel.

[D]

Okay.

[B]

Tucker just gave a master class in the den of Zionist Hasbro. The anchor. The. He used every Zionist talking point. Anti Semitism, self defense, even protocols of the elders of Zion. And Tucker calmly dismantled it all. So let's watch a little bit. I got a couple clips in the. In the chamber. Let's listen.

[C]

So Israel is the most violent state in the world, even more than Iran.

[B]

Yeah.

[C]

Are you serious?

[E]

No country, and I say this with sadness, but no country has boasted more about killing its political opponents than Israel. Of course, about its assassination programs. The prime minister of Israel gave a golden pager to the President of the United States. I was there. And that golden pager represented the pagers that Hezbollah leaders were killed by.

[F]

Sure.

[E]

I mean, so yes, Israel brags about assassinating people and of course it does assassinate people. Many countries assassinate people. But Israel makes a public relations campaign out of boasting about killing its opponents. So by definition, these people that were

[C]

killed are the terrorists of Hezbollah that had a plan to eliminate Israel. In fact, when you said you're against the war in Iran, Iran is the creator of the fire ring around Israel through Hamas and Hezbollah trying to eliminate Israel. So don't you think that Israel has the right of self defense, which is one of the major pillar of interest of national security in Israel and also in the United States?

[E]

Of course I think Israel has the right of self defense.

[B]

So you said about the pager, like

[C]

a golden pager, something that is wrong, isn't it? The fact that you, when you're fighting your enemies, you need to kill them first.

[E]

Sometimes there may be circumstances where you can justify killing someone preemptively. And just to restate Israel, like the United States, like Burundi, like France, like every nation, like every person has the right of self defense. That's an inherent right. So I would. I've never questioned that. I support it. The question that I think is worth discussing is what does that mean? Killing innocence is never acceptable, period. Under any circumstances, by any person or any nation. It's immoral. It's the thing that separates the civilized from the barbarous. And if you wind up killing people like Hamas did. Of course.

[C]

October 7th.

[E]

Right. None of this is a defense of, of Israel's enemies. Of course not. It's a blanket universal principle.

[C]

It sounds like.

[E]

Of course it's not.

[C]

It sounds like you are.

[E]

No, it's a universal principle that applies to every person and every nation. Now that is not an attack on Israel. Israel has to, in order to remain a considered a civilized nation, abide by the same universal principles everybody else does. If Hamas does something that's bad, it's bad. That does not justify Israel doing that same bad thing or the United States doing that same bad thing, or anybody doing that same bad thing. So the principle remains the same. You can't kill people who did nothing wrong.

[C]

It's not just that. No. I'm going back to October 7th. This was a message that was attack on Israel about innocent, about women raping women kidnapping.

[B]

Okay, so again, he's just lying. There was no, there was no sex assaults. That was all made up. So that of course you. There's a Zionist cannot debate without lies. That's all they have because they don't have any because they. They are immoral. They're genocide. They're the terrorists. And so when they debate you, they have to use lies. And that's what that was more of. And he's just confessing that they do everything bad, Everything bad that there is that you could do because they have the right to defend themselves from other people. Defending themselves from Israel. Considering all the orchestra. Just consider all the orchestrated walls wars of the 20th century. JFK, RFK, 9, 11. America is the most attacked nation in the world. Anyway, let's get back. You want to say something, Kurt?

[D]

Whenever you debate somebody with this, especially Israeli, what they always end up falling back on is game theory for some reason. Like, would you know game theory? Because somehow that justifies this. I swear to God, every single time.

[B]

Is that what Brett Weinstein said to you?

[D]

He mentioned it, but it was in relation to that. But like, I could think of three times off top of my head, oh, one guy wanted to be on here, a guy, though, who I'm friendly with, Avi, something comic. And he goes, would you understand game theory? It was the day we covered the story where they were eating food in front of those starving kids to make them to torture them.

[B]

Yep.

[D]

And it turns out there's. There's like 40 more videos like that. So I was kind of upset about it. I'd never seen anything like that because it's pretty dark. And he goes, well, you said game theory. And I was like, you should go on a wood chipper if you study game theory. That's how I feel about game theorists. How about having a moral compass?

[B]

Is that not Avi Lieberman?

[D]

Wait a minute.

[B]

Okay, I know Avi Lieberman.

[D]

Yeah, I like him. But I'm just saying, I think game theory is like a moral justification because like, you did some fucking nerd method says you go blow up kids, go, I really? Fuck yourself.

[B]

Okay, here we go.

[C]

Infants, take them to the tunnels for long months inside Gaza. Do you imagine what the United States would have done to an enemy that would have attacked the United States and do the same in the same magnitude? Do you think that would differently?

[E]

Well, I don't. I don't need to imagine because we had nine, 11 or many innocents were killed. And in response, the United States killed some of the perpetrators and also many innocents. And so we've done that. It is never allowable, period, for any person to kill an innocent. You can't kill a child. The child did nothing wrong. And civilized people understand that. That's what civilized people Are. That's the definition of a civilized country.

[D]

A country.

[C]

But it seems like. Right, but it seems like when you speak about Israel as the most violent state in the world, you forget to mention that it is the most attacked state in the world from so many enemies, like any other country in the world. So if you don't put this equation together, it seems like we are doing it for fun or that we lost our morality. This is self defense.

[E]

Well, Israel has definitely lost its morality. There's no question about that, of course. But I do think, and I would always say, because it's true, that Israel has many enemies, many of whom have committed atrocities against innocent Israelis. Blowing up people in cafes in Tel Aviv is every bit as immoral as killing any other innocent in any other country at any other time. It's all wrong. The reason that I have caused to comment on this and to say that it's wrong is that I'm paying for it. There's no reason the United States should be sending any money at all to Israel and particularly not to its military, even if Israel has neighbors that.

[C]

Even if the price will be the annihilation of Israel. Yeah, this is not your problem.

[E]

I don't.

[D]

Let me be clear.

[C]

This is the morality that you're preaching for.

[E]

Well, let me tell you what I do think, okay? Which is I don't want Israel to be destroyed. I don't want any Israeli to be harmed. I personally have always liked Israel, not that that's relevant, but I, I have. So it's not. I don't want is anyone to be hurt in Israel. I just don't understand why the United States has an obligation to pay for any of this, to send the weapons, for it, to lend its moral authority to Israel, to lend its diplomatic cover to Israel, to lend its air force and its navy and its military. Israel, I don't understand where does this obligation. And no one will answer that question. And instead they say, well, you're an anti Semite. Well, I'm not an anti Semite.

[B]

All right?

[E]

And that's not an answer. What is. What is the answer? And I've never received one. And I know now because of this war that America's relationship with Israel, while it may be based on good intentions, is hurting the United States very badly. Very badly. We can't afford it. And our standing in the world has declined. And we're implicated in some of the many crimes Israel has committed.

[F]

Why?

[C]

I have some about it, but, but I haven't. But I have a question. Please tell me you know, you accused Netanyahu of dragging Trump into an unnecessary war with Iran. So let's think about what it actually mean. Do you really think that a foreign leader can pull the President of the United States into a war he didn't want? And what does it tell us about Trump? Is he really that weak?

[E]

Well, I don't think that that could happen. I saw it happen. I was there. And so that happened.

[B]

So the question I just love, is it that weak? He thought he had him cornered. He goes, you really think. I don't have to think that happened. It happened. I saw it happen.

[D]

Go blackmail, stupid. You forgot about the star of Epstein on your flag.

[E]

I was there. And so that happened. So the question is why? And I just want to be clear. I don't primarily blame the Israeli Prime Minister, who I think is wrong. I think he's gravely hurt Israel. I think he's leading Israel toward destruction. I think he's a very bad leader and a very unwise leader. However, I also believe that that Prime Minister Netanyahu is acting in what he thinks is his nation's best interest. So I give him credit for that and always have. I don't blame him. Primarily, I blame Donald Trump for folding under the pressure from Benjamin Netanyahu and his many allies in the United States. Donors to Donald Trump, people in the media class here were effectively working on behalf of the Israeli government. And Donald Trump, whose decision it was, caved under that pressure. But on February 28, the United States followed Israel into this war. And the Secretary of State of the United States said, we had no choice. They chose the time the Israeli Prime Minister decided when this started. Well, that's the definition of control. He had control of this war. And so my question is, why did Donald Trump allow a nation of 9 million people to pull the United States, a nation of 350 million people, into a war that will change its future and it is bad for the United States. And I can't answer that question.

[C]

You can't answer?

[E]

I don't have an answer.

[C]

What you imply that Donald Trump is so weak that the foreign leader can drag him into a war he doesn't want?

[E]

Well, I'm not. First of all, I never hesitated and

[C]

maybe afraid to say clearly that Donald Trump is weak.

[E]

Let me say two things. For one, of course I'm not afraid or I wouldn't be doing this interview or talking about this at all.

[B]

He just, he just.

[E]

Thanks for watching our YouTube channel.

[B]

Okay, go ahead.

[D]

It's so guido ish how they are. Oh, you Saying he's weak. Like, that idiot thinks he really nailed Tucker by like, oh, you. You just said Donald Trump is weak about your own president. Like, yeah, no, he's weak. He's a cannibal pedophile. How about that, you dumb mother?

[B]

Oh, does this. Does this a really reporter? Does he give mileage points for the guilt trips he's trying to use on Tucker? Because those are. Those are guilt voyages. Guilt journeys. That was not even. So let's keep going. Here we go. I mean, he just said it. He just said Donald Trump was weak and that he followed him into. Do you think he's weak? He just said it. I don't.

[D]

I think he's a punk of your president, you scumbag. What are you talking about?

[B]

So there's more.

[C]

Caving to Iran terror regime that controls now also the hormones.

[B]

I love that Tucker doesn't let him get away with this calling. Is Iran a terror regime? Watch this. This is great.

[C]

But that the United States with caving to Iran terror regime that controls now also the hormones pathway and the terror ring that it created in the Middle East. Maybe it would be even worse for any citizens in the world, not only in Israel, but also in the United States. And this is exactly what Donald Trump said. He said that the United States would have been in danger. So you don't believe Donald Trump.

[E]

I don't believe Donald Trump. And I also think, as an Israeli, you should pause before using the phrase terror regime since you live in a country that just murdered thousands of children in Gaza. We should all pull back a little bit on the.

[D]

Oh,

[B]

wow. So this is going out on Israeli television. That's the beauty of this.

[D]

He's going on an Israeli hit list for that. That little remark.

[B]

That's the beauty. We stand for you with beauty.

[D]

Israel's gonna try to kill him like it's a small, helpless child. He's a small, helpless child.

[B]

Oh, come on. And you know what the comedians say in America over this stuff? Oh, come on. Oi.

[F]

I don't.

[B]

I don't want any trouble. Okay.

[E]

Should pause before using the phrase terror regime since you live in a country that just murdered thousands of children in Gaza. We should all pull back a little bit on the rhetoric. I'm not defending Iran, but I'm just. I'm just saying it's a little. It's a little hard to hear that from Israeli right now. The government of Iran's behavior is in some cases disgusting to me and immoral. But the behavior of the Israeli government in Gaza is Disgusting and immoral. And of course, Israel's not a democracy in any sense. There are millions of people who live under Israeli control who cannot vote.

[B]

All right, again, like

[D]

they got no. I said, Sarah, they got no constitution. Even an Arab has a constitution in their country. But Israel does it. They're not a democracy, they're a theocracy. And you know what he said to me? It's more of ethnocracy. That's not better.

[B]

That reporter needs to take his research team out to the water and treat him like a flotilla, if you know what I'm talking about. Because they committed the worst act of terrorism to Israel. They made him look like what he actually is, a full demonic piece of garbage.

[D]

I think this reporting is to look to the best Jew there ever was. Jesus Christ.

[B]

Jesus Christ. I used to do a joke about that. You know, they say that the, you know, the Jews say they're waiting for the Savior to come. He came. He was Jewish and they still didn't accept him. You know, I'm from Chicago. We were waiting for the greatest basketball player to come. He came. He was Michael Jordan and we embraced him.

[D]

Who shall I sell from this team?

[B]

So here is Haaretz on Israel, Gaza, Palestine, big mouth Tucker Carlson spoke nothing but truth. This is in their Jewish newspaper. There it is.

[D]

Well, they're far left crazies, Jimmy, as anybody from Israel will tell you. Who's a far right crazy.

[B]

Here's some of that. What they said. What was not true in the interview. Tucker Carlson. What was not true in the interview that Tucker Carlson gave to Israel's Channel 13, he told interviewer Udi Sehgal that he was living in a country that had recently murdered thousands of children. What's wrong about that? It's obvious that Israel is not a democracy in any sense. As Carlson said, it's not. So here's some. Here's a little more. Here's the first two. Glenn Greenwald tweeted this out, the first two paragraphs from this article. So let's read it together, shall we? Let's read it together. It's been a long time since such an interview has been aired here. It contained only truths. There wasn't one word that Tucker Carlson said in a conversation with Channel 13's UDI Seagal that wasn't true. It was the distilled truth, a perfect mirror, which is why it evokes such furor. Here the eloquent American media personality proposed an alternative agenda to Israeli media. Speak the truth. Try it for once. Carlson's truth is painful, shaming, oppressive, but it's the truth. It was framed as an interview with America's big mouth, with the Israeli hating, anti Semite social media scream that he shouldn't be interviewed. They were right. There's no place on Israeli TV networks for the truth. But Seagal dared, regrettably, with some redundant sanctimoniousness. Bam.

[D]

It's crazy when they get sanctimonious with you.

[B]

Yes.

[D]

That is really thing we're like, are you kidding me? Oh, does Israel not have a right to exist? I'll tell you what, you go pay for it yourself. And if you can pay for it, then you have a right.

[B]

Mike Malloy has a great analogy. Someone said, doesn't Israel have a right to defend itself? And Mike Malloy said, you live in Minnesota, right? So let's say I showed up at your house and I said, hey, this is mine now. You lived there for a hundred years. I show up and I say, hey, this is mine now get out. And I do it at the point of a gun and you leave and you move down the street and it bothers you and it drives you crazy that these people stole your house and are now living in it. And so then you show up and every once in a while you throw rocks at them and you break their window because it makes you feel a little bit better. And then in response to you throwing rocks at them, they take out a howitzer and a mortar and they slaughter you and your family and your children

[D]

and all your neighbors nearby. And you have a right to do that.

[B]

Yeah. Does that seem right? Because that's what's happening.

[D]

The definition of self defense is being stretched real thin.

[B]

Yeah, self defense.

[D]

In fact, it's being stretched in a way that no one in America could ever get away with calling self defense a thing Israel is doing. There's no court that would ever tell, oh, you gave a fake exploding page that blew up people's faces off their kids. But that was just in self defense. How is that self defense, by the way, they're going to try. Want to kill you more now. Almost like you want it that way all the time. So you can expand and expand and expand.

[B]

And if you want to hear my jokes about this, come see me Saturday. This Saturday in Atlanta, Georgia. My one and only trip ever to Atlanta. I'm never going back. That'll be this Saturday. So if you ever want to see me, and I bring it hard, standing ovations every time we perform. We'll see you this Saturday in Atlanta. Then we'll be in Raleigh. I don't even know if there's tickets left in Raleigh because we're pretty popular in Raleigh. And then we'll be in Spokane, Tacoma, Levittown, Rosemont, Chicago. Also June 19th, just added. Friday, June 19th, 7:30. We're doing a panel show, lots of celebrities. Who will be the celebrity? Will it be Bullet, William Shatner? Will it, Will it, Will it be? Will it be. Who knows? Will it be Zach Galifianaki? Will it be Conan the Real Barbarian? Will it be. Who knows? Maybe it'll be maybe. Maybe it'll be Louis Ckale show up and masturbate for us. I think he would do that.

[D]

I'm on his side. I defend that every time. He asked for consent to not touch someone.

[B]

So I'm giving him consent.

[D]

I defend him openly and forever on that.

[B]

I'm giving him, I'm giving him because I, I'm consenting.

[D]

I, I would be an honor for me as well.

[B]

It would be an honor.

[D]

Yes. And it would be an honor for me to go to Riyadh and apologize to Saudi Arabia for America being a bad friend. And I would like to still, I hope this goes out to someone. They'll book me on that fine festival.

[B]

I got invited to Riyadh. I had a guy a week ago, said, hey, would you be willing to go to Riyadh and tell jokes? And I go, yeah, but I got to say whatever I want. If they let me say whatever I want, I'll go until that guy.

[D]

I will only say things that make them happy because I would like to apologize for America on foreign soil as soon as possible.

[B]

And then the guy said to me, he goes, oh, that's right. Ok, no, I guess that wouldn't work out.

[D]

Whoever that is, hit me up, dude, because they will love what I say to them.

[B]

Hey, you know, here's another other great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member. We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week and it's a great way to help support the show. You can do it by going to jimmy dork.com, clicking on join Premium. It's the most affordable premium program in the business and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards. Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member. And if you haven't, you're missing out. We give you lots of bonus content. Thanks for your support. So this is John Pot Horitz who got, literally took the job that his dad, had we. They called the Keaton was calling him Lucky Boy.

[D]

John Pothertz.

[B]

Yeah. Yeah. So it's no longer. What do they call that when you. What's it called when you inherit Nepo. Nepa's. Yeah, but we call him Lucky Boy

[D]

and not in terms of his name or appearance.

[B]

No, no, no. But he has blocked me on Twitter. He's one of those guys. All right, but at least. At least he doesn't tweet about me like Dan Bonjino. If you block someone, that's fine. You can block anybody. But you can't. If you block them and then tweet about them that you're a garbage person, okay?

[D]

It's self defense. Doesn't he have a right to self defense?

[B]

Does he have a right. So here he is. He's going to talk about the Thomas Massie election and what. Everything he says here, he's saying this in defense of Jews, but everything he says here qualifies as anti Semitism according to the IHRA new rules.

[D]

Oh, this is going to be good.

[B]

Everything he says here. Here is this guy, John Podhoritz, thinking he's actually. So if there's. If you want to know what increases anti Semitism and actual Jew hate this, watch this. Because everything he says here, while being true, will also make people hate them and would be considered anti Semitic if it wasn't a Jew saying it. So let's listen.

[G]

I think it is a good thing if Massie and the people like him and others believe that if you cross the line into antisemitism, Jews are going to use the power that we have openly to go for you.

[B]

And what is that power exactly? I wonder what that power is. Let's see.

[D]

Something with the banks and all the media.

[B]

The media, it's bad.

[G]

Let's see asthma spray, because what other recourse is there? Are we just going to sit here and take it? Beg for scraps? Hope that nice people in, you know, are nice to us? The Democratic Party is going explicitly anti, okay?

[B]

Of course. Why wouldn't people be nice and helpful with the ones that are demanding all their money and children? Isn't that how it's supposed to work? I rob you and if you complain, I threaten you, and if you don't acquiesce to demands, I blow up the world. That's what. Come on. That's how reciprocity works. As long as it works for me. Okay, here we go.

[G]

Semitic. We can see it happening. People are getting benefits, as Seth says, for being anti Semites. That seems to be part of an appeal in primaries to the left and the party. We have to use what means there are at our disposal. And in my view, and I'm going to put it blank, that is Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean.

[B]

That's exactly what you mean. You mean that Jewish billionaires put their money into politics and control the politics of America. That's what he's saying. He's saying that if I said that.

[D]

Shekels.

[B]

If I said that it would be anti Semitic.

[D]

That what? That they put their Jew money in taking

[G]

Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean Jewish donors. Wildly disproportionate, not only charitably, but politically. And when I say charitably, I mean nobody really knows the numbers. Jews make up 2% of the population. According to some studies, jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually. That is a tenfold. Think about that. Think about the disproportion of that. And in politics, it's pretty close.

[B]

So he's telling you that Jews are disproportionately, wildly overrepresented with Jewish money in politics. And why do they put that money in politics? To control it.

[D]

Charitable donations. What charitable donations? Cars for kids?

[B]

Pagers.

[D]

Free pagers.

[B]

Again, if I said this, it would be anti Semitic. If I said. I wouldn't say jews make up 2% of the population. They make up 20% of the political spending with their Jewish money.

[D]

That's.

[B]

If I said that, it would be. I would be canceled. They'd take down my channel and everything because I'm an anti Semite. That's what they would say.

[D]

He's saying it is because only Nazis and Zionists conflate Judaism with this horseshit.

[B]

That's exactly right.

[G]

Jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually. That is a tenfold. Think about that. Think about the disproportion of that. And in politics, it's pretty close also. And if that money isn't used, why do people give money? Because they want to influence elections to get people elected who reflect their views well.

[B]

So 2% of the population takes 20% of all political spending to control the politics in favor of who? Americans, Jews, Israel. That's what he's saying.

[D]

And then, you know, the evidence is Trump didn't do any. Well, I let you know. Tax on tips. Thanks. Thanks.

[B]

Thank you.

[G]

This is an existential issue for Jews

[B]

and the Jews and by the way, look at the faces of the people. Look at the faces of the people say they're like. And they're not interrupting him for a second, like everybody ixnay on the ujay.

[D]

Because they know if I say something it's gonna look really extra worse than it looks now. So they have to sit there and look at this, look at this chick here who's like staring into him. I mean, both are, but this one's like, are you kidding me?

[B]

Are you. You're doing the thing that we're not supposed to do. You're telling the truth. It's this quiet part. We're on a zoom. You're not supposed to say. You're supposed to say this in secret.

[D]

Oh, by the way, those rich, those rich Jews. He's bragging about controlling all the things. You know how they treat the regular Jews? Like absolute shit. They're extremely racist and classist. Did you know that?

[G]

To get people elected who reflect their views. Well, this is an existential issue for Jews. And the Jews who explicitly give money because they want to make it clear to anti Semitic candidates that they are going to have to go through a buzzsaw and that they are not going to simply waltz in and be, you know, be. If they're treated with kid gloves by the New York Times. We are double time going to do what we can to expose who they are to find out what we can find out about them that will harm them and, and that we will do what we can to.

[B]

You're going to do what you can to find out what you can to harm them? Really? Like what? Like finding out they're on the Epstein island flight list. You mean that should be a deal breaker, shouldn't it? Right?

[D]

Yeah, a little bit.

[G]

Preventing will harm them and that we will do what we can to prevent them from taking office. What other choice does American Jewry have?

[D]

How about live your own moral principles you supposedly have, you scumbag. I mean I, I thought you studied Torah. You don't follow it. It tells you not to do this kind of.

[B]

That's. Let me place without stopping it if I can, because that you have to hear it and it's.

[D]

What else can we do besides every stereotype? That's the only way. Unreal. John Pudhurst, what a great name.

[G]

I think it is a good thing if Massey and the people like him and others believe that if you cross the line into antisemitism, Jews are going to use the power that we have openly to go for you. Because what Other recourse.

[B]

And let's remember what he's considering. Anti Semitism by Thomas Massie. Antisemitism is. I don't think we should fund a genocide. I don't think we should fund Israel. I think we should have the Epstein list exposed. That's what he's calling anti Semitism.

[D]

That's how you know Israel's guilty, because it's anti Semitism. To expose the Epstein thing. That's how you know Israel's guilty. Right there.

[B]

Right there.

[G]

Is there. Are we just gonna sit here and take it? Beg for scraps? Hope that nice people are nice to us? The Democratic Party is going explicitly anti Semitic. We can see it happening. People are getting benefits, as Seth says, for being anti Semites. That seems to be part of an appeal in primaries to the left and the party. We have to use what means there are at our disposal. And in my view, and I'm gonna put it blank, that is Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean Jewish donors. Wildly disproportionate, not only charitably, but politically. When I say charitably, I mean nobody really knows the numbers. Jews make up 2% of the population. According to some studies, jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually. That is a tenfold. Think about that. Think about the disproportion of that. And in politics, it's pretty close also. And if that money isn't used, what, why do people give money? Because they want to influence elections, to get people elected who reflect their views. Well, this is an existential issue for Jews. And the Jews who explicitly give money because they want to make it clear to anti Semitic candidates that they are going to have to go through a buzzsaw and that they are not going to simply waltz in and be, you know, be. If they're treated with kid gloves by the New York Times. We are double time going to do what we can to expose who they are, to find out what we can find out about them that will harm them and that we will do what we can to prevent them from taking office. What other choice does American Jewry have?

[B]

I don't want any trouble.

[D]

I mean, what is

[F]

today?

[B]

Bastard. You've done it.

[D]

Unreal, dude. I, I, I, all them, all the people sitting there who I assume agree with him must be sickened. I mean, if their faces, they look

[B]

sickened, they look sickened. Here's what Glenn Greenwald jewelry has to say about it. He said, it's always like this Israel loyalists explicitly threaten U.S. politicians with destruction if they don't support Israel because as Norm Podhoritz, Nepo baby or lucky boy, as Keaton and Gruss say. Lucky boy says here there's an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, but if you say it, you're an anti Semite. By the way, here's another. Here's another tweet from John Pot. Horace Trump bombed Iran. He can say Shylock 100 times a day for forever as far as I'm concerned.

[D]

Wait, but I'm doing a Shakespeare play playing Shylock and I not say, you remember this.

[B]

You remember when this was Norm? Was he Norm? The masters of the universe are Jews. That's. I think his name is norm Coleman, former U.S. senator declares in their own thing.

[D]

I mean, if you want to remember the story of Moses, how big of trouble he got in for saying we made the water come out of the rock. Because you're not supposed to say that kind of shit. This is grounds in your own religious text to kick you the fuck out of Israel. I will cause the land to vomit you out. That's what God says. And he will, and he should.

[B]

More from Glenn Greenwald. So here's aipac bragging that they bought that election. Aipac all but admits to buying Massie's seat in Kentucky. But if you point out, point that out, or said something similar, you're an evil Jew hating Nazi. It's just so tiring. Glenn says. Exactly. AIPAC just openly boasted that they replaced two Israeli critics in Congress with ardent pro Israeli loyalists now in the seats of Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. But if you say that AIPAC does this, the ADL and Jake Tapper will call you anti Semitic.

[D]

Jake Tapper, the former Hooters lobbyist who turned.

[B]

That's right. So I didn't. Kurt, maybe you're aware of this, but Dostoevsky wondered how they would treat us if we were only 2% of the population and they were the vast majority, would they treat us well? Meaning. Meaning if I guess he's saying if The Russians were 2% of the population and the Jews were 98, would they treat us well?

[D]

Are they all Russians?

[B]

Would they allow us to control their country if we were only 2%, would they be kind? And so he. And he tweets this out. It is not for nothing that over there in Europe, the Jews rule all the stock exchanges. It is not for nothing that they control capital, that they are the masters of credit. And it's not for nothing, I repeat, that they are Also the masters of international politics. And what is going to happen in the future is known to the Jews themselves. Their reign, their complete reign is approaching. What is coming is complete triumph of ideas, before which sentiments of humanity, the thirst for truth, Christian feelings, the national and popular pride of European peoples must bow. I sometimes imagine, what if there were not 3 million Jews, but 3 million Russians in Russia and there were 80 million Jews? Well, how would they treat Russians? And how would they lord it over them? What rights would Jews give Russians? Wouldn't they turn them into slaves? Worse than that, wouldn't they skin them altogether? Wouldn't they slaughter them to the last man, to the point of complete extermination, as they used to do with alien people in ancient times? I repeat, is it possible to conceive of a Jew without God? Moreover, I do not believe in the existence of atheists. Even among educated Jews. They are all of the same essence. They are all undeviatingly awaiting the Messiah. All of them, from the very lowest to the highest and most learned philosophers and Rabbi Kabbalahists, they all believe that the Messiah will again unite them in Jerusalem and bring by his sword all nations to their feet. That was from Dostoevsky, the Diary of a Writer. Dostoevsky said that? I'm not saying that. That's what Dostoevsky said.

[D]

Yeah, well, here's the thing. All these people like, oh, what about the creations? If you're militaristic or you're whatever, you're not a Christian. So Christians are like, really are like maybe 2%. They really are. Everybody else is like, not a Christian that says they are. It's all nationalism and nonsense and murder and war and that blood and soil crap. And they all, all these countries have a guy that's pushing that, like their, their blood and soil narrative. It's a little gross for any Jews to be doing it. Because, you know, the thing with Hitler kind of, I would think, would put a bad taste in your mouth for that.

[B]

No, I would just switch it to. I would switch that to. Again, most of the Jews I know are just as disgusted, just like Glenn Greenwald is. He's a Jew. They're just as disgusted by Israel and all things Israel as I am. So I wouldn't say all Jews. I would say those Israeli Zionists. And the fact that they hoodwinked Christian evangelicals into being Christian Zionists is the craziest thing ever.

[D]

I mean, it's not supposed to be a race. Your religion is just not supposed to be a race. It's supposed to be how you behave.

[B]

That's right.

[D]

And as you can see, everybody says one thing and does another all the time.

[E]

We stand for you.

[B]

Guess what Facebook's doing, Kirk? Facebook is making their employees train their AI and then firing them.

[D]

Yeah.

[B]

So leaked audio. In an all hands meeting on April 30, Mark Zuckerberg tells employees that he's training AI on them ahead of mass layoffs.

[D]

Why is he telling them that?

[B]

Let's listen.

[H]

Another news. I know layoffs are top of mind, but there were also some updates this week around and a question around employee device tracking. So can you share more on employee device tracking? I think the way that it was announced left folks with some.

[F]

Yeah.

[H]

So, okay, let's talk about what we're doing. Like Alex just said, going into what makes these AI models great, there's basically a few key ingredients. There's getting the research and the architecture good. There's having good infrastructure, which is both the quantity of compute, but as important, if not more, is also just how efficiently can you use it, how reliable is it, what is the quality of that? And then the third piece, which is in some ways it's hard to say that these are more important than the other because they're all necessary, is effectively the data and what knowledge it learns. So we're in a phase where basically the AI models learn from watching really smart people do things. And if you're trying to get it to be able to do certain capabilities, having it be able to observe really smart people doing those things is very important. So there are a few examples of where we're trying to do this across the company. Because one, one basic insight and hypothesis that we have is that a lot of data generation across the field is done by these contract companies. And Alex has a bunch of.

[B]

So what he just said, if you miss it, I don't know why this is sped up, but it is. I didn't want it sped up, but it is accident. I'll take the blame. So what he just said was they have AI watching people across his company so they could learn from watching really smart people that work at Facebook so then they can get rid of them. He didn't say that part yet.

[D]

They were smart. They didn't see that coming.

[B]

Yeah,

[H]

Because you ran one before coming here. But in general, the average intelligence of the people who are at this company is significantly higher than the average set of people that you can get to do tasks if you're working through the contract, through these contractors. So if we're trying to teach the Models coding, for example, then having people internally build tools or solve tasks that help teach the model how to code, we think is going to dramatically increase our model's coding ability faster than what others in the industry have the capability to do who don't have thousands and thousands of extremely strong engineers in their company. So that's one example. Another thing that our, that our system.

[B]

So the people who are doing the coding right now, the super smart people at Facebook, he's got AI watching how they do it. So then the AI can do it. And those people don't have a job. He doesn't say that. Second. So if they're so smart, don't you think they would have seen this coming? Right? And if they're so smart, they know the second part of what he's not saying. Correct, Kurt?

[D]

They're cool. I know they think, they think like autistics. They're. They're compartmentalized to never look at the big picture. Just be really smart about one thing. And that's how you miss that. You're training your replacement.

[B]

There's more needs to be very good

[H]

at is using computers. So the way that you get a system to be good at using computers is by having it watch really smart people use computers. So that's basically the essence of what we are trying to do here. We are, we're rolling it out in a way that is like, you know, it's like we're basically, we're not like actually no human or anything is like looking at or watching what you're. What people are doing on their computers. The content is sort of stripped out, like, as much as possible. None of the data has been used for looking at what people are doing or surveillance or performance tracking or anything like that. It's purely just like we are using this to feed a very large amount of content into the AI model, so that way it can learn how smart people use computers to accomplish tasks. I think this is going to be a very big advantage if we can do it. So anyway, that's what we're trying to do. I think that there are going to be probably other things around the company where we basically try to enlist the fact that we have just like a very high quality set of people to teach the AI systems to do different things that we need to get them to be able to do over time. So this probably isn't the last thing like this, but I think this is like an interesting strategy. I think that we want to see how well it does at this point. It's some of the hypothesis, we'll actually be able to complete the loop to see how well these kinds of things actually improve it. If they don't, we won't do more things like it. If they do, then we'll probably do more things like it. So that's kind of the basic thing in terms of how we communicate about this. I mean, this stuff is tricky. I think we're. Yeah, I mean, I think when I was looking through the details of this, there's like all these things that we could have done better.

[B]

So.

[H]

Yes, I mean, yes, acknowledged and we will try to improve this. The kind of core tension on this is that we want to communicate as clearly as possible about what we're doing while not having all of the details of things that we think are going to be strategically differentiating leak immediately to competitors. And so I think part of the challenge is like we are a pretty big company. If we post stuff publicly, it leaks. Some things matter more if they leak than others. If we're building something in our ad system, for example, or our infrastructure that's bespoke to us and it's not something that other people are going to copy and it leaks, it's not a big of a deal. Maybe it's kind of annoying. I think we know that AI is one of the most competitive fields probably in history. So anything that can give us, that can make the quality of our thing better is generally not something that I think it is in our strategic interest as a company to lay out the details in a lot of detail, knowing the physics of the situation is that that stuff is going to leak. So I think you will have to. We're just going to have to navigate that and it's going to be a little bit different on a thing by thing basis in terms of how we communicate. But I actually think it is not strategically in your interest for us to communicate everything in all the detail that we normally, normally would on this. But I think we do need to try to make sure we get this right and communicate enough so that people understand what's going on. So this, I think will be a continued thing that we're trying to navigate. It's part of the complexity of how do we navigate running the company through what is just this incredibly dynamic period. There's lots of things that I think people would like more certainty on than we have lots of things that people would like more details on that it's not necessarily like. It's not that it's bad for any one person to know, but it is bad for leaks. And I don't know how we exactly navigate that. So that's the basic situation on that.

[B]

So Rushi says tech companies really normalize. Announcing 10,000 layoffs like it's casual weather. Update every other Friday. Whole lives getting flipped upside down. So CEOs can say we're becoming more efficient on an earnings call.

[D]

Yeah, that's why they let you have all that DEI gender crap, because they're going to get rid of you anyway. Stupids.

[B]

So basically, if you're employed by Facebook, you're spoon feeding a vicious animal that will one day simply just eat you when a spoonful is no longer enough.

[D]

Yeah, well, also, it's never going to come alive, this thing where it's going to watch really smart people do things. I just said the smart people didn't see the end coming for their job. So you see how that's not helpful to the AI? What, are you going to make more spurgs in the AI? Come on.

[B]

You know, if I, if I certainly was one of those employees, would I train the AI? Well, I mean, of all these people have all this ingenuity and creativity, why wouldn't they somehow come together and do their own techno revolution?

[D]

They're trained not to wink, wink.

[B]

So Jimmy, how do you know that he's going to use this to fire their employees? Well, guess What? As of May 19, Meta's human resource chief has confirmed the company will cut 10% of its workforce tomorrow. 8,000 workers will lose their jobs via email that was sent out at 4am the mass layoffs are expected at 4am last Wednesday. So here. This is real. Might as well start packing your desk into a cardboard box the moment you get hired at Facebook because you committed the cardinal sin of being born too late to have a long lasting, meaningful job.

[D]

But the IDF will still be there, right? And the CIA people, they'll still be working there, won't they?

[B]

Yeah, the IDS people for sure. But. But now you are disposable instruction booklet that gets read once and then thrown away. Hey, there's probably a YouTube that explains what you do with a cheerful ukulele playing in the background. A plastic fork has a longer lifespan than you do now working for that soulless machine called Facebook. And here it is, also less plastic

[D]

in it than your taint.

[B]

4am layoff email. Meta starts alerting 8,000 employees about job cuts and reassigns 7,000 to new AI powered teams. Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has started notifying thousands of employees worldwide that they're being sacked. The latest round of job cuts is expected to hit Meta's engineering and product teams. In particular, the engineering and additional layoffs could come later in the year, Bloomberg reported, citing for people familiar the Mark Zuckerberg led company had announced plans to cut roughly 8,000 rolls globally as part of a restructuring aimed at reducing costs and driving product productivity through AI LED automation.

[D]

Mm.

[B]

There it is. But don't worry, I'm sure the severance package includes a cool sweatshirt with Facebook written on it because that's what you want to parade around in, right? Something that has the name of your former employer on it as you get a job at the local car wash.

[F]

Wow.

[B]

The announcement followed Meta's commitment of more than $100 billion to capital expenditures towards artificial intelligence. They're putting $100 billion into getting rid of 100 billion salaries. The day before, Meta informed staff that 7,000 workers had also been reassigned to newly formed teams focused on AI initiatives, including products and agents. Meta started by notifying employees in its Asian hub, Singapore. Employees in Singapore reportedly received emails at 4am Imagine waking up to that. Hey, you're fired. What? That's how you wake up. They send you an email. They even do it in person. Wow. European and US Based staff are expected to receive word early in their time zone as well, according to an internal memo. Meanwhile, staff are being encouraged to work from home. Meta has just under 80,000 employees at the end of March ahead of the reassignments and layoffs. And in a memo which was reviewed by Bloomberg News, Meta's head of people, they call it the head of people. Janelle Gale said the organizations can now operate with smaller teams that are faster and and have more accountability because they're spying on you

[C]

work.

[B]

And by the way, they can work from home. What home homes cost money. You know, that's money. The stuff you don't have to pay a machine. We were now at the stage where many organizations can operate with a flatter structure, with smaller teams of pods, cohorts that can move faster and with more ownership. We believe this will make us more productive and make the work more rewarding, the memo said. The restructuring AI for AI what I know the restructuring follows Zuckerberg's making AI the company's top priority, committing the bulk of Meta's resources to it to keep pace with rivals like Google and open AI. They find every way they can dehumanize you now that you're in a pod.

[D]

Yeah, well we got to compete. Not what about China? On top of all those other rivals do you want? Who do you want to win? Don't you want to become half a, half an iPhone, half man, half iPhone just to compete with China? You're going to have to. Or else China could have the best AI.

[B]

Jimmy Mata has gone through waves of layoffs in recent years as Zuckerberg has pushed for increased efficiency, encourage engineers to use AI agents for coding, and outlayed pledge plans to track employees devices to improve the technology. Zuckerberg even spent time coding his own AI powered assistant to handle some of his CEO duties, like soliciting employee feedback. Yeah, he didn't want. He didn't want to read people saying fuck off. Zuckerberg. Wow. Hey, you're fired as of this moment. Did you find this message helpful? Thanks for your feedback. The restructuring has left Meta employees both frustrated and anxious. I bet more than a thousand employees have signed a petition addressed to Zuckerberg and other leaders of the company, demanding that it refrain from collecting their data from devices, which can be as granular as gathering keystrokes, mouse movements and screen content. In the effort to train AI. Sorry, pay pound sand. Others have also taken to social media to post about how the threat of layoffs has impacted their work and morale. Guess what? The machine doesn't care about you. And when I say the machine, I mean Mark Zuckerberg. Jeff what's his name? Mark Zuckerberg.

[D]

I mean, he didn't come up with Facebook. Anyway, it's a darpa.

[B]

It's a DARPA thing.

[D]

I mean, we're going to pretend that all these oligarchs are innovators. They're all puppets that are installed. The whole reason we have fate Meta is because the government wanted you to learn how to snitch on yourself all day long. And it worked, and it worked and it worked. So this is just where it goes from there.

[B]

A former Meta employee in a post on social media on X said, my friends still, still there are either just waiting, hoping to get laid off, or extremely anxious because the job is their lifeline. Recalling the first wave of layoffs at Meta, she added, I remember the very first big layoff. The night before was almost like doomsday. People were stuffing their bags with free snacks and drinks and chargers. While Meta has framed the layoffs as an opportunity to offset the cost of some of its major AI investments, and analysts at Everyone said that they will generate about 3 billions in savings. That's just a small portion of Meta's projected capital expenditure this year, which could hit 145 billion. And the additional hundreds of billions that the company anticipates spending on AI infrastructure before the end of the decade. Tech layoffs hit 138,000 people in 2026. Nearly 1,000 jobs were cut every day. Look at that. Oracle, UPS, Citi, Amazon, Dell, Meta, Chevron, Microsoft, PayPal. Look at all the people that got fired.

[D]

Well, I hope no bitter ex employee exposes all company secrets and stuff that could harm those companies.

[B]

That's all I hope for. I hope they don't drone bomb those companies AI facilities. That would be horrible. Hours before mass layoffs, Meta donates nearly a million dollars to the Pro Becerra super pac. That's a guy running for governor here in California. Another investment in Zuckerberg's dystopian future of a world that works for him and leaves scraps for the rest of us. Welcome to. Welcome to the future.

[D]

That's all these tech plastic looking tech people, that's all. They've all been working towards this the whole time and they need to do it better than China.

[B]

Hey, this is Jimmy. Who's this?

[F]

Hey. Hey, what's up? Jimmy, this is J.D. vance, the Vice President of American Presidents. God save the king. Okay, sorry, that was awkward. My bad. That was a weird way of saying who I was. Let's try that again. Hello. Jimmy, this is Vice President J.D. vance.

[B]

Hello, Mr. Vice President.

[F]

Now we're cooking with grease.

[B]

No, indeed we are. Why the confusion?

[F]

Well, Jimmy, sometimes things get thrown out of whack when the people who really run things show up and remind us who's boss.

[B]

Uh huh.

[F]

And when that happens, we reminded that titles like Vice President are purely a massive joke. Yeah, like think about it. Vice President. Like what?

[B]

The penultimate President.

[F]

Right.

[B]

Okay, who. Who showed up to remind you of this? Who was it?

[F]

The runners? The in charge people.

[B]

Okay, who are we talking about exactly? I think I know, but tell me again.

[F]

We cannot say their names because their names are beyond saying.

[B]

Okay, well what, What? What did they do when they showed up?

[F]

Oh, Jimmy. They ensured the most wondrous election results in Kentucky and elsewhere. Most wondrous indeed. Praise be unto them.

[B]

Them who?

[F]

Them who saw to it that Thomas Massey and others who defy the powers would be defeated and would be defeated by the Trump loyalists and those who supported the them.

[B]

The them. Are they trained?

[F]

I'm at an airport and I cannot say much more than this. Suffice it to say that there is an elite that is above the duly elected officials of this nation and they

[B]

are the theme you're talking about. The Deep State.

[F]

Oh, give me a break. The deep State. What are you talking about, you maniac? Deep State. Where have you been getting your analysis, Reddit? No, Jimmy, I'm not talking about the quote, unquote, deep state. I'm simply talking about the unelected international stratum of wealthy and powerful individuals who actually dictate how world affairs are governed and conducted. State.

[B]

Oh, them.

[F]

Yes, the them. Now you get it.

[B]

And do the them have a leader?

[F]

Well, in a sense, but he's too powerful to even.

[B]

Hold on, hold on, Mr. Vice President, I'm getting another call. Hey, this is the Jimmy Dore Show. Who is this?

[F]

Hello? Hello there. How's everything going? Oh, hello, sir. Everything is well. Everything is very well. Thank you for asking. It is our honor that you're asking if they. If I may have the privilege of saying so. Is this shit Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde, Joey Buttafuoco? Yes, it's whoever you want it to be. J.D. has everything taken care of? Oh, yes, sir. Mr. Massie will never see the halls of Congress again. Are we sure about that? Oh, absolutely, sir. Because if troublemakers like Massey continue to infiltrate Congress, not only will I be upset, but the people I work for will be very upset. Do you understand, jd? Do you understand what I mean? Sometimes I don't think you really understand when I'm talking to you, the people you work, the pe. You mean Mitch and Murray? No, no, no, no. Above Mitch and Murray. Oh, my dear God.

[B]

I'm sorry, but Jeffrey Epstein, aren't you dead?

[F]

Yeah, sure. I'm a ghost on the phone because I hung myself in jail. Or was I murdered? Which is. It gives you goyim. Something to argue about. Gives meaning to your worthless lives. Yeah, I'm calling from the afterlife. You want to talk to Elvis?

[B]

Well, where are you then?

[F]

Well, let's just say last night I was able to catch Kevin Spacey's latest cabaret act. Oh, how was that? I've heard good things. I've seen better. I've seen worse.

[B]

So you just got away with it? You just got away with everything?

[F]

Not really. Really? There's a lot of my assets I simply don't have access to. And we are working on that for you, sir, around the clock. Thank you, jd. I appreciate that. Look, I have to go. It's been a pleasure chatting with you gentlemen. Jd, remember what we expect from you and Donnie, okay? Don't forget that. I need to run now. I have some visitors. I guess you call them. Yeah, you could call them that. Oh, my. Oh, My goodbye, sir. Oh, wow, Jimmy, what a great man. So honored to be a part of a government that has subverted the entire justice system to protect him and his cronies. Put that on my tombstone. And anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, Jimmy, there's no such thing as the deep state.

[B]

Ah, there's no such thing as the deep state. Well, we just got a call from Jeffrey Epstein from Israel.

[F]

He didn't call himself Jeffrey Epstein. I just called him sir. Only you called him Jeffrey Epstein. Your producer put up the picture of Jeffrey Epstein. We call that plausible deniability. You see how this works?

[B]

Yeah, I do actually. So, so great to get a glimpse into the horrifying reality of how power actually works in this country. Look, gotta go, Mr. Vice President. I have got a show to do where we expose all this BS so people can know what is really going on. Hopefully someday you'll all be sent to the Hague. Bye bye.

[F]

Okay, bye bye. Have a great show, buddy.

[B]

Hey. Become a premium member. Go to jimmy door comedy.com sign up. It's the most affordable premium program in the business. All the voices performed today are by the one and only, the inimitable Mike McCray. He can be found at mikemcrae.com that's it for this week. You be the best you can be and I'll keep being me. Out. Don't freak out.

[F]

Out.

[B]

I'm not giving.

[F]

Do not.

[D]

Do not.

[B]

I'm not.

[A]

I'm not.

[D]

I'm not.

[F]

I'm not.

[B]

Freak out. Do not freak out. To Covis is the go to for premium handcrafted western boots. Stop by any store location for a warm welcome, a cold drink in hand

[E]

and a truly one of a kind shopping experience.

[B]

Let our friendly staff help you find your new Go to boots.

[E]

Whether your first pair or your 50th. Finish things off with a complimentary boot brand to make them extra special.

[B]

Come for the boots, Stay for the good times. Tacovis Forever West.